corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines

[Shusha]

on the status of the territory prior to the occupation -- ie terra nullius.

Is that like a land without people for a people without a land?

Oh, the irony. From the person claiming that the Jewish people does not and can not have a sovereign territory.

And obviously, I was pointing how your silly slogans misrepresent actual law, not claiming that Arab Palestinians have no rights to sovereign territory. Remember I am the one supporting the rights of both peoples.

 

[Hollie]

The Arab Palestinian cannot claim territorial sovereignty over a territory that is under the control of Israel; no matter what "right" they may claim.

Occupations do not acquire sovereignty.

Another of your goofy slogans in the absence of a coherent comment.

 

[USAF 2023]

The Arab Palestinian cannot claim territorial sovereignty over a territory that is under the control of Israel; no matter what "right" they may claim.

Occupations do not acquire sovereignty.

Too bad that wasn’t the thought process in 1967.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, Shusha, et al,

What!

The Palestinians have the right to control their land and borders.

Everything that Rocco said. But also, from a slightly different perspective: BOTH the Arab Palestinians (which includes all of Jordan, btw) AND the Jewish Palestinians would have the right to "control their lands and borders". The Jewish Palestinians (now called Israelis) have successfully met the conditions required for this and therefore DO control land and borders. The Jordanians have also met the conditions and DO. The other Arab Palestinians have not. The "right" to control land and borders is absolutely meaningless if you have no ability to control land and borders. Now, in the context of this particular thread, the government of Gaza does have the ability to control land and borders. And does. Which is why the crossing of said border violates the customary law.

Nice speculation.

(COMMENT)

Shusha is NOT forming a theory. Shusha is NOT engaging in conjecture.

Israel has taken a series of measures with a view to enhance the border security and immigration control systems to fight against international terrorism the infiltration of Arab Palestinians that threaten the citizens, the comfort, and protection which the Jewish National Home provides. These intrusion and interdiction measures and the defenses mounted with the introduction of effective mechanisms in the border controls are not unlike many controls employed by other members of the UN; including members of the Arab League.

(SIDEBAR)

I am appreciative of the position you hold relative to the connection between "Sovereignty" and the People under "Occupation." Your argument is that Sovereignty (rights and title over the territory) in an occupied territory are not vested in Israel (as the occupying power). As you have explained many times before, it is the inalienability of sovereignty through actual or threatened use of force.
Under the contemporary international law, self-determination and sovereignty are vested in the people held under occupation. This would have a ring of truth if not for one reason. Granting the Arab Palestinian constituents, which have conducted international criminal activity (Jihadism, Fedayeen Activism, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence) does not do so at the expense of the Israeli.

Granting or recognizing the Arab Palestinians sovereignty is NOT proper if it comes at the expense of Israeli safety and security.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, Shusha, et al,

What!

The Palestinians have the right to control their land and borders.

Everything that Rocco said. But also, from a slightly different perspective: BOTH the Arab Palestinians (which includes all of Jordan, btw) AND the Jewish Palestinians would have the right to "control their lands and borders". The Jewish Palestinians (now called Israelis) have successfully met the conditions required for this and therefore DO control land and borders. The Jordanians have also met the conditions and DO. The other Arab Palestinians have not. The "right" to control land and borders is absolutely meaningless if you have no ability to control land and borders. Now, in the context of this particular thread, the government of Gaza does have the ability to control land and borders. And does. Which is why the crossing of said border violates the customary law.

Nice speculation.

(COMMENT)

Shusha is NOT forming a theory. Shusha is NOT engaging in conjecture.

Israel has taken a series of measures with a view to enhance the border security and immigration control systems to fight against international terrorism the infiltration of Arab Palestinians that threaten the citizens, the comfort, and protection which the Jewish National Home provides. These intrusion and interdiction measures and the defenses mounted with the introduction of effective mechanisms in the border controls are not unlike many controls employed by other members of the UN; including members of the Arab League.

(SIDEBAR)

I am appreciative of the position you hold relative to the connection between "Sovereignty" and the People under "Occupation." Your argument is that Sovereignty (rights and title over the territory) in an occupied territory are not vested in Israel (as the occupying power). As you have explained many times before, it is the inalienability of sovereignty through actual or threatened use of force.
Under the contemporary international law, self-determination and sovereignty are vested in the people held under occupation. This would have a ring of truth if not for one reason. Granting the Arab Palestinian constituents, which have conducted international criminal activity (Jihadism, Fedayeen Activism, Hostile Insurgency Operations, Radicalized Islamic Behaviors, and Asymmetric Violence) does not do so at the expense of the Israeli.

Granting or recognizing the Arab Palestinians sovereignty is NOT proper if it comes at the expense of Israeli safety and security.

Most Respectfully,
R

Your post looked good until you got here:

Granting the Arab Palestinian constituents, which have conducted international criminal activity

You say that all of the time without specifying what those international criminal activities might be. And how would that negate their rights?

The Palestinians are under brutal occupation 24/7 yet their resistance is expected to be pristine.

 

[Shusha]

The Palestinians are under brutal occupation 24/7 yet their resistance is expected to be pristine.

Not at all. Their "resistance" is expected to meet standards of law - the primary one of which is the standard of non-violent, peaceful negotiation. Where violence in necessary (and it is NOT for the Arab Palestinians) an adherence to laws and conventions which protect civilians as far as is possible and reasonable is expected.

Incidentally, the same is expected of Israel.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Well --- let's just see if we can expand this without just writing the criminal code. Most of it is common sense.

Your post looked good until you got here:

Granting the Arab Palestinian constituents, which have conducted international criminal activity

You say that all of the time without specifying what those international criminal activities might be. And how would that negate their rights?

The Palestinians are under brutal occupation 24/7 yet their resistance is expected to be pristine.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians are not really under a brutal occupation. The Administration is under a "brutal occupation." Israel the uses the force necessary to maintain law and order; as it applies in these complex security situations that are increasingly more belligerent and violent.

The criminal activity (inside the territories and with no cross-border element) comes in five general activity categories:

✪ Offense committed by the Arab Palestinian which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (Israel).

✪ Cases where the Arab Palestinian is guilty of espionage.

✪ Serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power.

✪ Intentional offences which caused:

• With the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury; or
• With the intent to cause extensive destruction of such a place, facility or system, where such destruction results in or is likely to result in major economic loss.​

✪ Intentionally delivers, places, discharges or detonates an explosive or other lethal device in, into or against a place of public use, a State or government facility, a public transportation system or an infrastructure facility.​

This is not all-inclusive. It does not address the Arab Palestinian calls for all forms of propaganda, which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Shusha]

Ah, RoccoR, you are so much "meaner" than I am. I only want the Arab Palestinians to stop targeting civilians and to stop indiscriminate attacks which impact civilians.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Well --- let's just see if we can expand this without just writing the criminal code. Most of it is common sense.

Your post looked good until you got here:

Granting the Arab Palestinian constituents, which have conducted international criminal activity

You say that all of the time without specifying what those international criminal activities might be. And how would that negate their rights?

The Palestinians are under brutal occupation 24/7 yet their resistance is expected to be pristine.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians are not really under a brutal occupation. The Administration is under a "brutal occupation." Israel the uses the force necessary to maintain law and order; as it applies in these complex security situations that are increasingly more belligerent and violent.

The criminal activity (inside the territories and with no cross-border element) comes in five general activity categories:

✪ Offense committed by the Arab Palestinian which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (Israel).

✪ Cases where the Arab Palestinian is guilty of espionage.

✪ Serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power.

✪ Intentional offences which caused:

• With the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury; or
• With the intent to cause extensive destruction of such a place, facility or system, where such destruction results in or is likely to result in major economic loss.​

✪ Intentionally delivers, places, discharges or detonates an explosive or other lethal device in, into or against a place of public use, a State or government facility, a public transportation system or an infrastructure facility.​

This is not all-inclusive. It does not address the Arab Palestinian calls for all forms of propaganda, which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression.

Most Respectfully,
R

That is all in response to Israel's illegal, violent, aggression against the Palestinians.

Are the Palestinians only allowed to sit on their hands?

 

[Hollie]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Well --- let's just see if we can expand this without just writing the criminal code. Most of it is common sense.

Your post looked good until you got here:

Granting the Arab Palestinian constituents, which have conducted international criminal activity

You say that all of the time without specifying what those international criminal activities might be. And how would that negate their rights?

The Palestinians are under brutal occupation 24/7 yet their resistance is expected to be pristine.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians are not really under a brutal occupation. The Administration is under a "brutal occupation." Israel the uses the force necessary to maintain law and order; as it applies in these complex security situations that are increasingly more belligerent and violent.

The criminal activity (inside the territories and with no cross-border element) comes in five general activity categories:

✪ Offense committed by the Arab Palestinian which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (Israel).

✪ Cases where the Arab Palestinian is guilty of espionage.

✪ Serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power.

✪ Intentional offences which caused:

• With the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury; or
• With the intent to cause extensive destruction of such a place, facility or system, where such destruction results in or is likely to result in major economic loss.​

✪ Intentionally delivers, places, discharges or detonates an explosive or other lethal device in, into or against a place of public use, a State or government facility, a public transportation system or an infrastructure facility.​

This is not all-inclusive. It does not address the Arab Palestinian calls for all forms of propaganda, which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression.

Most Respectfully,
R

That is all in response to Israel's illegal, violent, aggression against the Palestinians.

Are the Palestinians only allowed to sit on their hands?

Link?

 

[RoccoR]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I can hardly believe you asked this...

BLUF: There is no avenue approved by the Arab Palestinians for Peace. Not because they are no alternatives; but, because the Arab Palestinian rules them out.

[
That is all in response to Israel's illegal, violent, aggression against the Palestinians.

Are the Palestinians only allowed to sit on their hands?

(COMMENT)

When I read this, three thoughts (and associated questions) immediately came to mind; the imagery was vivid (like a bolt of lightning):

• In Posting #467, there are five areas taken either from the Fourth Geneva Convention or from the one of the conventions in which the international community has elaborated 19 international legal instruments to prevent terrorist acts (as the UN is fond of saying, "in all its forms"). Are you suggesting that the Arab Palestinian should be allowed to engage in any (or all) of the prohibited criminal categories?

• Your question leads me to believe that the Arab Palestinians would prefer to continue the path and follow of violence (armed struggle being "the only way to liberate Palestine").

• When The 1967 Khartoum Resolutions ("no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations") were announced, the Arab League pretty much ruled out the practices outlined in the Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States.​

There is no real advocate for peace, mutual recognition or good faith negotiations on the Arab Palestinian.

"Jihad and the Armed Resistance
is the right and real method for the liberation of Palestine,
and the restoration of all the rights,
together with, of course,
all forms of political and diplomatic struggle
including in the media, public and legal [spheres];
with the need to mobilize all the energies of the nation in the battle."
→ Khaled Meshal (2012)
​

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Well --- let's just see if we can expand this without just writing the criminal code. Most of it is common sense.

Your post looked good until you got here:

Granting the Arab Palestinian constituents, which have conducted international criminal activity

You say that all of the time without specifying what those international criminal activities might be. And how would that negate their rights?

The Palestinians are under brutal occupation 24/7 yet their resistance is expected to be pristine.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians are not really under a brutal occupation. The Administration is under a "brutal occupation." Israel the uses the force necessary to maintain law and order; as it applies in these complex security situations that are increasingly more belligerent and violent.

The criminal activity (inside the territories and with no cross-border element) comes in five general activity categories:

✪ Offense committed by the Arab Palestinian which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (Israel).

✪ Cases where the Arab Palestinian is guilty of espionage.

✪ Serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power.

✪ Intentional offences which caused:

• With the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury; or
• With the intent to cause extensive destruction of such a place, facility or system, where such destruction results in or is likely to result in major economic loss.​

✪ Intentionally delivers, places, discharges or detonates an explosive or other lethal device in, into or against a place of public use, a State or government facility, a public transportation system or an infrastructure facility.​

This is not all-inclusive. It does not address the Arab Palestinian calls for all forms of propaganda, which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression.

Most Respectfully,
R

That is all in response to Israel's illegal, violent, aggression against the Palestinians.

Are the Palestinians only allowed to sit on their hands?

Link?

I have posted many.

Do try to keep up.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I can hardly believe you asked this...

BLUF: There is no avenue approved by the Arab Palestinians for Peace. Not because they are no alternatives; but, because the Arab Palestinian rules them out.

[
That is all in response to Israel's illegal, violent, aggression against the Palestinians.

Are the Palestinians only allowed to sit on their hands?

(COMMENT)

When I read this, three thoughts (and associated questions) immediately came to mind; the imagery was vivid (like a bolt of lightning):

• In Posting #467, there are five areas taken either from the Fourth Geneva Convention or from the one of the conventions in which the international community has elaborated 19 international legal instruments to prevent terrorist acts (as the UN is fond of saying, "in all its forms"). Are you suggesting that the Arab Palestinian should be allowed to engage in any (or all) of the prohibited criminal categories?

• Your question leads me to believe that the Arab Palestinians would prefer to continue the path and follow of violence (armed struggle being "the only way to liberate Palestine").

• When The 1967 Khartoum Resolutions ("no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations") were announced, the Arab League pretty much ruled out the practices outlined in the Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States.​

There is no real advocate for peace, mutual recognition or good faith negotiations on the Arab Palestinian.

"Jihad and the Armed Resistance
is the right and real method for the liberation of Palestine,
and the restoration of all the rights,
together with, of course,
all forms of political and diplomatic struggle
including in the media, public and legal [spheres];
with the need to mobilize all the energies of the nation in the battle."
→ Khaled Meshal (2012)
​

Most Respectfully,
R

All of the Palestinian's responses are to prevent or reverse Israeli terrorist and illegal acts against them.

Who are the illegal terrorists here?

 

[Hollie]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Well --- let's just see if we can expand this without just writing the criminal code. Most of it is common sense.

Your post looked good until you got here:

Granting the Arab Palestinian constituents, which have conducted international criminal activity

You say that all of the time without specifying what those international criminal activities might be. And how would that negate their rights?

The Palestinians are under brutal occupation 24/7 yet their resistance is expected to be pristine.

(COMMENT)

The Arab Palestinians are not really under a brutal occupation. The Administration is under a "brutal occupation." Israel the uses the force necessary to maintain law and order; as it applies in these complex security situations that are increasingly more belligerent and violent.

The criminal activity (inside the territories and with no cross-border element) comes in five general activity categories:

✪ Offense committed by the Arab Palestinian which is solely intended to harm the Occupying Power (Israel).

✪ Cases where the Arab Palestinian is guilty of espionage.

✪ Serious acts of sabotage against the military installations of the Occupying Power.

✪ Intentional offences which caused:

• With the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury; or
• With the intent to cause extensive destruction of such a place, facility or system, where such destruction results in or is likely to result in major economic loss.​

✪ Intentionally delivers, places, discharges or detonates an explosive or other lethal device in, into or against a place of public use, a State or government facility, a public transportation system or an infrastructure facility.​

This is not all-inclusive. It does not address the Arab Palestinian calls for all forms of propaganda, which is either designed or likely to provoke or encourage and threat to the peace, breach of the peace, or act of aggression.

Most Respectfully,
R

That is all in response to Israel's illegal, violent, aggression against the Palestinians.

Are the Palestinians only allowed to sit on their hands?

Link?

I have posted many.

Do try to keep up.

Nice duck. Your usual retreat.

 

[Hollie]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I can hardly believe you asked this...

BLUF: There is no avenue approved by the Arab Palestinians for Peace. Not because they are no alternatives; but, because the Arab Palestinian rules them out.

[
That is all in response to Israel's illegal, violent, aggression against the Palestinians.

Are the Palestinians only allowed to sit on their hands?

(COMMENT)

When I read this, three thoughts (and associated questions) immediately came to mind; the imagery was vivid (like a bolt of lightning):

• In Posting #467, there are five areas taken either from the Fourth Geneva Convention or from the one of the conventions in which the international community has elaborated 19 international legal instruments to prevent terrorist acts (as the UN is fond of saying, "in all its forms"). Are you suggesting that the Arab Palestinian should be allowed to engage in any (or all) of the prohibited criminal categories?

• Your question leads me to believe that the Arab Palestinians would prefer to continue the path and follow of violence (armed struggle being "the only way to liberate Palestine").

• When The 1967 Khartoum Resolutions ("no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations") were announced, the Arab League pretty much ruled out the practices outlined in the Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States.​

There is no real advocate for peace, mutual recognition or good faith negotiations on the Arab Palestinian.

"Jihad and the Armed Resistance
is the right and real method for the liberation of Palestine,
and the restoration of all the rights,
together with, of course,
all forms of political and diplomatic struggle
including in the media, public and legal [spheres];
with the need to mobilize all the energies of the nation in the battle."
→ Khaled Meshal (2012)
​

Most Respectfully,
R

All of the Palestinian's responses are to prevent or reverse Israeli terrorist and illegal acts against them.

Who are the illegal terrorists here?

Who are the illegal terrorists here (as opposed to legal islamic terrorists)?

You can easily find them. They are the ones heeding the call to gee-had by bearded loons who represent your "religion". You can find them attempting to breach the Israeli border. They're flying kites with swastikas.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I can hardly believe you asked this...

BLUF: There is no avenue approved by the Arab Palestinians for Peace. Not because they are no alternatives; but, because the Arab Palestinian rules them out.

[
That is all in response to Israel's illegal, violent, aggression against the Palestinians.

Are the Palestinians only allowed to sit on their hands?

(COMMENT)

When I read this, three thoughts (and associated questions) immediately came to mind; the imagery was vivid (like a bolt of lightning):

• In Posting #467, there are five areas taken either from the Fourth Geneva Convention or from the one of the conventions in which the international community has elaborated 19 international legal instruments to prevent terrorist acts (as the UN is fond of saying, "in all its forms"). Are you suggesting that the Arab Palestinian should be allowed to engage in any (or all) of the prohibited criminal categories?

• Your question leads me to believe that the Arab Palestinians would prefer to continue the path and follow of violence (armed struggle being "the only way to liberate Palestine").

• When The 1967 Khartoum Resolutions ("no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations") were announced, the Arab League pretty much ruled out the practices outlined in the Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States.​

There is no real advocate for peace, mutual recognition or good faith negotiations on the Arab Palestinian.

"Jihad and the Armed Resistance
is the right and real method for the liberation of Palestine,
and the restoration of all the rights,
together with, of course,
all forms of political and diplomatic struggle
including in the media, public and legal [spheres];
with the need to mobilize all the energies of the nation in the battle."
→ Khaled Meshal (2012)
​

Most Respectfully,
R

All of the Palestinian's responses are to prevent or reverse Israeli terrorist and illegal acts against them.

Who are the illegal terrorists here?

Who are the illegal terrorists here (as opposed to legal islamic terrorists)?

You can easily find them. They are the ones heeding the call to gee-had by bearded loons who represent your "religion". You can find them attempting to breach the Israeli border. They're flying kites with swastikas.

Why do you clutter the board with stupid posts?

 

[RoccoR]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Oh, for heaven's sake. You have that exactly backward.

[
All of the Palestinian's responses are to prevent or reverse Israeli terrorist and illegal acts against them.

Who are the illegal terrorists here?

(COMMENT)

Israeli's never:

• Hijacked Commercial Airliners full of passengers.
• Stormed Olympic Residences and killed athletes.
• Pirated a Mediterranian Passenger Vessel, killing a wheelchair-bound tourist, rolling them overboard.
• Captured a coastal bus, lined-up the passengers (including 12 children) and machine-gunned them.
* Hijacked a commercial airliner and killed an unarmed passenger; opening the door of the plane, shooting the passenger in the head, and throwing the body onto the tarmac.
• Let loose a suicide bomber into a restaurant filled with civilians.
• Kidnapped teenagers and murdered them.
• Use a vehicle as a ramming weapon into markets and pedestrians.
• Enter and killed unarmed people at prayer in a holy place.
• Engaged in drive-by shootings of family vehicles.
• etc etc etc​

This is not counting the thousands of rockets and mortars attacks. This sounds more like a standard practice for the Arab Palestinians.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[Hollie]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

I can hardly believe you asked this...

BLUF: There is no avenue approved by the Arab Palestinians for Peace. Not because they are no alternatives; but, because the Arab Palestinian rules them out.

[
That is all in response to Israel's illegal, violent, aggression against the Palestinians.

Are the Palestinians only allowed to sit on their hands?

(COMMENT)

When I read this, three thoughts (and associated questions) immediately came to mind; the imagery was vivid (like a bolt of lightning):

• In Posting #467, there are five areas taken either from the Fourth Geneva Convention or from the one of the conventions in which the international community has elaborated 19 international legal instruments to prevent terrorist acts (as the UN is fond of saying, "in all its forms"). Are you suggesting that the Arab Palestinian should be allowed to engage in any (or all) of the prohibited criminal categories?

• Your question leads me to believe that the Arab Palestinians would prefer to continue the path and follow of violence (armed struggle being "the only way to liberate Palestine").

• When The 1967 Khartoum Resolutions ("no peace with Israel, no recognition of Israel, no negotiations") were announced, the Arab League pretty much ruled out the practices outlined in the Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation among States.​

There is no real advocate for peace, mutual recognition or good faith negotiations on the Arab Palestinian.

"Jihad and the Armed Resistance
is the right and real method for the liberation of Palestine,
and the restoration of all the rights,
together with, of course,
all forms of political and diplomatic struggle
including in the media, public and legal [spheres];
with the need to mobilize all the energies of the nation in the battle."
→ Khaled Meshal (2012)
​

Most Respectfully,
R

All of the Palestinian's responses are to prevent or reverse Israeli terrorist and illegal acts against them.

Who are the illegal terrorists here?

Who are the illegal terrorists here (as opposed to legal islamic terrorists)?

You can easily find them. They are the ones heeding the call to gee-had by bearded loons who represent your "religion". You can find them attempting to breach the Israeli border. They're flying kites with swastikas.

Why do you clutter the board with stupid posts?

Nice duck. You do get angry and emotive when you're unable to defend your claims.

 

[Shusha]

All of the Palestinian's responses are to prevent or reverse Israeli terrorist and illegal acts against them.

Who are the illegal terrorists here?

Well, you make two rather egregious errors here. The first is that actions such as the "Great March of Return", suicide bombings, rockets and mortars, stabbings and car rammings, kite bombs, and other terrorist actions have efficacy in obtaining what the Arab Palestinians want (either what they actually want or what they claim to want).

The second is that a "just cause" creates conditions where illegal actions become legal.

Amended to add: There is a third error here. That Israel's actions are terrorist or illegal.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: corrupt US government blocks UN from having an independent investigation into 61 murdered palestines
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Oh, for heaven's sake. You have that exactly backward.

[
All of the Palestinian's responses are to prevent or reverse Israeli terrorist and illegal acts against them.

Who are the illegal terrorists here?

(COMMENT)

Israeli's never:

• Hijacked Commercial Airliners full of passengers.
• Stormed Olympic Residences and killed athletes.
• Pirated a Mediterranian Passenger Vessel, killing a wheelchair-bound tourist, rolling them overboard.
• Captured a coastal bus, lined-up the passengers (including 12 children) and machine-gunned them.
* Hijacked a commercial airliner and killed an unarmed passenger; opening the door of the plane, shooting the passenger in the head, and throwing the body onto the tarmac.
• Let loose a suicide bomber into a restaurant filled with civilians.
• Kidnapped teenagers and murdered them.
• Use a vehicle as a ramming weapon into markets and pedestrians.
• Enter and killed unarmed people at prayer in a holy place.
• Engaged in drive-by shootings of family vehicles.
• etc etc etc​

This is not counting the thousands of rockets and mortars attacks. This sounds more like a standard practice for the Arab Palestinians.

Most Respectfully,
R

You left out the most important part.