Dan Crenshaw crushes Bill Maher

[ColonelAngus]

What were Crenshaw’s lies? Specifically.

Listed above. Read the thread.

Lied about Pelosi introducing a bill. Lied about when the bill was introduces. Lied about who introduced it. Lied about what it did.

The No Ban Act was introduced a year ago, not days after the travel restrictions were announced. It was not going to stop Trump from doing anything. Crenshaw lies about to make the viewer believe the act was a direct response to Trump’s travel restrictions which is used to support the false narrative that Trump’s restrictions were universally opposed. It’s a lie. Didn’t happen. He’s gaslighting you.

Wow. Crenshaw is a lying POS.

Who tells the truth? From where should I get my news?

Print media is typically the most reliable. They spend the most time, gather the most facts, and aren't bound by the sensationalist TV and internet news cycles which are too short for any in depth reporting.

Crenshaw is a liar.

Print media?

Who specifically? Can I go to my local Walgreens and ask for print media?

From where should I get accurate news?

I subscribe to the NY Times and WaPo. They're pretty reliable. Reuters, ProPublica and a handful of others are good too. I like reading New Yorker from time to time. WSJ is okay but too technical. The Economist is a good one for outside perspective since they're European based. Foreign Policy is good, but low volume.

The NYT reported that Trump is a Russian spy for 3 years. Was that accurate?

No. It didn't.

You think these people read the NY Times?

Of course not. They just are told what it said.

The New York Times repeatedly said for 3 years that Trump and Putin stole the election on 2016. Was that accurate?

Except they never said that and you are just shamelessly making up bullshit as usual.

It's just what you do.

It’s what you do. You make up shameless bullshit,

 

[ColonelAngus]

So beautiful

Maher is a dipshit. He's a good example of someone with no desire for intellectual honesty.

Maher feels better about himself saying "Trump does nothing but lie, finger point yadda yadda". Why do people like him consider themselves smart and educated when they consistently say things that cannot possibly be true? Yet they run at the mouth anyway, simply because it makes them feel better about themselves.

Isn’t it hilarious how lame he is without his sycophant crowd?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Ah, no. It doesn't. You don't even know what it does. Read the bill. It does not prevent the president from enacting travel restrictions.

The REAL title of the bill is National Origin-Based Antidiscrimination for Nonimmigrants Act :

This bill imposes limitations on the President's authority to suspend or restrict aliens from entering the United States and terminates certain presidential actions implementing such restrictions. It also prohibits religious discrimination in various immigration-related decisions, such as whether to issue an immigrant or non-immigrant visa, unless there is a statutory basis for such discrimination.

Before imposing a restriction, the State Department and DHS shall consult with Congress. The State Department and DHS shall report to Congress about the restriction within 48 hours of the restriction's imposition. If such a report is not made, the restriction shall immediately terminate.

Tell me what you think this bill does?

The China travel restriction would have been immediately terminated!!!!

It goes even further, to potentially give China (by way of its ONE BILLION people) causes of action to file lawsuits against the FedGov and BANKRUPT the U.S.

Individuals or entities present in the United States and unlawfully harmed by such a restriction may sue in federal court.



.

 

[colfax_m]

Ah, no. It doesn't. You don't even know what it does. Read the bill. It does not prevent the president from enacting travel restrictions.

The REAL title of the bill is National Origin-Based Antidiscrimination for Nonimmigrants Act :

This bill imposes limitations on the President's authority to suspend or restrict aliens from entering the United States and terminates certain presidential actions implementing such restrictions. It also prohibits religious discrimination in various immigration-related decisions, such as whether to issue an immigrant or non-immigrant visa, unless there is a statutory basis for such discrimination.

Before imposing a restriction, the State Department and DHS shall consult with Congress. The State Department and DHS shall report to Congress about the restriction within 48 hours of the restriction's imposition. If such a report is not made, the restriction shall immediately terminate.

Tell me what you think this bill does?

The China travel restriction would have been immediately terminated!!!!

It goes even further, to potentially give China (by way of its ONE BILLION people) causes of action to file lawsuits against the FedGov and BANKRUPT the U.S.

Individuals or entities present in the United States and unlawfully harmed by such a restriction may sue in federal court.



.

It requires the president to tell Congress why he’s doing something.

What makes you say Trump’s ban would have been immediately terminated?

 

[Nostra]

What were Crenshaw’s lies? Specifically.

Listed above. Read the thread.

Lied about Pelosi introducing a bill. Lied about when the bill was introduces. Lied about who introduced it. Lied about what it did.

The No Ban Act was introduced a year ago, not days after the travel restrictions were announced. It was not going to stop Trump from doing anything. Crenshaw lies about to make the viewer believe the act was a direct response to Trump’s travel restrictions which is used to support the false narrative that Trump’s restrictions were universally opposed. It’s a lie. Didn’t happen. He’s gaslighting you.

Wow. Crenshaw is a lying POS.

Who tells the truth? From where should I get my news?

Print media is typically the most reliable. They spend the most time, gather the most facts, and aren't bound by the sensationalist TV and internet news cycles which are too short for any in depth reporting.

Crenshaw is a liar.

List his lies.

 

[Ken Mac]

Maher hasn’t been terribly relevant for a long time. Crenshaw lies repeatedly in this interview and I’ve only watched a few minutes.

List the lies. You aren't providing any value with your comment.

Maher isn't relevant in your mind so that makes a valid reason for "Nothing to see here" attitude of yours? Mahers relevance makes the video irrelevant? That's certainly a logical fallacy.

 

[Ken Mac]

Maher hasn’t been terribly relevant for a long time. Crenshaw lies repeatedly in this interview and I’ve only watched a few minutes.

What did he lie about?

.

For starters he claims that there was widespread condemnation of Trump’s travel ban. There wasn’t. He even claims Biden had stated he wouldn’t have done it. Also false. He also claimed Pelosi introduced legislation the day that Trump enacted travel restrictions that would have prevented Trump from doing so. That’s a three sided lie. Pelosi didn’t introduce it. It was introduced a year ago. And it wouldn’t have stopped Trump from enacting restrictions.

The condemnation of trump's travel ban was on the news cycle for OVER a week. It was widespread. Biden DID say he wouldn't have done it. The Pelosi thing is to convoluted. I'm not going into that shit but to say - She DID bring up the legislation on 1/31. Coincidental? Nope. Not a ******* chance. That's the point.

 

[colfax_m]

Maher hasn’t been terribly relevant for a long time. Crenshaw lies repeatedly in this interview and I’ve only watched a few minutes.

List the lies. You aren't providing any value with your comment.

Maher isn't relevant in your mind so that makes a valid reason for "Nothing to see here" attitude of yours? Mahers relevance makes the video irrelevant? That's certainly a logical fallacy.

Keep reading the thread. I listed numerous lies.

 

[colfax_m]

Maher hasn’t been terribly relevant for a long time. Crenshaw lies repeatedly in this interview and I’ve only watched a few minutes.

What did he lie about?

.

For starters he claims that there was widespread condemnation of Trump’s travel ban. There wasn’t. He even claims Biden had stated he wouldn’t have done it. Also false. He also claimed Pelosi introduced legislation the day that Trump enacted travel restrictions that would have prevented Trump from doing so. That’s a three sided lie. Pelosi didn’t introduce it. It was introduced a year ago. And it wouldn’t have stopped Trump from enacting restrictions.

The condemnation of trump's travel ban was on the news cycle for OVER a week. It was widespread. Biden DID say he wouldn't have done it. The Pelosi thing is to convoluted. I'm not going into that shit but to say - She DID bring up the legislation on 1/31. Coincidental? Nope. Not a ******* chance. That's the point.

No, condemnation wasn’t all over the media. It was barely discussed. The most I’ve found is condemnation from a travel blogger in an OpEd The NY Times.

Biden did not say he wouldn’t have done it. Pelosi didn’t bring up the legislation on 1/31, she brought it up on 1/27. There goes your coincidence.

The House will soon vote on a bill to repeal Trump’s travel ban — as he gears up to expand it

Nancy Pelosi says she will bring the NO BAN Act to the floor in the coming weeks.

www.vox.com

 

[Ken Mac]

Maher hasn’t been terribly relevant for a long time. Crenshaw lies repeatedly in this interview and I’ve only watched a few minutes.

What did he lie about?

.

For starters he claims that there was widespread condemnation of Trump’s travel ban. There wasn’t. He even claims Biden had stated he wouldn’t have done it. Also false. He also claimed Pelosi introduced legislation the day that Trump enacted travel restrictions that would have prevented Trump from doing so. That’s a three sided lie. Pelosi didn’t introduce it. It was introduced a year ago. And it wouldn’t have stopped Trump from enacting restrictions.

The condemnation of trump's travel ban was on the news cycle for OVER a week. It was widespread. Biden DID say he wouldn't have done it. The Pelosi thing is to convoluted. I'm not going into that shit but to say - She DID bring up the legislation on 1/31. Coincidental? Nope. Not a ******* chance. That's the point.

No, condemnation wasn’t all over the media. It was barely discussed. The most I’ve found is condemnation from a travel blogger in an OpEd The NY Times.

Biden did not say he wouldn’t have done it. Pelosi didn’t bring up the legislation on 1/31, she brought it up on 1/27. There goes your coincidence.

The House will soon vote on a bill to repeal Trump’s travel ban — as he gears up to expand it

Nancy Pelosi says she will bring the NO BAN Act to the floor in the coming weeks.

www.vox.com

You don't think she had wind of what Trump was going to do about a travel ban on 1/27? It was being talked about for almost two weeks prior to. So - yeah - It's NOT coincidental.

 

[colfax_m]

Maher hasn’t been terribly relevant for a long time. Crenshaw lies repeatedly in this interview and I’ve only watched a few minutes.

What did he lie about?

.

For starters he claims that there was widespread condemnation of Trump’s travel ban. There wasn’t. He even claims Biden had stated he wouldn’t have done it. Also false. He also claimed Pelosi introduced legislation the day that Trump enacted travel restrictions that would have prevented Trump from doing so. That’s a three sided lie. Pelosi didn’t introduce it. It was introduced a year ago. And it wouldn’t have stopped Trump from enacting restrictions.

The condemnation of trump's travel ban was on the news cycle for OVER a week. It was widespread. Biden DID say he wouldn't have done it. The Pelosi thing is to convoluted. I'm not going into that shit but to say - She DID bring up the legislation on 1/31. Coincidental? Nope. Not a ******* chance. That's the point.

No, condemnation wasn’t all over the media. It was barely discussed. The most I’ve found is condemnation from a travel blogger in an OpEd The NY Times.

Biden did not say he wouldn’t have done it. Pelosi didn’t bring up the legislation on 1/31, she brought it up on 1/27. There goes your coincidence.

The House will soon vote on a bill to repeal Trump’s travel ban — as he gears up to expand it

Nancy Pelosi says she will bring the NO BAN Act to the floor in the coming weeks.

www.vox.com

You don't think she had wind of what Trump was going to do about a travel ban on 1/27? It was being talked about for almost two weeks prior to. So - yeah - It's NOT coincidental.

No. She had wind that he was applying a travel ban to some African nations and had nothing to do with COVID-19. So you’re guesses are completely at odds with reality.

Here’s Pelosi’s statement. Is 100% clear why it was brought up.

Pelosi Statement on President Trump’s Expanded Travel Ban

The Trump Administration’s expansion of its outrageous, un-American travel ban threatens our security, our values and the rule of law. The sweeping rule, barring more than 350 million individuals from predominantly African nations from traveling to the United States, is discrimination disguised...

www.speaker.gov

 

[Ken Mac]

Maher hasn’t been terribly relevant for a long time. Crenshaw lies repeatedly in this interview and I’ve only watched a few minutes.

What did he lie about?

.

For starters he claims that there was widespread condemnation of Trump’s travel ban. There wasn’t. He even claims Biden had stated he wouldn’t have done it. Also false. He also claimed Pelosi introduced legislation the day that Trump enacted travel restrictions that would have prevented Trump from doing so. That’s a three sided lie. Pelosi didn’t introduce it. It was introduced a year ago. And it wouldn’t have stopped Trump from enacting restrictions.

The condemnation of trump's travel ban was on the news cycle for OVER a week. It was widespread. Biden DID say he wouldn't have done it. The Pelosi thing is to convoluted. I'm not going into that shit but to say - She DID bring up the legislation on 1/31. Coincidental? Nope. Not a ******* chance. That's the point.

No, condemnation wasn’t all over the media. It was barely discussed. The most I’ve found is condemnation from a travel blogger in an OpEd The NY Times.

Biden did not say he wouldn’t have done it. Pelosi didn’t bring up the legislation on 1/31, she brought it up on 1/27. There goes your coincidence.

The House will soon vote on a bill to repeal Trump’s travel ban — as he gears up to expand it

Nancy Pelosi says she will bring the NO BAN Act to the floor in the coming weeks.

www.vox.com

You don't think she had wind of what Trump was going to do about a travel ban on 1/27? It was being talked about for almost two weeks prior to. So - yeah - It's NOT coincidental.

No. She had wind that he was applying a travel ban to some African nations and had nothing to do with COVID-19. So you’re guesses are completely at odds with reality.

Here’s Pelosi’s statement. Is 100% clear why it was brought up.

Pelosi Statement on President Trump’s Expanded Travel Ban

The Trump Administration’s expansion of its outrageous, un-American travel ban threatens our security, our values and the rule of law. The sweeping rule, barring more than 350 million individuals from predominantly African nations from traveling to the United States, is discrimination disguised...

www.speaker.gov

She knew it would apply to China. Don't give me that line. You're being duped.

 

[colfax_m]

Maher hasn’t been terribly relevant for a long time. Crenshaw lies repeatedly in this interview and I’ve only watched a few minutes.

What did he lie about?

.

For starters he claims that there was widespread condemnation of Trump’s travel ban. There wasn’t. He even claims Biden had stated he wouldn’t have done it. Also false. He also claimed Pelosi introduced legislation the day that Trump enacted travel restrictions that would have prevented Trump from doing so. That’s a three sided lie. Pelosi didn’t introduce it. It was introduced a year ago. And it wouldn’t have stopped Trump from enacting restrictions.

The condemnation of trump's travel ban was on the news cycle for OVER a week. It was widespread. Biden DID say he wouldn't have done it. The Pelosi thing is to convoluted. I'm not going into that shit but to say - She DID bring up the legislation on 1/31. Coincidental? Nope. Not a ******* chance. That's the point.

No, condemnation wasn’t all over the media. It was barely discussed. The most I’ve found is condemnation from a travel blogger in an OpEd The NY Times.

Biden did not say he wouldn’t have done it. Pelosi didn’t bring up the legislation on 1/31, she brought it up on 1/27. There goes your coincidence.

The House will soon vote on a bill to repeal Trump’s travel ban — as he gears up to expand it

Nancy Pelosi says she will bring the NO BAN Act to the floor in the coming weeks.

www.vox.com

You don't think she had wind of what Trump was going to do about a travel ban on 1/27? It was being talked about for almost two weeks prior to. So - yeah - It's NOT coincidental.

No. She had wind that he was applying a travel ban to some African nations and had nothing to do with COVID-19. So you’re guesses are completely at odds with reality.

Here’s Pelosi’s statement. Is 100% clear why it was brought up.

Pelosi Statement on President Trump’s Expanded Travel Ban

The Trump Administration’s expansion of its outrageous, un-American travel ban threatens our security, our values and the rule of law. The sweeping rule, barring more than 350 million individuals from predominantly African nations from traveling to the United States, is discrimination disguised...

www.speaker.gov

She knew it would apply to China. Don't give me that line. You're being duped.

You’re just making shit up. The only one that was duped is you. Crenshaw said an obvious lie and you repeated it. Now you’re making shit up to cover for your own gullibility.

 

[Ken Mac]

Maher hasn’t been terribly relevant for a long time. Crenshaw lies repeatedly in this interview and I’ve only watched a few minutes.

What did he lie about?

.

For starters he claims that there was widespread condemnation of Trump’s travel ban. There wasn’t. He even claims Biden had stated he wouldn’t have done it. Also false. He also claimed Pelosi introduced legislation the day that Trump enacted travel restrictions that would have prevented Trump from doing so. That’s a three sided lie. Pelosi didn’t introduce it. It was introduced a year ago. And it wouldn’t have stopped Trump from enacting restrictions.

The condemnation of trump's travel ban was on the news cycle for OVER a week. It was widespread. Biden DID say he wouldn't have done it. The Pelosi thing is to convoluted. I'm not going into that shit but to say - She DID bring up the legislation on 1/31. Coincidental? Nope. Not a ******* chance. That's the point.

No, condemnation wasn’t all over the media. It was barely discussed. The most I’ve found is condemnation from a travel blogger in an OpEd The NY Times.

Biden did not say he wouldn’t have done it. Pelosi didn’t bring up the legislation on 1/31, she brought it up on 1/27. There goes your coincidence.

The House will soon vote on a bill to repeal Trump’s travel ban — as he gears up to expand it

Nancy Pelosi says she will bring the NO BAN Act to the floor in the coming weeks.

www.vox.com

You don't think she had wind of what Trump was going to do about a travel ban on 1/27? It was being talked about for almost two weeks prior to. So - yeah - It's NOT coincidental.

No. She had wind that he was applying a travel ban to some African nations and had nothing to do with COVID-19. So you’re guesses are completely at odds with reality.

Here’s Pelosi’s statement. Is 100% clear why it was brought up.

Pelosi Statement on President Trump’s Expanded Travel Ban

The Trump Administration’s expansion of its outrageous, un-American travel ban threatens our security, our values and the rule of law. The sweeping rule, barring more than 350 million individuals from predominantly African nations from traveling to the United States, is discrimination disguised...

www.speaker.gov

She knew it would apply to China. Don't give me that line. You're being duped.

You’re just making shit up. The only one that was duped is you. Crenshaw said an obvious lie and you repeated it. Now you’re making shit up to cover for your own gullibility.

Ok - let's say you're right for expediency sake. What about the so called other "Lies". Did he provide anything of substance that you believed? Why did it shut down Maher? Maher was at a loss to say anything. He was being ridden like a pony at a petting zoo. He was owned. For good reason too - His view was skewed and wrong.

 

[colfax_m]

Maher hasn’t been terribly relevant for a long time. Crenshaw lies repeatedly in this interview and I’ve only watched a few minutes.

What did he lie about?

.

For starters he claims that there was widespread condemnation of Trump’s travel ban. There wasn’t. He even claims Biden had stated he wouldn’t have done it. Also false. He also claimed Pelosi introduced legislation the day that Trump enacted travel restrictions that would have prevented Trump from doing so. That’s a three sided lie. Pelosi didn’t introduce it. It was introduced a year ago. And it wouldn’t have stopped Trump from enacting restrictions.

The condemnation of trump's travel ban was on the news cycle for OVER a week. It was widespread. Biden DID say he wouldn't have done it. The Pelosi thing is to convoluted. I'm not going into that shit but to say - She DID bring up the legislation on 1/31. Coincidental? Nope. Not a ******* chance. That's the point.

No, condemnation wasn’t all over the media. It was barely discussed. The most I’ve found is condemnation from a travel blogger in an OpEd The NY Times.

Biden did not say he wouldn’t have done it. Pelosi didn’t bring up the legislation on 1/31, she brought it up on 1/27. There goes your coincidence.

The House will soon vote on a bill to repeal Trump’s travel ban — as he gears up to expand it

Nancy Pelosi says she will bring the NO BAN Act to the floor in the coming weeks.

www.vox.com

You don't think she had wind of what Trump was going to do about a travel ban on 1/27? It was being talked about for almost two weeks prior to. So - yeah - It's NOT coincidental.

No. She had wind that he was applying a travel ban to some African nations and had nothing to do with COVID-19. So you’re guesses are completely at odds with reality.

Here’s Pelosi’s statement. Is 100% clear why it was brought up.

Pelosi Statement on President Trump’s Expanded Travel Ban

The Trump Administration’s expansion of its outrageous, un-American travel ban threatens our security, our values and the rule of law. The sweeping rule, barring more than 350 million individuals from predominantly African nations from traveling to the United States, is discrimination disguised...

www.speaker.gov

She knew it would apply to China. Don't give me that line. You're being duped.

You’re just making shit up. The only one that was duped is you. Crenshaw said an obvious lie and you repeated it. Now you’re making shit up to cover for your own gullibility.

Ok - let's say you're right for expediency sake. What about the so called other "Lies". Did he provide anything of substance that you believed? Why did it shut down Maher? Maher was at a loss to say anything. He was being ridden like a pony at a petting zoo. He was owned. For good reason too - His view was skewed and wrong.

Pretty easy to “own” someone when you can just make up whatever you want.

Still looking for evidence of this widespread condemnation. For something so prevalent, there seems to be very little substantiation.