Could The Trump Landslide Be America Living "they know not what they do,"????

[PoliticalChic]

Yes, the Left over-used RACIST to the point where it became a punchline. They over-used it so much that it created a massive resentment that played out in the 2016 elections. They fucked up. They weaponized PC/Identity Politics, and it backfired. The Right was correct to be annoyed.

And now I see the Right doing the same thing, only using it on a wide range of words. So I have to wonder: Why is the Right so willing to behave so much like those they despise?

Two wrongs don't make a right.

Could you support your post with some examples?

 

[Mac1958]

Could you support your post with some examples?

I already did. "Landslide".

You'll start spinning now.

Believe what you will.

 

[PoliticalChic]

There was no landslide victory, so your questions and theses are worthless.

1. It is clear that being proven a liar doen't result in you reconsidering your posts....I proved that there is marked turn to the Left, a Red Tide by your party.

2. But your posts are vastly imporant because they allow me to decimate your warped thinking, and provide facts.


3. Oxford Dictionary: cultural marxism
...a radical political ideology said to be promoted by left-wing activists with the aim of undermining or subverting western social and cultural institutions, ultimately resulting in the imposition of a progressive agenda on society.
"is cultural Marxism actually taking over our universities and academic thinking?"


4.Here is how it is written by the cultural marxists who own the Democrat Party today:
"Cultural Marxism" refers to a far-right antisemitic conspiracy theory that misrepresents Western Marxism (especially the Frankfurt School) as being responsible for modern progressive movements, identity politics, and political correctness. The conspiracy theory posits that there is an ongoing and intentional academic and intellectual effort to subvert Western society via a planned culture war....'
Wikipedia

(There is no Far Right in our nation.)



5. The attempts to corrupt our culture are everywhere:

"This writer always says politics is downstream of culture. And the Left knows this. Which is why they push their agenda through culture -- movies, music, video games.They seek to normalize their agenda by putting it in every facet of life.
Even crossword puzzles.Which aren't safe from the trans agenda, obviously.
USATODAY's crossword puzzle wants you to fill in Lia Thomas as the answer to a "NCAA champion swimmer."Lia Thomas is a man. He cheated to get his NCAA championship.USATODAY is promoting a cheater and a liar.Lia Thomas did not earn his medal."

SERIOUSLY? USAToday's Crossword Puzzle Is a Slap In the Face for Women Athletes​

twitchy.com



Please engage again.

 

[konradv]

1. It is clear that being proven a liar doen't result in you reconsidering your posts....I proved that there is marked turn to the Left, a Red Tide by your party.

2. But your posts are vastly imporant because they allow me to decimate your warped thinking, and provide facts.


3. Oxford Dictionary: cultural marxism
...a radical political ideology said to be promoted by left-wing activists with the aim of undermining or subverting western social and cultural institutions, ultimately resulting in the imposition of a progressive agenda on society.
"is cultural Marxism actually taking over our universities and academic thinking?"


4.Here is how it is written by the cultural marxists who own the Democrat Party today:
"Cultural Marxism" refers to a far-right antisemitic conspiracy theory that misrepresents Western Marxism (especially the Frankfurt School) as being responsible for modern progressive movements, identity politics, and political correctness. The conspiracy theory posits that there is an ongoing and intentional academic and intellectual effort to subvert Western society via a planned culture war....'
Wikipedia

(There is no Far Right in our nation.)



5. The attempts to corrupt our culture are everywhere:

"This writer always says politics is downstream of culture. And the Left knows this. Which is why they push their agenda through culture -- movies, music, video games.They seek to normalize their agenda by putting it in every facet of life.
Even crossword puzzles.Which aren't safe from the trans agenda, obviously.
USATODAY's crossword puzzle wants you to fill in Lia Thomas as the answer to a "NCAA champion swimmer."Lia Thomas is a man. He cheated to get his NCAA championship.USATODAY is promoting a cheater and a liar.Lia Thomas did not earn his medal."

SERIOUSLY? USAToday's Crossword Puzzle Is a Slap In the Face for Women Athletes​

twitchy.com



Please engage again.

I’m the liar? You’re the one claiming a landslide, when there was none.

 

[PoliticalChic]

81 million people did not vote , 76.9 million voted for trump. 74.4 million voted for Kamala. About 3 million voted for other candidates. Where is the landslide ? Looks like none of the above won to me.

• Donald Trump won the White House this election with a final 312 electoral votes.
• He received 77.3 million popular votes, a number that ranks among the largest vote totals ever.

The question is really about folks like you who eschew American values for, at least for you, the warm embrace of the socialist mob.
Clearly Trump is the better President for Americans, as shown in his prvious presidency.
Why would you wish to saddle America with this agenda?
Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system

 

[konradv]

• Donald Trump won the White House this election with a final 312 electoral votes.
• He received 77.3 million popular votes, a number that ranks among the largest vote totals ever.

The question is really about folks like you who eschew American values for, at least for you, the warm embrace of the socialist mob.
Clearly Trump is the better President for Americans, as shown in his prvious presidency.
Why would you wish to saddle America with this agenda?
Race and gender preferences

Language police

No punishment for criminals

Open borders

Attacks on the Supreme Court

Transgender sports competitions

Antisemitism

Wealth tax

Cancel culture

Welfare State

Government run healthcare mandates

Sanctuary Cities

Two-Tiered Justice system

Still not a landslide. Give it up!

 

[PoliticalChic]

I’m the liar? You’re the one claiming a landslide, when there was none.

AI Overview
Learn more

In the context of elections, a
landslide refers to a victory where a candidate or party wins by a large and decisive margin, significantly outperforming their opponents.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects:

• Overwhelming Victory: A landslide election signifies a clear and substantial win for the victor, suggesting strong support from the electorate.
• Large Margin: This implies the winner secures a significantly higher proportion of votes or seats compared to their rivals, exceeding what would be considered a close or competitive race.
• Implied Popular Mandate: Landslide victories can be seen as a powerful expression of public opinion, indicating a strong endorsement of the winner's policies and platform.
• No Precise Definition: While widely used, there is no universally agreed-upon or precise numerical threshold that defines a landslide victory.
• Informal Usage: The term "landslide" is generally used informally and its interpretation can be somewhat subjective, varying depending on the specific context and electoral system.

In essence, a landslide election suggests a resounding victory where the winning candidate or party achieves a decisive and overwhelming triumph, leaving little doubt about the outcome.



STEPHEN A. SMITH: It is a mandate, and I'm going to explain why.

Now I don't mind the question, but let me be very clear. I'm no supporter of Trump. I'm a supporter of truth and facts. And here's the facts. The man won every swing state. He increased in terms of his vote, his voter turnout, in his favor, from the standpoint of blacks, Latinos and young voters. He increased his numbers in that regard from 2020. 89 percent of the counties shifted to the right. That's a mandate.

We can sit up here and play around all we want to. In 2020, Trump didn't win the popular vote. He didn't win the electoral college vote. As a matter of fact the Republicans have won the popular vote, if I remember correctly, since 2004. But they did this year. So 20 years after they last won a popular vote, they won the popular vote. They won the electoral college vote. The man won every swing state. And on top of it all, 89 percent of the counties shifted (inaudible.)

I don't understand how people can look at that and say "There's no mandate." There's a mandate.



Try to be an adult and confront the error of your vote. Analyze why you made such a great and glaring mistake.

 

[konradv]

AI Overview
Learn more

In the context of elections, a
landslide refers to a victory where a candidate or party wins by a large and decisive margin, significantly outperforming their opponents.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects:

• Overwhelming Victory: A landslide election signifies a clear and substantial win for the victor, suggesting strong support from the electorate.
• Large Margin: This implies the winner secures a significantly higher proportion of votes or seats compared to their rivals, exceeding what would be considered a close or competitive race.
• Implied Popular Mandate: Landslide victories can be seen as a powerful expression of public opinion, indicating a strong endorsement of the winner's policies and platform.
• No Precise Definition: While widely used, there is no universally agreed-upon or precise numerical threshold that defines a landslide victory.
• Informal Usage: The term "landslide" is generally used informally and its interpretation can be somewhat subjective, varying depending on the specific context and electoral system.

In essence, a landslide election suggests a resounding victory where the winning candidate or party achieves a decisive and overwhelming triumph, leaving little doubt about the outcome.



STEPHEN A. SMITH: It is a mandate, and I'm going to explain why.

Now I don't mind the question, but let me be very clear. I'm no supporter of Trump. I'm a supporter of truth and facts. And here's the facts. The man won every swing state. He increased in terms of his vote, his voter turnout, in his favor, from the standpoint of blacks, Latinos and young voters. He increased his numbers in that regard from 2020. 89 percent of the counties shifted to the right. That's a mandate.

We can sit up here and play around all we want to. In 2020, Trump didn't win the popular vote. He didn't win the electoral college vote. As a matter of fact the Republicans have won the popular vote, if I remember correctly, since 2004. But they did this year. So 20 years after they last won a popular vote, they won the popular vote. They won the electoral college vote. The man won every swing state. And on top of it all, 89 percent of the counties shifted (inaudible.)

I don't understand how people can look at that and say "There's no mandate." There's a mandate.



Try to be an adult and confront the error of your vote. Analyze why you made such a great and glaring mistake.

Still not a landslide using historical metrics.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Still not a landslide using historical metrics.

How about addressing the problems that cost your party the American vote, and address my thesis that glaring communism has taken over your party.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I already did. "Landslide".

You'll start spinning now.

Believe what you will.

AI Overview
Learn more

In the context of elections, a
landslide refers to a victory where a candidate or party wins by a large and decisive margin, significantly outperforming their opponents.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects:

• Overwhelming Victory: A landslide election signifies a clear and substantial win for the victor, suggesting strong support from the electorate.
• Large Margin: This implies the winner secures a significantly higher proportion of votes or seats compared to their rivals, exceeding what would be considered a close or competitive race.
• Implied Popular Mandate: Landslide victories can be seen as a powerful expression of public opinion, indicating a strong endorsement of the winner's policies and platform.
• No Precise Definition: While widely used, there is no universally agreed-upon or precise numerical threshold that defines a landslide victory.
• Informal Usage: The term "landslide" is generally used informally and its interpretation can be somewhat subjective, varying depending on the specific context and electoral system.

In essence, a landslide election suggests a resounding victory where the winning candidate or party achieves a decisive and overwhelming triumph, leaving little doubt about the outcome.



STEPHEN A. SMITH: It is a mandate, and I'm going to explain why.

Now I don't mind the question, but let me be very clear. I'm no supporter of Trump. I'm a supporter of truth and facts. And here's the facts. The man won every swing state. He increased in terms of his vote, his voter turnout, in his favor, from the standpoint of blacks, Latinos and young voters. He increased his numbers in that regard from 2020. 89 percent of the counties shifted to the right. That's a mandate.

We can sit up here and play around all we want to. In 2020, Trump didn't win the popular vote. He didn't win the electoral college vote. As a matter of fact the Republicans have won the popular vote, if I remember correctly, since 2004. But they did this year. So 20 years after they last won a popular vote, they won the popular vote. They won the electoral college vote. The man won every swing state. And on top of it all, 89 percent of the counties shifted (inaudible.)

I don't understand how people can look at that and say "There's no mandate." There's a mandate.



Try to be an adult and confront the error of your vote. Analyze why you made such a great and glaring mistake.



Landslide.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The essence of this thread is that many Americans have realized that the Democrat Party has become an arm of the "Democratic Socialists of America," and not the other way around.




And the party has admitted it!
And lots of Americans....over 77 million, don't wish to be governed as serfs and slaves.






This is what they've become, and what fools voted for:



That sort has certainly taken control of the party.....but if it remains so, the country is finished.




Here is Tom Perez, who served as the Chair of the Democratic National Committee, naming what they are.



"MARXISTS AND EXTREME RADICALS SEEK TO TAKE OVER THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
DNC chairman Tom Perez said Democratic Socialists of America member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez “represents the future of our party.”

DSA chapter chairs have agreed that “communism is good.”

One DSA caucus calls its members “revolutionary Marxists.”

A far-left group behind rising Democratic star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is rife with Marxists and other far-left radicals.
The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), which includes Ocasio-Cortez, is creeping its way into the mainstream of American politics.

What Perez didn’t mention is that the group behind “the future” of the Democratic Party is teeming with radicals openly dedicated to dismantling and overturning the economic and social foundations of the United States."
Marxists And Extreme Radicals Seek To Take Over The Democratic Party

The Democratic Socialists of America behind rising Democratic star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is rife with Marxists and other far-left radicals.
dailycaller.com

 

[j-mac]

There was no Trump landslide.

Progressive lies

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I do not considered it a landslide, but it WAS very decisive when you factor in all the powerful forces acting to prevent it.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I do not considered it a landslide, but it WAS very decisive when you factor in all the powerful forces acting to prevent it.

AI Overview
Learn more

In the context of elections, a
landslide refers to a victory where a candidate or party wins by a large and decisive margin, significantly outperforming their opponents.
Here's a breakdown of the key aspects:

• Overwhelming Victory: A landslide election signifies a clear and substantial win for the victor, suggesting strong support from the electorate.
• Large Margin: This implies the winner secures a significantly higher proportion of votes or seats compared to their rivals, exceeding what would be considered a close or competitive race.
• Implied Popular Mandate: Landslide victories can be seen as a powerful expression of public opinion, indicating a strong endorsement of the winner's policies and platform.
• No Precise Definition: While widely used, there is no universally agreed-upon or precise numerical threshold that defines a landslide victory.
• Informal Usage: The term "landslide" is generally used informally and its interpretation can be somewhat subjective, varying depending on the specific context and electoral system.

In essence, a landslide election suggests a resounding victory where the winning candidate or party achieves a decisive and overwhelming triumph, leaving little doubt about the outcome.



STEPHEN A. SMITH: It is a mandate, and I'm going to explain why.

Now I don't mind the question, but let me be very clear. I'm no supporter of Trump. I'm a supporter of truth and facts. And here's the facts. The man won every swing state. He increased in terms of his vote, his voter turnout, in his favor, from the standpoint of blacks, Latinos and young voters. He increased his numbers in that regard from 2020. 89 percent of the counties shifted to the right. That's a mandate.

We can sit up here and play around all we want to. In 2020, Trump didn't win the popular vote. He didn't win the electoral college vote. As a matter of fact the Republicans have won the popular vote, if I remember correctly, since 2004. But they did this year. So 20 years after they last won a popular vote, they won the popular vote. They won the electoral college vote. The man won every swing state. And on top of it all, 89 percent of the counties shifted (inaudible.)

I don't understand how people can look at that and say "There's no mandate." There's a mandate.



Try to be an adult and confront the error of your vote. Analyze why you made such a great and glaring mistake.



Landslide.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I was hoping for a discussion about whether the take-over of the Democrat Party, and the nation, by Marxist forces, might be the reason for Trump's astounding victory.......landslide.

Here's one more example of an "awakening" to the danger....More Democrats leaving the stinking ship.




Same in Nevada

ENTIRE STAFF OF NEVADA DEMOCRATIC PARTY QUITS AFTER DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST SLATE WON EVERY SEAT
The battle between insurgent progressives in Nevada and the Harry Reid machine began building in 2016.

Entire Staff of Nevada Democratic Party Quits After Democratic Socialist Slate Won Every Seat​

The battle between insurgent progressives in Nevada and the Harry Reid machine began building in 2016.

theintercept.com

 

[konradv]

I was hoping for a discussion about whether the take-over of the Democrat Party, and the nation, by Marxist forces, might be the reason for Trump's astounding victory.......landslide.

Here's one more example of an "awakening" to the danger....More Democrats leaving the stinking ship.




Same in Nevada

ENTIRE STAFF OF NEVADA DEMOCRATIC PARTY QUITS AFTER DEMOCRATIC SOCIALIST SLATE WON EVERY SEAT
The battle between insurgent progressives in Nevada and the Harry Reid machine began building in 2016.

Entire Staff of Nevada Democratic Party Quits After Democratic Socialist Slate Won Every Seat​

The battle between insurgent progressives in Nevada and the Harry Reid machine began building in 2016.

theintercept.com

Like the purported “landslide”, the Marxist-takeover narrative is also false.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Like the purported “landslide”, the Marxist-takeover narrative is also false.

I documented it in both post #111 and #115, stated by Democrat officials.

This is why it is so important for you to continue posting, and be the butt of my reveliations.



About this poster: he represents the damage tht the soviet version of a political party has done to the less astute.

1 There are those of us who have been brought up correctly, with the right principles and knowledge of right and wrong



2. Some of us may not have had that start, and been misled by sophistry, but finally saw through it and moved in the right direction.



3. I see that he belongs to neither of those categories. But he is not alone: Around 22% of Americans identify as strong Democrats, meaning they are highly likely to consistently vote for Democratic candidates, no matter how many lies and hoaxes are revealed.

 

[konradv]

I documented it in both post #111 and #115, stated by Democrat officials.

This is why it is so important for you to continue posting, and be the butt of my reveliations.



About this poster: he represents the damage tht the soviet version of a political party has done to the less astute.

1 There are those of us who have been brought up correctly, with the right principles and knowledge of right and wrong



2. Some of us may not have had that start, and been misled by sophistry, but finally saw through it and moved in the right direction.



3. I see that he belongs to neither of those categories. But he is not alone: Around 22% of Americans identify as strong Democrats, meaning they are highly likely to consistently vote for Democratic candidates, no matter how many lies and hoaxes are revealed.

MAGA lies.

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Yes, the Left over-used RACIST to the point where it became a punchline. They over-used it so much that it created a massive resentment that played out in the 2016 elections. They fucked up. They weaponized PC/Identity Politics, and it backfired. The Right was correct to be annoyed.

And now I see the Right doing the same thing, only using it on a wide range of words. So I have to wonder: Why is the Right so willing to behave so much like those they despise?

Two wrongs don't make a right.

You could be right on all counts but my impression is that the left has been doing it for much longer. It was necessary to maintain the woke narrative that focused on moral character rather than political or social issues. Or, maybe they just considered all issues (political, social, etc.) to be moral issues. I don't know.

Either way, the left and the Democrat party are not at all what they used to be. Their behavior and tactics today resemble the behavior and tactics they once despised in religion.

I could go on and on but I think you get the gist.

 

[PoliticalChic]

MAGA lies.

Any reader can check the quotes and will find them to be true and accurate.

MAGA lies.

More proof of the provenance of communism and the Democrats?



On this date….July 23rd, 1948 Progressive party convention nominates Henry Wallace for President.



1.Democrat Franklin Roosevelt practically worshiped homicidal psychopath Joseph ‘Koba’ Stalin, and warmly accepted every Soviet spy inserted into his administration.

2. FDR demanded communist Henry Wallace as his vice-president, second term, or he wouldn’t run.
Even with FDR’s endorsement (and his threat to withdraw from the presidential race if Wallace were not chosen by the Democratic convention), Wallace won by only 628 to 459…Wallace was not allowed to give an acceptance speech. FDR, Stalin, and Oliver Stone



3.…historian John Lewis Gaddis has written that “there is Soviet documentation that Wallace was regularly reporting to the Kremlin in 1945 and 1946 while he was in the Truman administration,” and that later, when Truman was considering a secret effort to approach the Soviets, his effort was “blown wide open by Wallace when he was running for president on the Progressive Party ticket” in 1948. This was after Truman fired Wallace for giving an address in Madison Square Garden attacking the Truman administration for excessive anti-Communist zeal.



4. "MARXISTS AND EXTREME RADICALS SEEK TO TAKE OVER THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY
DNC chairman Tom Perez said Democratic Socialists of America member Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez “represents the future of our party.”
DSA chapter chairs have agreed that “communism is good.”

One DSA caucus calls its members “revolutionary Marxists.”A far-left group behind rising Democratic star Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is rife with Marxists and other far-left radicals.
The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), which includes Ocasio-Cortez, is creeping its way into the mainstream of American politics.

What Perez didn’t mention is that the group behind “the future” of the Democratic Party is teeming with radicals openly dedicated to dismantling and overturning the economic and social foundations of the United States."
Marxists And Extreme Radicals Seek To Take Over The Democratic Party




5.“Black Lives Matter co-founder describes herself as ‘trained Marxist’”

Black Lives Matter co-founder describes herself as ‘trained Marxist’​

Black Lives Matter co-founder Patrisse Cullors said in a newly surfaced video from 2015 that she and her fellow organizers are “trained Marxists” – making clear their movement’s ideological f…

nypost.com




Where’s the surprise????