Democrats Change 181 Year-Old Rule To Allow Ilhan Omar To Wear Hijab In The House

[Wyatt earp]

Minnesota has elected some strange characters.

Wrestler Jesse Ventura, the not funny "comedian" Al Franken, Antifa-fan and woman beater, Keith Ellison, in addition to Omar. And a dog is mayor of one town...

Have you noticed how Texas voted in "Rape Face" Cruz and the ever funny Louie Gohmert?

She is tearing down the establishment clause..

I know ghost readers lawyers read .
Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congres

 

[Faun]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is the same ******* thing..



Allegheny County v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989)

Court finds that a nativity scene displayed inside a government building violates the Establishment Clause

"inside a government building"....yes. Put it on church or private property.

She is wearing it in Congress a pure crime..


Oh trust me lawyers read these posts..

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Minnesota has elected some strange characters.

Wrestler Jesse Ventura, the not funny "comedian" Al Franken, Antifa-fan and woman beater, Keith Ellison, in addition to Omar. And a dog is mayor of one town...

Have you noticed how Texas voted in "Rape Face" Cruz and the ever funny Louie Gohmert?

She is tearing down the establishment clause..

I know ghost readers lawyers read .
Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congres

No she's not. As long as that cult is legal, she is free to exercise her "religion" too. This is what happens when you let Democrats flood the country with these Turd Worlderers.

 

[Faun]

I am going to have a field day with this one..


You tards want separation of church and state and allow this?



.

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

Once again these people will be on the news, saying assnine things ..


What happened to separation of church and state..the left wants dot head bullshit instead of Christianity..


.

I still don’t see where the left has prevented students in public schools from wearing such head garments. What about religious symbols on jewelry, e.g., crosses, Jewish stars, etc.... does the left fight to keep those out of public schools or from Congress?

I’m not seeing the hypocrisy you’re howling over.

Don't give me any of that bullshit..


The left is all about tearing down crosses and the ten commandments..

Now they want to change the laws to allow religious head garb in Congress .




God damn you guys are ******* assholes.

Dumbfuck, the Senate already allows this and they’re a part of Congress.

Where was your outrage over that??

 

[Wyatt earp]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

 

[Faun]

Congress is making no laws regarding establishment of religion
They are only allowing free exercise therein

Don't be such a disingenuous sophist! A preference for one religion over all others is being shown here. It's everything
the left claims to be against...except when it suits them.
The slope is slippery indeed.

Read the first amendment and get back to me

How is allowing a head scarf showing preference?

Why do you want to be such a prick a about a woman exercising her religion?

Because they hate Muslims.

 

[Faun]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

How does wearing a head cover establish religion?

And why haven’t you complained about the Senate allowing this?

 

[bodecea]

Eh, who cares?

I personally think the Republicans should all wear MAGA hats every single day from now on.

And that would be fine. Let them.

 

[Wyatt earp]

This is the same ******* thing..



Allegheny County v. ACLU, 492 U.S. 573 (1989)

Court finds that a nativity scene displayed inside a government building violates the Establishment Clause

"inside a government building"....yes. Put it on church or private property.

So this dumb dot head can flaunt her religion in Congress?


Bullshit..you started the fight..


.

 

[there4eyeM]

If such a symbol did not represent the oppression of women, perhaps it would be less unpalatable.

Is that what it meant when catholic women were covered in church? Asking for a friend.

It isn't expressed the same way in the Bible as in the Koran, but the effect is pretty much the same; i.e., there is an inferiority in women compared to men as well as the differences between them.

That's why I'm not a fan of patriarchal religions....but we DO have the 1st Amendment, so......

So? So, in open society freedom of expression is guaranteed. In selected, voluntary, closed environments, certain concerns may be promoted and others not.

 

[Wyatt earp]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

How does wearing a head cover establish religion?

And why haven’t you complained about the Senate allowing this?

Why does she need to wear it?


.

 

[deanrd]

The Ban on Hats on the House Floor | US House of Representatives: History, Art & Archives

Congresswoman-elect Frederica Wilson says hat ban started in 1800s but can be waived

An aside: we wondered if the current hat ban rule would prohibit religious Jews from wearing yarmulke or Muslim women from wearing the hijab or headscarf. Steel, Boehner's spokesman, said in an e-mail: "The rule regarding hats has never been interpreted to apply to religious headcoverings."

It was actually a ban on MEN wearing hats.

There is no such rule in the Senate.

FYI.

 

[bodecea]

Minnesota has elected some strange characters.

Wrestler Jesse Ventura, the not funny "comedian" Al Franken, Antifa-fan and woman beater, Keith Ellison, in addition to Omar. And a dog is mayor of one town...

Have you noticed how Texas voted in "Rape Face" Cruz and the ever funny Louie Gohmert?

She is tearing down the establishment clause..

I know ghost readers lawyers read .
Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congres

How is this woman tearing down the Establishment Clause? Why is it that she frightens you so much by wearing her hijab? Do Jews with yalmukes frighten you as much?

 

[martybegan]

How do we know who the person is if we can't see their face?

sorry, but that's just retarded.

Many ways to tell who a person is without seeing a face

If Republicans want to be such dicks about it they can invest in a fingerprint scanner at the entrance

Or the person can just show their face.

A head scarf is one thing, a full face covering is something else.

How does that prevent her from serving in Congress other than it freaks you out?

again, how do we know who it is?

Again, head covering fine, face covering, no.

Should we allow congress to all show up in guy fawkes masks? Government representatives should be able to be identified.

People call me on the phone and I can tell who they are by their voice

But if Republicans want to be a dick about it, you can give her an access code or fingerprint or retinal scanner

So many women impersonate women in burkas

Or again, show your face. it's not a hard thing to ask.

 

[Faun]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

How does wearing a head cover establish religion?

And why haven’t you complained about the Senate allowing this?

Why does she need to wear it?


.

Why don’t you answer my questions?

 

[bodecea]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

How does wearing a head cover establish religion?

And why haven’t you complained about the Senate allowing this?

Why does she need to wear it?


.

For the same reason that Orthodox Jews will wear a yamulke.
For the same reason that Catholic women used to wear head covers at mass.
For the same reason that Sikhs wear their head coverings and grow beards.
For the same reason that Jews and Muslims don't eat pork.
For the same reason that some Christians wear crosses and some Jews wear Stars of David.
For the same reason that Catholics cross themselves in prayer.

 

[bodecea]

Many ways to tell who a person is without seeing a face

If Republicans want to be such dicks about it they can invest in a fingerprint scanner at the entrance

Or the person can just show their face.

A head scarf is one thing, a full face covering is something else.

How does that prevent her from serving in Congress other than it freaks you out?

again, how do we know who it is?

Again, head covering fine, face covering, no.

Should we allow congress to all show up in guy fawkes masks? Government representatives should be able to be identified.

People call me on the phone and I can tell who they are by their voice

But if Republicans want to be a dick about it, you can give her an access code or fingerprint or retinal scanner

So many women impersonate women in burkas

Or again, show your face. it's not a hard thing to ask.

I agree with the "show your face" part. Is that a problem with this new Congresswoman?

 

[deanrd]

Hey, if the rule has been changed I see no reason that this shouldn't be ok...

 

[Lysistrata]

What’s wrong with this? Where have laws ever been crafted to prevent people from wearing something of religious content in public? Are students in public schools not allowed to wear yarmulkes or hajibs?

The United States congress is not a public place. Your questions are ridiculous. And just that for 181 years no one has demanded an exception to this rule and now the left willingly yields to Muslim demands should tell anyone with half a brain something ominous.

”The United States congress is not a public place.”

Congressmen/women are public servants and most of the Capitol is open to the public. Even the House & Senate galleries when not in session and to visitors acquiring a pass from a legislator when it is.

How Do I Tour the U.S. Capitol and See Congress in Session?

But that’s neither here nor there, the salient point is that the rule that is in place has nothing to do with religion. It’s not like that rule was put in place to separate church from state. Furthermore, this only applies to the House as the Senate allows religious head coverings...

...he shall not permit any person to place any object whatsoever--including hats, coats, or other personal apparel--or portion of a person on any railing, or any male to wear a hat, except that where a man's religious beliefs require that he wear a head-cover in such public places as the Senate Gallery, then such head-cover shall be permitted;

United States Senate Manual, 104th Congress-RULES FOR REGULATION OF THE SENATE WING OF THE UNITED STATES CAPITOL​

... so what is the objection other than this being nothing more than conservative rage where the right presents a knee-jerk response to anything the left promotes?

The establishment clause you stupid tard



Es·tab·lish·ment Clause
noun
LAW

1. the clause in the First Amendment of the US Constitution that prohibits the establishment of religion by Congress.

This has nothing at all to do with the Establishment Clause. No one is being required to wear anyone else's religious symbol. Islam is not being elevated to be the official religion of the U.S. House of Representatives. Where are you getting this stuff???