Could we put the lies about Biden to bed now?

[Uncensored2008]

So you’re saying that Congress has the ability to impeach the president but not the ability to investigate the president?

Where the hell do people come up with this nonsense?

So, you're saying that you pick your butt with a pickax and eat the results?

Standard Disclaimer: You don't make up shit and try to claim I said it, and I won't make up shit and claim you said it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

This coup is a farce, based on rumors, innuendo, slander, and third hand claims. It was STARTED because the Stalinist party FAILED in the Russian Collusion Conspiracy Theory. The farce was PREDICATED on a a whistleblower named Eric Ciaramella who turns out to be CIA operative who was FIRED from the NSC by President Trump because the little ****** leaked classified information to the little Goebbels.

But it gets better. Turns out that Ciaramella is a good buddy of Quid Pro Joe Biden.

{
Eric Ciaramella, the alleged Ukraine whistleblower, was a guest of Vice President Joe Biden at a glitzy lunch in October 2016 to honor the prime minister of Italy.

Biden co-hosted the banquet with former Secretary of State John Kerry for then-Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi. Ciaramella, who is of Italian heritage, was among the U.S. officials who accepted an invitation. This week, the Washington Examiner reported that Ciaramella is now a deputy national intelligence officer for Russia and Eurasia on the National Intelligence Council, reporting to the director of national intelligence.}

Alleged whistleblower Eric Ciaramella was Biden guest at State Department banquet

Of course Ciaramella is a confidant of KGB John Brennan and hand picked by the old Stalinist pile of shit himself;

{Federal documents reveal that the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella, previously worked in the Obama administration with former Vice President Joe Biden and former CIA Director John Brennan. RealClear reports that Ciaramella remained there into the Trump administration, and headed the Ukraine desk at the National Security Council, eventually transitioning into the West Wing, until June 2017.}

Anti-Trump 'Whistleblower' Worked With DNC Operatives, Joe Biden

AND Ciaramella was involved in the Ukraine tampering with the 2016 election with Alexandra Chalupa.

{
Alexandra Chalupa was apparently hired by the DNC going as far back as 2013. According to Politico, shortly after the election:

A daughter of Ukrainian immigrants who maintains strong ties to the Ukrainian-American diaspora and the U.S. Embassy in Ukraine, Chalupa, a lawyer by training, in 2014 was doing pro bono work for another client interested in the Ukrainian crisis and began researching Manafort’s role in Yanukovych’s rise, as well as his ties to the pro-Russian oligarchs who funded Yanukovych’s political party.”

According to Politico, Chalupa claimed that in October of 2015 she began investigating Trump’s ties to Russia. Why she began this investigation is completely unknown. The only thing of significance that had happened at this point was that Trump announced he was running for office. There was no apparent triggering event. Candidate Trump had very limited contact with Russia or Russia businessmen

...

And Ciaramella worked with a Democratic National Committee operative who dug up dirt on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, inviting her into the White House for meetings, former White House colleagues said. The operative, Alexandra Chalupa, a Ukrainian-American who supported Hillary Clinton, led an effort to link the Republican campaign to the Russian government. “He knows her. He had her in the White House,” said one former co-worker, who requested anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter.

Documents confirm the DNC opposition researcher attended at least one White House meeting with Ciaramella in November 2015. She visited the White House with a number of Ukrainian officials lobbying the Obama administration for aid for Ukraine.}

HUGE! CIA "Whistleblower" Eric Ciaramella Worked with DNC Operative Alexandra Chalupa in Creation of Trump-Russia Collusion Hoax

No WONDER you Communists hid his name and the little Goebbels covered it up...

Nice copy pasta but has nothing to do with the matter. Just a lot of obfuscation and distraction.

The facts are that Trump was pushing for an investigation into his political opponents. The fact is that Trump personally ordered a delay in foreign aid.

These facts alone raise reasonable suspicion.

The entire farrago is to hide the fact that Biden sold the office of the vice-presidency to China and a Ukrainian gas company.
And there is proof...PROOF.....of exactly that.

Don't be a dunce your whole life...take a day off.

proof. PROOF!

no there isn’t. There’s zero evidence. No one has shown anything of the sort.

Let's check:





The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Hunter Biden....drug addict, reprobate, no experience in the gas industry...or in Ukraine...

...yet given $83 thousand a month for the sale of the office of the vice-presidency.


And....
Interesting that when Biden was VP, he and his son Hunter went to deal with China, and Hunter came away with $millions.....

But Trump is immune to the bribes.


"The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter Biden’s firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president."
https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troubling-reason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/


Sounds a lot like the $145 million Putin gave the Clintons.


Research this:

https https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=lH_sdTC7Anw






PROOF!!!!!


Brutal, huh? Sorry you didn’t run with scissors when you had the chance?

Where is there proof that Biden was attempting to help his son by getting the prosecutor dismissed?

The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Now explain why Hunter was worth $83,000 a month?

 

[colfax_m]

So you’re saying that Congress has the ability to impeach the president but not the ability to investigate the president?

Where the hell do people come up with this nonsense?

So, you're saying that you pick your butt with a pickax and eat the results?

Standard Disclaimer: You don't make up shit and try to claim I said it, and I won't make up shit and claim you said it.

But that is exactly what you said, I'll prove it.

The house has zero oversight authority - nor should it.

You claimed there is zero oversight. That's obviously not true. The House has been exerting oversight of the executive since the founders were still members of Congress. Oversight means investigating the executive. That's what Schiff is trying to do. They have the power to impeach the president which requires they have the ability to investigate him. This has been settled ages ago during many, many arguments. Especially during Watergate.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not a fantasy. It’s literally how they used to do it back in the old days. No one sent marines to storm the capital in a coup attempt. Such an order would be clearly unconstitutional by the speech and debate clause.

REALLY?

Oh wow, so you can show the HOUSE arresting a member of the executive branch?

Let's see it.

The last arrest was like a century ago. There was a court case about it. Precedent is on my side.

McGrain v. Daugherty - Wikipedia

AND HE GOES FOR THE LIE.

Midland National Bank of Washington Court House is not the Executive branch, lying scumbag. Arresting a bank president is not making war on another branch of the federal government, attempting to use arms against the executive branch is, and an act of treason per article III of the Constitution you have never read.

This coequal branches of government thing REALLY disturbs you.

 

[colfax_m]

Nice copy pasta but has nothing to do with the matter. Just a lot of obfuscation and distraction.

The facts are that Trump was pushing for an investigation into his political opponents. The fact is that Trump personally ordered a delay in foreign aid.

These facts alone raise reasonable suspicion.

The entire farrago is to hide the fact that Biden sold the office of the vice-presidency to China and a Ukrainian gas company.
And there is proof...PROOF.....of exactly that.

Don't be a dunce your whole life...take a day off.

proof. PROOF!

no there isn’t. There’s zero evidence. No one has shown anything of the sort.

Let's check:





The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Hunter Biden....drug addict, reprobate, no experience in the gas industry...or in Ukraine...

...yet given $83 thousand a month for the sale of the office of the vice-presidency.


And....
Interesting that when Biden was VP, he and his son Hunter went to deal with China, and Hunter came away with $millions.....

But Trump is immune to the bribes.


"The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter Biden’s firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president."
https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troubling-reason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/


Sounds a lot like the $145 million Putin gave the Clintons.


Research this:

https https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=lH_sdTC7Anw






PROOF!!!!!


Brutal, huh? Sorry you didn’t run with scissors when you had the chance?

Where is there proof that Biden was attempting to help his son by getting the prosecutor dismissed?

The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Now explain why Hunter was worth $83,000 a month?

Still waiting for the evidence that Biden was acting to help his son. That wasn't in the little video you linked.

 

[colfax_m]

Not a fantasy. It’s literally how they used to do it back in the old days. No one sent marines to storm the capital in a coup attempt. Such an order would be clearly unconstitutional by the speech and debate clause.

REALLY?

Oh wow, so you can show the HOUSE arresting a member of the executive branch?

Let's see it.

The last arrest was like a century ago. There was a court case about it. Precedent is on my side.

McGrain v. Daugherty - Wikipedia

AND HE GOES FOR THE LIE.

Midland National Bank of Washington Court House is not the Executive branch, lying scumbag. Arresting a bank president is not making war on another branch of the federal government, attempting to use arms against the executive branch is, and an act of treason per article III of the Constitution you have never read.

This coequal branches of government thing REALLY disturbs you.

Since when do members of the executive branch get immunity? Where is that written in the Constitution?

Congress has oversight over the executive. That's written into the Constitution. That's is division of power. Without Congressional oversight, the executive would be supreme over all other branches.

 

[Uncensored2008]

So you’re saying that Congress has the ability to impeach the president but not the ability to investigate the president?

Where the hell do people come up with this nonsense?

So, you're saying that you pick your butt with a pickax and eat the results?

Standard Disclaimer: You don't make up shit and try to claim I said it, and I won't make up shit and claim you said it.

But that is exactly what you said, I'll prove it.

The house has zero oversight authority - nor should it.

You claimed there is zero oversight. That's obviously not true. The House has been exerting oversight of the executive since the founders were still members of Congress. Oversight means investigating the executive. That's what Schiff is trying to do. They have the power to impeach the president which requires they have the ability to investigate him. This has been settled ages ago during many, many arguments. Especially during Watergate.

Investigation is part of the impeachment process, moron.

Learn to read.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not a fantasy. It’s literally how they used to do it back in the old days. No one sent marines to storm the capital in a coup attempt. Such an order would be clearly unconstitutional by the speech and debate clause.

REALLY?

Oh wow, so you can show the HOUSE arresting a member of the executive branch?

Let's see it.

The last arrest was like a century ago. There was a court case about it. Precedent is on my side.

McGrain v. Daugherty - Wikipedia

AND HE GOES FOR THE LIE.

Midland National Bank of Washington Court House is not the Executive branch, lying scumbag. Arresting a bank president is not making war on another branch of the federal government, attempting to use arms against the executive branch is, and an act of treason per article III of the Constitution you have never read.

This coequal branches of government thing REALLY disturbs you.

Since when do members of the executive branch get immunity? Where is that written in the Constitution?

Congress has oversight over the executive. That's written into the Constitution. That's is division of power. Without Congressional oversight, the executive would be supreme over all other branches.

Moving the goal posts?

You've got nothing but hate site talking points.

Slither back to your gutter, you're defeated.

 

[colfax_m]

So you’re saying that Congress has the ability to impeach the president but not the ability to investigate the president?

Where the hell do people come up with this nonsense?

So, you're saying that you pick your butt with a pickax and eat the results?

Standard Disclaimer: You don't make up shit and try to claim I said it, and I won't make up shit and claim you said it.

But that is exactly what you said, I'll prove it.

The house has zero oversight authority - nor should it.

You claimed there is zero oversight. That's obviously not true. The House has been exerting oversight of the executive since the founders were still members of Congress. Oversight means investigating the executive. That's what Schiff is trying to do. They have the power to impeach the president which requires they have the ability to investigate him. This has been settled ages ago during many, many arguments. Especially during Watergate.

Investigation is part of the impeachment process, moron.

Learn to read.

That's what I've been saying this whole time. If Congress has the power to investigate the executive, that's called oversight. Trump is preventing Congress's ability to investigate which is unconstitutional.

 

[colfax_m]

Not a fantasy. It’s literally how they used to do it back in the old days. No one sent marines to storm the capital in a coup attempt. Such an order would be clearly unconstitutional by the speech and debate clause.

REALLY?

Oh wow, so you can show the HOUSE arresting a member of the executive branch?

Let's see it.

The last arrest was like a century ago. There was a court case about it. Precedent is on my side.

McGrain v. Daugherty - Wikipedia

AND HE GOES FOR THE LIE.

Midland National Bank of Washington Court House is not the Executive branch, lying scumbag. Arresting a bank president is not making war on another branch of the federal government, attempting to use arms against the executive branch is, and an act of treason per article III of the Constitution you have never read.

This coequal branches of government thing REALLY disturbs you.

Since when do members of the executive branch get immunity? Where is that written in the Constitution?

Congress has oversight over the executive. That's written into the Constitution. That's is division of power. Without Congressional oversight, the executive would be supreme over all other branches.

Moving the goal posts?

You've got nothing but hate site talking points.

Slither back to your gutter, you're defeated.

I haven't moved any goal posts.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Since when do members of the executive branch get immunity? Where is that written in the Constitution?

Congress has oversight over the executive. That's written into the Constitution. That's is division of power. Without Congressional oversight, the executive would be supreme over all other branches.

Really? Show us?

Standard Disclaimer: Now the dishonest troll will cite some Marxist academic and claim that is the Constitution....

 

[colfax_m]

Since when do members of the executive branch get immunity? Where is that written in the Constitution?

Congress has oversight over the executive. That's written into the Constitution. That's is division of power. Without Congressional oversight, the executive would be supreme over all other branches.

Really? Show us?

Standard Disclaimer: Now the dishonest troll will cite some Marxist academic and claim that is the Constitution....

Article 1, section 2

 

[PoliticalChic]

The entire farrago is to hide the fact that Biden sold the office of the vice-presidency to China and a Ukrainian gas company.
And there is proof...PROOF.....of exactly that.

Don't be a dunce your whole life...take a day off.

proof. PROOF!

no there isn’t. There’s zero evidence. No one has shown anything of the sort.

Let's check:





The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Hunter Biden....drug addict, reprobate, no experience in the gas industry...or in Ukraine...

...yet given $83 thousand a month for the sale of the office of the vice-presidency.


And....
Interesting that when Biden was VP, he and his son Hunter went to deal with China, and Hunter came away with $millions.....

But Trump is immune to the bribes.


"The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter Biden’s firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president."
https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troubling-reason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/


Sounds a lot like the $145 million Putin gave the Clintons.


Research this:

https https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=lH_sdTC7Anw






PROOF!!!!!


Brutal, huh? Sorry you didn’t run with scissors when you had the chance?

Where is there proof that Biden was attempting to help his son by getting the prosecutor dismissed?

The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Now explain why Hunter was worth $83,000 a month?

Still waiting for the evidence that Biden was acting to help his son. That wasn't in the little video you linked.

Answer the question and it will destroy your pretend ignorance of Biden selling the vice=presidency to Burisma and to China"

Now explain why Hunter was worth $83,000 a month?

 

[colfax_m]

proof. PROOF!

no there isn’t. There’s zero evidence. No one has shown anything of the sort.

Let's check:





The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Hunter Biden....drug addict, reprobate, no experience in the gas industry...or in Ukraine...

...yet given $83 thousand a month for the sale of the office of the vice-presidency.


And....
Interesting that when Biden was VP, he and his son Hunter went to deal with China, and Hunter came away with $millions.....

But Trump is immune to the bribes.


"The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter Biden’s firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president."
https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troubling-reason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/


Sounds a lot like the $145 million Putin gave the Clintons.


Research this:

https https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=lH_sdTC7Anw






PROOF!!!!!


Brutal, huh? Sorry you didn’t run with scissors when you had the chance?

Where is there proof that Biden was attempting to help his son by getting the prosecutor dismissed?

The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Now explain why Hunter was worth $83,000 a month?

Still waiting for the evidence that Biden was acting to help his son. That wasn't in the little video you linked.

Answer the question and it will destroy your pretend ignorance of Biden selling the vice=presidency to Burisma and to China"

Now explain why Hunter was worth $83,000 a month?

Because he's great at cocktail parties. Who cares? It's not illegal to be overpaid. It's illegal to take a bribe, which means there must be a quid pro quo. Where is that?

 

[Uncensored2008]

[

That's what I've been saying this whole time. If Congress has the power to investigate the executive, that's called oversight. Trump is preventing Congress's ability to investigate which is unconstitutional.

First off, you have never read the Constitution, that is painfully clear.

{

5: The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

}

That's it, that is the ONLY statement about what the the house may do.

Nothing grants them the power to subpoena members of the executive branch, nor even hints of it.

{
6: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

7: Judgment in Cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.}

Obviously this is the very first time you've ever been exposed to the above.

You kept pushing the lie that the Communist party has the power to subpoena members of the executive. There is no such authority. President Trump is correct in telling the Marxists to **** off.

 

[bripat9643]

Let's check:





The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Hunter Biden....drug addict, reprobate, no experience in the gas industry...or in Ukraine...

...yet given $83 thousand a month for the sale of the office of the vice-presidency.


And....
Interesting that when Biden was VP, he and his son Hunter went to deal with China, and Hunter came away with $millions.....

But Trump is immune to the bribes.


"The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter Biden’s firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president."
https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troubling-reason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/


Sounds a lot like the $145 million Putin gave the Clintons.


Research this:

https https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=lH_sdTC7Anw






PROOF!!!!!


Brutal, huh? Sorry you didn’t run with scissors when you had the chance?

Where is there proof that Biden was attempting to help his son by getting the prosecutor dismissed?

The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Now explain why Hunter was worth $83,000 a month?

Still waiting for the evidence that Biden was acting to help his son. That wasn't in the little video you linked.

Answer the question and it will destroy your pretend ignorance of Biden selling the vice=presidency to Burisma and to China"

Now explain why Hunter was worth $83,000 a month?

Because he's great at cocktail parties. Who cares? It's not illegal to be overpaid. It's illegal to take a bribe, which means there must be a quid pro quo. Where is that?

Being paid to do nothing is evidence that you're being bribed.

 

[Uncensored2008]

REALLY?

Oh wow, so you can show the HOUSE arresting a member of the executive branch?

Let's see it.

The last arrest was like a century ago. There was a court case about it. Precedent is on my side.

McGrain v. Daugherty - Wikipedia

AND HE GOES FOR THE LIE.

Midland National Bank of Washington Court House is not the Executive branch, lying scumbag. Arresting a bank president is not making war on another branch of the federal government, attempting to use arms against the executive branch is, and an act of treason per article III of the Constitution you have never read.

This coequal branches of government thing REALLY disturbs you.

Since when do members of the executive branch get immunity? Where is that written in the Constitution?

Congress has oversight over the executive. That's written into the Constitution. That's is division of power. Without Congressional oversight, the executive would be supreme over all other branches.

Moving the goal posts?

You've got nothing but hate site talking points.

Slither back to your gutter, you're defeated.

I haven't moved any goal posts.

When pinned down on your lie that congress has arrested members of the executive branch, which you, as expected, tried to cover up by lying about a bank president in the Tea Pot Dome scandal, you throw out a red herring about "Since when do members of the executive branch get immunity? "

That's called "moving the goals posts," sparky.

 

[colfax_m]

[

That's what I've been saying this whole time. If Congress has the power to investigate the executive, that's called oversight. Trump is preventing Congress's ability to investigate which is unconstitutional.

First off, you have never read the Constitution, that is painfully clear.

{

5: The House of Representatives shall chuse their Speaker and other Officers; and shall have the sole Power of Impeachment.

}

That's it, that is the ONLY statement about what the the house may do.

Nothing grants them the power to subpoena members of the executive branch, nor even hints of it.

{
6: The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present.

7: Judgment in Cases of impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.}

Obviously this is the very first time you've ever been exposed to the above.

You kept pushing the lie that the Communist party has the power to subpoena members of the executive. There is no such authority. President Trump is correct in telling the Marxists to **** off.

No hint? So you think they have the power to impeach but not to investigate whether someone did something impeachable?

No court would believe that argument. Investigation is a necessary part of impeachment.

It's like saying the cops have the ability to pull you over and ticket you for speeding but no authority to check your speed in any way.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Since when do members of the executive branch get immunity? Where is that written in the Constitution?

Congress has oversight over the executive. That's written into the Constitution. That's is division of power. Without Congressional oversight, the executive would be supreme over all other branches.

Really? Show us?

Standard Disclaimer: Now the dishonest troll will cite some Marxist academic and claim that is the Constitution....

Article 1, section 2

 

[Uncensored2008]

Let's check:





The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Hunter Biden....drug addict, reprobate, no experience in the gas industry...or in Ukraine...

...yet given $83 thousand a month for the sale of the office of the vice-presidency.


And....
Interesting that when Biden was VP, he and his son Hunter went to deal with China, and Hunter came away with $millions.....

But Trump is immune to the bribes.


"The troubling reason why Biden is so soft on China
In 2013, then-Vice President Joe Biden and his son Hunter Biden flew aboard Air Force Two to China. Less than two weeks later, Hunter Biden’s firm inked a $1 billion private equity deal with a subsidiary of the Chinese government’s Bank of China. The deal was later expanded to $1.5 billion. In short, the Chinese government funded a business that it co-owned along with the son of a sitting vice president."
https://nypost.com/2019/05/11/the-troubling-reason-why-biden-is-so-soft-on-china/


Sounds a lot like the $145 million Putin gave the Clintons.


Research this:

https https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/01/us/politics/biden-son-ukraine.html://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=5&v=lH_sdTC7Anw






PROOF!!!!!


Brutal, huh? Sorry you didn’t run with scissors when you had the chance?

Where is there proof that Biden was attempting to help his son by getting the prosecutor dismissed?

The bribe at 02:15


Biden sidesteps questions about corruption;






Now explain why Hunter was worth $83,000 a month?

Still waiting for the evidence that Biden was acting to help his son. That wasn't in the little video you linked.

Answer the question and it will destroy your pretend ignorance of Biden selling the vice=presidency to Burisma and to China"

Now explain why Hunter was worth $83,000 a month?

Because he's great at cocktail parties. Who cares? It's not illegal to be overpaid. It's illegal to take a bribe, which means there must be a quid pro quo. Where is that?

It is when your dad is giving the people paying you $1.8 billion in US Foreign aid. Or at least for those subject to the law it is. I get that the Communist democrat party is above the law and immune.