Democrat DA Orders No More Arrests for Breaking-Entering, Shoplifting, Property Destruction, Etc.

[Uncensored2008]

"WE" don't

Wow: DA candidate Rachael Rollins is hailed nationally, but locally her plan not to prosecute petty crimes alarms some - The Boston Globe

We just keep lowering standards.
.

; Democrats do!! Mac; get your Party back!! The loons have taken it over!!

Greg

The Right does too. You're happy to have Trump as President, willing to make excuse after excuse for his petulant, immature behaviors. Behaviors we would not allow from our CHILDREN.

You champion people who are embarrassingly inarticulate (Trump, Dubya, Palin) because you agree with them politically.

And now you've even gone so far as infer that advanced education is a bad thing.

Neither whacked out end of our political spectrum is faultless here. Do I blame the Left more? Yes. But they're not alone.
.

Bullshit Mac.

You can't show anything from Americans that is even in the same galaxy as to what the democrats are doing. You may hate Trump, but inarticulate is not destructive to the nation, the complete breakdown of civil law is.

Join a side, you can either be an American, or a democrat. One side will win, one will be destroyed. The only step the democrats have not yet taken in the war they wage is gunfire. They hoped to disarm us before that stage, but doesn't look like they will get their wish.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Yes, they are following the Venezuelan guide as if they had written it themselves. This should not surprise anyone, the traitors always preferred criminals over Americans, and if they happen to be illegals, even more so.

Oh well when the breakers and enterers get blown away less see what get reaction week be even the homeowner beats her in apoeals court.

If you shoot a person breaking into your home in one of the Soros states, YOU will go to prison. The Soros states protect criminals from decent citizens.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not necessarily. This is an opportunity to give responsibility back to the people, to see to their own safety, and security. Less reliance on government to solve ones problems is often times a good thing.

If the people do anything to protect themselves of their property, THEY will be sent to prison. The Soros agents protect criminals from their victims. This is just the latest example.

This is how Lenin took down the Tsar. The left is systematically undercutting the foundations of a civilized society. This is a deliberate assault intended to destroy the nation and pave the way for a Marxist dictatorship.

 

[Vastator]

Not necessarily. This is an opportunity to give responsibility back to the people, to see to their own safety, and security. Less reliance on government to solve ones problems is often times a good thing.

This is how Lenin took down the Tsar. This is a deliberate assault intended to destroy the nation and pave the way for a Marxist dictatorship.

But therein lies the gamble... They’ll have to bet it all that their side emerges victorious.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not necessarily. This is an opportunity to give responsibility back to the people, to see to their own safety, and security. Less reliance on government to solve ones problems is often times a good thing.

This is how Lenin took down the Tsar. This is a deliberate assault intended to destroy the nation and pave the way for a Marxist dictatorship.

But therein lies the gamble... They’ll have to bet it all that their side emerges victorious.

They are already all in. I don't see any path for the democrats to return to a normal party. They've crossed too many lines.

 

[Vastator]

Not necessarily. This is an opportunity to give responsibility back to the people, to see to their own safety, and security. Less reliance on government to solve ones problems is often times a good thing.

This is how Lenin took down the Tsar. This is a deliberate assault intended to destroy the nation and pave the way for a Marxist dictatorship.

But therein lies the gamble... They’ll have to bet it all that their side emerges victorious.

They are already all in. I don't see any path for the democrats to return to a normal party. They've crossed too many lines.

But they’ve yet to cross the Rubicon. Once they do... There’s no turning back. No Moderates, or fence sitters. No surrender. Just the vanquished; and those left to rebuild...

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not necessarily. This is an opportunity to give responsibility back to the people, to see to their own safety, and security. Less reliance on government to solve ones problems is often times a good thing.

This is how Lenin took down the Tsar. This is a deliberate assault intended to destroy the nation and pave the way for a Marxist dictatorship.

But therein lies the gamble... They’ll have to bet it all that their side emerges victorious.

They are already all in. I don't see any path for the democrats to return to a normal party. They've crossed too many lines.

But they’ve yet to cross the Rubicon. Once they do... There’s no turning back. No Moderates, or fence sitters. No surrender. Just the vanquished; and those left to rebuild...

I think they have already crossed it. I would prefer to be wrong.


"In a moral society, these are the criminals, and the statutes are written to protect you against them. But when a society establishes criminals-by-right and looters-by-law, men who use force to seize the wealth of disarmed victims—then money becomes its creators' avenger. Such looters believe it safe to rob defenseless men, once they've passed a law to disarm them. But their loot becomes the magnet for other looters, who get it from them as they got it. Then the race goes, not to the ablest at production, but to those most ruthless at brutality. When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket. And then that society vanishes, in a spread of ruins and slaughter." - Francisco d'Anconia

 

[Vastator]

Not necessarily. This is an opportunity to give responsibility back to the people, to see to their own safety, and security. Less reliance on government to solve ones problems is often times a good thing.

This is how Lenin took down the Tsar. This is a deliberate assault intended to destroy the nation and pave the way for a Marxist dictatorship.

But therein lies the gamble... They’ll have to bet it all that their side emerges victorious.

They are already all in. I don't see any path for the democrats to return to a normal party. They've crossed too many lines.

But they’ve yet to cross the Rubicon. Once they do... There’s no turning back. No Moderates, or fence sitters. No surrender. Just the vanquished; and those left to rebuild...

I think they have already crossed it. I would prefer to be wrong.


"In a moral society, these are the criminals, and the statutes are written to protect you against them. But when a society establishes criminals-by-right and looters-by-law, men who use force to seize the wealth of disarmed victims—then money becomes its creators' avenger. Such looters believe it safe to rob defenseless men, once they've passed a law to disarm them. But their loot becomes the magnet for other looters, who get it from them as they got it. Then the race goes, not to the ablest at production, but to those most ruthless at brutality. When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket. And then that society vanishes, in a spread of ruins and slaughter." - Francisco d'Anconia

But at which point in that procession did the society vanish? Upon the first misstep of a downward spiral? Or once it’s run its course?

 

[Uncensored2008]

This is how Lenin took down the Tsar. This is a deliberate assault intended to destroy the nation and pave the way for a Marxist dictatorship.

But therein lies the gamble... They’ll have to bet it all that their side emerges victorious.

They are already all in. I don't see any path for the democrats to return to a normal party. They've crossed too many lines.

But they’ve yet to cross the Rubicon. Once they do... There’s no turning back. No Moderates, or fence sitters. No surrender. Just the vanquished; and those left to rebuild...

I think they have already crossed it. I would prefer to be wrong.


"In a moral society, these are the criminals, and the statutes are written to protect you against them. But when a society establishes criminals-by-right and looters-by-law, men who use force to seize the wealth of disarmed victims—then money becomes its creators' avenger. Such looters believe it safe to rob defenseless men, once they've passed a law to disarm them. But their loot becomes the magnet for other looters, who get it from them as they got it. Then the race goes, not to the ablest at production, but to those most ruthless at brutality. When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket. And then that society vanishes, in a spread of ruins and slaughter." - Francisco d'Anconia

But at which point in that procession did the society vanish? Upon the first misstep of a downward spiral? Or once it’s run its course?

Society is faltering. It has not vanished yet, but the pillars supporting it are crumbling, as the democrats continue to bash them with sledge hammers.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

When I first saw this story, I thought it had to be an April Fools joke. But, it is not. Democrat Rachel Rollins, the DA of Suffolk County, which includes Boston, has ordered the police to stop arresting people for breaking and entering, destruction of private property, shoplifting, receiving stolen property, and other crimes. She has also ordered the police not to cooperate with ICE in arresting illegal immigrants in courthouses, regardless of their crime.

This, folks, is a step toward the situation in Venezuela and in so many other Third World countries where the rule of law does not exist or is very unreliable.

Vicki Batts puts it well when she says,

While Rollins may say her memo is about creating an “equal” justice system, the victims of these now-permissible crimes aren’t likely to feel they are being treated equally. But of course, that’s really the goal here, isn’t it? No one cares about the shopkeepers and homeowners that are victimized. Under far-left dogma, criminals are the true victims, we’re just too “hateful” to see it.​

Left-Wing Cities Going Lawless - LewRockwell LewRockwell.com

Another Soros-Linked District Attorney Blocks Boston Police from Making Arrests on Shoplifting, Destruction of Property, Resisting Arrest, Drug Offenses... No Deportation of Illegals

If you think these articles must be exaggerating, here is Rollins' memo:

Rachael Rollins for Suffolk DA | Charges To Be Declined

This needs federal attention. It is no different than when democrats were lynching blacks in the South. It is democrats flagrantly violating the law, again. Batts is violating the civil rights of those in Boston. She needs to do some SERIOUS federal time.

What goes on in a certain district, city or state is their problem. However when liberals realize the destruction of their leaders policies, they move to red states to escape things like crime and high taxes. Then they do the same stupid thing that caused all the problems in their state which is vote Democrat, and they ruin the new state they moved to while at the same time turning it more blue.

It reminds me of the dopy leftists that moves downtown, and then complain they don't have enough green space.

 

[Vastator]

But therein lies the gamble... They’ll have to bet it all that their side emerges victorious.

They are already all in. I don't see any path for the democrats to return to a normal party. They've crossed too many lines.

But they’ve yet to cross the Rubicon. Once they do... There’s no turning back. No Moderates, or fence sitters. No surrender. Just the vanquished; and those left to rebuild...

I think they have already crossed it. I would prefer to be wrong.


"In a moral society, these are the criminals, and the statutes are written to protect you against them. But when a society establishes criminals-by-right and looters-by-law, men who use force to seize the wealth of disarmed victims—then money becomes its creators' avenger. Such looters believe it safe to rob defenseless men, once they've passed a law to disarm them. But their loot becomes the magnet for other looters, who get it from them as they got it. Then the race goes, not to the ablest at production, but to those most ruthless at brutality. When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket. And then that society vanishes, in a spread of ruins and slaughter." - Francisco d'Anconia

But at which point in that procession did the society vanish? Upon the first misstep of a downward spiral? Or once it’s run its course?

Society is faltering. It has not vanished yet, but the pillars supporting it are crumbling, as the democrats continue to bash them with sledge hammers.

I’m reminded of a story my philosophy teacher told me. About a car he received for high school graduation. He cherished the car. Maintained it religiously, and when money allowed upgraded it. The usual. Oil, tires, shocks... Post college he still had it. Long in the tooth but in great shape. So he put a new motor in it. A “better” one. Which required a new transmission to make it work. Being torquier; he had to make changes to the tie rod ends and other stabilizing features. He really loved, and took care of this car. 10 years post grad, he even put a new coat of paint on her, and redid the interior. In leather of course...
He had that car his father bought him for more than 35 years. He put countless hours of personal investment, and untold amounts of money into it. And one day some ****** crossed that yellow line, nearly killing him, and totaling that car in a fiery wreck, beyond repair.
While an emotional loss for sure. What he struggled with most... Was to quantify the moment he actually “lost” that car his father bought him so many years ago. As very little of it was present at the time of that fiery crash... Hmm...

 

[BULLDOG]

As usual, this is another right wing thread based on either a misrepresentation or an outright lie. There has been a problem in Suffolk County with improper prosecution, and for now, prosecution for the things on that list must be appropriately overseen by experienced prosecutors.

In socialism no individual owns anything....

Wrong, but what does that have to do with this?

 

[BULLDOG]

As usual, this is another right wing thread based on either a misrepresentation or an outright lie. There has been a problem in Suffolk County with improper prosecution, and for now, prosecution for the things on that list must be appropriately overseen by experienced prosecutors.

Denying facts won't make them go away. If you would bother to actually break and down and read her memo, she states clearly that from now on "the default" action will be *not* to prosecute the crimes listed in her memo, and that the only way that the default action cannot be followed is with supervisor permission. So "the default" action on such crimes is not to prosecute them. Do you know what "default" means?

And, pray tell, with Rollins in charge of the DA's office, how has there been a problem with "improper prosecution" for crimes such as breaking and entering, larceny, shoplifting, trespassing, and even resisting arrest? How can you "improperly prosecute" someone for resisting arrest, breaking and entering, property destruction? If they committed the crime, what is "improper" about prosecuting them for it? Hey? Explain that one to us.

Of course I know what default means. All the things on that list can still be prosecuted if a more experienced supervisor feels it is proper. All they have to do is ask. Taking those decisions out of the hands of inexperienced people sounds like a good thing to me. You think a more experienced supervisor will let people go when they should be prosecuted?

Yes they will. It's called kissing up. The prosecutors (knowing the will of the commie DA) will be hesitant to take any action unless no other alternative is available.

Got it. An inexperienced newcomer's judgment is better than an experienced prosecutor. I'm always amazed at right wing logic.

 

[Vastator]

As usual, this is another right wing thread based on either a misrepresentation or an outright lie. There has been a problem in Suffolk County with improper prosecution, and for now, prosecution for the things on that list must be appropriately overseen by experienced prosecutors.

Denying facts won't make them go away. If you would bother to actually break and down and read her memo, she states clearly that from now on "the default" action will be *not* to prosecute the crimes listed in her memo, and that the only way that the default action cannot be followed is with supervisor permission. So "the default" action on such crimes is not to prosecute them. Do you know what "default" means?

And, pray tell, with Rollins in charge of the DA's office, how has there been a problem with "improper prosecution" for crimes such as breaking and entering, larceny, shoplifting, trespassing, and even resisting arrest? How can you "improperly prosecute" someone for resisting arrest, breaking and entering, property destruction? If they committed the crime, what is "improper" about prosecuting them for it? Hey? Explain that one to us.

Of course I know what default means. All the things on that list can still be prosecuted if a more experienced supervisor feels it is proper. All they have to do is ask. Taking those decisions out of the hands of inexperienced people sounds like a good thing to me. You think a more experienced supervisor will let people go when they should be prosecuted?

Yes they will. It's called kissing up. The prosecutors (knowing the will of the commie DA) will be hesitant to take any action unless no other alternative is available.

Got it. An inexperienced newcomer's judgment is better than an experienced prosecutor. I'm always amazed at right wing logic.

By the opposing logic a seasoned hooker would make a better wife. After all... Of all people; she should know what makes a man happy...
I’m always amazed at Leftwinger logic...

 

[BULLDOG]

As usual, this is another right wing thread based on either a misrepresentation or an outright lie. There has been a problem in Suffolk County with improper prosecution, and for now, prosecution for the things on that list must be appropriately overseen by experienced prosecutors.

Got caught, did you fuckwad?

You scum are waging civil war on this nation. This is just more of your shit designed to corrupt the foundation of civil society so as to create anarchy so that your rulers can seize power.

What a stupid thing to say.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

As usual, this is another right wing thread based on either a misrepresentation or an outright lie. There has been a problem in Suffolk County with improper prosecution, and for now, prosecution for the things on that list must be appropriately overseen by experienced prosecutors.

Denying facts won't make them go away. If you would bother to actually break and down and read her memo, she states clearly that from now on "the default" action will be *not* to prosecute the crimes listed in her memo, and that the only way that the default action cannot be followed is with supervisor permission. So "the default" action on such crimes is not to prosecute them. Do you know what "default" means?

And, pray tell, with Rollins in charge of the DA's office, how has there been a problem with "improper prosecution" for crimes such as breaking and entering, larceny, shoplifting, trespassing, and even resisting arrest? How can you "improperly prosecute" someone for resisting arrest, breaking and entering, property destruction? If they committed the crime, what is "improper" about prosecuting them for it? Hey? Explain that one to us.

Of course I know what default means. All the things on that list can still be prosecuted if a more experienced supervisor feels it is proper. All they have to do is ask. Taking those decisions out of the hands of inexperienced people sounds like a good thing to me. You think a more experienced supervisor will let people go when they should be prosecuted?

Yes they will. It's called kissing up. The prosecutors (knowing the will of the commie DA) will be hesitant to take any action unless no other alternative is available.

Got it. An inexperienced newcomer's judgment is better than an experienced prosecutor. I'm always amazed at right wing logic.

Unlike left-wing logic that states if you lower the penalty for crimes, there will be less crimes.

Riddle me this: what is an inexperienced person handling those cases for in the first place? Wouldn't the right thing to do is hire experienced people to do the job? After all, if you don't have the ability to do the job, you shouldn't have that job.

Sounds to me like CYA.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Crime is a yoog part of Liberal culture

 

[Uncensored2008]

As usual, this is another right wing thread based on either a misrepresentation or an outright lie. There has been a problem in Suffolk County with improper prosecution, and for now, prosecution for the things on that list must be appropriately overseen by experienced prosecutors.

Got caught, did you fuckwad?

You scum are waging civil war on this nation. This is just more of your shit designed to corrupt the foundation of civil society so as to create anarchy so that your rulers can seize power.

What a stupid thing to say.

So you agree that laws should not be applied due to traditional inequality of application?

Translation, black people should not be subject to the law - and you agree with that?

Explain how this is anything but a frontal assault on the basis of a civil society? No society can be civil without criminal law.

 

[BULLDOG]

As usual, this is another right wing thread based on either a misrepresentation or an outright lie. There has been a problem in Suffolk County with improper prosecution, and for now, prosecution for the things on that list must be appropriately overseen by experienced prosecutors.

Denying facts won't make them go away. If you would bother to actually break and down and read her memo, she states clearly that from now on "the default" action will be *not* to prosecute the crimes listed in her memo, and that the only way that the default action cannot be followed is with supervisor permission. So "the default" action on such crimes is not to prosecute them. Do you know what "default" means?

And, pray tell, with Rollins in charge of the DA's office, how has there been a problem with "improper prosecution" for crimes such as breaking and entering, larceny, shoplifting, trespassing, and even resisting arrest? How can you "improperly prosecute" someone for resisting arrest, breaking and entering, property destruction? If they committed the crime, what is "improper" about prosecuting them for it? Hey? Explain that one to us.

Of course I know what default means. All the things on that list can still be prosecuted if a more experienced supervisor feels it is proper. All they have to do is ask. Taking those decisions out of the hands of inexperienced people sounds like a good thing to me. You think a more experienced supervisor will let people go when they should be prosecuted?

Yes they will. It's called kissing up. The prosecutors (knowing the will of the commie DA) will be hesitant to take any action unless no other alternative is available.

Got it. An inexperienced newcomer's judgment is better than an experienced prosecutor. I'm always amazed at right wing logic.

By the opposing logic a seasoned hooker would make a better wife. After all... Of all people; she should know what makes a man happy...
I’m always amazed at Leftwinger logic...

Are you actually trying to argue that less experience is better than more experience? Yep, right wing logic is truly unique.

 

[Vastator]

Denying facts won't make them go away. If you would bother to actually break and down and read her memo, she states clearly that from now on "the default" action will be *not* to prosecute the crimes listed in her memo, and that the only way that the default action cannot be followed is with supervisor permission. So "the default" action on such crimes is not to prosecute them. Do you know what "default" means?

And, pray tell, with Rollins in charge of the DA's office, how has there been a problem with "improper prosecution" for crimes such as breaking and entering, larceny, shoplifting, trespassing, and even resisting arrest? How can you "improperly prosecute" someone for resisting arrest, breaking and entering, property destruction? If they committed the crime, what is "improper" about prosecuting them for it? Hey? Explain that one to us.

Of course I know what default means. All the things on that list can still be prosecuted if a more experienced supervisor feels it is proper. All they have to do is ask. Taking those decisions out of the hands of inexperienced people sounds like a good thing to me. You think a more experienced supervisor will let people go when they should be prosecuted?

Yes they will. It's called kissing up. The prosecutors (knowing the will of the commie DA) will be hesitant to take any action unless no other alternative is available.

Got it. An inexperienced newcomer's judgment is better than an experienced prosecutor. I'm always amazed at right wing logic.

By the opposing logic a seasoned hooker would make a better wife. After all... Of all people; she should know what makes a man happy...
I’m always amazed at Leftwinger logic...

Are you actually trying to argue that less experience is better than more experience? Yep, right wing logic is truly unique.

Depends upon which arena that experience is in; and how you expect the person to perform.