Democrat Sheep Instructed You Must Not ‘Do Your Own Research’

[Dadoalex]

I blame you for these cultist screaming trump madness.

There ya go again, another example of doung your own "research" on YouTube.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[jc456]

There ya go.
Another doing their own "research" on YouTube.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

So Liz wasn’t there?

 

[Dadoalex]

So Liz wasn’t there?

If you want to discuss YouTube garbage comment on the YouTube channel from which you wiped this "Research".

"Research"
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[jc456]

If you want to discuss YouTube garbage comment on the YouTube channel from which you wiped this "Research".

"Research"
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Again, did YouTube misrepresent the news outlets?

 

[Dadoalex]

Again, did YouTube misrepresent the news outlets?

YouTube "research"

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

 

[jc456]

YouTube "research"

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Yep

 

[SeaMajor7]

YouTube "research"

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Hey Alinsky, all you have to do is REFUTE the opinions expressed from whatever source you're presented with; be it You Tube, wiki, or any other source on the internet.
Your automatic dismissal of the sources cited and refusal to present any substantial evidence that supports your Narrative is weak, and actually illogical.
The internet is the public square in this century, so have at it!

 

[SeaMajor7]

Here, let's try this as an example.

I did some research on the internet, and found this:
The Reality of Red Subversion

The Reality of Red Subversion
The Recent Confirmation of Soviet Espionage in America
STEPHEN J. SNIEGOSKI • SEPTEMBER 1, 2003
(Republished 2016)


"In an apparent effort to illustrate political simple-mindedness, Carroll Quigley derisively wrote in his noted (at least by the John Birch Society) Tragedy and Hope, that the “same groups who were howling about Soviet espionage in 1948-1955 were also claiming that President Roosevelt expected and wanted Pearl Harbor.”[1] In a previous contribution to The Occidental Quarterly, I dealt with the latter; here I will do some “howling” about the former. According to what until recently has passed as conventional wisdom for the liberal establishment, America in the late 1940s and early 1950s was gripped by a terrible Red scare, a period of anti-Communist hysteria and witch hunts. Malicious “red-baiters” slandered innocent liberals as Communists in order to destroy the reforms of the New Deal and impede peace with the Soviet Union. At most, some of the more “anti-Communist” liberals would concede that there may have been a few Communist subversives, but nothing to justify the terrible anti-Communist overreaction, above all the antics of the demagogic Joe McCarthy. From the 1960s through the 1980s, one of the strongest taboos in American political discourse was the subject of Soviet influence within the United States.

During the 1990s, the release of the Venona documents (see p. 49) by the U.S. government and the partial opening of the Soviet archives forced establishment minds to a reconsideration. Yes, Virginia, there really were Communist spies in the United States during the so-called “McCarthy era.” In fact, it now appears that even the slandered and smeared “red-baiters” of the period were unaware of just how far Soviet Communist subversion had penetrated. It must be added that even during the period of the so-called “witch hunt” there was more than enough evidence to prove the reality of Soviet Communist spying to any objective person. But, of course, if one is going to pass for an “educated,” “respectable” person, objective thinking must be eschewed—it’s simply not a Darwinian survival trait in modern America.

From Lenin onward Soviet Communist leaders have preached the necessity of underground activities, with foreign governments the key target for infiltration. The evidence for this from many countries is overwhelming. Communists in government engaged in espionage and acted to influence policy in a pro-Soviet direction. Many of the individuals engaged in these activities were Communist Party members; others were fellow travelers, who despite their lack of party discipline, sought to advance the interests of Soviet Communism."
__________________________________________
Ok then. There's some internet research with 86 footnotes to boot.
A rabbit hole of information that backs up the original premise.
It's on the internet, therefore dismissed by these self-proclaimed arbiters of the tRuTh.

"We choose truth over facts!"
- Joe Biden

Refute away, Alinskyites!!!!!

 

[bripat9643]

is he advocating silencing hard left sources of "information"?

Also, what science says women can have penises?

Or says men can have babies?

 

[mamooth]

Hey Alinsky, all you have to do is REFUTE the opinions expressed from whatever source you're presented with; be it You Tube, wiki, or any other source on the internet.

No, you don't. It's not up to the normal people to refute weepy crank loser propaganda. It's up to you to support it. So far, you've failed laughably.

It's hilarious, how the pseudoscicence-spouting cult dimwits here think they can link to some other cult whackaloon making up crazy things, and then demand everyone spend hours refuting every single point, otherwise they get to declare victory. Not how it works. The Unibomber doesn't get to publish a Manifesto and then say he wins because everyone ignores it. Everyone just laughs at the Unibomber.

If you have a point to make, make it in your own words. If you're too stupid, lazy and cowardly to do that, then expect everyone to justifiably laugh at you. If you can't even be bothered to summarize your own point, it's clear that you don't understand it. If you're too lazy to look at your own source, don't expect anyone else to look at it.

 

[SeaMajor7]

No, you don't. It's not up to the normal people to refute weepy crank loser propaganda. It's up to you to support it. So far, you've failed laughably.

It's hilarious, how the pseudoscicence-spouting cult dimwits here think they can link to some other cult whackaloon making up crazy things, and then demand everyone spend hours refuting every single point, otherwise they get to declare victory. Not how it works. The Unibomber doesn't get to publish a Manifesto and then say he wins because everyone ignores it. Everyone just laughs at the Unibomber.

If you have a point to make, make it in your own words. If you're too stupid, lazy and cowardly to do that, then expect everyone to justifiably laugh at you. If you can't even be bothered to summarize your own point, it's clear that you don't understand it. If you're too lazy to look at your own source, don't expect anyone else to look at it.

So, you don't understand the premise of debate.
Why are you here?
You just resorted to projection instead of presenting any substantial discussion.
You zombies are programmed to automatically dismiss any information presented to you without any counterpoints based on observable reality.
Projection and gaslighting is all you offer.
GTFOH!!!

 

[mamooth]

So, you don't understand the premise of debate.

I do. You don't.

You seem to think you can just link to some conspiracy nutter ravings and declare victory. That's very dishonest and cowardly of you.

If you can't defend your garbage arguments -- and you clearly can't, because why else would you keep running from actual debate -- then just admit it. It's not like you're fooling anyone.

Seriously, has your cult babbling ever worked on a normal person? No? I guess that's why you're deflecting like this.

 

[mamooth]

The Dems are going to jail , if the Reps gain power

and they know it.....

At least this piece of fascist dogshit is honest about getting off on being fascist dogshit.

 

[mamooth]

Kneeling for commies is noble.

From their own mouths, why most conservatives service Putin and Xi with such gusto.

 

[mamooth]

When did people decide that not learning and never thinking for yourself was a great idea?

When Republicans started their war on education and common sense.

I bet you want to go Pol Pot on us, and execute all the intellectuals. Teachers, journalists, scientists, doctors, conservatives want all of them dead for failing to support TheParty.

 

[SeaMajor7]

I do. You don't.

You seem to think you can just link to some conspiracy nutter ravings and declare victory. That's very dishonest and cowardly of you.

If you can't defend your garbage arguments -- and you clearly can't, because why else would you keep running from actual debate -- then just admit it. It's not like you're fooling anyone.

Seriously, has your cult babbling ever worked on a normal person? No? I guess that's why you're deflecting like this.

"They don't think it be like it is, but it do."
OG

 

[Zincwarrior]

Says the Nazi party line!!

Thats a non sequitur.