Cornell Antisemite rejects interview, proudly telling Jewish employer he won’t work for a Jew

If you have a separate thing you want to discuss, start a different thread.
What separate thing? It’s in the OP’s article. If you want to discuss your separate thing, they you start another thread.
 
What separate thing? It’s in the OP’s article. If you want to discuss your separate thing, they you start another thread.
the thread is about what the applicant said. The "other thing" would be your fascinatin with how Cornell is dealing with it. Why ignore what he said, and the implications of it? If you find what he said to be a problem then that should be your contribution. If you think there are other elements which should be addressed, take the article, start a new thread and express your feelings about Cornell University. I'm sure they will hang on your every word.
 
It's not an accusation honey, it's an observation.
if it were an observation, you would be able to point to evidence of what you have observed and then explain why it is generalizable beyond your particular experience. If not, it is just an empty accusation. And why would you call me "honey"? Weird.
 
A student at Cornell applied for a summer internship, and then realized his would-be boss was Jewish. He was offered an interview by the Jewish boss, but rejected it with a scathing email saying he wouldn’t work for a Jew. Points of discussion:

1) We now seem to be in the run-up to the concentration camps of Nazi Germany, in which people felt free - even proud - to declare their hatred for Jews, and directly to their faces.

2) This disgusting attitude is more prevalent among students at far-left universities, where -supposedly - leftists are opposed to bigotry,

3) The antisemitic student who did this is majoring in Labor Relations, which includes the fight against prejudice and discrimination. What organization, other than maybe CAIR or a similar antisemitic group, would ever hire this Jew-hater?

It’s his loss
 
And Cornell’s response.

I will ask again. Do you support using taxpayer money to investigate this personal interaction between two people?
no more or less than I support my taxes going to all sorts of other things. There is no line item veto on taxes. Good thing this isn't about taxes, but about anti-Semitism.
 
A student at Cornell applied for a summer internship, and then realized his would-be boss was Jewish. He was offered an interview by the Jewish boss, but rejected it with a scathing email saying he wouldn’t work for a Jew. Points of discussion:

1) We now seem to be in the run-up to the concentration camps of Nazi Germany, in which people felt free - even proud - to declare their hatred for Jews, and directly to their faces.

2) This disgusting attitude is more prevalent among students at far-left universities, where -supposedly - leftists are opposed to bigotry,

3) The antisemitic student who did this is majoring in Labor Relations, which includes the fight against prejudice and discrimination. What organization, other than maybe CAIR or a similar antisemitic group, would ever hire this Jew-hater?

How many Jews have Palestinian bosses they work for?
 
the question isn't about what he "can" or "can not" do, but what we, as a society are condoning. People are becoming empowered to make public statements which dismiss all Jews simply because they are Jews. The freedom to express your opinion doesn't mean to escape the societal impact and consequence of your opinion.
It wasn’t a public statement until the business owner made it public. It was originally a private communication between two people.

I will ask again. Do you think tax dollars should be spent on investigating an initially private communication?
 
A student at Cornell applied for a summer internship, and then realized his would-be boss was Jewish. He was offered an interview by the Jewish boss, but rejected it with a scathing email saying he wouldn’t work for a Jew. Points of discussion:

1) We now seem to be in the run-up to the concentration camps of Nazi Germany, in which people felt free - even proud - to declare their hatred for Jews, and directly to their faces.

2) This disgusting attitude is more prevalent among students at far-left universities, where -supposedly - leftists are opposed to bigotry,

3) The antisemitic student who did this is majoring in Labor Relations, which includes the fight against prejudice and discrimination. What organization, other than maybe CAIR or a similar antisemitic group, would ever hire this Jew-hater?

It is called freedom of speech.
 
no more or less than I support my taxes going to all sorts of other things.
That’s a cop out. Do you support tax dollars being spent on investigating a private communication?
 
. Good thing this isn't about taxes, but about anti-Semitism.
It is about taxes. Cornell wants to investigate a private communication.

Burying your head in sand will not make it go away.
 
The term "anti-semitism" is very much like the term "terrorist". Both are used so often as terms of propaganda that they have lost all meaning. They seem to be connected to various hasbara that are so common these days.
 
15th post
Probably a Spanish or Italian Catholic raised by Antisemitic northeastern ass clowns, felt 'empowered' by the latest left wing calls for violence and murder.
 
This business owner made the communication public. He left out the applicant’s name, but posted the applicant’s pic. The owner pretended that he was protecting the applicant’s identify. BS. The owner’s quickly and easily used facial recognition internet tools to identify the applicant.

So tell me how a business owner involved in the business of ID verification does not know about photo recognition tools available on the internet. Another case of deception from the sneaky owner.
 
It wasn’t a public statement until the business owner made it public. It was originally a private communication between two people.

I will ask again. Do you think tax dollars should be spent on investigating an initially private communication?
Why would what you wrote change my position? Instead of just repeating your question, why not incorporate what you got from my answer. Taxes aren't subject to a line item veto. There are plenty of things my taxes are used for that I don't necessarily support. Whether or not this is one of them is immaterial to a discussion about the growth of anti-Semitism.
 
Back
Top Bottom