Democrats could misinterpret the Red Trickle

Well, now Republicans have the House
What are they going to do about it?

They complained about Biden and said they could do better
Where is it
What they can do as a start is be a check on Biden's (Susan Rice's) destructive agenda....Biden made the mistake of saying that the midterm results emboldened him to double down on this, and it is now up to Republican's in charge of at least the House to draw the purse strings tight and put a stop to this madness.
 
What they can do as a start is be a check on Biden's (Susan Rice's) destructive agenda....Biden made the mistake of saying that the midterm results emboldened him to double down on this, and it is now up to Republican's in charge of at least the House to draw the purse strings tight and put a stop to this madness.
They ran on high inflation, high gas prices, the Border crisis, Ukraine
They said they would do better

Well, what are they offering??
 
Hahaha…yeah it was me who turned off the ignorant fucks….it wasn‘t the public school system, CNN, media and social media that programmed them.
This is why you and Mac1958 can’t be taken seriously.
NO ONE. has been "programmed" in the Democratic or Independent voting. Nor were all the Republicans who started voting for the Democrats, and even switching Parties.

The word "programmed", "groomed" and other ugly ones have been designed to make Democrats who vote to look like robots.

If they are robots, so are the Millions who are leaving the Republican Party, and the Millions who chose to vote for Democrat candidates in 2020 and even more Democrat candidates in 2022.

Last I heard, CNN is now owned by a Republican. What do you have to complain about?


People have mind of their own once they get the facts. They voted the facts of what voting for Republicans this midterm was all about and what it would do to their lives if they allowed the Republicans to take over the Congress.
 
This was my problem with Trump in 2016.
He picked the Republican Party because he knew Hillary was the "chosen one" in the machine. Not because he suddenly became Republican.
He knew after Obama abandoned the working class, and Hillary running as Obama 2.0 - he would run under a patriotic message and have a chance.
Today - Trump is his own party. He has trashed every popular Republican there is. He has trashed Fox News, and pretty much every other conservative news for not praising him enough this election.
He is no Republican. He is King Trump. You are either 100% unquestioningly faithful of his worshipfulness - or you are the enemy. PERIOD.
I have no room for such a self serving, destructive force.
Great post and we’re in complete agreement. I voted for Dumb Don in 2016 but he lost me during his failed presidency. When he picked a cabinet full of corporatists, warmongers, and elitists I concluded he was a fraud, just like so many of our recent presidents.
 
You are saying that Republicans do not get Massive amounts of money from the Billionaires and Millionaires of the country?

These are the people responsible for endless money now being allowed into US elections:

What was Citizens United about?

A conservative nonprofit group called Citizens United challenged campaign finance rules after the FEC stopped it from promoting and airing a film criticizing presidential candidate Hillary Clinton too close to the presidential primaries.

A 5–4 majority of the Supreme Court sided with Citizens United, ruling that corporations and other outside groups can spend unlimited money on elections.

What was the rationale for the ruling?

In the court’s opinion, Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote that limiting “independent political spending” from corporations and other groups violates the First Amendment right to free speech. The justices who voted with the majority assumed that independent spending cannot be corrupt and that the spending would be transparent, but both assumptions have proven to be incorrect.

With its decision, the Supreme Court overturned election spending restrictions that date back more than 100 years. Previously, the court had upheld certain spending restrictions, arguing that the government had a role in preventing corruption. But in Citizens United, a bare majority of the justices held that “independent political spending” did not present a substantive threat of corruption, provided it was not coordinated with a candidate’s campaign.

As a result, corporations can now spend unlimited funds on campaign advertising if they are not formally “coordinating” with a candidate or political party.

How has Citizens United changed elections in the United States?

The ruling has ushered in massive increases in political spending from outside groups, dramatically expanding the already outsized political influence of wealthy donors, corporations, and special interest groups.

In the immediate aftermath of the Citizens United decision, analysts focused much of their attention on how the Supreme Court designated corporate spending on elections as free speech. But perhaps the most significant outcomes of Citizens United have been the creation of super PACs, which empower the wealthiest donors, and the expansion of dark money through shadowy nonprofits that don’t disclose their donors.

A Brennan Center report by Daniel I. Weiner pointed out that a very small group of Americans now wield “more power than at any time since Watergate, while many of the rest seem to be disengaging from politics.“

“This is perhaps the most troubling result of Citizens United: in a time of historic wealth inequality,” wrote Weiner, “the decision has helped reinforce the growing sense that our democracy primarily serves the interests of the wealthy few, and that democratic participation for the vast majority of citizens is of relatively little value.”

An election system that is skewed heavily toward wealthy donors also sustains racial bias and reinforces the racial wealth gap. Citizens United also unleashed political spending from special interest groups.
1. I can't find the amount each party got of the $17b donated/spent on the 2022 midterms, but I do know that Soros donated the most, followed by now bankrupt crypto-currency
FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried who donated about $40m to the dems.

2. The Citizens United ruling was based on a "Free Speech" argument, you can't stop people from spending THEIR MONEY how they want to spend it.

3. Besides $17b of donations, you also need to consider the MSM's bias toward democrats and against Republicans, as well as the Federal Deep State's bias against Republicans. Just look at Hunter's laptop, with a real whistleblower, and how the FBI covered-up obvious crimes.

Years ago Republicans had big donors, now democrats have the big money donors, google "Zuckerbucks" to see how he bought the WI election in 2020.
 
3. Besides $17b of donations, you also need to consider the MSM's bias toward democrats and against Republicans, as well as the Federal Deep State's bias against Republicans.
This is a key fact

The slanted lying lib media alone is worth $17b for the dems
 
Dems have been in power that brought us these things. That’s why they lost.

That was what Republicans said would cause a “Red Tsunami” against Democrats

Never happened
 
1668268289893.png
 
That was what Republicans said would cause a “Red Tsunami” against Democrats

Never happened
Ok, but in the end they still lost....Your narrative that Republican's were supposed to do something, when Democrats owned the House, Senate, and Presidency is utter foolishness....
 
1. I can't find the amount each party got of the $17b donated/spent on the 2022 midterms, but I do know that Soros donated the most, followed by now bankrupt crypto-currency
FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried who donated about $40m to the dems.

2. The Citizens United ruling was based on a "Free Speech" argument, you can't stop people from spending THEIR MONEY how they want to spend it.

3. Besides $17b of donations, you also need to consider the MSM's bias toward democrats and against Republicans, as well as the Federal Deep State's bias against Republicans. Just look at Hunter's laptop, with a real whistleblower, and how the FBI covered-up obvious crimes.

Years ago Republicans had big donors, now democrats have the big money donors, google "Zuckerbucks" to see how he bought the WI election in 2020.


Soros contributed $125 million
 
Ho-hum... has it ever occurred to you that you just have shitty ideas?

I suspect decent people on both sides avoid running for office. Who wants the grief?

Nope, what gives the Democrats an unfair advantage is that the GOP is in the minority. What keeps it viable is money, corporate support and dumb white people like you who keep voting away your rights as workers.

Actually, Trump was trailing Biden the whole time. The debate didn't kill him. Remember, the debate was going to expose Biden as senile... but it didn't. Biden looked dignified while Trump looked like a clown.
1. Conservative ideas are NOT shitty ideas. Socialist ideas are shitty ideas.

2. Agreed. Capable candidates on both parties want to avoid the cesspool of politics.

3. Know why the US moved 7,000 factories to China? Because the unions made manufacturing in the US unprofitable. Now that China is on the ascension and the US is declining because of the unfair trade practices, its probably too late to put that genie back in the bottle. The Scandinavian manufacturing plants here in the US figured out the right mix of profit sharing with US workers.

4. My recollection of Trump's 1st debate with Biden was that Trump bullied Biden mercilessly. My wife said "No way I can vote for that AH". Biden didn't look dignified, he looked like a baby seal getting clubbed.

"Vicious first debate between Trump and Biden offered little on policy, lots of conflict"​

 

Forum List

Back
Top