DEI and the Rise of the Modern Slur

And Im sure that if these lee, davis, etc types somehow rose from the grave, they would see nothing wrong with transgenders, child mutations, cutting body parts off. So.....what were you saying? Lol.
I was saying how you're too pussy to love Lee like a real Proud Boy. :lol:

Lee and Davis were trash whites? Correct, cuck? :dunno: :lol:
 
She is DEI hire. White women are part of DEI.
.

When looking at that with just the numbers ... And your constant desire to support them ...
Would only reasonably defeat your desire to support DEI.

You openly admit that DEI benefits white women ... More than anyone else.

If you actually understood what you are saying ... Then that would make DEI a program ...
Founded in governance ... That favors whites above all others ...
And will always keep the black numbers lower in comparison.

You see dumbass ... That's what you get when you put your faith in the government ...
Instead of accepting your own personal responsibility ... And embracing the desire to escape the same old shit ...
You are always complaining about ... :thup:

Look at what the numbers are ... Look at what you are saying ...
And understand it makes you look stupid ... When you cannot see what is there in black and white ...
And how it totally defeats your argument ... That it would make things any different than they already are ...
As far as the numbers are concerned.

.
 
Last edited:
“Plausible deniability is the ability to deny any involvement in illegal or unethical activities because there is no clear evidence to prove involvement. The lack of evidence makes the denial credible, or plausible.”

I start the thread with this definition because this is how people are able to continue practicing racism in this country today. DEI is part of modern racism and is used as a racial slur. People can't use the n-word but they can use terms like DEI. Notice that people like Pam Biondi are never called DEI but as a woman, she would be a DEI hire. Instead, we see the use of that term only for blacks. It is apparent what they mean.

This video explores the use of modern slurs such as BLM, CRT, woke, or DEI.


Word up Brother!! Word! It's the same thing with "woke"
 
  • Fact
Reactions: IM2
You should probably research the Civil Rights Act and try again
You probably should do that because:

Members of today’s Republican Party tell a tale about republican support for the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Act. They spin a fabulous story about a democratic filibuster and will say that by percentage more Democrats opposed these bills than Republicans.

But the reality was this:

As it pertains to the Civil Rights Act, 153 Democrats and 139 Republicans voted in favor of the legislation in the House. In the Senate, forty-six Democrats and twenty-seven Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act.

In the House, 221 Democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and 112 Republicans did. In the Senate, forty-seven Democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and thirty Republicans did.



HR. 7152, Senate vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Jun 19, 1964 HR. 7152. PASSAGE. -- Senate Vote #409 -- Jun 19, 1964

H.R. 7152. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Adoption of a resolution (h. Res. 789) providing for house approval of the bill as amended by the Senate, Jul 2, 1964 H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A … -- House Vote #182 -- Jul 2, 1964.

TO PASS S. 1564, The Voting Rights Act Of 1965, May 26, 1965, TO PASS S. 1564, THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965. -- Senate Vote #78 -- May 26, 1965 .

TO PASS H.R. 6400, The 1965 Voting Rights Act, Jul 9, 1965, TO PASS H.R. 6400, THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT. -- House Vote #87 -- Jul 9, 1965 .
 
You probably should do that because:

Members of today’s Republican Party tell a tale about republican support for the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Act. They spin a fabulous story about a democratic filibuster and will say that by percentage more Democrats opposed these bills than Republicans.

But the reality was this:

As it pertains to the Civil Rights Act, 153 Democrats and 139 Republicans voted in favor of the legislation in the House. In the Senate, forty-six Democrats and twenty-seven Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act.

In the House, 221 Democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and 112 Republicans did. In the Senate, forty-seven Democrats voted for the Voting Rights Act, and thirty Republicans did.



HR. 7152, Senate vote on the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Jun 19, 1964 HR. 7152. PASSAGE. -- Senate Vote #409 -- Jun 19, 1964

H.R. 7152. Civil Rights Act of 1964. Adoption of a resolution (h. Res. 789) providing for house approval of the bill as amended by the Senate, Jul 2, 1964 H.R. 7152. CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964. ADOPTION OF A … -- House Vote #182 -- Jul 2, 1964.

TO PASS S. 1564, The Voting Rights Act Of 1965, May 26, 1965, TO PASS S. 1564, THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT OF 1965. -- Senate Vote #78 -- May 26, 1965 .

TO PASS H.R. 6400, The 1965 Voting Rights Act, Jul 9, 1965, TO PASS H.R. 6400, THE 1965 VOTING RIGHTS ACT. -- House Vote #87 -- Jul 9, 1965 .


Yeah, buddy:


“As long as you are black, and you’re gonna be black till the day you die, no one’s gonna call you by your goddamn name. So no matter what you are called, ni**er, you just let it roll off your back like water, and you’ll make it. Just pretend you’re a goddamn piece of furniture. [Said to his chauffeur, Robert Parker, when Parker said he’d prefer to be referred to by his name rather than "boy," "ni**er" or "chief."]”
― Lyndon B. Johnson


“Son, when I appoint a ni**er to the bench, I want everybody to know he’s a ni**er. [Said to an aide in 1965 regarding the appointment of Thurgood Marshall as associate justice of the Supreme Court]”
― Lyndon B. Johnson
 
Yeah, buddy:


“As long as you are black, and you’re gonna be black till the day you die, no one’s gonna call you by your goddamn name. So no matter what you are called, ni**er, you just let it roll off your back like water, and you’ll make it. Just pretend you’re a goddamn piece of furniture. [Said to his chauffeur, Robert Parker, when Parker said he’d prefer to be referred to by his name rather than "boy," "ni**er" or "chief."]”
― Lyndon B. Johnson


“Son, when I appoint a ni**er to the bench, I want everybody to know he’s a ni**er. [Said to an aide in 1965 regarding the appointment of Thurgood Marshall as associate justice of the Supreme Court]”
― Lyndon B. Johnson

He's foundering
 
The pathology of white America to pretend that Black Americans weren't discriminated against, socially and economically, ironically, exposes the fragility of white people. Facts shouldn't break your brain and cause you to fantasize and make believe. :lol:

They WERE discriminated against. Here in 2025 however, you now have an edge being a person of color.
 
They WERE discriminated against. Here in 2025 however, you now have an edge being a person of color.
You do not. That's what's hilarious about this frail white pathology. White families have 10 times the wealth on average as black families do, as you spent decades benefiting from government policies to subsidize and grow the white middle class that Black Americans were economically segregated from. You soft whites think Affirmative Action and DEI is something? You didn't get to your socio-economic position through merit, you got there by stepping on the backs of others and if you think that injustice can be addressed without you suffering back pain in return then you whites are ignorantly mistaken. Black American socioeconomic justice can't come without whites being made uncomfortable.
 
The continuing saga of IM2 explaining how everything is racist.

Unfortunately, most of these are reruns.
Would you like to try discussing the topic since you do the behavior? Because DEI is the same tire racist rerun of CRT, AA, Woke, liberal, etc.
 
And Im sure that if these lee, davis, etc types somehow rose from the grave, they would see nothing wrong with transgenders, child mutations, cutting body parts off. So.....what were you saying? Lol.
You are off-topic and talking about .1 percent of the population. According to recent polls, around 30 percent of whites had racist views, so how about you discuss the topic instead of trying to divert the issue to slave rapists and white that practiced bodily mutilation on black slaves.
 
You do not. That's what's hilarious about this frail white pathology. White families have 10 times the wealth on average as black families do, as you spent decades benefiting from government policies to subsidize and grow the white middle class that Black Americans were economically segregated from. You soft whites think Affirmative Action and DEI is something? You didn't get to your socio-economic position through merit, you got there by stepping on the backs of others and if you think that injustice can be addressed without you suffering back pain in return then you whites are ignorantly mistaken. Black American socioeconomic justice can't come without whites being made uncomfortable.
 
Would you like to try discussing the topic since you do the behavior? Because DEI is the same tire racist rerun of CRT, AA, Woke, liberal, etc.
We agree. All those things ARE racist. They concentrate completely on the color of ones skin or some other immutable attribute as THE determining factor.

That's textbook racism.

You're never going to be convinced of that...because you're as racist a Brokeloser.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom