Democrats block the release of the Epstein files again

That's a viable theory.

The only problem with it is Dems (as you no doubt are aware) already released three selected Emails where they blacked out a victim's name who has already denied Trump was associated with any wrongdoing.

Leftists were savagely gnawing on that red meat yesterday. :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:
 
That's a viable theory.

The only problem with it is Dems (as you no doubt are aware) already released three selected Emails where they blacked out a victim's name who has already denied Trump was associated with any wrongdoing.

Like I said, that would be epic, so it most likely will not play out that way. lol

And that's why I think it all should be released. I really don't think the D's want them released, they're just counting on the R's to block it.
 
Noticed how the media are ignoring this? Trump needs to hold a rally and tell Americans that Democrats refused to release the names.
 
It's been 5 years now that the Democrats have kept these files from the public.

The list of prominent Democrats named in the files must be long, indeed.

THM News: This Says It All: Democrats Block the Release of the Epstein Files This Says It All: Democrats Block the Release of the Epstein Files


Which party controlled the House floor at the time of Burchett's bogus petition?

Trump loyalist unveiled his own Epstein measure — with one big caveat

"However, several outlets reported that Burchett’s attempt to immediately consider the Epstein Files Transparency Act was shot down by Rep. Steve Womack (R-Ark.), the senior Republican in charge of the House floor at the time, who claimed 'it is not a proper inquiry' since it must be 'cleared by the bipartisan floor and committee leaderships.'

"Once Burchett spoke on the floor to request unanimous consent, Womack ruled his request out of order, The Hill reported."
 
Where are Sealy BooBoo and G5000 by the way? Both of them were making waves yesterday screaming the walls are closing in on Trump for real this time.
 
And there it is ladies and gents.

At this point, if you're still DUMB enough - or LEFT WING enough (but I repeat myself) - to actually say the DEMS are the ones trying to shed light on this?

You're either a disingenuous charlatan, or an utter fool.

Or both.

Game. Set. Match.
Make the files public and see what democrats are being protected. The majority of democrats are on board. Trump is the one preventing the files be made public
 
Nobody in the Swamp Party (Demicans and Republicrats) want any names mentioned. It would embarrass them all and implicate some. Both sides of the Swamp coin were buddies with Epstein and both sides of the Swamp coin flew on his jet. How many visited the island may be a question that a release of the files may answer.

"1980s–2000: Jeffrey Epstein’s rise to prominence

Key dates
  • 1980: Epstein becomes a limited partner at Bears Stern.
  • 1988: Epstein creates his own money-management firm, targeting clients worth $1 billion or more.
  • 1992–97: Trump hosts parties attended by Epstein and flies on Epstein’s private jet multiple times.

The meteoric rise of Jeffrey Epstein began in the 1980s when, after a stint with Wall Street firm Bear Stearns, Epstein struck out on his own, partnering with others and ultimately running his own financial firm. His success made him a millionaire many times over—he owned one of the largest private residences in Manhattan, New York, and one of the U.S. Virgin Islands—and as such he moved in circles of wealth and influence. Among those he socialized and did business with were Donald Trump, Pres. Bill Clinton, Michael Jackson, Prince Andrew, and others. This involvement is known because parts of the Epstein files have been released in response to questions raised by journalists and Epstein’s victims. The documents that have been released do not implicate Trump, Clinton, or Jackson in any illegal behavior. Andrew has denied any wrongdoing. However in October 2025, King Charles stripped Andrew of his “prince” title because of his ties to Epstein.


Throughout the 1990s Trump and Epstein socialized, and Trump sometimes hosted Epstein at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach, Florida, including at a party with NFL cheerleaders. Trump and Epstein were also the only two guests at a so-called competition to choose calendar models. On a number of those occasions, young women accused Trump of misconduct, which he has denied. In a four-year period in the 1990s, Trump flew at least seven times on Epstein’s private jet, according to flight logs that are also part of the released files. The files also show that Clinton flew on the Epstein jet in the 2000s after he left the White House. Flight logs indicate at least 17 flights with Clinton aboard to locales including Siberia, Morocco, China, and Armenia. A spokesperson for the former president has said the trips were related to the Clinton Foundation."

 
Last edited:
Need to keep the Epstein debacle alive. Especially with the democrats shutting down
the government for 40 days. Especially with their party transitioning to a socialist/communist
party. Especially with a party that seems to be without a leader.
Yeah, let's talk about the important Epstein debacle.
:eusa_whistle:
 
15th post
Am I the only one wondering why there is NO CORROBBORATING EVIDENCE and without it the whole scenario sounds like BS gold-digging?? I want the EVIDENCE!!! Guiffre said her Dad, Hubby and just about anyone else abused her. Doesn't sound convincing to me especially after her Dad denied it and a Court found in favor of the Husband.

Greg
 
I was a vote to bring it to the floor today instead of its scheduled vote.
I dont understand why they did that, if they plan on voting to release it.
Maybe too many members are absent and the vote would be negative?

The motion was for unanimous consent
 
This is going to PASS the House and then the GOP Senate will BLOCK THE RELEASE OF THE EPSTEIN FILES.

Then what? Will these posters in this thread be all over the GOP?????????????????????
 
I was a vote to bring it to the floor today instead of its scheduled vote.
I dont understand why they did that, if they plan on voting to release it.
Maybe too many members are absent and the vote would be negative?

I'm pretty confident that Mike Johnson will push for an unrecorded vote.

That's how these foreign-first lizards operate.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom