I'm gonna predict that Democrat supporters will either be unable to refute any of the documentation proving the title, or will be reduced to the usual "is not, issssssssss nooooottttttttt!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!'
1.
“CNN blatantly lies about Governor Abbott and the COVID superspreader that Biden is running at the border …accused Governor Greg Abbott of accusing Biden of exposing Texans to COVID
“without evidence”: Gov. Greg Abbott, who has said
without evidence that migrants expose Texans to Covid-19, is stalling a federal offer to test people released from custody. Does CNN even bother to read the news?
It was NBC News which ran the article
two days ago, which we were among the
first to cover:
After Border Patrol release, asylum-seekers test positive for Covid-19 in Brownsville, Texas.
https://thhttps://therightscoop.com/cnn-blatantly-lies-about-governor-abbott-and-the-covid-superspreader-that-biden-is-running-at-the-border/
NEXT!!
2. We have learned….from the state media….that none of the hundreds of Biden voter riots count…..the only one that matters is the
‘Armed Insurrection at the Capitol”!!!
When a Republican calls their lie, well…then PolitiFact calls him a liar…’Pants On Fire!’
“Says Jan. 6 Capitol riot “didn’t seem like an armed insurrection.”
U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisconsin, still claims accounts of
the day’s events are being exaggerated. He made his case Feb. 15, 2021, in an
appearance on "The Jay Weber Show" on WISN radio.
"The fact of the matter is
this didn’t seem like an armed insurrection to me. I mean armed, when you hear armed, don’t you think of firearms?" Johnson said. "Here’s the questions I would have liked to ask.
How many firearms were confiscated? How many shots were fired? I’m only aware of one, and I’ll defend that law enforcement officer for taking that shot." PolitiFact - Yes, Jan. 6 Capitol assault was an “armed insurrection”
But….the FBI supported the Republican's contention:
“How many firearms were confiscated in the Capitol or on Capitol grounds that day?
To my knowledge
we have not recovered any on that day from any other arrests at the scene at this point.
So
nobody has been charged with any firearm weapon in the Capitol or on Capitol grounds.
Correct.”
Update: FBI Counterterrorism Official Says She Has No Knowledge of Firearms Recovered During Jan. 6 Capitol Breach
And…
FBI assistant director for counterterrorism Jill Sanborn confirmed in a Senate hearing that no guns were recovered during the Capitol protests on Jan 6
www.lawenforcementtoday.com
They lie about everything.
really.
AUSTIN, Texas (AP) — As he ended Texas’ coronavirus restrictions Wednesday over the objections of public health officials, Republican Gov.
apnews.com
so, both items. border coronavirus insignificant, according to AP, who is the most unbiased an reliable source. Then we have this guy at capitol charged for brining a gun. Seems like the problem is these far right news sources.
Wait.....you are using as your 'proof' a source that proffered dozens of lies.....
Democrats lie about everything….on what basis would any of their fabricated data be considered valid???
Here the prism through which every Democrat pronouncement should be viewed: First collusion, collusion, collusion, Russia, Russia, Russia, Obstruction, Obstruction, Obstruction. Racist, Racist, Racist, Impeach, Impeach, Impeach, Recession, Recession, Recession, Emoluments, 25th amendment, Stormy Daniels, lies about Charlottesville fine Nazis, Kurds, Ukraine, Quid Pro Quo, ‘lynching,’ the Kavanaugh hoax, the GAO charges, Lev Parnas, impeachment, coronavirus ‘hoax,’
General Flynn perjury trap, no evidence of voter fraud in the stolen election.....
Don’t forget the Democrats told you that Trump was colluding with Russia…and that wasn’t true. They also told you that so was Naval Academy grad Carter Page and so was George Papadopoulos and so was General Michael Flynn, a three star general and former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency….and all of that was a lie. How stupid must one be to keep believing what they say?
...and, AOC lying about her near-death experience in the Capitol Riots.....when she wasn't even in the Capitol.
And that Biden voters as agents provocateur weren't behind the Capitol Riot.....and that Pelosi knew and refused to allow extra security. They lie about everything.......yet here you are, ready to swallow the next lie.
FakeStories: Three years of Russian Collusion stories; altering documents at the DoJ and FBI to railroad political opponents; the state media burying the Hunter Biden Scandal what with Joe getting 10% of the bribes; stories about Kavanaugh rape parties, and Covington Catholic School; Carter Page working for Russia when he was actually working for the CIA….where were those ‘fact checkers’? The great lie that there was an ‘insurrection’ January 6th.
What should you do when
they lied to you at least these 25 times already???????????
THIS IS WHAT YOU TURN TO AS PROOF??????????????
You've got a gish gallop there; 3 new items:
For the russian "collusion", its proven here with manafort giving secret campaign polling data to russia:
WASHINGTON (AP) — It was one of the more tantalizing, yet unresolved, questions of the investigation into possible connections between Russia and Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign: Why was a business associate of campaign chairman Paul Manafort given internal polling data — and what did he d
apnews.com
And there is
senate intel report expanding on that subject more.
On the next subject of
pelosi and capitol security, she isnt responsible for it. The
actual reason for delay of capitol security is here.
And the last subject of Flynn perjury trap:
A perjury trap would be if a prosecutor asked someone something totally unrelated to the case at hand, maybe something embarrassing which the defendant had a reasonable motive to lie about, thereby using the power of the station to artificially create an unfair environment in which a defendant is pressured into committing a crime that can be used against him in the original criminal case where evidence is slim.
Being interviewed about, and lying about, facts directly related to the case you are being investigated for is
not a perjury trap. If you committed a crime, and investigators have enough probably cause to pick you up for questioning, and you
lie about the circumstances or crimes they're asking you about, that's just plain perjury, or obstruction, depending. You have an obligation to tell them the truth because investigators and prosecutors have the mandate of pursuing justice. What Flynn did was a crime, he knew it was a crime, and he lied about it to try and get out of trouble.
But asking someone about something in their private life that you know or suspect they want to keep secret, the details of which have
nothing to do with that mandate to pursue justice, and then prosecuting them based on their deception in that matter,
that would be the perjury trap.
Let's say a guy is on trial for bank robbery. He is also cheating on his wife with a mistress. These two have nothing to do with one another. Maybe his mistress has been out of the country for a year and isn't connected to the crime in any way.
But let's say my evidence against him for the bank robbery is extremely slim, but because I had detectives watching the guy, I know he's been seeing another woman on the side. I know this has nothing to do with my charge to get justice for the bank robbery. But I ask him, under oath, "have you ever had sexual relations outside of your marriage". To which he says, "no," because he doesn't want his wife to find out. He doesn't want it on record that he's having an affair. Which is reasonable. I have no real cause to ask this thing of him.
But then, when I fail to find any evidence on him for bank robbery, and it becomes clear I might lose this case or have wasted countless hours on the wrong man, I submit proof he was having an affair, and try to prosecute him on perjury.
The reason this is a form of prosecutorial misconduct is because
the prosecutors created the circumstance in which we knew the defendant would be compelled to lie about something not even connected to our case.
Does this sound familiar?
It should,
because it's exactly what Republicans did to Bill Clinton.
The Whitewater investigation was about the Clintons' real estate holdings. They found nothing, but in the course of their exhaustive and wasteful investigation, discovered evidence of an extramarital affair which had absolutely nothing to do with their original investigation, and pressured Clinton, causing him to lie about the affair, which itself was not illegal, but was embarrassing, which gave Republicans the chance to impeach him on... you guessed it, lying under oath, also called perjury.
There's literally nothing these people do that isn't projection.