Decrying Gay Marriage, Black Pastors Join Legal Fight

[hipeter924]

That is because you're stupid, little guy. Nothing I have said would qualify as "anti-science"...I've mostly used science, and Ive never used religion as an argument against homosexuality. You're trying hard to pigeonhole me since you already gave up enough info about yourself for anyone here to see you're a dumbass. I'm not taking the bait. Go try and find a post where I have claimed to be religious.....This ought to be fun...lmao

*yawn*

Do you get paid extra to say that by the Koch brothers, or is this right-wing raving free of charge?

You are on record in the other thread as saying that sex-change operations on children shouldn't be allowed, then you claim you aren't anti-science. Next you will be bitching about stem-cells and claiming that people can choose to be gay. It is only a matter of time. Wouldn't want to live on planet LockeJaw, where you have to ask the religious police to have an operation.

 

[Vigilante]

*yawn*

Do you get paid extra to say that by the Koch brothers, or is this right-wing raving free of charge?

You are on record in the other thread as saying that sex-change operations on children shouldn't be allowed, then you claim you aren't anti-science. Next you will be bitching about stem-cells and claiming that people can choose to be gay. It is only a matter of time. Wouldn't want to live on planet LockeJaw, where you have to ask the religious police to have an operation.

 

[JimBowie1958]

This sucks, Im actually starting to like Bodey even though I disagree with her. I'm going to apologize to you for saying rude things about your partnership, Bodey. You don't have to accept it, but I just read some of the stuff I said the other day and I did cross the line... So I sincerely apologize, I can discuss and debate this stuff without attacking people in That way.

You will find your apologies wasted on the PC Nazis.

 

[JimBowie1958]

That is because you're stupid, little guy. Nothing I have said would qualify as "anti-science"...I've mostly used science, and Ive never used religion as an argument against homosexuality. You're trying hard to pigeonhole me since you already gave up enough info about yourself for anyone here to see you're a dumbass. I'm not taking the bait. Go try and find a post where I have claimed to be religious.....This ought to be fun...lmao

Pfft! This is what I see when I read your posts:

*yawn*

Do you get paid extra to say that by the Koch brothers, or is this right-wing raving free of charge?

You are on record in the other thread as saying that sex-change operations on children shouldn't be allowed, then you claim you aren't anti-science. Next you will be bitching about stem-cells and claiming that people can choose to be gay. It is only a matter of time. Wouldn't want to live on planet LockeJaw, where you have to ask the religious police to have an operation.

Typical PC Nazi; cant imagine anyone would honestly oppose him without being corrupt or stupid.

 

[JimBowie1958]

When were civil unions ever up for a vote?I'm not calling you a liar...I just have either forgotten or am correct when I say that I don't remember any states bringing up civil unions for a vote.

A teeny tiny minority that manages to get 19 states....19 states to vote to prevent gay marriages AND civil unions.....

Same-sex marriage in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

At least 19 states codified laws to PREVENT even civil unions from being recognized. NINETEEN......pay attention to what's going on in the world next time.

So what? That does not mean that the opponents were necessarily against civil unions as a whole.

For example, there are people in Colorado who voted to not recognize the concealed carry licenses from the neighboring state of Utah, not because they are against concealed carry, idiot, but because they did not like the way Utah was doing it. So they voted to no longer recognize some of Utahs concealed carry licenses. In the beginning of a wave of libtard hysteria pushing states into legalizing very questionable activities, some states might pass laws refusing to recognize the civil unions of other states until they have time to review what the other states implement, just like with concealed carry.

You libtards are so ******* stupid.

 

[Seawytch]

When were civil unions ever up for a vote?I'm not calling you a liar...I just have either forgotten or am correct when I say that I don't remember any states bringing up civil unions for a vote.

At least 19 states codified laws to PREVENT even civil unions from being recognized. NINETEEN......pay attention to what's going on in the world next time.

So what? That does not mean that the opponents were necessarily against civil unions as a whole.

For example, there are people in Colorado who voted to not recognize the concealed carry licenses from the neighboring state of Utah, not because they are against concealed carry, idiot, but because they did not like the way Utah was doing it. So they voted to no longer recognize some of Utahs concealed carry licenses. In the beginning of a wave of libtard hysteria pushing states into legalizing very questionable activities, some states might pass laws refusing to recognize the civil unions of other states until they have time to review what the other states implement, just like with concealed carry.

You libtards are so ******* stupid.

They weren't against civil unions so they voted to prevent civil unions?

And you just called someone else ******* stupid? Irony poisoning...

 

[JimBowie1958]

At least 19 states codified laws to PREVENT even civil unions from being recognized. NINETEEN......pay attention to what's going on in the world next time.

So what? That does not mean that the opponents were necessarily against civil unions as a whole.

For example, there are people in Colorado who voted to not recognize the concealed carry licenses from the neighboring state of Utah, not because they are against concealed carry, idiot, but because they did not like the way Utah was doing it. So they voted to no longer recognize some of Utahs concealed carry licenses. In the beginning of a wave of libtard hysteria pushing states into legalizing very questionable activities, some states might pass laws refusing to recognize the civil unions of other states until they have time to review what the other states implement, just like with concealed carry.

You libtards are so ******* stupid.

They weren't against civil unions so they voted to prevent civil unions?

And you just called someone else ******* stupid? Irony poisoning...

lol, yes, you stupid *****, and I explained why I stated that.

The issue of civil unions is not the only issue involved, but also the matter of how another state would implement civil unions. So, just like concealed carry licensing, many states will pass a law refusing to recognize the license of other states then negotiate the terms and criteria that other states use and reciprocate on a case by case basis.

Why are you libtards so ******* stupid? I mean, do you practice each morning how to be stupid? Is there some kind of exercise program that reduces the blood flow to your brain?

I really don't get how I can explain something in almost minute detail and you still respond, 'Duh, buhd how dah ya get dat from dat?'

Sheesh, please, shut up until you can grow, borrow or steel a ******* brain.

 

[Seawytch]

So what? That does not mean that the opponents were necessarily against civil unions as a whole.

For example, there are people in Colorado who voted to not recognize the concealed carry licenses from the neighboring state of Utah, not because they are against concealed carry, idiot, but because they did not like the way Utah was doing it. So they voted to no longer recognize some of Utahs concealed carry licenses. In the beginning of a wave of libtard hysteria pushing states into legalizing very questionable activities, some states might pass laws refusing to recognize the civil unions of other states until they have time to review what the other states implement, just like with concealed carry.

You libtards are so ******* stupid.

They weren't against civil unions so they voted to prevent civil unions?

And you just called someone else ******* stupid? Irony poisoning...

lol, yes, you stupid *****, and I explained why I stated that.

The issue of civil unions is not the only issue involved, but also the matter of how another state would implement civil unions. So, just like concealed carry licensing, many states will pass a law refusing to recognize the license of other states then negotiate the terms and criteria that other states use and reciprocate on a case by case basis.

Why are you libtards so ******* stupid? I mean, do you practice each morning how to be stupid? Is there some kind of exercise program that reduces the blood flow to your brain?

I really don't get how I can explain something in almost minute detail and you still respond, 'Duh, buhd how dah ya get dat from dat?'

Sheesh, please, shut up until you can grow, borrow or steel a ******* brain.

Yeah, that's it...use some more bad language and epithets...that really proves your point.

The FACT is that Civil Unions haven't been rejected by gays, but by the haters. THEY are the ones that said no to civil unions, not the gays. There is not a single state in the union where it was gays that shot them down, but in 19 it was the haters that said "nope, sorry queers you don't get civil unions either...it's too close to marriage".

So, ya'll had your chance and you blew it...now we got the whole thing and it's staying that way.

Your little dick licence isn't akin to a marriage license for straights. If you marry your 13 year old 1st cousin in Alabama, you're still married in CA where those things aren't permitted...but my legal marriage to my consenting adult non familial partner in CA is not recognized in your backwater Alabama. Marriage licenses aren't like concealed carry permits, you dolt...except for the gays. We only get our licenses in the states that issue them and recognize them...like your tiny penis license.

 

[hipeter924]

At least 19 states codified laws to PREVENT even civil unions from being recognized. NINETEEN......pay attention to what's going on in the world next time.

So what? That does not mean that the opponents were necessarily against civil unions as a whole.

For example, there are people in Colorado who voted to not recognize the concealed carry licenses from the neighboring state of Utah, not because they are against concealed carry, idiot, but because they did not like the way Utah was doing it. So they voted to no longer recognize some of Utahs concealed carry licenses. In the beginning of a wave of libtard hysteria pushing states into legalizing very questionable activities, some states might pass laws refusing to recognize the civil unions of other states until they have time to review what the other states implement, just like with concealed carry.

You libtards are so ******* stupid.

They weren't against civil unions so they voted to prevent civil unions?

And you just called someone else ******* stupid? Irony poisoning...

Unchecked rage is the calling card of the 'party of no', they are 'oppressed' angry white men, and Ann Coulter clones (a Republican social experiment after turning all women into docile robots was determined unfeasible). But that said, a lot of them are in the closet and hate gays because they are confused specimens of sexuality i.e. in Congress they attack same-sex marriage, the next minute they are with male escorts.

*awaits more rage*

 

[JimBowie1958]

They weren't against civil unions so they voted to prevent civil unions?

And you just called someone else ******* stupid? Irony poisoning...

lol, yes, you stupid *****, and I explained why I stated that.

The issue of civil unions is not the only issue involved, but also the matter of how another state would implement civil unions. So, just like concealed carry licensing, many states will pass a law refusing to recognize the license of other states then negotiate the terms and criteria that other states use and reciprocate on a case by case basis.

Why are you libtards so ******* stupid? I mean, do you practice each morning how to be stupid? Is there some kind of exercise program that reduces the blood flow to your brain?

I really don't get how I can explain something in almost minute detail and you still respond, 'Duh, buhd how dah ya get dat from dat?'

Sheesh, please, shut up until you can grow, borrow or steel a ******* brain.

Yeah, that's it...use some more bad language and epithets...that really proves your point.

The FACT is that Civil Unions haven't been rejected by gays, but by the haters. THEY are the ones that said no to civil unions, not the gays. There is not a single state in the union where it was gays that shot them down, but in 19 it was the haters that said "nope, sorry queers you don't get civil unions either...it's too close to marriage".

So, ya'll had your chance and you blew it...now we got the whole thing and it's staying that way.

Your little dick licence isn't akin to a marriage license for straights. If you marry your 13 year old 1st cousin in Alabama, you're still married in CA where those things aren't permitted...but my legal marriage to my consenting adult non familial partner in CA is not recognized in your backwater Alabama. Marriage licenses aren't like concealed carry permits, you dolt...except for the gays. We only get our licenses in the states that issue them and recognize them...like your tiny penis license.

roflmao, you just cant make this stupid shit up, lolololol

 

[JimBowie1958]

So what? That does not mean that the opponents were necessarily against civil unions as a whole.

For example, there are people in Colorado who voted to not recognize the concealed carry licenses from the neighboring state of Utah, not because they are against concealed carry, idiot, but because they did not like the way Utah was doing it. So they voted to no longer recognize some of Utahs concealed carry licenses. In the beginning of a wave of libtard hysteria pushing states into legalizing very questionable activities, some states might pass laws refusing to recognize the civil unions of other states until they have time to review what the other states implement, just like with concealed carry.

You libtards are so ******* stupid.

They weren't against civil unions so they voted to prevent civil unions?

And you just called someone else ******* stupid? Irony poisoning...

Unchecked rage is the calling card of the 'party of no', they are 'oppressed' angry white men, and Ann Coulter clones (a Republican social experiment after turning all women into docile robots was determined unfeasible). But that said, a lot of them are in the closet and hate gays because they are confused specimens of sexuality i.e. in Congress they attack same-sex marriage, the next minute they are with male escorts.

*awaits more rage*

Is it true that you suck at least twelve cocks every morning?

piss off child.

 

[Seawytch]

lol, yes, you stupid *****, and I explained why I stated that.

The issue of civil unions is not the only issue involved, but also the matter of how another state would implement civil unions. So, just like concealed carry licensing, many states will pass a law refusing to recognize the license of other states then negotiate the terms and criteria that other states use and reciprocate on a case by case basis.

Why are you libtards so ******* stupid? I mean, do you practice each morning how to be stupid? Is there some kind of exercise program that reduces the blood flow to your brain?

I really don't get how I can explain something in almost minute detail and you still respond, 'Duh, buhd how dah ya get dat from dat?'

Sheesh, please, shut up until you can grow, borrow or steel a ******* brain.

Yeah, that's it...use some more bad language and epithets...that really proves your point.

The FACT is that Civil Unions haven't been rejected by gays, but by the haters. THEY are the ones that said no to civil unions, not the gays. There is not a single state in the union where it was gays that shot them down, but in 19 it was the haters that said "nope, sorry queers you don't get civil unions either...it's too close to marriage".

So, ya'll had your chance and you blew it...now we got the whole thing and it's staying that way.

Your little dick licence isn't akin to a marriage license for straights. If you marry your 13 year old 1st cousin in Alabama, you're still married in CA where those things aren't permitted...but my legal marriage to my consenting adult non familial partner in CA is not recognized in your backwater Alabama. Marriage licenses aren't like concealed carry permits, you dolt...except for the gays. We only get our licenses in the states that issue them and recognize them...like your tiny penis license.

roflmao, you just cant make this stupid shit up, lolololol

Oh look, impotent bluster. You just can't dispute what I said. lolololol

 

[bodecea]

They weren't against civil unions so they voted to prevent civil unions?

And you just called someone else ******* stupid? Irony poisoning...

Unchecked rage is the calling card of the 'party of no', they are 'oppressed' angry white men, and Ann Coulter clones (a Republican social experiment after turning all women into docile robots was determined unfeasible). But that said, a lot of them are in the closet and hate gays because they are confused specimens of sexuality i.e. in Congress they attack same-sex marriage, the next minute they are with male escorts.

*awaits more rage*

Is it true that you suck at least twelve cocks every morning?

piss off child.

When you have nothing but a personal attack/insult....it means you've got.....well, nothing.

 

[hipeter924]

Unchecked rage is the calling card of the 'party of no', they are 'oppressed' angry white men, and Ann Coulter clones (a Republican social experiment after turning all women into docile robots was determined unfeasible). But that said, a lot of them are in the closet and hate gays because they are confused specimens of sexuality i.e. in Congress they attack same-sex marriage, the next minute they are with male escorts.

*awaits more rage*

Is it true that you suck at least twelve cocks every morning?

piss off child.

When you have nothing but a personal attack/insult....it means you've got.....well, nothing.

Pretty much, since I am getting stung with all these broad generalizations and stereotypes I just give the same back. My extended family here are Mormon conservatives, and the conversations are polite. I don't bother them with talk about abortions, same-sex marriage, or go after their religious beliefs at all.

I would be happy to have a debate, so long as those that the other end realize:
a) That I am not condoning an act just because I argue against/for something.
b) That I am not a politician or lawyer, so I am not actually capable of imposing my beliefs or ideas on others.
c) That I don't protest and hold signs disrupting the peace, as there are more fun things to do with my time.
d) That if I think a thread is silly, even if I agree with the premise, I am going to apply the same level of sillyness in reply to the OP.

 

[Vigilante]

UNFORESEEN CIRCUMSTANCES!!!....You KNOW it will be coming down the road!

 

[JimBowie1958]

Yeah, that's it...use some more bad language and epithets...that really proves your point.

The FACT is that Civil Unions haven't been rejected by gays, but by the haters. THEY are the ones that said no to civil unions, not the gays. There is not a single state in the union where it was gays that shot them down, but in 19 it was the haters that said "nope, sorry queers you don't get civil unions either...it's too close to marriage".

So, ya'll had your chance and you blew it...now we got the whole thing and it's staying that way.

Your little dick licence isn't akin to a marriage license for straights. If you marry your 13 year old 1st cousin in Alabama, you're still married in CA where those things aren't permitted...but my legal marriage to my consenting adult non familial partner in CA is not recognized in your backwater Alabama. Marriage licenses aren't like concealed carry permits, you dolt...except for the gays. We only get our licenses in the states that issue them and recognize them...like your tiny penis license.

roflmao, you just cant make this stupid shit up, lolololol

Oh look, impotent bluster. You just can't dispute what I said. lolololol

I have completely refuted what you have said, but you are too stupid to realize it.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Unchecked rage is the calling card of the 'party of no', they are 'oppressed' angry white men, and Ann Coulter clones (a Republican social experiment after turning all women into docile robots was determined unfeasible). But that said, a lot of them are in the closet and hate gays because they are confused specimens of sexuality i.e. in Congress they attack same-sex marriage, the next minute they are with male escorts.

*awaits more rage*

Is it true that you suck at least twelve cocks every morning?

piss off child.

When you have nothing but a personal attack/insult....it means you've got.....well, nothing.

More proof of your stupidity. If I list five rational points to support my claim and end it with an accurate assessment of the counterparts deficiency, that does not negate the five rational points made, nit wit.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Is it true that you suck at least twelve cocks every morning?

piss off child.

When you have nothing but a personal attack/insult....it means you've got.....well, nothing.

Pretty much, since I am getting stung with all these broad generalizations and stereotypes I just give the same back. My extended family here are Mormon conservatives, and the conversations are polite. I don't bother them with talk about abortions, same-sex marriage, or go after their religious beliefs at all.

I would be happy to have a debate, so long as those that the other end realize:
a) That I am not condoning an act just because I argue against/for something.
b) That I am not a politician or lawyer, so I am not actually capable of imposing my beliefs or ideas on others.
c) That I don't protest and hold signs disrupting the peace, as there are more fun things to do with my time.
d) That if I think a thread is silly, even if I agree with the premise, I am going to apply the same level of sillyness in reply to the OP.

You are hilariously stupid and demonstrate that point repeatedly.