Democrats, Baptized With A New Name

[PoliticalChic]

The party that the supreme court in a full decision said was legal and constitutional.

That's the use of emergency powers when the country is actually in a war.

A shooting war

A WORLD war.

No it didn't, liar.it explicitly stated that these decisions were "gravely wrong" and had "no place in law under the Constitution"

 

[PoliticalChic]

You proved socialism in the OP.

In fact now we have a true communist in the white house, who believes the state should control the means of production. With the government now owning parts of those companies,

That's COMMUNISM

AI Overview


Zohran Mamdani, the Democratic nominee and frontrunner for New York City mayor, has proposed several initiatives to use city government to control production in an effort to make the city more affordable.

Communist.....the new name of the Democrat Party

 

[LordBrownTrout]

They’re winning. Republicans are losing.

Mandami will be the next mayor of New York.

Palestinian support grows stronger as support for Israel grows weaker, and Christianists aren’t even a footnote

You didn't even know but your last sentence is biblically prophectic and happening.

 

[alang1216]

You do nothing but lie, Herman the Vermin.

I proved the communism in the OP

Proven??? Not even close.

1. The Zohran Mamdani Democrat party stands for abolishing private property, socialis/communism,

An unsubstantiated accusation is hardly proof of anything but your lack of integrity.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Proven??? Not even close.


An unsubstantiated accusation is hardly proof of anything but your lack of integrity.

Socialist Zohran Mamdani called for ‘abolition of private property,’ resurfaced video shows​

The Republican National Committee ridiculed New York City socialist Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani, posting a resurfaced video of him supporting “the abolition of private property.…

Socialist Zohran Mamdani called for ‘abolition of private property,’ resurfaced video shows

The Republican National Committee ridiculed New York City socialist Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani, posting a resurfaced video of him supporting “the abolition of private property.…

nypost.com

Seems I'm never wrong and you're never right, vermin.

 

[alang1216]

Socialist Zohran Mamdani called for ‘abolition of private property,’ resurfaced video shows​

The Republican National Committee ridiculed New York City socialist Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani, posting a resurfaced video of him supporting “the abolition of private property.…

Socialist Zohran Mamdani called for ‘abolition of private property,’ resurfaced video shows

The Republican National Committee ridiculed New York City socialist Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani, posting a resurfaced video of him supporting “the abolition of private property.…

nypost.com

Seems I'm never wrong and you're never right, vermin.

You mean you believe there is nothing wrong with distortions and taking quotes out of context. If you bothered to listen to him you'd know he was talking about the high cost of NYC housing and how the government should play a role.

What is your plan for affordable housing?

 

[BluesLegend]

Democrats have long envied the absolute power of China and Russian governments.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

How ya' gonna vote

For neither.

 

[alang1216]

Let's skip the fantasies and stick to what you voted for:

Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system

You claimed postman voted for your list. Do you have any quotations to support that accusation or are you the vermin liar?

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Glad to hear it.

Right.

 

[Dorian Mode]

Today's democraps really aren't that new once you think about it, they're just new to the US. The same type of people that overthrew Cuba and then Venezuela are trying to overthrow the American government now, it's just a new generation of neo-leftists doing the same thing.

 

[postman]

No it didn't, liar.it explicitly stated that these decisions were "gravely wrong" and had "no place in law under the Constitution"

You're absolutely WRONG (for lack of reading the decision)


Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944),
a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that upheld the exclusion of people of Japanese descent from the West Coast Military Area during World War II, an exclusion that led to the internment of Japanese Americans.



Korematsu v. United States
A case in which the Court held that compulsory exclusion of citizens during times of war is justified in order to reduce the risk of espionage.

In an opinion written by Justice Black, the Court ruled that the evacuation order violated by Korematsu was valid. The majority found that the Executive Order did not show racial prejudice but rather responded to the strategic imperative of keeping the U.S. and particularly the West Coast (the region nearest Japan) secure from invasion. The Court relied heavily on a 1943 decision, Hirabayashi v. U.S., which addressed similar issues. Black argued that the validation of the military's decision by Congress merited even more deference.

Justice Frankfurter concurred, writing that the “martial necessity arising from the danger of espionage and sabotage” warranted the military’s evacuation order.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Today's democraps really aren't that new once you think about it, they're just new to the US. The same type of people that overthrew Cuba and then Venezuela are trying to overthrow the American government now, it's just a new generation of neo-leftists doing the same thing.

You can go back further.....they are the Jacobins of the French Revolution.

 

[PoliticalChic]

You're absolutely WRONG (for lack of reading the decision)


Korematsu v. United States, 323 U.S. 214 (1944),
a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that upheld the exclusion of people of Japanese descent from the West Coast Military Area during World War II, an exclusion that led to the internment of Japanese Americans.



Korematsu v. United States
A case in which the Court held that compulsory exclusion of citizens during times of war is justified in order to reduce the risk of espionage.

In an opinion written by Justice Black, the Court ruled that the evacuation order violated by Korematsu was valid. The majority found that the Executive Order did not show racial prejudice but rather responded to the strategic imperative of keeping the U.S. and particularly the West Coast (the region nearest Japan) secure from invasion. The Court relied heavily on a 1943 decision, Hirabayashi v. U.S., which addressed similar issues. Black argued that the validation of the military's decision by Congress merited even more deference.

Justice Frankfurter concurred, writing that the “martial necessity arising from the danger of espionage and sabotage” warranted the military’s evacuation order.

I'm never wrong


AI Overview


Initially, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of Japanese internment in the 1944 case
Korematsu v. United States. However, the Supreme Court formally disavowed this decision in 2018, with Chief Justice John Roberts declaring that the original ruling was "gravely wrong the day it was decided".


The 2018 reversal

• While the Korematsu decision was widely condemned for decades, it was not officially overturned by the Supreme Court until the 2018 case Trump v. Hawaii.
• In the majority opinion, Chief Justice John Roberts stated that "Korematsu was gravely wrong the day it was decided, has been overruled in the court of history, and—to be clear—'has no place in law under the Constitution'".

 

[j-mac]

Take the Affordable Care Act

It’s worth noting that many facets of the Republican’s health care agenda at the time made it into the Affordable Care Act. The Affordable Care Act was a private market plan, and it dropped a long-held Democratic priority to include a public option.

For example, 788 amendments were submitted during the ACA’s markup in the Senate Committee for Health, Education, Labor and Pensions committee (HELP). Three quarters of them were filed by the committee’s Republican members,
Of those, 161 were adopted in whole or revised form.

In the end, no Senate or House Republicans voted for the Affordable Care Act in its final version.

Dems own the failure of the ACA.