In what way does this sound like a fairy tale? This sounds like a viable explanation for the change that occurs over time in species. You find it to be a fairytale because of your pre-supposition that a designer exists, so you simply refute any evidence brought to you. Anyhow, all you have to do is wikipedia speciation and you get an example:
Speciation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Artificial speciation
New species have been created by domesticated animal husbandry, but the initial dates and methods of the initiation of such species are not clear. For example, domestic sheep were created by hybridisation, and no longer produce viable offspring with Ovis orientalis, one species from which they are descended.[18] Domestic cattle, on the other hand, can be considered the same species as several varieties of wild ox, gaur, yak, etc., as they readily produce fertile offspring with them.[19]
The best-documented creations of new species in the laboratory were performed in the late 1980s. William Rice and G.W. Salt bred fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, using a maze with three different choices of habitat such as light/dark and wet/dry. Each generation was placed into the maze, and the groups of flies that came out of two of the eight exits were set apart to breed with each other in their respective groups. After thirty-five generations, the two groups and their offspring were isolated reproductively because of their strong habitat preferences: they mated only within the areas they preferred, and so did not mate with flies that preferred the other areas.[20] The history of such attempts is described in Rice and Hostert (1993).[21]
Diane Dodd was also able to show how reproductive isolation can develop from mating preferences in Drosophila pseudoobscura fruit flies after only eight generations using different food types, starch and maltose.[22]"
So, demonstrated in a lab is speciation. Of course you will refute this because it will not be your standard of evidence, because of your pre-supposition about there being an intelligent designer, and proving speciation to occur would weaken the argument that there needs to be a designer, if not, destroy it. Speciation is only one piece of evidence, by the way.
Do you have any evidence that your designer exists? No. None. You rely on the "god of the gaps" while refuting any evidence about evolution. So, you can see reality how you want to, that is your choice, but there is only one right answer. So far, your case has ZERO evidence, while the evidence for evolution is plentiful, and applicable to the real world. It is used in biology everyday. Creationism can only be used except to vindicate faith, which does not attest to its veracity whatsoever.
