Dem. Governor: Babies can be killed even after birth.

It doesn't get any more extreme than this. This is what the Democrat party has become. They support baby killing without restrictions, even after the child is born.

This used to be called murder.

Start at the 1:15 mark.


Total nonsense. The stink of Trump's ass on your face has gone to your brain, Skippy.
 
You really need to learn to listen.
“The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”
 
Euthanizing disabled people and other forms of Nazi-era eugenics are very popular on the left.
Were we watching the left at the tiki-torch neo-Nazi fest in Charlottesville? A couple of them were wearing shirts saying 6MWE....6 Million Weren`t Enough. Look in the mirror, Adolph.
 
“The infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians and the mother.”
Kept comfortable but not medically treated. The child wouldn’t be resuscitated if the parents didn’t want that. And the ensuing discussion would debate whether to continue to withhold medical care until the child dies.

Not clear why you pretend that it means anything else. Honestly obviously osnt your menu on this one.
 
It doesn't get any more extreme than this. This is what the Democrat party has become. They support baby killing without restrictions, even after the child is born.

This used to be called murder.

Start at the 1:15 mark.


He is lying about not wanting the government to be involved. He exactly wants the government to be involved. He wants the government to empower people to murder a human being, something that was against the laws of every civilized society for thousands of years.

Only in totalitarian socialist societies, such as a Soviet union, Communist China and Nazi Germany has the government empowered people to kill other human beings for any other reason except immediate self-defense, capital punishment, and war.
 
Kept comfortable but not medically treated. The child wouldn’t be resuscitated if the parents didn’t want that. And the ensuing discussion would debate whether to continue to withhold medical care until the child dies.

Not clear why you pretend that it means anything else. Honestly obviously osnt your menu on this one.
The 2002 law requires ordinary care for every live infant. That care includes medical treatment.


  1. An infant is born with Down’s syndrome, indicating probable mental retardation. He needs very low-risk surgery for an easily correctable intestinal defect. If untreated the baby will not be able to retain food and will die. The parents refuse surgery, stating that the mental retardation will mean a less than meaningful life for the baby.
    Answer: This case involves ordinary care; illegal decision: Parents may not refuse ordinary care; the refusal of surgery would result in the proximate cause of death for the child they have a legal duty to protect. Courts, however, usually have ruled in favor of parents’ refusal.
  2. A baby is born with anencephaly (part or most of the brain matter absent), with a prognosis of living only a few weeks or months. A decision is made to withhold all nourishment by mouth or other means.
    Answer: Ordinary care; illegal decision: Ordinary care is mandatory for all patients regardless of prognosis. However, in practice, many children like this are starved.
  3. A baby is born with the same condition as above, spina bifida, but in addition the baby has no kidneys, a rare and fatal condition for which there is no treatment. No surgery was done for the spina bifida.
    Answer: Extraordinary care: Ordinary care (surgery for spina bifida) becomes extraordinary care because the fatal kidney condition makes surgery useless. The baby will die regardless of treatment.
    Legal decision – useless treatment not required.
 
Abortion is illegal in Indonesia.

CULT, YOU HAVE WORK TO DO! THINK OF ALL THE DEAD BABIES YOU ARE MISSING OUT ON FROM INDONESIA!

Forget Oklahoma. Land a big fish.

OK = 4m people.
Indonesia = 300m people.
 
The 2002 law requires ordinary care for every live infant. That care includes medical treatment.


  1. An infant is born with Down’s syndrome, indicating probable mental retardation. He needs very low-risk surgery for an easily correctable intestinal defect. If untreated the baby will not be able to retain food and will die. The parents refuse surgery, stating that the mental retardation will mean a less than meaningful life for the baby.
    Answer: This case involves ordinary care; illegal decision: Parents may not refuse ordinary care; the refusal of surgery would result in the proximate cause of death for the child they have a legal duty to protect. Courts, however, usually have ruled in favor of parents’ refusal.
  2. A baby is born with anencephaly (part or most of the brain matter absent), with a prognosis of living only a few weeks or months. A decision is made to withhold all nourishment by mouth or other means.
    Answer: Ordinary care; illegal decision: Ordinary care is mandatory for all patients regardless of prognosis. However, in practice, many children like this are starved.
  3. A baby is born with the same condition as above, spina bifida, but in addition the baby has no kidneys, a rare and fatal condition for which there is no treatment. No surgery was done for the spina bifida.
    Answer: Extraordinary care: Ordinary care (surgery for spina bifida) becomes extraordinary care because the fatal kidney condition makes surgery useless. The baby will die regardless of treatment.
    Legal decision – useless treatment not required.
So the Born Alive bill would rectify that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top