Debbie Wasserman Shultz At It Again - Pushing More Garbage

[scruffy]

Has that been altered ?

Probably not.

 

[toobfreak]

Thanks a lot. I am going to have nightmares because of that picture.

I don't know what it is about progressive leftist women, but they all seem to be flat chested, always have ratty hair that looks unwashed, and an aversion to make up.

Here is a picture of Hillary taken years ago before she started having plastic surgery. Can you imagine her now?

 

[HikerGuy83]

I don't know what it is about progressive leftist women, but they all seem to be flat chested, always have ratty hair that looks unwashed, and an aversion to make up.

Here is a picture of Hillary taken years ago before she started having plastic surgery. Can you imagine her now?

View attachment 1042422

 

[Dekster]

Uh....she's never been right.

And that hasn't changed.

I wouldn't hire someone with 2 years experience to keep me out of jail let alone put them in charge of the legal system. Hell I wouldn't even vote for a guy that inexperienced to be a local prosecutor. She is right.

 

[luiza]

Another Jewish family defending their Deep State organisation .

But fear her husband Steve even more .
He is Deep State --- signed up to the WEF many years ago .

But more concerning ---he is officially a Prophet of God within the Elijah movement

That Crazy .

 

[Independent thinker]

The Hag is at it again.

This time over Tulsi Gabbard.

This thread is about what a disaster she is. Feel free to contribute to the pile on as we reveal what a leftist self-absorbed moron this snake-oil salesman....er wom.....er....not sure....is.

There’s a reason why MSNBC’s ratings have plummeted. No one wants to listen to the garbage they spew anymore, including Wasserface.

 

[kyzr]

No one cares what these "democrats" say, so why even give them notice?

Better to just ignore them.

 

[HikerGuy83]

I wouldn't hire someone with 2 years experience to keep me out of jail let alone put them in charge of the legal system. Hell I wouldn't even vote for a guy that inexperienced to be a local prosecutor. She is right.

Who are you talking about ?

 

[Dekster]

Who are you talking about ?

The very first person she talks about in the interview you posted.

 

[HikerGuy83]

The very first person she talks about in the interview you posted.

Yes, well my OP specifically is talking about Tulsi Gabbard so I wasn't sure.

I would agree that Gaetz is a bit of a reach.

Her pushing back on him only makes it less so in my mind (but it's still a reach.

She's a partisan idiot who is the closest thing to Democratic ROBOT I've ever witnessed.

 

[Hollie]

Saturday morning with my third quart of coffee and being entertained by the worst of the democrat retrogrades who are in full and uncontrolled meltdown as they lash out like petulant children.

Wasserman Schultz sparks backlash for claiming Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian asset

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., is facing backlash online for claiming that Tulsi Gabbard, President-elect Trump’s pick for Director of National Intelligence (DNI), is “likely a Russian asset."

www.foxnews.com

Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., is facing backlash for claiming that Tulsi Gabbard is 'likely a Russian asset'​

These losers will never be able to get past their Russia collusion sociopathy.

 

[odanny]

She is a likely Russian asset, this was long ago established, this is not news.

Welcome to 2024.

 

[shockedcanadian]

She could be for all we know. The evidence has to be provided to someone though and not just a fake dossier that was created a day or two after Gabbard sunk Harris in the 2019 Primaries which was the day she became the enemy of the Dems it seems.

Any politician or person with influence can be an agent, there would need to be serious evidence. This evidence most surely would have leader to her arrest by now, no?

 

[Hollie]

She is a likely Russian asset, this was long ago established, this is not news.

Welcome to 2024.

You spend way too much time immersed in your goofy conspiracy theories,

I can’t welcome you to the adult world as you’re immune.

 

[Oddball]

Saturday morning with my third quart of coffee and being entertained by the worst of the democrat retrogrades who are in full and uncontrolled meltdown as they lash out like petulant children.

Wasserman Schultz sparks backlash for claiming Tulsi Gabbard is a Russian asset

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., is facing backlash online for claiming that Tulsi Gabbard, President-elect Trump’s pick for Director of National Intelligence (DNI), is “likely a Russian asset."

www.foxnews.com

Congresswoman Debbie Wasserman Schultz, D-Fla., is facing backlash for claiming that Tulsi Gabbard is 'likely a Russian asset'​

These losers will never be able to get past their Russia collusion sociopathy.

One week into a 4-year term that hasn't even started yet....

 

[Yarddog]

She is a likely Russian asset, this was long ago established, this is not news.

Welcome to 2024.

Something "likely", is ESTABLISHED ! your so full of it as well as Schultz and others. If they are going to open their mouth they should back something like that up. Not say its "likely"

More political infighting crap.

 

[Oddball]

She is a likely Russian asset, this was long ago established, this is not news.

Welcome to 2024.

 

[Hollie]

She could be for all we know. The evidence has to be provided to someone though and not just a fake dossier that was created a day or two after Gabbard sunk Harris in the 2019 Primaries which was the day she became the enemy of the Dems it seems.

Any politician or person with influence can be an agent, there would need to be serious evidence. This evidence most surely would have leader to her arrest by now, no?

“For all we know”. As you are the spokesloon for some collective “we”, tell us what you know.

 

[Hollie]

She is a likely Russian asset, this was long ago established, this is not news.

Welcome to 2024.

You are likely under indictment for trading sexual favors to men on the street in exchange for vials of crack cocaine, right?

 

[odanny]

One can easily agree with Wasserman Schultz, however, where you would have to challenge her claim is in the language she used, a "Russian asset" being, in my opinion, someone who will work for some other entity (in this case, Putin) to further their aims and ambition.

Another explanation is someone working on behalf of, as in directly for, and DWS should not have used vague language, unless providing evidence of such work.

Not that I really care either way, just trying to help the cult out here.