Creationists

[Hollie]

No matter how hard they work at trying to build the puzzle there will always be missing pieces showing this theory to be fabricated from vivid minds.

You're in denial as the entirety of science. The history of knowledge has been to reduce the fear and superstition that defines the worldview you espouse. Living in fear and ignorance is a sad existence. Living in denial of the natural world in favor of comforting myths of a father figure who is watching over you is attempting to escape from reality.

There is no escaping reality we are surrounded by it.

Reality, by definition. is separate from your spirit world of supernatural gods and unverified claims to miraculous events. Your attempted escapes from reality are your own to come to terms with.

 

[Hollie]

Can you reconize conjecture when you see it ? Like i said before all things would have to had been genetically related according to your sides own reasoning on Dna similarity.

It is so dang rediculous how your side ignores problems for your theory,your side simply looks away at contradicting evidence or give some explanation that is filled with conjecture why is that ?

Youwerecreated, do you think that you were created on an off day?

I am the product of natural laws put in to motion, so are you and everything around us. Everything is here for a reason this all did not simply happen by luck or chance. If a piece of your brain was missing you would not function properly. How can you take obvious evidence of design and pervert it with your biased logic.

You rattle on about your designer gawds yet you consistently fail to offer support for these gawds.

 

[Hollie]

Some more creationist ass-whooping.




10th Foundational Falsehood of Creationism - YouTube

Can you reconize conjecture when you see it ? Like i said before all things would have to had been genetically related according to your sides own reasoning on Dna similarity.

It is so dang rediculous how your side ignores problems for your theory,your side simply looks away at contradicting evidence or give some explanation that is filled with conjecture why is that ?

The fact that you don't understand the theory is what causes you such angst.

 

[UltimateReality]

Haha... no, they are not. They are idiotic misconceptions of reality, far from anything one might call "fact."

No matter how hard they work at trying to build the puzzle there will always be missing pieces showing this theory to be fabricated from vivid minds.

You're in denial as the entirety of science...

You wish ID Theorist and Christian Creationists were all or nothing when it comes to science. You keep repeated this slogan as if it will come true. However, you are discounting 3000 years of scientific enquiry made by scientists of the Judeo-Christian religion. You do this over and over, just like a good little atheistic revisionist should. FYI, no one is fallling for it.

 

[UltimateReality]

Youwerecreated, do you think that you were created on an off day?

I am the product of natural laws put in to motion, so are you and everything around us. Everything is here for a reason this all did not simply happen by luck or chance. If a piece of your brain was missing you would not function properly. How can you take obvious evidence of design and pervert it with your biased logic.

You rattle on about your designer gawds yet you consistently fail to offer support for these gawds.

Done, numerous times, whether you choose to ignore it or not. This is not surprising, since you have failed to grasp over and over the fact that the majority of posters here believe in one God and the fact that you can't seem to differentiate between myself and YWC in 600 pages of posts. Have you been tested for attention deficit disorder?

 

[UltimateReality]

Some more creationist ass-whooping.




10th Foundational Falsehood of Creationism - YouTube

Can you reconize conjecture when you see it ? Like i said before all things would have to had been genetically related according to your sides own reasoning on Dna similarity.

It is so dang rediculous how your side ignores problems for your theory,your side simply looks away at contradicting evidence or give some explanation that is filled with conjecture why is that ?

The fact that you don't understand the theory is what causes you such angst.

And you do? You funny, funny shemale.

 

[Hollie]

Can you reconize conjecture when you see it ? Like i said before all things would have to had been genetically related according to your sides own reasoning on Dna similarity.

It is so dang rediculous how your side ignores problems for your theory,your side simply looks away at contradicting evidence or give some explanation that is filled with conjecture why is that ?

The fact that you don't understand the theory is what causes you such angst.

And you do? You funny, funny shemale.

Typical nonsense from the self-hating fundie.

 

[HUGGY]

I am the product of natural laws put in to motion, so are you and everything around us. Everything is here for a reason this all did not simply happen by luck or chance. If a piece of your brain was missing you would not function properly. How can you take obvious evidence of design and pervert it with your biased logic.

You rattle on about your designer gawds yet you consistently fail to offer support for these gawds.

Done, numerous times, whether you choose to ignore it or not. This is not surprising, since you have failed to grasp over and over the fact that the majority of posters here believe in one God and the fact that you can't seem to differentiate between myself and YWC in 600 pages of posts. Have you been tested for attention deficit disorder?

Truth is not encumbant on a poll or majority vote. "Most" people can be and are wrong much of the time. It has been a difficult road for intelligent people as much of the history of organised religion has focused it's "argument" towards agreement on murdering it's opposition. Pure publicly accepted reason is a very recent developement.

 

[Hollie]

I am the product of natural laws put in to motion, so are you and everything around us. Everything is here for a reason this all did not simply happen by luck or chance. If a piece of your brain was missing you would not function properly. How can you take obvious evidence of design and pervert it with your biased logic.

You rattle on about your designer gawds yet you consistently fail to offer support for these gawds.

Done, numerous times, whether you choose to ignore it or not. This is not surprising, since you have failed to grasp over and over the fact that the majority of posters here believe in one God and the fact that you can't seem to differentiate between myself and YWC in 600 pages of posts. Have you been tested for attention deficit disorder?

What you're unable to grasp is that you and the other fundie both are unable to offer support for your gawds so take the position of the science-loathing blowhard. You don't understand that your claims to one gawd or many is pointless absent any verification.

Here is some news for you: biological evolution is fact; the planet is older than 6,000 years and your self-hate is self-destructive. The only difference between you and the other fundie is the appalling lack vs. the abysmal lack of tact and education you both sorely are in need of.

 

[pjnlsn]

No matter how hard they work at trying to build the puzzle there will always be missing pieces showing this theory to be fabricated from vivid minds.

If you were to think that because not all is known, nothing is known, but this is false.

In any case, whatever glee you may have from that there are missing pieces, does not mean that the pieces found do not exist.

p.s. or perhaps you think that these people do not have all the pieces, but you have them all. Or perhaps you think that an effervescent being has all the pieces, and you identify strongly with this concept, but in both cases, assuming that it is indeed the belief in a god that you would associate with this, and again:

Also, You speak of "God" as if you know of it, or at least, as if, if the thing in question wanted something, with the assumption that it has a kind of personality, that you would know about it. But it is not known that there is, or has been, any kind of godly being, in any location, this being mostly due to that the definition, or at least, the most common one given, is so vague and insubstantial that it is not possible to prove it existing anywhere or anytime.

 

[UltimateReality]

You rattle on about your designer gawds yet you consistently fail to offer support for these gawds.

Done, numerous times, whether you choose to ignore it or not. This is not surprising, since you have failed to grasp over and over the fact that the majority of posters here believe in one God and the fact that you can't seem to differentiate between myself and YWC in 600 pages of posts. Have you been tested for attention deficit disorder?

What you're unable to grasp is that you and the other fundie both are unable to offer support for your gawds so take the position of the science-loathing blowhard. You don't understand that your claims to one gawd or many is pointless absent any verification.

Here is some news for you: biological evolution is fact; the planet is older than 6,000 years and your self-hate is self-destructive. The only difference between you and the other fundie is the appalling lack vs. the abysmal lack of tact and education you both sorely are in need of.

Now we get to see the angry evofundie lash out in all her saliva slinging viciousness.

You continue to project your own, self-hating, sexually confused, bigotry and your own silence on the topic of education screams volumes about here own severe lack of formal training and your absolute lack of qualifications to make comments on any of the topics at hand. This would also explain the fact that, in over 600 pages, he/she has failed to present a single logical rebuttal of her/his own, but continues the same, tired ad hominem attacks in a feeble attempt to disguise not just her own utter ignorance on the topics at hand, but her intense self-hatred stemming from same sex attraction.

Hollie, you are the most science loathing of all, as evidenced by the fact you never attempted to take any formal science classes and the fact that your frantic cut and pasting shows absolutely no working knowledge of the things you cut and paste.

 

[UltimateReality]

No matter how hard they work at trying to build the puzzle there will always be missing pieces showing this theory to be fabricated from vivid minds.

If you were to think that because not all is known, nothing is known, but this is false.

In any case, whatever glee you may have from that there are missing pieces, does not mean that the pieces found do not exist.

In any case, whatever glee you may have from that you have missed evidence for God, does not mean that God does not exist.

 

[UltimateReality]

You rattle on about your designer gawds yet you consistently fail to offer support for these gawds.

Done, numerous times, whether you choose to ignore it or not. This is not surprising, since you have failed to grasp over and over the fact that the majority of posters here believe in one God and the fact that you can't seem to differentiate between myself and YWC in 600 pages of posts. Have you been tested for attention deficit disorder?

Truth is not encumbant on a poll or majority vote. "Most" people can be and are wrong much of the time. It has been a difficult road for intelligent people as much of the history of organised religion has focused it's "argument" towards agreement on murdering it's opposition. Pure publicly accepted reason is a very recent developement.

It sounds like you must have seen the movie Expelled. Are you talking about the materialistic zealots that use the courts and formal education, as well as a policy of zero tolerance of any opposing thought in the workplace, to foist their Darwinisitic religious views on everyone?

 

[pjnlsn]

No matter how hard they work at trying to build the puzzle there will always be missing pieces showing this theory to be fabricated from vivid minds.

If you were to think that because not all is known, nothing is known, but this is false.

In any case, whatever glee you may have from that there are missing pieces, does not mean that the pieces found do not exist.

In any case, whatever glee you may have from that you have missed evidence for God, does not mean that God does not exist.

This doesn't follow from the above, and so the following qualifies as a tangent. However, and again:

Also, You speak [, or have spoken,] of "God" as if you know of it. [...] But it is not known that there is, or has been, any kind of godly being, in any location, this being mostly due to that the definition, or at least, the most common one given, is so vague and insubstantial that it is not possible to prove it existing anywhere or anytime.

 

[HUGGY]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=SSxgnu3Hww8]Top Ten Creationist Arguments - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Hollie]

Done, numerous times, whether you choose to ignore it or not. This is not surprising, since you have failed to grasp over and over the fact that the majority of posters here believe in one God and the fact that you can't seem to differentiate between myself and YWC in 600 pages of posts. Have you been tested for attention deficit disorder?

What you're unable to grasp is that you and the other fundie both are unable to offer support for your gawds so take the position of the science-loathing blowhard. You don't understand that your claims to one gawd or many is pointless absent any verification.

Here is some news for you: biological evolution is fact; the planet is older than 6,000 years and your self-hate is self-destructive. The only difference between you and the other fundie is the appalling lack vs. the abysmal lack of tact and education you both sorely are in need of.

Now we get to see the angry evofundie lash out in all her saliva slinging viciousness.

You continue to project your own, self-hating, sexually confused, bigotry and your own silence on the topic of education screams volumes about here own severe lack of formal training and your absolute lack of qualifications to make comments on any of the topics at hand. This would also explain the fact that, in over 600 pages, he/she has failed to present a single logical rebuttal of her/his own, but continues the same, tired ad hominem attacks in a feeble attempt to disguise not just her own utter ignorance on the topics at hand, but her intense self-hatred stemming from same sex attraction.

Hollie, you are the most science loathing of all, as evidenced by the fact you never attempted to take any formal science classes and the fact that your frantic cut and pasting shows absolutely no working knowledge of the things you cut and paste.

You're projecting.

 

[Hollie]

Done, numerous times, whether you choose to ignore it or not. This is not surprising, since you have failed to grasp over and over the fact that the majority of posters here believe in one God and the fact that you can't seem to differentiate between myself and YWC in 600 pages of posts. Have you been tested for attention deficit disorder?

Truth is not encumbant on a poll or majority vote. "Most" people can be and are wrong much of the time. It has been a difficult road for intelligent people as much of the history of organised religion has focused it's "argument" towards agreement on murdering it's opposition. Pure publicly accepted reason is a very recent developement.

It sounds like you must have seen the movie Expelled. Are you talking about the materialistic zealots that use the courts and formal education, as well as a policy of zero tolerance of any opposing thought in the workplace, to foist their Darwinisitic religious views on everyone?

What a shame that the Christian Taliban take exception to the courts enforcing the law.

 

[Hollie]

No matter how hard they work at trying to build the puzzle there will always be missing pieces showing this theory to be fabricated from vivid minds.

If you were to think that because not all is known, nothing is known, but this is false.

In any case, whatever glee you may have from that there are missing pieces, does not mean that the pieces found do not exist.

In any case, whatever glee you may have from that you have missed evidence for God, does not mean that God does not exist.

In any case, your pointless "because I say so" claim to your gods is not something that thinking humans will accept from fundie zealots.

 

[HUGGY]

Done, numerous times, whether you choose to ignore it or not. This is not surprising, since you have failed to grasp over and over the fact that the majority of posters here believe in one God and the fact that you can't seem to differentiate between myself and YWC in 600 pages of posts. Have you been tested for attention deficit disorder?

Truth is not encumbant on a poll or majority vote. "Most" people can be and are wrong much of the time. It has been a difficult road for intelligent people as much of the history of organised religion has focused it's "argument" towards agreement on murdering it's opposition. Pure publicly accepted reason is a very recent developement.

It sounds like you must have seen the movie Expelled. Are you talking about the materialistic zealots that use the courts and formal education, as well as a policy of zero tolerance of any opposing thought in the workplace, to foist their Darwinisitic religious views on everyone?

I have not. Just saw the trailer... I'm not going to watch an hour and 38 minutes of it.

 

[Gadawg73]

Truth is not encumbant on a poll or majority vote. "Most" people can be and are wrong much of the time. It has been a difficult road for intelligent people as much of the history of organised religion has focused it's "argument" towards agreement on murdering it's opposition. Pure publicly accepted reason is a very recent developement.

It sounds like you must have seen the movie Expelled. Are you talking about the materialistic zealots that use the courts and formal education, as well as a policy of zero tolerance of any opposing thought in the workplace, to foist their Darwinisitic religious views on everyone?

I have not. Just saw the trailer... I'm not going to watch an hour and 38 minutes of it.

Amazing the hour and so videos folk put up here as if we would watch that.
If there are nekked women up to something in it, probably then.