Democrat insider whistleblower: Hunter Biden was acting President.

Now I know you don’t actually read anything I post, you are simply and inaccurately regurgitating old rightwing claims of victimization and assigning them to me based on my political viewpoints.
Any comment on the Crackhead being the de facto President?
 
More Dimtard Cult “Nuh-uh”.

At least you clowns are consistent.
As usual....................Q-NUT.

1739036356556.png
 
Anything on topic, troll?
Already delivered troll. Again, to recap for the simple minded:

You posted an OP from PJMedia about a woman claiming something about Hunter Biden and his role in the Biden Administration.

I point out that there is no collaboration or evidence for her account (despite others supposedly being in those meetings).

Instead of providing any sort of evidence, you respond the with predictable rightist projection…but but E Jean Carroll!

I correct your misconceptions and point out why it is a faulty comparison on multiple levels (that you appear unable to comprehend).

You then proceed to troll your own thread and demand something “on topic” despite the fact you dragged it off topic to begin with.

As a troll, you aren’t even in the top third. But I’ll give you a freebie (you can thank me later). If you want a valid “unsupported Trump allegations” comparison, look no further than many of Mary Trump’s claims. Most are not supported by evidence or corroboration, are opinion, and should be viewed in the same light as any titillating unsubstantiated rumors typically found in the National Enquirer (or PJMedia).

Work on improving your trolling, it is certainly crude, obvious and in need of refinement. Maybe a C+ given today’s grade inflation.
 
No, you were quite happy to regurgitate that BS over a year after it was proven false.
I’ll take that as “I got nuthin”

Case dismissed.

Maybe you can help your buddy save his thread and find someone in the meeting (since we know there were others) who can corroberate Li’s account. I’m sure he will appreciate the assistance.

Now, I’ve dogs to run and stuff to do. See you alls later.
 
So…no evidence offered, PJMedia, no collaborating voices or sworn testimony…ya….anyone else in those meetings able to confirm this?


Right. Thought so.

Looks like the predictable, tedious and juvenile MAGA tactic of projection.
First Democrats DENY then when they can no longer deny they DEFLECT. I think we all know what's coming next.
 
Nobody voted for him. He has no security clearance.

An unelected crackhead as President? Nice job Democrats.


.
“No one voted for Elon Musk!” they say.

Time Magazine’s latest issue has joined the fray, featuring Musk seated confidently at the Resolute Desk—a symbolic jab suggesting he's really the one in charge. The outrage is ironic, considering the same voices now wailing about Musk’s alleged control were silent while Joe Biden spent four years clearly not running the White House.

Why does this matter? Well, we now have fresh allegations from Lindy Li, a former Democratic National Committee (DNC) insider, about who was running the White House for Joe Biden.

And it’s quite terrifying.

Once a proud fundraiser for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, Li has turned into an insider spilling the Democratic Party's most closely held secrets—and, boy, does she have stories.

Her revelations pull back the curtain on what has been described as a chaotic and delusional 2024 campaign for the Democrats, which spectacularly collapsed under the weight of its own hubris. Li has revealed intriguing insider details about how Joe Biden was ultimately ousted, and what Pelosi and Obama really think of Kamala. Back in December, she revealed new dirt on Joe Biden’s mental decline. “The president has not been cognitively fit to assume the duties of the Oval Office for a number of years now,” she told Fox News. "And it breaks my heart because I know President Biden and I love the man, but he is in no shape or form able to carry out the duties that the Commander in Chief requires, and it's just devastating.”


But it’s her revelations about what happened in the White House in the aftermath of Biden’s devastating performance in his June debate on CNN with Trump that are truly jaw-dropping.

Related: Joe Biden’s Fake Job Numbers Scandal Just Got Worse

According to Li, Joe Biden, already staggering from public scrutiny, effectively lost control of the White House after that fateful debate. The event reportedly prompted an audacious power shuffle at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue—one spearheaded by none other than Hunter Biden.

Li alleges that, following Biden’s disastrous debate drubbing, Hunter essentially took over White House operations. Speaking with podcaster Shawn Ryan, she painted a picture of dysfunction at the highest levels of government: “After the [CNN] debate, Hunter basically commandeered the White House. He sat in on all of the White House top-level meetings. We had a former cocaine addict sitting in on the most sensitive meetings of the most consequential and most important government in world history. Does that sit right with you?"

Ryan’s immediate reaction—“No”—reflected what many are surely thinking.

“Without security clearance mind you,” Li added.

The idea that Hunter Biden, with no security clearance, was allegedly dictating the flow of information to his father is a much bigger deal than Elon Musk going after government waste, don’t you think?





No wonder the whole Biden Crime Family got 10 year pardons.
 
Did anybody notice that OMB revoked the Security Clearance of Sponge Brains Shits Pants? Which deprives him of Daily Intelligence Briefings from the FBI and CIA.

A little birdie told me that Sponge Brains Shits Pants would leak those secrets to people, including Hunter, just to have somebody to talk to and to seem important. Still relevant.

The entire dimocrap scum party is a criminal cabal. And, as I've been saying all along and people are just now catching on to -- dimocrap scum voters are the worst scum of all. Just read what they're saying in here. Any that aren't -- I'd like to know.

Every one of them is defending the criminality of USAID, the FBI, The Ed Dept, CIA, Jackoff Smith, Fat Fani, Bragg, Tish James, the whole shitbag criminal cabal.

Why is that?? Is this Board that infested with Deep State opinion-makers, paid or otherwise? To an extent, yes. But you can tell when the semi-literate dimocrap lumpen proletariat respond favorably to the bullshit, that it runs deep into the Base.
 
So…no evidence offered, PJMedia, no collaborating voices or sworn testimony…ya….anyone else in those meetings able to confirm this?


Right. Thought so.

Looks like the predictable, tedious and juvenile MAGA tactic of projection.
You wouldn't believe it anyway, so what's the point??
 
Democrats are the most uninformed people in America. Lindy Li is only saying what has been said many, many times. But cults have to cult.

Hunter Biden’s unusual new role in meetings was first reported by NBC News, citing four sources — and was confirmed to The Post by two sources with indirect knowledge, who said they aren’t sure what precisely his role has been in informing official and political decision-making.

One NBC source said the internal reaction among aides was, “What the hell is happening?” after the first son “popped into” multiple meetings and phone calls.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre sought to portray Hunter’s role as fleeting and isolated to Monday night when he joined a meeting preparing for an evening speech on a Supreme Court ruling on presidential immunity — even though one source told The Post that the first son was again spotted in the West Wing Tuesday morning.

 
Already delivered troll. Again, to recap for the simple minded:

You posted an OP from PJMedia about a woman claiming something about Hunter Biden and his role in the Biden Administration.

I point out that there is no collaboration or evidence for her account (despite others supposedly being in those meetings).

Instead of providing any sort of evidence, you respond the with predictable rightist projection…but but E Jean Carroll!

I correct your misconceptions and point out why it is a faulty comparison on multiple levels (that you appear unable to comprehend).

You then proceed to troll your own thread and demand something “on topic” despite the fact you dragged it off topic to begin with.

As a troll, you aren’t even in the top third. But I’ll give you a freebie (you can thank me later). If you want a valid “unsupported Trump allegations” comparison, look no further than many of Mary Trump’s claims. Most are not supported by evidence or corroboration, are opinion, and should be viewed in the same light as any titillating unsubstantiated rumors typically found in the National Enquirer (or PJMedia).

Work on improving your trolling, it is certainly crude, obvious and in need of refinement. Maybe a C+ given today’s grade inflation.
So what you are saying is “Nuh-uh” is all ya got.
 
Back
Top Bottom