Considering all the lies by the democrats and MSM in 2020, is Joe Biden's presidency legitimate? (Poll)

Based on all of the MSM lies and bias during 2020, does that make the Biden presidency illegitimate?

  • Yes, winning narrowly because of MSM bias and outright lies makes Biden's presidency illegitimate.

    Votes: 14 87.5%
  • No, all's fair in love and politics

    Votes: 2 12.5%
  • Maybe, see my post

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    16
Biden won by at most 43,000 votes in AZ, GA, WI that could have easily gone to Trump. Did the lying MSM give Biden the illegitimate win?
The only reason it was this close was the lying conservative media.
Here is independent proof (via Harvard) of MSM anti-Trump media bias. Show us your proof of "conservative media bias".


1618597493777.png
 
Biden won by at most 43,000 votes in AZ, GA, WI that could have easily gone to Trump. Did the lying MSM give Biden the illegitimate win?
The only reason it was this close was the lying conservative media.
They keep leaving out how Biden took the popular vote by 7 million people. And the electoral college 306 to 232.

Not to mention that Treasury just imposed sanctions on the man who linked the Trump campaign (collusion) to Russia helping Trump in 2016 win those battleground states.
I notice that you didn't link to any "proof" of what you say.
There was "Russian Collusion" in 2016, but it was via the HRC campaign, not Trump.
Clinton Campaign and Democratic Party Helped Pay for Russia Trump Dossier
 
Now that Trump's gone, the MSM is trying to unwind some of their lies so Biden won't have to deal with them.

Leaving the voting irregularities aside. Here are a few new factoids to consider:

1. Biden won by at most 43,000 votes in AZ, GA, WI that could have easily gone to Trump. Did the lying MSM give Biden the illegitimate win?
There are many sites with this latest 2020 margin story, google it:

2. Biden's "open border" policy is a disgrace. Trump's "remain in Mexico" policy was the correct policy. The "kids in cages" bullshit also cost Trump votes. But little kids by themselves, as invited by Biden is just fine?!
View attachment 480561

3. The "Russian Bounty" on US soldiers is another MSM lie, that cost Trump votes. Now its "low to moderate" confidence, bullshit. There is ZERO hard evidence, just bullshit.


4. Remember how the MSM ignored the Hunter Biden laptop, and the actual whistleblower? Another case of MSM cheating/bias for Biden.
Tony Bobulinski: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

5. Add-in the House democrats' two "no-crime" bullshit impeachments, as cheating as well as the MSM's cheating.


There are many more examples of the MSM's Biden propaganda, but considering that only 43,000 votes could have swung the 2020 election to Trump, does that make Biden illegitimate?
Yes, by a lot.
 
No, the election was stolen from we the people. This is all the proof you need.
Actually the election result was because Trump couldn't handle the coronavirus crisis, and this is all the proof you need.

View attachment 480597

Trump handled it fine. Your chinese allies loosed the disease on the world, then your allies in big tech lied about the actual mortality rate, and then the political elite banded together to steal the vote from the people.
Agree that the US oligarchs "banded together" to get rid of Trump. Their biased control of "free speech" was proof enough.
 
Now that Trump's gone, the MSM is trying to unwind some of their lies so Biden won't have to deal with them.

Leaving the voting irregularities aside. Here are a few new factoids to consider:

1. Biden won by at most 43,000 votes in AZ, GA, WI that could have easily gone to Trump. Did the lying MSM give Biden the illegitimate win?
There are many sites with this latest 2020 margin story, google it:

2. Biden's "open border" policy is a disgrace. Trump's "remain in Mexico" policy was the correct policy. The "kids in cages" bullshit also cost Trump votes. But little kids by themselves, as invited by Biden is just fine?!
View attachment 480561

3. The "Russian Bounty" on US soldiers is another MSM lie, that cost Trump votes. Now its "low to moderate" confidence, bullshit. There is ZERO hard evidence, just bullshit.


4. Remember how the MSM ignored the Hunter Biden laptop, and the actual whistleblower? Another case of MSM cheating/bias for Biden.
Tony Bobulinski: 5 Fast Facts You Need to Know

5. Add-in the House democrats' two "no-crime" bullshit impeachments, as cheating as well as the MSM's cheating.


There are many more examples of the MSM's Biden propaganda, but considering that only 43,000 votes could have swung the 2020 election to Trump, does that make Biden illegitimate?

Given the lies of the MSM???? What the fuck are you smoking????

Given the lies of the Republican Party and Donald Trump, you're lucky you still have a country, and there is just no end to your lunacy.
See post-22. That is what we call "unbiased proof".
 
Hannity had every right to.
Great. Then stop bitching about media bias.
Hannity is only one pundit. He is vastly outnumbered by the hacks in the MSM. The bias is overwhelming and we know now CNN did not report facts. Networks are caught editing videos to support lies all the time. Just recently to push cop hatred they did this.
 
So Hannity is NOT "biased fake news", like Harvard proved. See post-22 again to grasp what "biased" means.
This is the first time you mentioned “news”.

Up until this point, it was biased “media”. Hannity is definitely media. You moved the goalposts, conveniently.
 
The recent confirmation of Trump campaign collusion wirh Russia confirms Trump's illegitimate Presidency.
What "recent confirmation"? Got unbiased "proof"?
Hillary colluded with Russia to buy the Steele Dossier.
The Mueller Investigation proved that Trump did NOT collude.
The "Biden DOJ" can publish bullshit any time they want and the compliant MSM will swear to it.
Enjoy the 2022 mid-terms, we'll see who the voters prefer.
 
So Hannity is NOT "biased fake news", like Harvard proved. See post-22 again to grasp what "biased" means.
This is the first time you mentioned “news”.

Up until this point, it was biased “media”. Hannity is definitely media. You moved the goalposts, conveniently.
Sorry I wasn't more clear, but the linked article is regarding biased "news outlets".
 
Sorry I wasn't more clear, but the linked article is regarding biased "news outlets".
So why make the distinction between media and news? The point of the thread is that people were misled into voting for someone. They can be misled by media personalities like Hannity just as much (far more Id argue) as the news media.

It’s a silly distinction in this context. Serves no true purpose.
 

Forum List

Back
Top