Constitutional Right To Peacefully Assemble Latest 'Victim' of Govt COVID-19 Crackdown

[Coyote]

1. Do my constitutional rights give me the right to put other people in danger?

I think the courts have consistently said...no.

Whether or not your rights put others "in danger" is irrelevant. There must be an injury/harm, not the risk of harm.

.

In that case Typhoid Mary had every right to continue working in the food industry.

In this case, all working people in America are Typhoid Mary and must stay home and get evicted and lose their jobs...
Because why? I don't get it. Why?

Perhaps if we had mandated paid sick leave that wouldn’t be necessary...

I am not the one claiming to have answers. How do you balance public safety and individual rights?

Whenever there is any question, you err on the side of freedom.

Why?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Why?

Well....this conversation is OVER.

Never, ever, EVER.....HEHEHEHEHEEEEEVER...call yourself a liberal...please.

.

 

[Marion Morrison]

1. Do my constitutional rights give me the right to put other people in danger?

I think the courts have consistently said...no.

Whether or not your rights put others "in danger" is irrelevant. There must be an injury/harm, not the risk of harm.

.

In that case Typhoid Mary had every right to continue working in the food industry.

In this case, all working people in America are Typhoid Mary and must stay home and get evicted and lose their jobs...
Because why? I don't get it. Why?

Perhaps if we had mandated paid sick leave that wouldn’t be necessary...

I am not the one claiming to have answers. How do you balance public safety and individual rights?

Whenever there is any question, you err on the side of freedom.

Why?

You would rather err on the side of oppression? Pls explain where you are coming from on this.

 

[freyasman]

1. Do my constitutional rights give me the right to put other people in danger?

I think the courts have consistently said...no.

Whether or not your rights put others "in danger" is irrelevant. There must be an injury/harm, not the risk of harm.

.

In that case Typhoid Mary had every right to continue working in the food industry.

In this case, all working people in America are Typhoid Mary and must stay home and get evicted and lose their jobs...
Because why? I don't get it. Why?

Perhaps if we had mandated paid sick leave that wouldn’t be necessary...

I am not the one claiming to have answers. How do you balance public safety and individual rights?

Whenever there is any question, you err on the side of freedom.

Why?

Because it is always better to be free.

 

[Marion Morrison]

1. Do my constitutional rights give me the right to put other people in danger?

I think the courts have consistently said...no.

Whether or not your rights put others "in danger" is irrelevant. There must be an injury/harm, not the risk of harm.

.

In that case Typhoid Mary had every right to continue working in the food industry.

In this case, all working people in America are Typhoid Mary and must stay home and get evicted and lose their jobs...
Because why? I don't get it. Why?

Perhaps if we had mandated paid sick leave that wouldn’t be necessary...

I am not the one claiming to have answers. How do you balance public safety and individual rights?

Not intentionally ******* over every working person in America is a good start.
Guess who I will support when the shit hits the fan?

Not the ones denying hard working Americans their jobs, that's for damn sure.
Done deal, baby, it's going to be on, and I'm on the side of the workers.

Not no Communist worker bullshit, because I see that coming, just real people put out by this elitist grab for power.

I know how it's been in America since the last Depression. I know because of my grandma, baby.

My Grandma, that stopped 3 KKK from killing her dad with a butcher knife, she did not play.

Oh! she taught me how to cook too, but dammit I hate chicken neckbones and rice.

I also know what I will do.

 

[Coyote]

Anyone who attends the gathering does so at their own risk

Why can't we just LEAVE IT AT THAT and not give even MORE power to an already overpowered government?

.

Because this rationale completely ignores the fact that attendees who acquire it at the gathering will spread it to others who did not attend this gathering.

When it comes to infectious disease, there are some pretty well established guidelines to follow to limit the spread. That is basically what is going on.

You might fairly argue it is too extreme...but what I am hearing is people saying is that ANY restriction is too extreme.

So...my questions are:

Given that asymptomatic people can spread this...what do you propose to limit the spread?

And...freedom. What I am hearing is SOME people’s freedom is more important than other people’s. So that SOME people can freely exercise their freedom...people who are more vulnerable, should restrict theirs. Kind of hypocritical.

 

[WEATHER53]

See the presumption that 20 people gatheting will sure fire spread it to 20 more....then 20 more....then 20 more....then 20 more has never been proven and never even been looked Into. It is Great Fodder for overreactive hysteria and freedom snatching.
Just as probable to offer is that it is incredibly infectious but incredibly benign ecrept for the old and sick. It’s already blown through most every one already with a 0.1% death rate but “we dont know” so let’s overreact and default to the worst case scenario as the most likely scenario, get 80% of frightened America to buy in and ultimately assure we will Never relate to each other as we used to.
We are now infectious agents,not decent human beings, and we must be locked down and lectured over the virtues of being treated like vermin.

 

[Coyote]

1. Do my constitutional rights give me the right to put other people in danger?

I think the courts have consistently said...no.

Whether or not your rights put others "in danger" is irrelevant. There must be an injury/harm, not the risk of harm.

.

In that case Typhoid Mary had every right to continue working in the food industry.

In this case, all working people in America are Typhoid Mary and must stay home and get evicted and lose their jobs...
Because why? I don't get it. Why?

Perhaps if we had mandated paid sick leave that wouldn’t be necessary...

I am not the one claiming to have answers. How do you balance public safety and individual rights?

Not intentionally ******* over every working person in America is a good start.
Guess who I will support when the shit hits the fan?

Not the ones denying hard working Americans their jobs, that's for damn sure.

It is a hard call. And if you are arguing jobs and livelihoods I have a lot more sympathy than than I do for those whining about a temporary loss of total freedom. After all, we can still go out, we can still buy necessities. The impact on jobs is much tougher.

 

[Coyote]

See the presumption that 20 people gatheting will sure fire spread it to 20 more....then 20 more....then 20 more....then 20 more has never been proven and never even been looked Into it is Great Fodder for overreactive hysteria and freedom snatching.
Just as probable to offer is that it is incredibly infectious but incredibly benign ecrept for the old and sick. It’s slreAdy blue. They most every one if ya with a 0.1% death rate but “we dont know” so let’s overreact and default to the worst case scenario as the most likely scenario get 80% of frightened America to buy in and ultimately assure we will Never relate to ea h other as we used to.
We are now infectious agents,not decent human beings, and we must be locked down and lectured over the virtues of being treated like vermin.

Well quarentine is nothing new. My mother remembers the polio quarentines but she does not remember this degree of whining. People buckled down, then it was over and normal life resumed.

 

[iceberg]

I don’t have a huge issue with that. Why do you? (Show us on your anatomically correct doll where TSA prevented you from traveling).

That's a shitty argument in favor of allowing TSA to grab my scrotum.

What are the consequences if I refuse to be frisked and molested?

That same type of bullshit argument was used to prevent gay marriage. There was nothing stopping gay people from marrying someone of the opposite sex, so their right to be married was not violated, RIGHT????

.

not saying it doesn't happen but in all my flying i've never had my scrotum grabbed.

almost makes me want to quit flying.

 

[WEATHER53]

Anyone who attends the gathering does so at their own risk

Why can't we just LEAVE IT AT THAT and not give even MORE power to an already overpowered government?

.

Because this rationale completely ignores the fact that attendees who acquire it at the gathering will spread it to others who did not attend this gathering.

When it comes to infectious disease, there are some pretty well established guidelines to follow to limit the spread. That is basically what is going on.

You might fairly argue it is too extreme...but what I am hearing is people saying is that ANY restriction is too extreme.

So...my questions are:

Given that asymptomatic people can spread this...what do you propose to limit the spread?

And...freedom. What I am hearing is SOME people’s freedom is more important than other people’s. So that SOME people can freely exercise their freedom...people who are more vulnerable, should restrict theirs. Kind of hypocritical.

Infectious diseases are out and about all the time and we never do this. The mystery of the Chinavirus has been crafted and conjoured almost like yet another witch hunt.

 

[Coyote]

Anyone who attends the gathering does so at their own risk

Why can't we just LEAVE IT AT THAT and not give even MORE power to an already overpowered government?

.

Because this rationale completely ignores the fact that attendees who acquire it at the gathering will spread it to others who did not attend this gathering.

When it comes to infectious disease, there are some pretty well established guidelines to follow to limit the spread. That is basically what is going on.

You might fairly argue it is too extreme...but what I am hearing is people saying is that ANY restriction is too extreme.

So...my questions are:

Given that asymptomatic people can spread this...what do you propose to limit the spread?

And...freedom. What I am hearing is SOME people’s freedom is more important than other people’s. So that SOME people can freely exercise their freedom...people who are more vulnerable, should restrict theirs. Kind of hypocritical.

Infectious diseases are out and about all the time and we never do this. The mystery of the Chinavirus has been crafted and conjoured almost like yet another witch hunt.

This one has been pretty bad. Worldwide.

 

[WEATHER53]

See the presumption that 20 people gatheting will sure fire spread it to 20 more....then 20 more....then 20 more....then 20 more has never been proven and never even been looked Into it is Great Fodder for overreactive hysteria and freedom snatching.
Just as probable to offer is that it is incredibly infectious but incredibly benign ecrept for the old and sick. It’s slreAdy blue. They most every one if ya with a 0.1% death rate but “we dont know” so let’s overreact and default to the worst case scenario as the most likely scenario get 80% of frightened America to buy in and ultimately assure we will Never relate to ea h other as we used to.
We are now infectious agents,not decent human beings, and we must be locked down and lectured over the virtues of being treated like vermin.

Well quarentine is nothing new. My mother remembers the polio quarentines but she does not remember this degree of whining. People buckled down, then it was over and normal life resumed.

I lived thru the polio era and there was no quarantine. There were special hospitals for them. There was no whining because there was no widespread public quarantine and your story is bogus.

 

[Coyote]

See the presumption that 20 people gatheting will sure fire spread it to 20 more....then 20 more....then 20 more....then 20 more has never been proven and never even been looked Into it is Great Fodder for overreactive hysteria and freedom snatching.
Just as probable to offer is that it is incredibly infectious but incredibly benign ecrept for the old and sick. It’s slreAdy blue. They most every one if ya with a 0.1% death rate but “we dont know” so let’s overreact and default to the worst case scenario as the most likely scenario get 80% of frightened America to buy in and ultimately assure we will Never relate to ea h other as we used to.
We are now infectious agents,not decent human beings, and we must be locked down and lectured over the virtues of being treated like vermin.

Well quarentine is nothing new. My mother remembers the polio quarentines but she does not remember this degree of whining. People buckled down, then it was over and normal life resumed.

I lived thru the polio era and there was no quarantine. There were special hospitals for them. There was no whining because there was no widespread public quarantine a nd your story is bogus.

Not bogus at all.

For those who survived polio, coronavirus is eerily familiar. But ultimately, 'science won.'

Before a vaccine arrived in the 1950s, polio had the US scared and quarantined. Now, those who lived through it face a similar terror: Coronavirus.

www.usatoday.com

 

[Marion Morrison]

1. Do my constitutional rights give me the right to put other people in danger?

I think the courts have consistently said...no.

Whether or not your rights put others "in danger" is irrelevant. There must be an injury/harm, not the risk of harm.

.

In that case Typhoid Mary had every right to continue working in the food industry.

In this case, all working people in America are Typhoid Mary and must stay home and get evicted and lose their jobs...
Because why? I don't get it. Why?

Perhaps if we had mandated paid sick leave that wouldn’t be necessary...

I am not the one claiming to have answers. How do you balance public safety and individual rights?

Not intentionally ******* over every working person in America is a good start.
Guess who I will support when the shit hits the fan?

Not the ones denying hard working Americans their jobs, that's for damn sure.

It is a hard call. And if you are arguing jobs and livelihoods I have a lot more sympathy than than I do for those whining about a temporary loss of total freedom. After all, we can still go out, we can still buy necessities. The impact on jobs is much tougher.

The impact on jobs and everybody working is much larger, derp!

You don't care about that waitress/waiter that can't make their rent, and is going to get thrown out into the street, or what?

She/he wanted to work and make her way, but the media and low-level government fucked her/him over.

I say that's bullshit! Hang them all!

 

[buttercup]

This one has been pretty bad. Worldwide.

Only if you believe everything the controlled media is telling you. It has already been established that the numbers are completely unreliable, inflated. There has been all sorts of of false reporting exposed, which you seem to be completely unaware of. Evidently you're spending too much time glued to the idiot box, listening to the very people who are lying to you, rather than numerous other sources and real people who have proven that we're being fed BS.

Read my sig, to try to understand what is happening. Fear is their best tool. It works every time. The sooner you realize that, the better, because you are cheerleading for authoritarians who don't give a rat's @ss about our lives, they care about their agendas, and total control.

 

[WEATHER53]

See the presumption that 20 people gatheting will sure fire spread it to 20 more....then 20 more....then 20 more....then 20 more has never been proven and never even been looked Into it is Great Fodder for overreactive hysteria and freedom snatching.
Just as probable to offer is that it is incredibly infectious but incredibly benign ecrept for the old and sick. It’s slreAdy blue. They most every one if ya with a 0.1% death rate but “we dont know” so let’s overreact and default to the worst case scenario as the most likely scenario get 80% of frightened America to buy in and ultimately assure we will Never relate to ea h other as we used to.
We are now infectious agents,not decent human beings, and we must be locked down and lectured over the virtues of being treated like vermin.

Well quarentine is nothing new. My mother remembers the polio quarentines but she does not remember this degree of whining. People buckled down, then it was over and normal life resumed.

I lived thru the polio era and there was no quarantine. There were special hospitals for them. There was no whining because there was no widespread public quarantine a nd your story is bogus.

Not bogus at all.

For those who survived polio, coronavirus is eerily familiar. But ultimately, 'science won.'

Before a vaccine arrived in the 1950s, polio had the US scared and quarantined. Now, those who lived through it face a similar terror: Coronavirus.

www.usatoday.com

We were not quarantined. I lived it so will have to go with that over a MSM type looking backward inaccurately to a time they were probably not even alive for and are crafting a story replete with other “quarantines” to help the story work.

 

[Coyote]

1. Do my constitutional rights give me the right to put other people in danger?

I think the courts have consistently said...no.

Whether or not your rights put others "in danger" is irrelevant. There must be an injury/harm, not the risk of harm.

.

In that case Typhoid Mary had every right to continue working in the food industry.

In this case, all working people in America are Typhoid Mary and must stay home and get evicted and lose their jobs...
Because why? I don't get it. Why?

Perhaps if we had mandated paid sick leave that wouldn’t be necessary...

I am not the one claiming to have answers. How do you balance public safety and individual rights?

Not intentionally ******* over every working person in America is a good start.
Guess who I will support when the shit hits the fan?

Not the ones denying hard working Americans their jobs, that's for damn sure.

It is a hard call. And if you are arguing jobs and livelihoods I have a lot more sympathy than than I do for those whining about a temporary loss of total freedom. After all, we can still go out, we can still buy necessities. The impact on jobs is much tougher.

The impact on jobs and everybody working is much larger, derp!

You don't care about that waitress that can't make her rent, and is going to get thrown out into the street, or what?

I just agreed with you derp.

 

[Marion Morrison]

1. Do my constitutional rights give me the right to put other people in danger?

I think the courts have consistently said...no.

Whether or not your rights put others "in danger" is irrelevant. There must be an injury/harm, not the risk of harm.

.

In that case Typhoid Mary had every right to continue working in the food industry.

In this case, all working people in America are Typhoid Mary and must stay home and get evicted and lose their jobs...
Because why? I don't get it. Why?

Perhaps if we had mandated paid sick leave that wouldn’t be necessary...

I am not the one claiming to have answers. How do you balance public safety and individual rights?

Not intentionally ******* over every working person in America is a good start.
Guess who I will support when the shit hits the fan?

Not the ones denying hard working Americans their jobs, that's for damn sure.

It is a hard call. And if you are arguing jobs and livelihoods I have a lot more sympathy than than I do for those whining about a temporary loss of total freedom. After all, we can still go out, we can still buy necessities. The impact on jobs is much tougher.

The impact on jobs and everybody working is much larger, derp!

You don't care about that waitress that can't make her rent, and is going to get thrown out into the street, or what?

I just agreed with you derp.

Ty derp. I'm mad about this thing, it ain't right, and is a direct assault on those trying to make it in America.

 

[Coyote]

Anyone who attends the gathering does so at their own risk

Why can't we just LEAVE IT AT THAT and not give even MORE power to an already overpowered government?

.

Because this rationale completely ignores the fact that attendees who acquire it at the gathering will spread it to others who did not attend this gathering.

When it comes to infectious disease, there are some pretty well established guidelines to follow to limit the spread. That is basically what is going on.

You might fairly argue it is too extreme...but what I am hearing is people saying is that ANY restriction is too extreme.

So...my questions are:

Given that asymptomatic people can spread this...what do you propose to limit the spread?

And...freedom. What I am hearing is SOME people’s freedom is more important than other people’s. So that SOME people can freely exercise their freedom...people who are more vulnerable, should restrict theirs. Kind of hypocritical.

Infectious diseases are out and about all the time and we never do this. The mystery of the Chinavirus has been crafted and conjoured almost like yet another witch hunt.

This one has been pretty bad. Worldwide.

Only if you believe everything the controlled media is telling you. It has already been established that the numbers are completely unreliable, inflated. There has been all sorts of of false reporting exposed, which you seem to be completely unaware of. Evidently you're spending too much time glued to the idiot box, listening to the very people who are lying to you, rather than numerous other sources and real people who have proven that we're being fed BS.

Read my sig, to try to understand what is happening. Fear is their best tool. It works every time. The sooner you realize that, the better, because you are cheerleading for authoritarians who don't give a rat's @ss about our lives, they care about their agendas, and total control.

I almost never watch TV. I get my news from a variety of sources rather than inhabiting echo chambers That regurgitate fake news and conspiracy theories.

What is your excuse?