David Icke from 1996....should sound rather familiar...

Funding both sides in a war doesn't sound profitable.
Germany didn't pay back Nazi loans after WWII.
The US didn't pay back Confederate loans after the Civil War.
 
One is going to win....That's when the big payday happens.
Leading up to the war. Most people for example don't know that Ford engines drove a large division of the panzer II for hitler.

Then the other motivation as was pointed out is the restructuring of the world economic form or paradigm.

Beware the military industrial complex. Eisenhower
 
Loan $1 billion to the winners, $1 billion to the losers.

Looks like you lost 50%. Why is the "big payday" going
to make up for that?
The war contractors make the boat loads leading up to the war. Then, after the war they must now rebuild the mass loss of war machines, guns, ammunition, ships, planes and on and on....
 
The war contractors make the boat loads leading up to the war. Then, after the war they must now rebuild the mass loss of war machines, guns, ammunition, ships, planes and on and on....

We were talking about banks lending to both sides, not military supplies.
 
everytime money changes hands banks somewhere make money,,

this case is a guaranteed payment for decades to come

everytime money changes hands banks somewhere make money,,

LOL!

this case is a guaranteed payment for decades to come

Far as I've seen, banks that lent to the losers.....lost.
 
broaden your sights,,

every bank that lent money got rich and most still exist to this day and the others were consumed by them,

every bank that lent money got rich

Lending to Nazis was profitable? Why do you feel that way? Any evidence?

Did the banks that lost billions on bad mortgages really make money?
 

Forum List

Back
Top