More proof by Konder3's above post that dittoheads don't give a shit about the girls. All they care about is taking cheap-shots at our brave American troops sent to find and possibly rescue the girls in Nigeria.
1. I'm no ditto-head; although I doubt you're capable of distinguishing between someone who (a) thinks your Hashtag Fetish is hilarious and (b) has you pegged for one of the few remaining Orgasmic ObamaBots --- and a true ditto-head.
2. I don't really care all that much about those girls, other than wanting to see them safely returned.
3. I take no cheap-shots at our troops.
4. I have done my time
AS a troop and earned my stripes. Have you?
5. I criticize the weak, limp-wristed "logistics" and "recon" -only role we've taken on.
6. I would have rather seen us do what we are doing,
plus much more, including multiple ground-based search-and-rescue teams, a fast-strike team or two, and some lethal air-support in the way of Air-Cav choppers, A-10 backups, and a modicum of CAP assets.
Do not let my laughing at you over your
teenage Hashtag Campaign angst cloud your judgment concerning my positions, message and abilities relative to your own.
Told you! Debbie Downer cant ever be happy even when things are done the way they supported they have to be sure to complain and change their minds
Repeating...
6. I would have rather seen us do what we are doing,
plus much more, including multiple ground-based search-and-rescue teams, a fast-strike team or two, and some lethal air-support in the way of Air-Cav choppers, A-10 backups, and a modicum of CAP assets.
Of course. You dont like whatever is happening and always want something different. You wanted boots on the ground...now you got 'em...Debbie Downer has to change her mind now and advocate for something different because what is happening is never good enough
Nope.
I have always believed that
IF we are going to participate, that we should participate in a manner designed to result in the girls' retrieval, not just figuring-out where they are.
That means ground-level Search-and-Rescue and Commando teams, with air support, as well as the surveillance and logistics rear-echelon services that we are currently providing.
Why does
EFFECTIVE participation involve such 'real' boots on the ground, in this situation, as opposed to simple lower-risk rear-echelon help?
Because the Nigerians have a disintegrating country on their hands, including whole provinces where the Nigerian military dare not show its face; the country appears to be slowly descending into chaos, and I, for one, have zero confidence in its military, to be able to act effectively upon the intelligence we feed them, and to effect a successful rescue on their own.
It's called not being willing to half-step... not being willing to do things as half-meaures... not being willing to do things half-assed.
Assuming that our 'surveillance' and 'logistics' assistance, as articulated in the media, is, indeed, all that we are doing at present, and assuming that the Nigerians have no trouble with the idea of us lending them boots-on-the-ground, and assuming that we are, indeed, sufficiently interested in rescuing those poor girls, to the extent where we are willing to metaphorically put our money where our mouth is, then...
We are, indeed, presently engaged in half-assed measures, and the criticism or bemoaning of us doing so much less than is needed, has merit.
All juvenile name-calling and attributions and hyper-partisan pissing and moaning to the contrary notwithstanding.
If you can find a substantive hole in that line of reasoning, or an inappropriate level of partisanship or criticism in that line of reasoning, then, by all means, enlighten the audience.
I, for one, am awaiting this flash of intellectual brilliance with the utmost anticipation, and the utmost confidence that you will give a good account of yourself.
But, if not, then, get off my back.