Make informed choices because covid 19 is a disease of the endothelium. You can get it and not have to go to the hospital because of the initial infection and still have health effects that go beyond the initial infection.THIS isn't good news at all. So much for the argument of go ahead and get it over with.
A recent study examined the cardiac MRIs of 100 people who had recovered from Covid-19 and compared them to heart images from 100 people who were similar but not infected with the virus. Their average age was 49 and two-thirds of the patients had recovered at home. 78 of the 100 patients showed structural changes to their hearts, 76 of the 100 had evidence of a biomarker signaling cardiac injury typically found after a heart attack, and 60 of the 100 had signs of inflammation.
Covid-19 infections leave an impact on the heart, raising concerns about lasting damage
It is too soon to say if the heart damage in patients recovering from Covid-19 is transient or permanent, but cardiologists are worried.www.statnews.com
Hopefully after he nukes China.
We can't fight on two fronts now. First we recover from the attack and get back on our feet, then we deal with the retaliation, provided Trump gets reelected.
Fight? I’m not talking about any fight. I’m talking about whoop-ass.
Just the destruction of the economy, small businesses, mandates and an unnecessary panic, all conveniently just before an election.What exactly are they doing to you that has you upset?No, just with those in power that feel they must make that call for me.I'm not hiding either. Tomorrow I will be playing my 97th round of golf for the year. But I am being smart about it. Again... this new information has change my perception of the risk profile and I will adjust accordingly. If you want to dismiss the risks and throw caution to the wind, that's your call. My call is different. Do you have a problem with that?Nor me, and I am not hiding.It hasn't found me yet.It will find ALL of us.If you really wanted to get it, I'm pretty no one can stop you from getting it. You should show them and go get it.
I get that from some people sometimes.
None of the above.
This bug has nothing to do with politics.Just the destruction of the economy, small businesses, mandates and an unnecessary panic, all conveniently just before an election.What exactly are they doing to you that has you upset?No, just with those in power that feel they must make that call for me.I'm not hiding either. Tomorrow I will be playing my 97th round of golf for the year. But I am being smart about it. Again... this new information has change my perception of the risk profile and I will adjust accordingly. If you want to dismiss the risks and throw caution to the wind, that's your call. My call is different. Do you have a problem with that?Nor me, and I am not hiding.It hasn't found me yet.It will find ALL of us.If you really wanted to get it, I'm pretty no one can stop you from getting it. You should show them and go get it.
But hey, no biggie, right?
That's probably why I have 97 rounds of golf in this year. I'm panicking.
You still didn't answer the question though. Please tell me the egregious things the government has done to you because of covid 19.
THIS isn't good news at all. So much for the argument of go ahead and get it over with.
A recent study examined the cardiac MRIs of 100 people who had recovered from Covid-19 and compared them to heart images from 100 people who were similar but not infected with the virus. Their average age was 49 and two-thirds of the patients had recovered at home. 78 of the 100 patients showed structural changes to their hearts, 76 of the 100 had evidence of a biomarker signaling cardiac injury typically found after a heart attack, and 60 of the 100 had signs of inflammation.
Covid-19 infections leave an impact on the heart, raising concerns about lasting damage
It is too soon to say if the heart damage in patients recovering from Covid-19 is transient or permanent, but cardiologists are worried.
Well the studies just came out so it kind of is news and I did say it isn't good news so there's that.THIS isn't good news at all. So much for the argument of go ahead and get it over with.
A recent study examined the cardiac MRIs of 100 people who had recovered from Covid-19 and compared them to heart images from 100 people who were similar but not infected with the virus. Their average age was 49 and two-thirds of the patients had recovered at home. 78 of the 100 patients showed structural changes to their hearts, 76 of the 100 had evidence of a biomarker signaling cardiac injury typically found after a heart attack, and 60 of the 100 had signs of inflammation.
Covid-19 infections leave an impact on the heart, raising concerns about lasting damage
It is too soon to say if the heart damage in patients recovering from Covid-19 is transient or permanent, but cardiologists are worried.
Its hardly even "news" , much less "good news".
Just alarmism designed to scare soft-brained Americans to take the dictates of the technocrats running this pandemic "seriously". My guess is that the media sources who published this didn't bother to vet the story at all, as their goal is to keep the country shut down as much as possible for as long as possible.
Well the studies just came out so it kind of is news and I did say it isn't good news so there's that.THIS isn't good news at all. So much for the argument of go ahead and get it over with.
A recent study examined the cardiac MRIs of 100 people who had recovered from Covid-19 and compared them to heart images from 100 people who were similar but not infected with the virus. Their average age was 49 and two-thirds of the patients had recovered at home. 78 of the 100 patients showed structural changes to their hearts, 76 of the 100 had evidence of a biomarker signaling cardiac injury typically found after a heart attack, and 60 of the 100 had signs of inflammation.
Covid-19 infections leave an impact on the heart, raising concerns about lasting damage
It is too soon to say if the heart damage in patients recovering from Covid-19 is transient or permanent, but cardiologists are worried.
Its hardly even "news" , much less "good news".
Just alarmism designed to scare soft-brained Americans to take the dictates of the technocrats running this pandemic "seriously". My guess is that the media sources who published this didn't bother to vet the story at all, as their goal is to keep the country shut down as much as possible for as long as possible.
And if you aren't concerned with it, then just ignore it.
Fair enough?
So you don't believe people should have all of the available information on the virus?Well the studies just came out so it kind of is news and I did say it isn't good news so there's that.THIS isn't good news at all. So much for the argument of go ahead and get it over with.
A recent study examined the cardiac MRIs of 100 people who had recovered from Covid-19 and compared them to heart images from 100 people who were similar but not infected with the virus. Their average age was 49 and two-thirds of the patients had recovered at home. 78 of the 100 patients showed structural changes to their hearts, 76 of the 100 had evidence of a biomarker signaling cardiac injury typically found after a heart attack, and 60 of the 100 had signs of inflammation.
Covid-19 infections leave an impact on the heart, raising concerns about lasting damage
It is too soon to say if the heart damage in patients recovering from Covid-19 is transient or permanent, but cardiologists are worried.
Its hardly even "news" , much less "good news".
Just alarmism designed to scare soft-brained Americans to take the dictates of the technocrats running this pandemic "seriously". My guess is that the media sources who published this didn't bother to vet the story at all, as their goal is to keep the country shut down as much as possible for as long as possible.
And if you aren't concerned with it, then just ignore it.
Fair enough?
But I am concerned, because its news that is petrifying a sector of the public and might have a negative effect on recovery. It doesn't offer any solutions, just negativity.
It would be like General Eisenhower addressing the men before the invasion of Normandy warning them about possible of disabling PTSD after the event.
This story has no redeeming social value, there is nothing that the people can do about possible bad aftereffects from Corona Virus except worry about it.
So you don't believe people should have all of the available information on the virus?Well the studies just came out so it kind of is news and I did say it isn't good news so there's that.THIS isn't good news at all. So much for the argument of go ahead and get it over with.
A recent study examined the cardiac MRIs of 100 people who had recovered from Covid-19 and compared them to heart images from 100 people who were similar but not infected with the virus. Their average age was 49 and two-thirds of the patients had recovered at home. 78 of the 100 patients showed structural changes to their hearts, 76 of the 100 had evidence of a biomarker signaling cardiac injury typically found after a heart attack, and 60 of the 100 had signs of inflammation.
Covid-19 infections leave an impact on the heart, raising concerns about lasting damage
It is too soon to say if the heart damage in patients recovering from Covid-19 is transient or permanent, but cardiologists are worried.
Its hardly even "news" , much less "good news".
Just alarmism designed to scare soft-brained Americans to take the dictates of the technocrats running this pandemic "seriously". My guess is that the media sources who published this didn't bother to vet the story at all, as their goal is to keep the country shut down as much as possible for as long as possible.
And if you aren't concerned with it, then just ignore it.
Fair enough?
But I am concerned, because its news that is petrifying a sector of the public and might have a negative effect on recovery. It doesn't offer any solutions, just negativity.
It would be like General Eisenhower addressing the men before the invasion of Normandy warning them about possible of disabling PTSD after the event.
This story has no redeeming social value, there is nothing that the people can do about possible bad aftereffects from Corona Virus except worry about it.
Herd immunity is achieved safely, through vaccination....thus the rush for a vaccine.Were all gonna get it. Unless herd immunity is allowed to take its course. Lockdowns stagger that process.There's no negative bubble. There's just reality. The reality is this virus is a disease of the endothelium. If you think it is an acceptable risk to get the virus and then treat it, that's your call. But from a risk perspective it is a higher risk than never getting it. That is reality.And if hydroxy does its job then the virus can’t attack as acutely.Maybe but they aren't side effects. Covid 19 is a disease of the endothelium. It just uses the lungs as it's entry point.Give them Hydroxy early and you’ll probably stave off those alleged heart side effects.THIS isn't good news at all. So much for the argument of go ahead and get it over with.
A recent study examined the cardiac MRIs of 100 people who had recovered from Covid-19 and compared them to heart images from 100 people who were similar but not infected with the virus. Their average age was 49 and two-thirds of the patients had recovered at home. 78 of the 100 patients showed structural changes to their hearts, 76 of the 100 had evidence of a biomarker signaling cardiac injury typically found after a heart attack, and 60 of the 100 had signs of inflammation.
Covid-19 infections leave an impact on the heart, raising concerns about lasting damage
It is too soon to say if the heart damage in patients recovering from Covid-19 is transient or permanent, but cardiologists are worried.
Sorry to burst your negative bubble.
Herd immunity is achieved safely, through vaccination....thus the rush for a vaccine.Were all gonna get it. Unless herd immunity is allowed to take its course. Lockdowns stagger that process.There's no negative bubble. There's just reality. The reality is this virus is a disease of the endothelium. If you think it is an acceptable risk to get the virus and then treat it, that's your call. But from a risk perspective it is a higher risk than never getting it. That is reality.And if hydroxy does its job then the virus can’t attack as acutely.Maybe but they aren't side effects. Covid 19 is a disease of the endothelium. It just uses the lungs as it's entry point.Give them Hydroxy early and you’ll probably stave off those alleged heart side effects.THIS isn't good news at all. So much for the argument of go ahead and get it over with.
A recent study examined the cardiac MRIs of 100 people who had recovered from Covid-19 and compared them to heart images from 100 people who were similar but not infected with the virus. Their average age was 49 and two-thirds of the patients had recovered at home. 78 of the 100 patients showed structural changes to their hearts, 76 of the 100 had evidence of a biomarker signaling cardiac injury typically found after a heart attack, and 60 of the 100 had signs of inflammation.
Covid-19 infections leave an impact on the heart, raising concerns about lasting damage
It is too soon to say if the heart damage in patients recovering from Covid-19 is transient or permanent, but cardiologists are worried.
Sorry to burst your negative bubble.
To do it the natural way as you prescribe, is 70% more deaths and long term damage and would take 10 years of misery, before we'd see relief....
I think Sweden, with little restrictions.... has only achieved 7% of their population having been infected and double the deaths of their neighboring Countries....
We need 70% of the population to have immunity in order to eradicate the virus....
A vaccine, With a controlled and limited amount of the virus in it to give immunity, will cause less deaths and less heart and neurological damage,
And can get our population to the 50 - 70% herd immunity level can be achieved in 2 - 3 years.
And, natural herd immunity through self made antibodies, have been shown to only last a few weeks on a portion of the people.... So getting the disease naturally, does not make one immune from getting it again... which is a shocker.... No natural herd immunity.....on many with the milder cases....And their second infection of the virus, has been shown, to be worse.
