DC appeals court says Trump is not immune (as a former president) from prosecution

[Lesh]

He did not charge them because the system is corrupt.

Wrong . Durham wasted four years and millions of dollars because Trump was trying to find something he could spin.

He couldn’t even find that

 

[Lastamender]

Wrong . Durham wasted four years and millions of dollars because Trump was trying to find something he could spin.

He couldn’t even find that

What did Mueller do when he knew there was no evidence? He did it anyway to perpetuate a hoax, a lie.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What did Mueller do when he knew there was no evidence?

He laid out the roadmap for a criminal obstruction case against Trump.

For starters.

 

[BS Filter]

Where are you going to find such an unethtical prosecutor?

So you believe using government to punish your political opponents is unethical? Oh my.

 

[BS Filter]

No. They won't. Trump has never been vindictive other than verbally toward his political opponents before and there is no reason to believe he will be now. He believes it is wrong to weaponize the government against your personal enemies.

I agree. I'm just trolling the dumb ass.

 

[Lastamender]

He laid out the roadmap for a criminal obstruction case against Trump.

For starters.

That senile **** only put his name on the investigation. Remember he did not know a main player in the game when he testified. A sham for stupid people to get behind.

The FBI knew RussiaGate was a lie — but hid that truth

Evidence revealed by special counsel John Durham proves it beyond dispute.

nypost.com

 

[Marener]

So you believe using government to punish your political opponents is unethical? Oh my.

Of course I do.

 

[Foxfyre]

I remember when you didn't like Trump. You figured out that you get more attention with this character.

It isn't a matter of liking or not liking Trump. There are a lot of us who are that fond of him personally, but we very much like his vision, courage, and policies that actually work for the American people.

And you don't have to like somebody to be deeply offended, alarmed, angry, bothered by a government weaponized against that person in ways that cannot be justified by any normal concept of good ethics.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

So you believe using government to punish your political opponents is unethical? Oh my.

...For no reason but them being political opponents? That isn't happening.

That's what you cultists want.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It isn't a matter of liking or not liking Trump. There are a lot of us who are that fond of him personally, but we very much like his vision, courage, and policies that actually work for the American people.

And you don't have to like somebody to be deeply offended, alarmed, angry, bothered by a government weaponized against that person in ways that cannot be justified by any normal concept of good ethics.

Wrong of course. Silly lies.

It's about liking Trump. That's why you have a defense at the ready for every criminal and sexually predatory thing he does.


Because you adore him.

There's no getting around it, sorry.

And it was Trump who tried to weaponize the DOJ aganst his political opponents. Not Biden. Biden has no control over the special prosecutor.

So as always, your post is full of lies that are only true of your cult and of the orange slob.

 

[Foxfyre]

What hilarious cult horseshit.

Trump tried to sic the DOJ on his political enemies. He was told to go diddle himself.

You can try to back that up with any credible source. You won't be able to.

 

[Foxfyre]

Oh horse shit. You read his mind now?


Sheesh

I listen to what he says and watch what he does. You won't be able to find any credible source that says he weaponized the DOJ against any of his political opponents.

 

[Foxfyre]

It’s not a matter of what Trump is or wants. The DoJ is committed to being non-partisan. He never had the support from prosecutors to do anything unethical.

It’s only a question as to whether a second term Trump would be able to transform government agencies to do his bidding.

Theyre already developing plans to do just that.

The fight to stop a cornerstone of Trump's 'retribution' agenda is underway

At issue is Schedule F, an executive order signed by Trump that would make it easier for a president to fire government workers.

www.nbcnews.com

I'm not saying the DOJ won't be going after real crimes that matter. But it will be real crimes that matter to the American people and not manufactured crimes or exaggerated crimes to punish people that offend or threaten Trump.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You can try to back that up with any credible source. You won't be able to.

In cult land, the only credible sources are those that tongue bathe Trump.

I know. If it is a letter from the former Attorney General, for example, you will just accuse him of being a disgruntled ex employee.

You only have about 4 tools in the toolbox, and I have seen them all.

 

[Lesh]

I listen to what he says and watch what he does. You won't be able to find any credible source that says he weaponized the DOJ against any of his political opponents.

Not Durham? Not Billy Barr?

You’re stupid or lying. Pick one. I say both

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Not Durham? Not Billy Barr?

You’re stupid or lying. Pick one. I say both

We don't actually need a source to "claim it".

The letter from the AG to his lesser prosecutor was dug up via FOIA.

 

[BS Filter]

Of course I do.

Then tell democrats to stop harassing President Trump.

 

[Lesh]

Then tell democrats to stop harassing President Trump.

Holding to account is not harassing

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Then tell democrats to stop harassing President Trump.

Awwww, poor orange baby

 

[Marener]

Then tell democrats to stop harassing President Trump.

I don’t think the federal prosecutors of Trump are motivated by politics.