RoshawnMarkwees
Assimilationist
They do not have the same rate of morbidity for people under-70. Flu is twice as bad for that group.Well..people are free to believe what they want...and determine the 'likelihood' according to their own unique rubric. You seem to be invested in the Covid and the flu having the same rates of virulence and morbidity--which, in fact, they do not.Or, they are counting the flu as the China virus....which is highly more likely than your lame excuse.Virus is not the flu..despite the best disinformation campaign the Right has waged. Its mortality rate is different--and it is far more virulent..obviously. The affected age is different as well.Yeah, that's it....but we're still getting plenty of the China virus, even with your, "social distancing and masking..... Add to that decreased exposure to carriers...kids not bringing it home to mom and dad, etc....and increased hand washing, of course!"The phenomena has been noted around the world. Easy answer. social distancing and masking work against the flu. Add to that social distancing and masking social distancing and masking Add to that decreased exposure to carriers...kids not bringing it home to mom and dad, etc....and increased hand washing, of course!Have you noticed how incredibly low the death rate is with flu this season as compared to last seasonA lot of American people are going to die. How did caring about that become something bad?
at this time? One has to question, why?
Why don't I believe you?
Believing me is not the issue...you should know that flu rates are down across the globe.
Just follow the money...
My 'lame excuse' is the prevailing professional wisdom in this matter. I know....everyone is full of shit..unless they embrace your narrative.
If it works for you..roll with it.
Under-70, BTW, constitutes 85% of the workforce.