emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
Finally, someone posted this chart to help distinguish the Anarchists
instead of Ancaps fighting Ancoms like Conservatives fight Liberals.
This is very cool, and helpful.
I ask of Anarchists: Can we have a mapping of "Statists" instead of lumping all people together who support minimal or Constitutional limited govt? Arguing with a Libertarian Capitalist is a totally different situation than dealing with a Liberal Statist who believes Govt can pass and mandate anything by majority vote or judicial ruling.
RE: "isocracy"
I was advised by another friend, my views are not so much Anarchy
but closer to Isocracy, where everybody has equal political rights.
PS my version of Constitutionalism has to include and protect ALL OTHER BELIEFS in order to be consistent with itself. ALL people have to CONSENT to policy or else that is "unconstitutional by imposing or establishing a belief/religion that violates or discriminates against others". So my standard of Constitutional "equal protections" of the law is a mix of Syndicates [Isocracy based on Mutualist/Voluntaryist CONSENT], Individualist, Free Enterprise, Libertarian/Anarchist, while I am personally still very Texas Nationalist and include myself equally as my progressive Collective Statist friends I support in creating their own self supporting Cooperatives and Administration to do the same thing as State/Federal Govt but only involving taxpayers who AGREE to those policies. The rest can set up their own Cooperative systems by groups or parties to ensure they only follow and fund their own beliefs, terms and conditions.
SOURCE: Here is the full video link this came from:
instead of Ancaps fighting Ancoms like Conservatives fight Liberals.
This is very cool, and helpful.
I ask of Anarchists: Can we have a mapping of "Statists" instead of lumping all people together who support minimal or Constitutional limited govt? Arguing with a Libertarian Capitalist is a totally different situation than dealing with a Liberal Statist who believes Govt can pass and mandate anything by majority vote or judicial ruling.
RE: "isocracy"
I was advised by another friend, my views are not so much Anarchy
but closer to Isocracy, where everybody has equal political rights.
PS my version of Constitutionalism has to include and protect ALL OTHER BELIEFS in order to be consistent with itself. ALL people have to CONSENT to policy or else that is "unconstitutional by imposing or establishing a belief/religion that violates or discriminates against others". So my standard of Constitutional "equal protections" of the law is a mix of Syndicates [Isocracy based on Mutualist/Voluntaryist CONSENT], Individualist, Free Enterprise, Libertarian/Anarchist, while I am personally still very Texas Nationalist and include myself equally as my progressive Collective Statist friends I support in creating their own self supporting Cooperatives and Administration to do the same thing as State/Federal Govt but only involving taxpayers who AGREE to those policies. The rest can set up their own Cooperative systems by groups or parties to ensure they only follow and fund their own beliefs, terms and conditions.
SOURCE: Here is the full video link this came from:
Last edited: