Covid Vaccine question.

[Gracie]

Why get the shot when you can still get covid? Simple question. Should be a simple answer. All these people getting the shot. WHY? You can still get it, whether you get the vaccine or not. So why do it???

 

[JoeMoma]

probability.

 

[theHawk]

Why get the shot when you can still get covid? Simple question. Should be a simple answer. All these people getting the shot. WHY? You can still get it, whether you get the vaccine or not. So why do it???

 

[Concerned American]

Why get the shot when you can still get covid? Simple question. Should be a simple answer. All these people getting the shot. WHY? You can still get it, whether you get the vaccine or not. So why do it???

Just like the flu.

 

[Gracie]

I finally know 1 guy that died of covid. He lived 2 doors down from me. He was 94 years old.

Meanwhile....he really died of complications from the flu, combined with his age. So..they said covid because the hospital gets more money when they put that on the death certificate.

Nice man. Sad he died. But at age 94, is it a surprise?

 

[Thoth001]

Why get the shot when you can still get covid? Simple question. Should be a simple answer. All these people getting the shot. WHY? You can still get it, whether you get the vaccine or not. So why do it???

Many people are ignorant and think the vaccine companies are there to help them, along with Big Pharma. I also have heard and excuse of someone I know saying "they are going to get it, because it will become mandatory anyway." Here is some data I would like to share that people should know:

“The most enduring myth regarding COVID-19,” the doctors wrote, “is that this is a highly lethal infection. It is not. The data is unequivocal:

COVID-19 kills very rarely and is mostly limited to the medically fragile,

COVID-19 is less deadly than influenza in children,

COVID-19 is similar lethality in the middle adult years and treatable.”

They went on to cite the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) own “best estimate” to demonstrate that the infection fatality rate (IFR) is overall very low:

0-19 years old: 0.00003 (99.997 percent survival rate)

20-49 years old: 0.0002 (99.98 percent survival rate)

50-69 years old: 0.005 (99.5 percent survival rate)

70+ years old: 0.054 (94.6 percent survival rate)

For the jab itself:

Brand new mRNA technology

First, what the doctors call the “largest experimental medication program in our history” uses a brand-new technology utilizing messenger RNA. “No vaccine” based on this technology “has ever been approved for any disease, or even entered final-stage trials until now, so there’s no peer-reviewed published human data to compare how mRNA stacks up against older technologies,” AFLD said.

No independently published animal studies

Further, previous coronavirus vaccines developed over decades have consistently failed in animal trials with the death of their subjects. Yet, these experimental vaccines have no independently published animal studies.

“Vaccine safety requires proper animal trials and peer-reviewed data,” the paper stated, “neither of which has occurred” with these experimental biological agents.

Recipient may become more vulnerable to virus

The AFLD White Paper stated that one of the greatest safety concerns relates to how “(p)rior coronavirus (and other respiratory) vaccines have failed due to the scientific phenomena known as pathogenic priming that makes the vaccine recipient more likely to suffer a sudden fatal outcome due to massive cytokine storm when exposed to the wild virus.”

Of note, current reports revealed that hundreds of individuals injected with COVID-19 experimental vaccines have been admitted to the hospital, and the shots have so far been linked to at least 181 deaths in the United States.

Neurological diseases, long-term effects

The paper listed many other possible complications, including neurological diseases, and cited from the “extremely limited COVID-19 vaccine data” instances of them already occurring.

Manufactures have no liability

Of great concern as well is the fact that the companies that produce these experimental biological agents “are immune from all liability” due to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Therefore, those who are injured or even the families of those who suffer death due to these injections will have no claim on the manufacturers themselves.

Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer’ than the Wuhan Virus
AFLD then drew from common sense to conclude that taking an experimental vaccine “is not safer” than a very low IFR for the Wuhan Virus. Besides the “extraordinarily low” mortality rates, doctors are “getting better and better at treating COVID-19: the death rate in terms of population continues to fall, hospital stays for COVID-19 get shorter and hospital mortality from COVID-19 plummets.”

While not directly asserting that the experimental vaccines are unsafe, AFLD clarified that “We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication.”

“In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease,” they explained, “the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened.”

Frontline Doctors: Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer' than COVID-19 - LifeSite

Physicians’ white paper says injection prohibited for the young and at least discouraged for healthy individuals under 70 years of age. ‘Unethical’ to advocate vaccine for persons under 50.

www.lifesitenews.com

 

[Thoth001]

Then this recent article. Notice how before they had it on the MSM putting fear into the minds with the numbers of the Covid deaths. And now you see the Experimental Covid jab deaths trying to be covered up. You sure don't see a daily death count on the MSM for the Experimental mRNA biological agent being injected into people:

February 14, 2021 CDC WITHOLDING INFORMATION! 1,170 DEAD Following COVID Injections: Almost Twice as Many Deaths as Found in VAERS Yesterday we reported that the CDC had done another data dump into the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database, showing that through February 4, 2021, there were 12,697 recorded adverse events, including 653 deaths following injections of the experimental COVID mRNA shots by Pfizer and Moderna. After publishing this article, a Health Impact News subscriber sent me a link to a page on the CDC website where they are reporting that as of February 11, 2021, VAERS received 1,170 reports of death among people who received a COVID-19 vaccine. For the past few weeks, the CDC has been slowly updating the VAERS database with data dumps on Friday, just before the weekend and the beginning of the slow news cycle that usually picks up again on Mondays. On Friday, January 29th, their VAERS data reported 329 deaths from people receiving one of the experimental COVID mRNA injections. The following Friday, February 5, 2021, their VAERS data reported 501 deaths. An increase of 172 deaths. Yesterday, February 12, 2021, the CDC VAERS data reported 653 deaths. An increase of 152 deaths. That still leaves 517 deaths unaccounted for in the VAERS database related to the COVID injections. Why is the CDC withholding this information?

CDC WITHOLDING INFORMATION! 1,170 DEAD Following COVID Injections: Almost Twice as Many Deaths as Found in VAERS - Vaccine Impact

Yesterday we reported that the CDC had done another data dump into the VAERS (Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System) database, showing that through February 4, 2021, there were 12,697 recorded adverse events, including 653 deaths following injections of the experimental COVID mRNA shots by...

vaccineimpact.com

 

[Gracie]

I also read somewhere that it takes 3 to 6 months for the time delay to kick in to kill off as many as possible...especially boomers. Old people. They are supposedly a "drain" on society. Its a conspiracy theory but it makes sense to me since Gates continues to butt in and say there is overpopulation in the world. Plus..he flatly refuses to let his wife and kids get the shot. Now why would he do that????

Meanwhile...sick of Penelope's thumbs down. Time for her to go on iggie.Someday she will get a clue nobody likes her, for obvious reasons.

 

[Penelope]

Why get the shot when you can still get covid? Simple question. Should be a simple answer. All these people getting the shot. WHY? You can still get it, whether you get the vaccine or not. So why do it???

Many people are ignorant and think the vaccine companies are there to help them, along with Big Pharma. I also have heard and excuse of someone I know saying "they are going to get it, because it will become mandatory anyway." Here is some data I would like to share that people should know:

“The most enduring myth regarding COVID-19,” the doctors wrote, “is that this is a highly lethal infection. It is not. The data is unequivocal:

COVID-19 kills very rarely and is mostly limited to the medically fragile,

COVID-19 is less deadly than influenza in children,

COVID-19 is similar lethality in the middle adult years and treatable.”

They went on to cite the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) own “best estimate” to demonstrate that the infection fatality rate (IFR) is overall very low:

0-19 years old: 0.00003 (99.997 percent survival rate)

20-49 years old: 0.0002 (99.98 percent survival rate)

50-69 years old: 0.005 (99.5 percent survival rate)

70+ years old: 0.054 (94.6 percent survival rate)

For the jab itself:

Brand new mRNA technology

First, what the doctors call the “largest experimental medication program in our history” uses a brand-new technology utilizing messenger RNA. “No vaccine” based on this technology “has ever been approved for any disease, or even entered final-stage trials until now, so there’s no peer-reviewed published human data to compare how mRNA stacks up against older technologies,” AFLD said.

No independently published animal studies

Further, previous coronavirus vaccines developed over decades have consistently failed in animal trials with the death of their subjects. Yet, these experimental vaccines have no independently published animal studies.

“Vaccine safety requires proper animal trials and peer-reviewed data,” the paper stated, “neither of which has occurred” with these experimental biological agents.

Recipient may become more vulnerable to virus

The AFLD White Paper stated that one of the greatest safety concerns relates to how “(p)rior coronavirus (and other respiratory) vaccines have failed due to the scientific phenomena known as pathogenic priming that makes the vaccine recipient more likely to suffer a sudden fatal outcome due to massive cytokine storm when exposed to the wild virus.”

Of note, current reports revealed that hundreds of individuals injected with COVID-19 experimental vaccines have been admitted to the hospital, and the shots have so far been linked to at least 181 deaths in the United States.

Neurological diseases, long-term effects

The paper listed many other possible complications, including neurological diseases, and cited from the “extremely limited COVID-19 vaccine data” instances of them already occurring.

Manufactures have no liability

Of great concern as well is the fact that the companies that produce these experimental biological agents “are immune from all liability” due to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Therefore, those who are injured or even the families of those who suffer death due to these injections will have no claim on the manufacturers themselves.

Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer’ than the Wuhan Virus
AFLD then drew from common sense to conclude that taking an experimental vaccine “is not safer” than a very low IFR for the Wuhan Virus. Besides the “extraordinarily low” mortality rates, doctors are “getting better and better at treating COVID-19: the death rate in terms of population continues to fall, hospital stays for COVID-19 get shorter and hospital mortality from COVID-19 plummets.”

While not directly asserting that the experimental vaccines are unsafe, AFLD clarified that “We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication.”

“In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease,” they explained, “the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened.”

Frontline Doctors: Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer' than COVID-19 - LifeSite

Physicians’ white paper says injection prohibited for the young and at least discouraged for healthy individuals under 70 years of age. ‘Unethical’ to advocate vaccine for persons under 50.

www.lifesitenews.com

Full Story
Dr. Simone Gold, who has a history of spreading dubious claims about the pandemic, used misinformation to sow doubt about COVID-19 vaccines in a live-streamed Jan. 3 address at a Pentecostal church in Florida.
Video Uses Bogus Claims to Stoke Race-Based Fears of COVID-19 Vaccine - FactCheck.org

 

[Penelope]

I also read somewhere that it takes 3 to 6 months for the time delay to kick in to kill off as many as possible...especially boomers. Old people. They are supposedly a "drain" on society. Its a conspiracy theory but it makes sense to me since Gates continues to butt in and say there is overpopulation in the world. Plus..he flatly refuses to let his wife and kids get the shot. Now why would he do that????

Meanwhile...sick of Penelope's thumbs down. Time for her to go on iggie.Someday she will get a clue nobody likes her, for obvious reasons.

That is a lie Gates won't let them get vaccinated, his children and their Mother are vaccinated.


Melinda Gates


April 18, 2019 ·

All three of my children are fully vaccinated.
Vaccines work. And when fewer people decide to get them, we all become more vulnerable to disease.
As World Immunization Week approaches, let’s listen to science, have honest conversations with each other, and act to protect our children.
(20+) Melinda Gates - Posts | Facebook

I call out lies.

 

[Thoth001]

I also read somewhere that it takes 3 to 6 months for the time delay to kick in to kill off as many as possible...especially boomers. Old people. They are supposedly a "drain" on society. Its a conspiracy theory but it makes sense to me since Gates continues to butt in and say there is overpopulation in the world. Plus..he flatly refuses to let his wife and kids get the shot. Now why would he do that????

Meanwhile...sick of Penelope's thumbs down. Time for her to go on iggie.Someday she will get a clue nobody likes her, for obvious reasons.

It could even take up to years for some cancers to develop from it. It all depends on the person's body. But no doubt it will cause a lot of problems and surly they will be saying it's not from the mRNA biological agent jab. I definitely won't be getting it. If people want to get it, good for them as long as they don't make it mandatory for me.

Yea, Penelope is something else. Maybe she works for Pfizer. There is some good info on here:

 

[Thoth001]

Why get the shot when you can still get covid? Simple question. Should be a simple answer. All these people getting the shot. WHY? You can still get it, whether you get the vaccine or not. So why do it???

Many people are ignorant and think the vaccine companies are there to help them, along with Big Pharma. I also have heard and excuse of someone I know saying "they are going to get it, because it will become mandatory anyway." Here is some data I would like to share that people should know:

“The most enduring myth regarding COVID-19,” the doctors wrote, “is that this is a highly lethal infection. It is not. The data is unequivocal:

COVID-19 kills very rarely and is mostly limited to the medically fragile,

COVID-19 is less deadly than influenza in children,

COVID-19 is similar lethality in the middle adult years and treatable.”

They went on to cite the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) own “best estimate” to demonstrate that the infection fatality rate (IFR) is overall very low:

0-19 years old: 0.00003 (99.997 percent survival rate)

20-49 years old: 0.0002 (99.98 percent survival rate)

50-69 years old: 0.005 (99.5 percent survival rate)

70+ years old: 0.054 (94.6 percent survival rate)

For the jab itself:

Brand new mRNA technology

First, what the doctors call the “largest experimental medication program in our history” uses a brand-new technology utilizing messenger RNA. “No vaccine” based on this technology “has ever been approved for any disease, or even entered final-stage trials until now, so there’s no peer-reviewed published human data to compare how mRNA stacks up against older technologies,” AFLD said.

No independently published animal studies

Further, previous coronavirus vaccines developed over decades have consistently failed in animal trials with the death of their subjects. Yet, these experimental vaccines have no independently published animal studies.

“Vaccine safety requires proper animal trials and peer-reviewed data,” the paper stated, “neither of which has occurred” with these experimental biological agents.

Recipient may become more vulnerable to virus

The AFLD White Paper stated that one of the greatest safety concerns relates to how “(p)rior coronavirus (and other respiratory) vaccines have failed due to the scientific phenomena known as pathogenic priming that makes the vaccine recipient more likely to suffer a sudden fatal outcome due to massive cytokine storm when exposed to the wild virus.”

Of note, current reports revealed that hundreds of individuals injected with COVID-19 experimental vaccines have been admitted to the hospital, and the shots have so far been linked to at least 181 deaths in the United States.

Neurological diseases, long-term effects

The paper listed many other possible complications, including neurological diseases, and cited from the “extremely limited COVID-19 vaccine data” instances of them already occurring.

Manufactures have no liability

Of great concern as well is the fact that the companies that produce these experimental biological agents “are immune from all liability” due to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Therefore, those who are injured or even the families of those who suffer death due to these injections will have no claim on the manufacturers themselves.

Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer’ than the Wuhan Virus
AFLD then drew from common sense to conclude that taking an experimental vaccine “is not safer” than a very low IFR for the Wuhan Virus. Besides the “extraordinarily low” mortality rates, doctors are “getting better and better at treating COVID-19: the death rate in terms of population continues to fall, hospital stays for COVID-19 get shorter and hospital mortality from COVID-19 plummets.”

While not directly asserting that the experimental vaccines are unsafe, AFLD clarified that “We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication.”

“In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease,” they explained, “the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened.”

Frontline Doctors: Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer' than COVID-19 - LifeSite

Physicians’ white paper says injection prohibited for the young and at least discouraged for healthy individuals under 70 years of age. ‘Unethical’ to advocate vaccine for persons under 50.

www.lifesitenews.com

Full Story
Dr. Simone Gold, who has a history of spreading dubious claims about the pandemic, used misinformation to sow doubt about COVID-19 vaccines in a live-streamed Jan. 3 address at a Pentecostal church in Florida.
Video Uses Bogus Claims to Stoke Race-Based Fears of COVID-19 Vaccine - FactCheck.org

She is one of my hero's.

 

[Thoth001]

I also read somewhere that it takes 3 to 6 months for the time delay to kick in to kill off as many as possible...especially boomers. Old people. They are supposedly a "drain" on society. Its a conspiracy theory but it makes sense to me since Gates continues to butt in and say there is overpopulation in the world. Plus..he flatly refuses to let his wife and kids get the shot. Now why would he do that????

Meanwhile...sick of Penelope's thumbs down. Time for her to go on iggie.Someday she will get a clue nobody likes her, for obvious reasons.

That is a lie Gates won't let them get vaccinated, his children and their Mother are vaccinated.


Melinda Gates


April 18, 2019 ·

All three of my children are fully vaccinated.
Vaccines work. And when fewer people decide to get them, we all become more vulnerable to disease.
As World Immunization Week approaches, let’s listen to science, have honest conversations with each other, and act to protect our children.
(20+) Melinda Gates - Posts | Facebook

I call out lies.

So, you know Gates personally now?

 

[Penelope]

Why get the shot when you can still get covid? Simple question. Should be a simple answer. All these people getting the shot. WHY? You can still get it, whether you get the vaccine or not. So why do it???

What are you waiting for herd immunity?

 

[Penelope]

Why get the shot when you can still get covid? Simple question. Should be a simple answer. All these people getting the shot. WHY? You can still get it, whether you get the vaccine or not. So why do it???

Many people are ignorant and think the vaccine companies are there to help them, along with Big Pharma. I also have heard and excuse of someone I know saying "they are going to get it, because it will become mandatory anyway." Here is some data I would like to share that people should know:

“The most enduring myth regarding COVID-19,” the doctors wrote, “is that this is a highly lethal infection. It is not. The data is unequivocal:

COVID-19 kills very rarely and is mostly limited to the medically fragile,

COVID-19 is less deadly than influenza in children,

COVID-19 is similar lethality in the middle adult years and treatable.”

They went on to cite the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) own “best estimate” to demonstrate that the infection fatality rate (IFR) is overall very low:

0-19 years old: 0.00003 (99.997 percent survival rate)

20-49 years old: 0.0002 (99.98 percent survival rate)

50-69 years old: 0.005 (99.5 percent survival rate)

70+ years old: 0.054 (94.6 percent survival rate)

For the jab itself:

Brand new mRNA technology

First, what the doctors call the “largest experimental medication program in our history” uses a brand-new technology utilizing messenger RNA. “No vaccine” based on this technology “has ever been approved for any disease, or even entered final-stage trials until now, so there’s no peer-reviewed published human data to compare how mRNA stacks up against older technologies,” AFLD said.

No independently published animal studies

Further, previous coronavirus vaccines developed over decades have consistently failed in animal trials with the death of their subjects. Yet, these experimental vaccines have no independently published animal studies.

“Vaccine safety requires proper animal trials and peer-reviewed data,” the paper stated, “neither of which has occurred” with these experimental biological agents.

Recipient may become more vulnerable to virus

The AFLD White Paper stated that one of the greatest safety concerns relates to how “(p)rior coronavirus (and other respiratory) vaccines have failed due to the scientific phenomena known as pathogenic priming that makes the vaccine recipient more likely to suffer a sudden fatal outcome due to massive cytokine storm when exposed to the wild virus.”

Of note, current reports revealed that hundreds of individuals injected with COVID-19 experimental vaccines have been admitted to the hospital, and the shots have so far been linked to at least 181 deaths in the United States.

Neurological diseases, long-term effects

The paper listed many other possible complications, including neurological diseases, and cited from the “extremely limited COVID-19 vaccine data” instances of them already occurring.

Manufactures have no liability

Of great concern as well is the fact that the companies that produce these experimental biological agents “are immune from all liability” due to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Therefore, those who are injured or even the families of those who suffer death due to these injections will have no claim on the manufacturers themselves.

Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer’ than the Wuhan Virus
AFLD then drew from common sense to conclude that taking an experimental vaccine “is not safer” than a very low IFR for the Wuhan Virus. Besides the “extraordinarily low” mortality rates, doctors are “getting better and better at treating COVID-19: the death rate in terms of population continues to fall, hospital stays for COVID-19 get shorter and hospital mortality from COVID-19 plummets.”

While not directly asserting that the experimental vaccines are unsafe, AFLD clarified that “We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication.”

“In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease,” they explained, “the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened.”

Frontline Doctors: Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer' than COVID-19 - LifeSite

Physicians’ white paper says injection prohibited for the young and at least discouraged for healthy individuals under 70 years of age. ‘Unethical’ to advocate vaccine for persons under 50.

www.lifesitenews.com

Full Story
Dr. Simone Gold, who has a history of spreading dubious claims about the pandemic, used misinformation to sow doubt about COVID-19 vaccines in a live-streamed Jan. 3 address at a Pentecostal church in Florida.
Video Uses Bogus Claims to Stoke Race-Based Fears of COVID-19 Vaccine - FactCheck.org

She is one of my hero's.

If you like a quack.

 

[Thoth001]

Why get the shot when you can still get covid? Simple question. Should be a simple answer. All these people getting the shot. WHY? You can still get it, whether you get the vaccine or not. So why do it???

Many people are ignorant and think the vaccine companies are there to help them, along with Big Pharma. I also have heard and excuse of someone I know saying "they are going to get it, because it will become mandatory anyway." Here is some data I would like to share that people should know:

“The most enduring myth regarding COVID-19,” the doctors wrote, “is that this is a highly lethal infection. It is not. The data is unequivocal:

COVID-19 kills very rarely and is mostly limited to the medically fragile,

COVID-19 is less deadly than influenza in children,

COVID-19 is similar lethality in the middle adult years and treatable.”

They went on to cite the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) own “best estimate” to demonstrate that the infection fatality rate (IFR) is overall very low:

0-19 years old: 0.00003 (99.997 percent survival rate)

20-49 years old: 0.0002 (99.98 percent survival rate)

50-69 years old: 0.005 (99.5 percent survival rate)

70+ years old: 0.054 (94.6 percent survival rate)

For the jab itself:

Brand new mRNA technology

First, what the doctors call the “largest experimental medication program in our history” uses a brand-new technology utilizing messenger RNA. “No vaccine” based on this technology “has ever been approved for any disease, or even entered final-stage trials until now, so there’s no peer-reviewed published human data to compare how mRNA stacks up against older technologies,” AFLD said.

No independently published animal studies

Further, previous coronavirus vaccines developed over decades have consistently failed in animal trials with the death of their subjects. Yet, these experimental vaccines have no independently published animal studies.

“Vaccine safety requires proper animal trials and peer-reviewed data,” the paper stated, “neither of which has occurred” with these experimental biological agents.

Recipient may become more vulnerable to virus

The AFLD White Paper stated that one of the greatest safety concerns relates to how “(p)rior coronavirus (and other respiratory) vaccines have failed due to the scientific phenomena known as pathogenic priming that makes the vaccine recipient more likely to suffer a sudden fatal outcome due to massive cytokine storm when exposed to the wild virus.”

Of note, current reports revealed that hundreds of individuals injected with COVID-19 experimental vaccines have been admitted to the hospital, and the shots have so far been linked to at least 181 deaths in the United States.

Neurological diseases, long-term effects

The paper listed many other possible complications, including neurological diseases, and cited from the “extremely limited COVID-19 vaccine data” instances of them already occurring.

Manufactures have no liability

Of great concern as well is the fact that the companies that produce these experimental biological agents “are immune from all liability” due to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Therefore, those who are injured or even the families of those who suffer death due to these injections will have no claim on the manufacturers themselves.

Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer’ than the Wuhan Virus
AFLD then drew from common sense to conclude that taking an experimental vaccine “is not safer” than a very low IFR for the Wuhan Virus. Besides the “extraordinarily low” mortality rates, doctors are “getting better and better at treating COVID-19: the death rate in terms of population continues to fall, hospital stays for COVID-19 get shorter and hospital mortality from COVID-19 plummets.”

While not directly asserting that the experimental vaccines are unsafe, AFLD clarified that “We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication.”

“In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease,” they explained, “the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened.”

Frontline Doctors: Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer' than COVID-19 - LifeSite

Physicians’ white paper says injection prohibited for the young and at least discouraged for healthy individuals under 70 years of age. ‘Unethical’ to advocate vaccine for persons under 50.

www.lifesitenews.com

Full Story
Dr. Simone Gold, who has a history of spreading dubious claims about the pandemic, used misinformation to sow doubt about COVID-19 vaccines in a live-streamed Jan. 3 address at a Pentecostal church in Florida.
Video Uses Bogus Claims to Stoke Race-Based Fears of COVID-19 Vaccine - FactCheck.org

Also be advised:

About the International Fact-Checking Network

Poynter’s IFCN has received funding from the Arthur M. Blank Family Foundation, the Duke Reporters’ Lab, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Google, the National Endowment for Democracy, the Omidyar Network, the Open Society Foundations and the Park Foundation.

About the International Fact-Checking Network - Poynter

 

[Thoth001]

Why get the shot when you can still get covid? Simple question. Should be a simple answer. All these people getting the shot. WHY? You can still get it, whether you get the vaccine or not. So why do it???

Many people are ignorant and think the vaccine companies are there to help them, along with Big Pharma. I also have heard and excuse of someone I know saying "they are going to get it, because it will become mandatory anyway." Here is some data I would like to share that people should know:

“The most enduring myth regarding COVID-19,” the doctors wrote, “is that this is a highly lethal infection. It is not. The data is unequivocal:

COVID-19 kills very rarely and is mostly limited to the medically fragile,

COVID-19 is less deadly than influenza in children,

COVID-19 is similar lethality in the middle adult years and treatable.”

They went on to cite the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) own “best estimate” to demonstrate that the infection fatality rate (IFR) is overall very low:

0-19 years old: 0.00003 (99.997 percent survival rate)

20-49 years old: 0.0002 (99.98 percent survival rate)

50-69 years old: 0.005 (99.5 percent survival rate)

70+ years old: 0.054 (94.6 percent survival rate)

For the jab itself:

Brand new mRNA technology

First, what the doctors call the “largest experimental medication program in our history” uses a brand-new technology utilizing messenger RNA. “No vaccine” based on this technology “has ever been approved for any disease, or even entered final-stage trials until now, so there’s no peer-reviewed published human data to compare how mRNA stacks up against older technologies,” AFLD said.

No independently published animal studies

Further, previous coronavirus vaccines developed over decades have consistently failed in animal trials with the death of their subjects. Yet, these experimental vaccines have no independently published animal studies.

“Vaccine safety requires proper animal trials and peer-reviewed data,” the paper stated, “neither of which has occurred” with these experimental biological agents.

Recipient may become more vulnerable to virus

The AFLD White Paper stated that one of the greatest safety concerns relates to how “(p)rior coronavirus (and other respiratory) vaccines have failed due to the scientific phenomena known as pathogenic priming that makes the vaccine recipient more likely to suffer a sudden fatal outcome due to massive cytokine storm when exposed to the wild virus.”

Of note, current reports revealed that hundreds of individuals injected with COVID-19 experimental vaccines have been admitted to the hospital, and the shots have so far been linked to at least 181 deaths in the United States.

Neurological diseases, long-term effects

The paper listed many other possible complications, including neurological diseases, and cited from the “extremely limited COVID-19 vaccine data” instances of them already occurring.

Manufactures have no liability

Of great concern as well is the fact that the companies that produce these experimental biological agents “are immune from all liability” due to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Therefore, those who are injured or even the families of those who suffer death due to these injections will have no claim on the manufacturers themselves.

Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer’ than the Wuhan Virus
AFLD then drew from common sense to conclude that taking an experimental vaccine “is not safer” than a very low IFR for the Wuhan Virus. Besides the “extraordinarily low” mortality rates, doctors are “getting better and better at treating COVID-19: the death rate in terms of population continues to fall, hospital stays for COVID-19 get shorter and hospital mortality from COVID-19 plummets.”

While not directly asserting that the experimental vaccines are unsafe, AFLD clarified that “We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication.”

“In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease,” they explained, “the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened.”

Frontline Doctors: Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer' than COVID-19 - LifeSite

Physicians’ white paper says injection prohibited for the young and at least discouraged for healthy individuals under 70 years of age. ‘Unethical’ to advocate vaccine for persons under 50.

www.lifesitenews.com

Full Story
Dr. Simone Gold, who has a history of spreading dubious claims about the pandemic, used misinformation to sow doubt about COVID-19 vaccines in a live-streamed Jan. 3 address at a Pentecostal church in Florida.
Video Uses Bogus Claims to Stoke Race-Based Fears of COVID-19 Vaccine - FactCheck.org

She is one of my hero's.

If you like a quack.

The real quack is Bill Gates that funds all this crap that censors real doctors, that aren't afraid to speak up. You really have taken the scam hook line and sinker, haven't you. You have earned the Sheeple award today P.

 

[Penelope]

Why get the shot when you can still get covid? Simple question. Should be a simple answer. All these people getting the shot. WHY? You can still get it, whether you get the vaccine or not. So why do it???

Many people are ignorant and think the vaccine companies are there to help them, along with Big Pharma. I also have heard and excuse of someone I know saying "they are going to get it, because it will become mandatory anyway." Here is some data I would like to share that people should know:

“The most enduring myth regarding COVID-19,” the doctors wrote, “is that this is a highly lethal infection. It is not. The data is unequivocal:

COVID-19 kills very rarely and is mostly limited to the medically fragile,

COVID-19 is less deadly than influenza in children,

COVID-19 is similar lethality in the middle adult years and treatable.”

They went on to cite the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) own “best estimate” to demonstrate that the infection fatality rate (IFR) is overall very low:

0-19 years old: 0.00003 (99.997 percent survival rate)

20-49 years old: 0.0002 (99.98 percent survival rate)

50-69 years old: 0.005 (99.5 percent survival rate)

70+ years old: 0.054 (94.6 percent survival rate)

For the jab itself:

Brand new mRNA technology

First, what the doctors call the “largest experimental medication program in our history” uses a brand-new technology utilizing messenger RNA. “No vaccine” based on this technology “has ever been approved for any disease, or even entered final-stage trials until now, so there’s no peer-reviewed published human data to compare how mRNA stacks up against older technologies,” AFLD said.

No independently published animal studies

Further, previous coronavirus vaccines developed over decades have consistently failed in animal trials with the death of their subjects. Yet, these experimental vaccines have no independently published animal studies.

“Vaccine safety requires proper animal trials and peer-reviewed data,” the paper stated, “neither of which has occurred” with these experimental biological agents.

Recipient may become more vulnerable to virus

The AFLD White Paper stated that one of the greatest safety concerns relates to how “(p)rior coronavirus (and other respiratory) vaccines have failed due to the scientific phenomena known as pathogenic priming that makes the vaccine recipient more likely to suffer a sudden fatal outcome due to massive cytokine storm when exposed to the wild virus.”

Of note, current reports revealed that hundreds of individuals injected with COVID-19 experimental vaccines have been admitted to the hospital, and the shots have so far been linked to at least 181 deaths in the United States.

Neurological diseases, long-term effects

The paper listed many other possible complications, including neurological diseases, and cited from the “extremely limited COVID-19 vaccine data” instances of them already occurring.

Manufactures have no liability

Of great concern as well is the fact that the companies that produce these experimental biological agents “are immune from all liability” due to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Therefore, those who are injured or even the families of those who suffer death due to these injections will have no claim on the manufacturers themselves.

Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer’ than the Wuhan Virus
AFLD then drew from common sense to conclude that taking an experimental vaccine “is not safer” than a very low IFR for the Wuhan Virus. Besides the “extraordinarily low” mortality rates, doctors are “getting better and better at treating COVID-19: the death rate in terms of population continues to fall, hospital stays for COVID-19 get shorter and hospital mortality from COVID-19 plummets.”

While not directly asserting that the experimental vaccines are unsafe, AFLD clarified that “We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication.”

“In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease,” they explained, “the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened.”

Frontline Doctors: Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer' than COVID-19 - LifeSite

Physicians’ white paper says injection prohibited for the young and at least discouraged for healthy individuals under 70 years of age. ‘Unethical’ to advocate vaccine for persons under 50.

www.lifesitenews.com

Full Story
Dr. Simone Gold, who has a history of spreading dubious claims about the pandemic, used misinformation to sow doubt about COVID-19 vaccines in a live-streamed Jan. 3 address at a Pentecostal church in Florida.
Video Uses Bogus Claims to Stoke Race-Based Fears of COVID-19 Vaccine - FactCheck.org

She is one of my hero's.

If you like a quack.

The real quack is Bill Gates that funds all this crap that censors real doctors, that aren't afraid to speak up. You really have taken the scam hook line and sinker, haven't you. You have earned the Sheeple award today P.

View attachment 457024

well I don't believe in "God will heal you and keep you from getting covid".

 

[Thoth001]

Why get the shot when you can still get covid? Simple question. Should be a simple answer. All these people getting the shot. WHY? You can still get it, whether you get the vaccine or not. So why do it???

Many people are ignorant and think the vaccine companies are there to help them, along with Big Pharma. I also have heard and excuse of someone I know saying "they are going to get it, because it will become mandatory anyway." Here is some data I would like to share that people should know:

“The most enduring myth regarding COVID-19,” the doctors wrote, “is that this is a highly lethal infection. It is not. The data is unequivocal:

COVID-19 kills very rarely and is mostly limited to the medically fragile,

COVID-19 is less deadly than influenza in children,

COVID-19 is similar lethality in the middle adult years and treatable.”

They went on to cite the Centers for Disease Control’s (CDC) own “best estimate” to demonstrate that the infection fatality rate (IFR) is overall very low:

0-19 years old: 0.00003 (99.997 percent survival rate)

20-49 years old: 0.0002 (99.98 percent survival rate)

50-69 years old: 0.005 (99.5 percent survival rate)

70+ years old: 0.054 (94.6 percent survival rate)

For the jab itself:

Brand new mRNA technology

First, what the doctors call the “largest experimental medication program in our history” uses a brand-new technology utilizing messenger RNA. “No vaccine” based on this technology “has ever been approved for any disease, or even entered final-stage trials until now, so there’s no peer-reviewed published human data to compare how mRNA stacks up against older technologies,” AFLD said.

No independently published animal studies

Further, previous coronavirus vaccines developed over decades have consistently failed in animal trials with the death of their subjects. Yet, these experimental vaccines have no independently published animal studies.

“Vaccine safety requires proper animal trials and peer-reviewed data,” the paper stated, “neither of which has occurred” with these experimental biological agents.

Recipient may become more vulnerable to virus

The AFLD White Paper stated that one of the greatest safety concerns relates to how “(p)rior coronavirus (and other respiratory) vaccines have failed due to the scientific phenomena known as pathogenic priming that makes the vaccine recipient more likely to suffer a sudden fatal outcome due to massive cytokine storm when exposed to the wild virus.”

Of note, current reports revealed that hundreds of individuals injected with COVID-19 experimental vaccines have been admitted to the hospital, and the shots have so far been linked to at least 181 deaths in the United States.

Neurological diseases, long-term effects

The paper listed many other possible complications, including neurological diseases, and cited from the “extremely limited COVID-19 vaccine data” instances of them already occurring.

Manufactures have no liability

Of great concern as well is the fact that the companies that produce these experimental biological agents “are immune from all liability” due to the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. Therefore, those who are injured or even the families of those who suffer death due to these injections will have no claim on the manufacturers themselves.

Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer’ than the Wuhan Virus
AFLD then drew from common sense to conclude that taking an experimental vaccine “is not safer” than a very low IFR for the Wuhan Virus. Besides the “extraordinarily low” mortality rates, doctors are “getting better and better at treating COVID-19: the death rate in terms of population continues to fall, hospital stays for COVID-19 get shorter and hospital mortality from COVID-19 plummets.”

While not directly asserting that the experimental vaccines are unsafe, AFLD clarified that “We are saying that by definition it is unsafe to widely distribute an experimental vaccine, because taking a vaccine is completely different than taking an ordinary medication.”

“In contrast to taking a medication for an actual disease,” they explained, “the person who takes a vaccine is typically completely healthy and would continue to be healthy without the vaccine. As the first rule of the Hippocratic Oath is: do no harm, vaccine safety must be guaranteed. That has not yet happened.”

Frontline Doctors: Experimental vaccines are ‘not safer' than COVID-19 - LifeSite

Physicians’ white paper says injection prohibited for the young and at least discouraged for healthy individuals under 70 years of age. ‘Unethical’ to advocate vaccine for persons under 50.

www.lifesitenews.com

Full Story
Dr. Simone Gold, who has a history of spreading dubious claims about the pandemic, used misinformation to sow doubt about COVID-19 vaccines in a live-streamed Jan. 3 address at a Pentecostal church in Florida.
Video Uses Bogus Claims to Stoke Race-Based Fears of COVID-19 Vaccine - FactCheck.org

She is one of my hero's.

If you like a quack.

The real quack is Bill Gates that funds all this crap that censors real doctors, that aren't afraid to speak up. You really have taken the scam hook line and sinker, haven't you. You have earned the Sheeple award today P.

View attachment 457024

well I don't believe in "God will heal you and keep you from getting covid".

I just take Vitamin D3 and Vitamin C, and I have worked around 100's that tested "positive" and I have never gotten it. In fact I rarely get sick. It has nothing to do about a god. It is about living a healthy lifestyle. Have you not heard of that? Taking your health in your own hands and not putting it in entities hands that want to make money off of you being sick.

And then you can even get deeper into how much of a fraud germ theory really is.

 

[Oz and the Orchestra]

Why get the shot when you can still get covid? Simple question. Should be a simple answer. All these people getting the shot. WHY? You can still get it, whether you get the vaccine or not. So why do it???

You can still get Ebola. Smallpox. Bubonic Plague. Just because you've had a vaccine won't stop the virus/bacteria from trying to take over your body. It doesn't know or care it will try to infect you anyway.
Having had the vaccine though you are far less likely to die or suffer a serious illness. Not enough of the virus can take over enough cells to make you any more than mildly sick.

That's why everyone needs to take the vaccine.

Simples!