Geeeze Liberals and their stereotypes. Explain this Tinkerbell:
What that you have pathetic, self-loathing Uncle Toms who vote against their own self-interests? Boring.
Someone needs to tell them it doesn't scrub off.
1)Obama had less experience the Palin and your party busted on her experience.
Um, no, he didn't.
Obama in 2008 had 4 years as a senator and 10 years as a state legislator.
Palin had less than a year and half as a governor and before that she was mayor of a trailer park.
You've never worked in construction
to know Donald's experience and ability to put difficult projects together ahead of schedule and on budget with huge workforce and supply issues to manage, is more then any Senate ir Governor experience missing votes and trashing projects partcway through, after money is already wasted because they can't manage budgets and do projects within that allotment.
First of all, since most of Donald's business have gone bankrupt or required government bailouts, that's not saying much.
The rest of your post is a lot of crazy and life is too short.
You can't ever post to people without sounding angry which means in context you are frustrated by your own position.
The Experience issue was raised by Democrats as a tactic to discredit a mere Vice President candidate not a President.
This experience debate surely needs to be weighed in perspective of President vs Vice President experience qualifications & against the Democrats' claim that their own candidate for president was self-evidently ready to assume the role of most powerful person on the planet VS Palins role which would be a lesser role of VP.
Your facts are off, both had less then 4 years served.
You forgot that Palin was state oil and gas commissioner, before entering local politics. And she had a resume that suggests something other than political ambitions that are the sort of experience that enables her to understand the concerns of most Americans.
Obama' experience was in working his way to the top by cultivating, pandering to and stroking the most powerful interest groups in the all-pervasive corrupt Chicago political machine, ensuring his views were aligned with the power brokers there this experience is good for those taking the Clinton corruption politics route.
Palin was the opposite, she got in to clean up her party and her State's mess, no status quo there nor aligning with her own party.
Who was the better fighter?
Obama only got elected to statewide office after a disastrous first run for a congressional seat and after his Republican opponent was exposed in a sexual scandal. He won his seat eventually in a contest against a candidate who didn't even live in the state.
Palin however was impressively elected to statewide office by challenging a long-serving Republican incumbent governor despite intense opposition from the party.
Paline achieved more in her campaign then Obama did winning by default.
The campaigner makes executive decisions
and is incharge of their staffn clearly Palin showed more qualified in her impressive win at impossible odds.
Sarah made executive decision every day that affect the lives of 500,000 people in her state, and that impact crucial issues of national economic interest such as the supply and cost of energy to the United States.
Clearly Palin had more experience for VP then Obama had for presidency.
Now your other excuse regarding Trump's business qualifications is absurdly false and out of context with the housing crisis that Senators Dodd and Frank created.
Ironically "why do I care it's not my money, but spending it makes me popular"- Obama was sending us to Bankruptcy and spend thrift Donny knows this is not his money and not his hotels, is saving us money on deals left and right.=epic fail in your fallacious arguments and you couldn't even refrain from name calling again=you are getting frustrated.
