Could there be an Israeli connection with Baath terrorists?

[rupol2000]

Judging by Israeli policy, there could be a connection.

In the early 2000s, the main support of the Baath terrorists was the Iraqi regime of the bloody Hussein. Israel has always been at odds with Iran, while the Reagan administration supported Iran against Hussein.

Currently, the support of the Ba'ath terrorists is the Syrian regime of Assed, and the main force against Assed is the Syrian Revolution. However, Israel, according to some sources, participated in the Syrian conflict against the Syrian revolution, and most importantly, official Israel did not object to the bloody Assed remaining in power in Syria.

Thus, we see at least the loyalty of official Israel towards the bloody Baath terrorists, namely they are considered the main culprits of 9/11

 

[irosie91]

Judging by Israeli policy, there could be a connection.

In the early 2000s, the main support of the Baath terrorists was the Iraqi regime of the bloody Hussein. Israel has always been at odds with Iran, while the Reagan administration supported Iran against Hussein.

Currently, the support of the Ba'ath terrorists is the Syrian regime of Assed, and the main force against Assed is the Syrian Revolution. However, Israel, according to some sources, participated in the Syrian conflict against the Syrian revolution, and most importantly, official Israel did not object to the bloody Assed remaining in power in Syria.

Thus, we see at least the loyalty of official Israel towards the bloody Baath terrorists, namely they are considered the main culprits of 9/11

your sophistry is pathetic. You reveal its very thin veneer at the very
outset---" "Israel has always been at odds with Iran", <<<nope --
only since 1979. Then you do the fantastic "I am an idiot" with
"official Israel did not object to the bloody Assed remaining in power in
Syria"
Review BAATH policy-----it is virulently anti-Israel from its inception

 

[rupol2000]

only since 1979

This doesn't change anything in my logic chain.

 

[rupol2000]

Review BAATH policy-----it is virulently anti-Israel from its inception

These are words, but the facts say otherwise.

 

[irosie91]

This doesn't change anything in my logic chain.

"always" = "since 1979" ????

These are words, but the facts say otherwise.

to what "facts" do you allude----review BAATHISM

 

[rupol2000]

"always" = "since 1979" ????

This is irrelevant. Israel itself has existed since 1948.

 

[rupol2000]

to what "facts" do you allude----review BAATHISM

Yes, Israel remains de facto loyal to the Baath terrorists. Official Israel did not object to the bloody Assed remaining at the head of Syria.

 

[irosie91]

This is irrelevant. Israel itself has existed since 1948.

relevant----in 1979 Iran went "ISLAMIC" are you very young?

 

[irosie91]

Yes, Israel remains de facto loyal to the Baath terrorists. Official Israel did not object to the bloody Assed remaining at the head of Syria.

Israel is not in a position to object to who is head of Syria. Israel
did not express an OBJECTION to Egypt's President GAMAL ABDEL
NASSER (the baathist pig) either---nor to baathist pig SADAAM HUSSEIN.
Both sought to annihilate Israel and expressed that idea just as clearly
as does Iran today. -----are you very young?

 

[rupol2000]

relevant----in 1979 Iran went "ISLAMIC" are you very young?

Probably this regime of the Islamic revolution was pro-American at that time. In any case, they opposed the bloody Baath terrorists.
These facts are also against Israel

 

[rupol2000]

NASSER (the baathist pig)

Lies. Nasser eliminated the Baathists

 

[irosie91]

Probably this regime of the Islamic revolution was pro-American at that time. In any case, they opposed the bloody Baath terrorists.
These facts are also against Israel

OH!!!! you are very young-----the islamic revolution in Iran 1979 was
VERY ANTI-AMERICAN----their issues with Iraq has nothing to do with BAATHISM. Do you understand the SUNNI vs SHIITE divide?

 

[irosie91]

Lies. Nasser eliminated the Baathists

Nasser was a BAATHIST very very BAATHIST

 

[rupol2000]

OH!!!! you are very young-----the islamic revolution in Iran 1979 was
VERY ANTI-AMERICAN----their issues with Iraq has nothing to do with BAATHISM. Do you understand the SUNNI vs SHIITE divide?

If the power of the Islamic Revolution were anti-American, they would support the Ba'ath.
In fact, Hussein's invasion of Iran was because it was a pro-American regime.

 

[rupol2000]

Do you understand the SUNNI vs SHIITE divide?

I don't understand, but it doesn't matter. Religion is only a political tool

 

[irosie91]

If the power of the Islamic Revolution were anti-American, they would support the Ba'ath.
In fact, Hussein's invasion of Iran was because it was a pro-American regime.

No. you are assuming incorrectly. Just being anti-american was not
enough to overcome the problem that Iran and Iraq had with each other.
Part of the conflict centers around the SHIITE (iranian) vs SUNNI (Iraqi)
hostility that has been going on for more than 12 centuries. There were
also land issues and economy and the fact of lots of SHIITES in Iraq
whom Saddam happily murdered. Iran was not anti-american under
THE SHAH. He wasn't even anti-Israel. The ISLAMISTS turned on him

 

[rupol2000]

No. you are assuming incorrectly. Just being anti-american was not
enough to overcome the problem that Iran and Iraq had with each other.

Enough. Only America decides everything. Everything else depends only on who sits in the white house.

 

[rupol2000]

Shah Pahlavi was an anti-American totalitarian. He proclaimed the imperial principle: “God, Shah and Motherland,” which usually means the anti-American path of centralization and dictatorship, oppression of minorities and destruction of local cultures. Moscow is now praising approximately the same thing.

 

[irosie91]

Enough. Only America decides everything. Everything else depends only on who sits in the white house.

Oh----you are very young and not American. I am old and American.
America does not 'decide' everything. America had nothing to do with
the conflict between Iraq and Iran. As to Baathism---Baathists
caused the 1967 war between Israel and the UAR (do you know what the
UAR was?) Can you tell me where or when you learned that America
decides everything?

 

[irosie91]

Shah Pahlavi was an anti-American totalitarian. He proclaimed the imperial principle: “God, Shah and Motherland,” which usually means the anti-American path of centralization and dictatorship, oppression of minorities and destruction of local cultures. Moscow is now praising approximately the same thing.

not exactly. He was fairly progressive and had good relations with
the US (I was alive and conscious back then) Iran TODAY oppresses
minorities a lot more than they were oppressed before 1979.
In the 1970s Iranians migrated to the USA in large numbers to
escape the ISLAMIST takeover. I got to know lots of them.
The Shah was a bit too much authoritarian----but MOSTLY he
was despised by radical shiites.