Consequence Culture - Gina Carano, Colin Kaepernick, The Dixie Chicks and Jane Fonda

You're such a lying little ****.

I don't "look into people's lives". I talk to my employees.

If I sense something amiss, I might ask further questions. If they say they'd rather not discuss it, that's the end of it. If they say "Yeah, there are problems", I ask them if there's any way I can help. That's it. Nothing more, nothing less.

I care about my employees. You, being a self-centered little scumbag, care only about yourself...

Again, not what you claimed earlier.. you claimed you fired them for talking about stuff in the workplace you didn't approve of and pried into their private lives if you thought it was effecting their performance. (Because heaven forbid that it might actually be managements fault.)

First, my two businesses have combined budgets of about $25,000,000. Personally, I cleared just over $700K last year. I don't bring this up to brag, I bring it up to deflate your egotistical "not that you could afford me" comment.

Oh, now you have TWO businesses. And you have a sports car and are married to a supermodel. Are you going to tell us about your yacht next?

Seems like you are the one who has a "deflated" ego, buddy.

I'd buy and sell your worthless ass.

And I don't treat my employees like that. I would treat you like that, though...

Again, you couldn't afford me. Think the last time I worked for a company that made that little money, was 1999. Shit, I handled purchasing accounts bigger than $25MM
Bullshit Joe. Bullshit. POs are nothing big deal. That is not the same as running a business or acquiring a $25mm company. You are such a liar it is hilarious.

Joe is jealous.

He knows he could never build and run his own company. He's not smart enough...
 
Have you stopped sucking little boy dicks yet

Vile and against usmb rules.

Stupid pig.
Was the post to which I was responding against the rules?
If not, why not?
And
If not then why are you complaining to me.
I simply responded. I didn't initiate the accusations.
complain to the mods.

Asking if you drink often is in poor taste. Accusing someone of pedophilia is against the rules. Those sorts of comments will always be deleted and you will be warned.
Why?
Why is one against the rules but not the other?
Do the rules only specify pedophilia? Or are the other forms of behavior off limits? Is it the "legality" that is the problem or the inferred act?
Seems the lines are rather arbitrary.

All the rules on a forum like this are arbitrary.

But much of it is common sense.

Someone asking if you drink a lot is, as I said, in poor taste. Accusing someone of pedophilia is crossing the line of decent behavior.

I suggest you take the time to read the rules.
I suggest you find another drum to beat. Or whatever you want to beat.

How was that?

It was amusing. You violated a rule. Then you asked about the rules. Now you get pissy about my answers.
Please quote the rule that says "poor taste."

If you want to give advice then listen to this....

Find someone who gives two shits about your advice.
Then, as long as you're not doing beastiality or pedophilia, have at it.

No, there is no rules about "poor taste".

The rule is about no bestiality and no pedophilia. And no accusations of either.

You are the one who asked why one is against the rules and one is not. I answered.

I don't give two shits whether you give two shits about my advice. You asked and I answered. Then you get all pissy.

Take a deep breath and stay on topic.
Poor caddokid is frustrated.
Says the lifetime president of
INCEL Anonymous
 
You're such a lying little ****.

I don't "look into people's lives". I talk to my employees.

If I sense something amiss, I might ask further questions. If they say they'd rather not discuss it, that's the end of it. If they say "Yeah, there are problems", I ask them if there's any way I can help. That's it. Nothing more, nothing less.

I care about my employees. You, being a self-centered little scumbag, care only about yourself...

Again, not what you claimed earlier.. you claimed you fired them for talking about stuff in the workplace you didn't approve of and pried into their private lives if you thought it was effecting their performance. (Because heaven forbid that it might actually be managements fault.)

First, my two businesses have combined budgets of about $25,000,000. Personally, I cleared just over $700K last year. I don't bring this up to brag, I bring it up to deflate your egotistical "not that you could afford me" comment.

Oh, now you have TWO businesses. And you have a sports car and are married to a supermodel. Are you going to tell us about your yacht next?

Seems like you are the one who has a "deflated" ego, buddy.

I'd buy and sell your worthless ass.

And I don't treat my employees like that. I would treat you like that, though...

Again, you couldn't afford me. Think the last time I worked for a company that made that little money, was 1999. Shit, I handled purchasing accounts bigger than $25MM
Bullshit Joe. Bullshit. POs are nothing big deal. That is not the same as running a business or acquiring a $25mm company. You are such a liar it is hilarious.

Joe is jealous.

He knows he could never build and run his own company. He's not smart enough...
He does. He is a resume writer who barely makes mid five figures and blames the rich Jews for his ills.
 
Have you stopped sucking little boy dicks yet

Vile and against usmb rules.

Stupid pig.
Was the post to which I was responding against the rules?
If not, why not?
And
If not then why are you complaining to me.
I simply responded. I didn't initiate the accusations.
complain to the mods.

Asking if you drink often is in poor taste. Accusing someone of pedophilia is against the rules. Those sorts of comments will always be deleted and you will be warned.
Why?
Why is one against the rules but not the other?
Do the rules only specify pedophilia? Or are the other forms of behavior off limits? Is it the "legality" that is the problem or the inferred act?
Seems the lines are rather arbitrary.

All the rules on a forum like this are arbitrary.

But much of it is common sense.

Someone asking if you drink a lot is, as I said, in poor taste. Accusing someone of pedophilia is crossing the line of decent behavior.

I suggest you take the time to read the rules.
I suggest you find another drum to beat. Or whatever you want to beat.

How was that?

It was amusing. You violated a rule. Then you asked about the rules. Now you get pissy about my answers.
Please quote the rule that says "poor taste."

If you want to give advice then listen to this....

Find someone who gives two shits about your advice.
Then, as long as you're not doing beastiality or pedophilia, have at it.

No, there is no rules about "poor taste".

The rule is about no bestiality and no pedophilia. And no accusations of either.

You are the one who asked why one is against the rules and one is not. I answered.

I don't give two shits whether you give two shits about my advice. You asked and I answered. Then you get all pissy.

Take a deep breath and stay on topic.
Poor caddokid is frustrated.
Says the lifetime president of
INCEL Anonymous
LMAO...you were banned under your prior ID....looking to double down, caddokid?
 
Have you stopped sucking little boy dicks yet

Vile and against usmb rules.

Stupid pig.
Was the post to which I was responding against the rules?
If not, why not?
And
If not then why are you complaining to me.
I simply responded. I didn't initiate the accusations.
complain to the mods.

Asking if you drink often is in poor taste. Accusing someone of pedophilia is against the rules. Those sorts of comments will always be deleted and you will be warned.
Why?
Why is one against the rules but not the other?
Do the rules only specify pedophilia? Or are the other forms of behavior off limits? Is it the "legality" that is the problem or the inferred act?
Seems the lines are rather arbitrary.

All the rules on a forum like this are arbitrary.

But much of it is common sense.

Someone asking if you drink a lot is, as I said, in poor taste. Accusing someone of pedophilia is crossing the line of decent behavior.

I suggest you take the time to read the rules.
I suggest you find another drum to beat. Or whatever you want to beat.

How was that?

It was amusing. You violated a rule. Then you asked about the rules. Now you get pissy about my answers.
Please quote the rule that says "poor taste."

If you want to give advice then listen to this....

Find someone who gives two shits about your advice.
Then, as long as you're not doing beastiality or pedophilia, have at it.

No, there is no rules about "poor taste".

The rule is about no bestiality and no pedophilia. And no accusations of either.

You are the one who asked why one is against the rules and one is not. I answered.

I don't give two shits whether you give two shits about my advice. You asked and I answered. Then you get all pissy.

Take a deep breath and stay on topic.
I was on topic.
You and the rest of the moral police are drifting.
Take your own advice Abby.

Continuing the discussion of the rules has no bearing on the topic of "Consequence Culture".

But now you know not to call people pedophiles.
 
You're such a lying little ****.

I don't "look into people's lives". I talk to my employees.

If I sense something amiss, I might ask further questions. If they say they'd rather not discuss it, that's the end of it. If they say "Yeah, there are problems", I ask them if there's any way I can help. That's it. Nothing more, nothing less.

I care about my employees. You, being a self-centered little scumbag, care only about yourself...

Again, not what you claimed earlier.. you claimed you fired them for talking about stuff in the workplace you didn't approve of and pried into their private lives if you thought it was effecting their performance. (Because heaven forbid that it might actually be managements fault.)

First, my two businesses have combined budgets of about $25,000,000. Personally, I cleared just over $700K last year. I don't bring this up to brag, I bring it up to deflate your egotistical "not that you could afford me" comment.

Oh, now you have TWO businesses. And you have a sports car and are married to a supermodel. Are you going to tell us about your yacht next?

Seems like you are the one who has a "deflated" ego, buddy.

I'd buy and sell your worthless ass.

And I don't treat my employees like that. I would treat you like that, though...

Again, you couldn't afford me. Think the last time I worked for a company that made that little money, was 1999. Shit, I handled purchasing accounts bigger than $25MM
Bullshit Joe. Bullshit. POs are nothing big deal. That is not the same as running a business or acquiring a $25mm company. You are such a liar it is hilarious.

Joe is jealous.

He knows he could never build and run his own company. He's not smart enough...
He does. He is a resume writer who barely makes mid five figures and blames the rich Jews for his ills.

I don't really see "resume writer" as a business which one builds. It's more like a side hustle than anything else...
 
You're such a lying little ****.

I don't "look into people's lives". I talk to my employees.

If I sense something amiss, I might ask further questions. If they say they'd rather not discuss it, that's the end of it. If they say "Yeah, there are problems", I ask them if there's any way I can help. That's it. Nothing more, nothing less.

I care about my employees. You, being a self-centered little scumbag, care only about yourself...

Again, not what you claimed earlier.. you claimed you fired them for talking about stuff in the workplace you didn't approve of and pried into their private lives if you thought it was effecting their performance. (Because heaven forbid that it might actually be managements fault.)

First, my two businesses have combined budgets of about $25,000,000. Personally, I cleared just over $700K last year. I don't bring this up to brag, I bring it up to deflate your egotistical "not that you could afford me" comment.

Oh, now you have TWO businesses. And you have a sports car and are married to a supermodel. Are you going to tell us about your yacht next?

Seems like you are the one who has a "deflated" ego, buddy.

I'd buy and sell your worthless ass.

And I don't treat my employees like that. I would treat you like that, though...

Again, you couldn't afford me. Think the last time I worked for a company that made that little money, was 1999. Shit, I handled purchasing accounts bigger than $25MM
Bullshit Joe. Bullshit. POs are nothing big deal. That is not the same as running a business or acquiring a $25mm company. You are such a liar it is hilarious.

Joe is jealous.

He knows he could never build and run his own company. He's not smart enough...
He does. He is a resume writer who barely makes mid five figures and blames the rich Jews for his ills.

I don't really see "resume writer" as a business which one builds. It's more like a side hustle than anything else...
Bingo!!!! He basically writes lies for people who cannot write their own shit. Pretty weak sauce. But he is here constantly complaining. You see his idiotic quotes in my siggy.
 
You missed the point dumb ass....you idiots claim he was canceled by the Right...when it is obvious to normal people you don't know what you are talking about.....you couldn't watch the democrat party controlled CBS, NBC, ABC, NPR, PBS the late night comedians, the hollywood entertainment shows or award shows without seeing them kiss his ass, you dumb ass....

That is the exact ******* opposite of being canceled....you moron.

You still don't get it because you're retarded.

He received a ton of backlash for kneeling, you moron.

To the point that he couldn't get a job anywhere else, you shit bird.

So yes, he was cancelled, you moron.

You idiot.
No, you twerp-he couldn't get a job because he was a shitty quarterback with three 747s worth of baggage.

What "baggage" are you talking about? You mean the baggage of getting shunned by NFL fans who got their feelings hurt and boycotted the NFL completely over his actions? You mean how they "cancelled" him? That baggage?

Are you all caught up now? Retard.
If he could play he would be playing.

If you’re going to interject, then maybe you can comment on the “baggage” that the other poster brought up.

The “baggage” is exactly the point.
 
have a "No religion/No politics" rule in the workplace, and it is inflexible
What does that mean on practice? If say you heard Peter and Jack argue about gay marriage during a lunchtime, what are you supposed to do?
 
have a "No religion/No politics" rule in the workplace, and it is inflexible
What does that mean on practice? If say you heard Peter and Jack argue about gay marriage during a lunchtime, what are you supposed to do?

If they're off the clock and off company premises? I don't care what they talk about.

But Peter and Jack both know that they're jeopardizing their jobs by having such a discussion under my roof, because workplace rules do not allow it...
 
You missed the point dumb ass....you idiots claim he was canceled by the Right...when it is obvious to normal people you don't know what you are talking about.....you couldn't watch the democrat party controlled CBS, NBC, ABC, NPR, PBS the late night comedians, the hollywood entertainment shows or award shows without seeing them kiss his ass, you dumb ass....

That is the exact ******* opposite of being canceled....you moron.

You still don't get it because you're retarded.

He received a ton of backlash for kneeling, you moron.

To the point that he couldn't get a job anywhere else, you shit bird.

So yes, he was cancelled, you moron.

You idiot.
No, you twerp-he couldn't get a job because he was a shitty quarterback with three 747s worth of baggage.

What "baggage" are you talking about? You mean the baggage of getting shunned by NFL fans who got their feelings hurt and boycotted the NFL completely over his actions? You mean how they "cancelled" him? That baggage?

Are you all caught up now? Retard.
If he could play he would be playing.

If you’re going to interject, then maybe you can comment on the “baggage” that the other poster brought up.

The “baggage” is exactly the point.
So you disagree that if he could play that he would playing? OK...LOL

Same thing I said to religious nuts about Tebow.
 
have a "No religion/No politics" rule in the workplace, and it is inflexible
What does that mean on practice? If say you heard Peter and Jack argue about gay marriage during a lunchtime, what are you supposed to do?

If they're off the clock and off company premises? I don't care what they talk about.

But Peter and Jack both know that they're jeopardizing their jobs by having such a discussion under my roof, because workplace rules do not allow it...
They are off the clock but on the company premises, of course. And I suppose it was you who established these rules. What was the main reason?
 
You missed the point dumb ass....you idiots claim he was canceled by the Right...when it is obvious to normal people you don't know what you are talking about.....you couldn't watch the democrat party controlled CBS, NBC, ABC, NPR, PBS the late night comedians, the hollywood entertainment shows or award shows without seeing them kiss his ass, you dumb ass....

That is the exact ******* opposite of being canceled....you moron.

You still don't get it because you're retarded.

He received a ton of backlash for kneeling, you moron.

To the point that he couldn't get a job anywhere else, you shit bird.

So yes, he was cancelled, you moron.

You idiot.
No, you twerp-he couldn't get a job because he was a shitty quarterback with three 747s worth of baggage.

What "baggage" are you talking about? You mean the baggage of getting shunned by NFL fans who got their feelings hurt and boycotted the NFL completely over his actions? You mean how they "cancelled" him? That baggage?

Are you all caught up now? Retard.
If he could play he would be playing.

If you’re going to interject, then maybe you can comment on the “baggage” that the other poster brought up.

The “baggage” is exactly the point.
So you disagree that if he could play that he would playing? OK...LOL

Same thing I said to religious nuts about Tebow.

As I figured, you completely ignore the "baggage" statement.

So here, let me help you out.



This is a video of NFL fans burning their NFL gear because they were upset about the kneeling thing. This is the "baggage" that you conveniently didn't want to address.

So let's call it what it is. Kaepernick alienated NFL fans who were upset about the kneeling thing and NFL owners didn't want to bring in that "baggage". Kaepernick was effectively cancelled because fans were offended by his protest.

It's not surprising that conservative posters who cry "CANCEL CULTURE!" the loudest completely ignore it when it comes from their side. You guys don't care about cancel culture. You just care when the left does it.

Now do me a favor and go ahead and continue to ignore the "baggage" statement, showing that you completely ignored the point. Then I can give you a "like" and you can continue to pretend to be objective about cancel culture.
 
You missed the point dumb ass....you idiots claim he was canceled by the Right...when it is obvious to normal people you don't know what you are talking about.....you couldn't watch the democrat party controlled CBS, NBC, ABC, NPR, PBS the late night comedians, the hollywood entertainment shows or award shows without seeing them kiss his ass, you dumb ass....

That is the exact ******* opposite of being canceled....you moron.

You still don't get it because you're retarded.

He received a ton of backlash for kneeling, you moron.

To the point that he couldn't get a job anywhere else, you shit bird.

So yes, he was cancelled, you moron.

You idiot.
No, you twerp-he couldn't get a job because he was a shitty quarterback with three 747s worth of baggage.

What "baggage" are you talking about? You mean the baggage of getting shunned by NFL fans who got their feelings hurt and boycotted the NFL completely over his actions? You mean how they "cancelled" him? That baggage?

Are you all caught up now? Retard.
If he could play he would be playing.

If you’re going to interject, then maybe you can comment on the “baggage” that the other poster brought up.

The “baggage” is exactly the point.
So you disagree that if he could play that he would playing? OK...LOL

Same thing I said to religious nuts about Tebow.

As I figured, you completely ignore the "baggage" statement.

So here, let me help you out.



This is a video of NFL fans burning their NFL gear because they were upset about the kneeling thing. This is the "baggage" that you conveniently didn't want to address.

So let's call it what it is. Kaepernick alienated NFL fans who were upset about the kneeling thing and NFL owners didn't want to bring in that "baggage". Kaepernick was effectively cancelled because fans were offended by his protest.

It's not surprising that conservative posters who cry "CANCEL CULTURE!" the loudest completely ignore it when it comes from their side. You guys don't care about cancel culture. You just care when the left does it.

Now do me a favor and go ahead and continue to ignore the "baggage" statement, showing that you completely ignored the point. Then I can give you a "like" and you can continue to pretend to be objective about cancel culture.

Because of a few fans? LOL
I don't buy it. If Kaep could play he would play
 
You missed the point dumb ass....you idiots claim he was canceled by the Right...when it is obvious to normal people you don't know what you are talking about.....you couldn't watch the democrat party controlled CBS, NBC, ABC, NPR, PBS the late night comedians, the hollywood entertainment shows or award shows without seeing them kiss his ass, you dumb ass....

That is the exact ******* opposite of being canceled....you moron.

You still don't get it because you're retarded.

He received a ton of backlash for kneeling, you moron.

To the point that he couldn't get a job anywhere else, you shit bird.

So yes, he was cancelled, you moron.

You idiot.
No, you twerp-he couldn't get a job because he was a shitty quarterback with three 747s worth of baggage.

What "baggage" are you talking about? You mean the baggage of getting shunned by NFL fans who got their feelings hurt and boycotted the NFL completely over his actions? You mean how they "cancelled" him? That baggage?

Are you all caught up now? Retard.
If he could play he would be playing.

If you’re going to interject, then maybe you can comment on the “baggage” that the other poster brought up.

The “baggage” is exactly the point.
So you disagree that if he could play that he would playing? OK...LOL

Same thing I said to religious nuts about Tebow.

As I figured, you completely ignore the "baggage" statement.

So here, let me help you out.



This is a video of NFL fans burning their NFL gear because they were upset about the kneeling thing. This is the "baggage" that you conveniently didn't want to address.

So let's call it what it is. Kaepernick alienated NFL fans who were upset about the kneeling thing and NFL owners didn't want to bring in that "baggage". Kaepernick was effectively cancelled because fans were offended by his protest.

It's not surprising that conservative posters who cry "CANCEL CULTURE!" the loudest completely ignore it when it comes from their side. You guys don't care about cancel culture. You just care when the left does it.

Now do me a favor and go ahead and continue to ignore the "baggage" statement, showing that you completely ignored the point. Then I can give you a "like" and you can continue to pretend to be objective about cancel culture.

Because of a few fans? LOL
I don't buy it. If Kaep could play he would play


I always thought Tebow shot himself in the foot by insisting he would only play QB. He would have made a helluva tightend.
 
You missed the point dumb ass....you idiots claim he was canceled by the Right...when it is obvious to normal people you don't know what you are talking about.....you couldn't watch the democrat party controlled CBS, NBC, ABC, NPR, PBS the late night comedians, the hollywood entertainment shows or award shows without seeing them kiss his ass, you dumb ass....

That is the exact ******* opposite of being canceled....you moron.

You still don't get it because you're retarded.

He received a ton of backlash for kneeling, you moron.

To the point that he couldn't get a job anywhere else, you shit bird.

So yes, he was cancelled, you moron.

You idiot.
No, you twerp-he couldn't get a job because he was a shitty quarterback with three 747s worth of baggage.

What "baggage" are you talking about? You mean the baggage of getting shunned by NFL fans who got their feelings hurt and boycotted the NFL completely over his actions? You mean how they "cancelled" him? That baggage?

Are you all caught up now? Retard.
If he could play he would be playing.

If you’re going to interject, then maybe you can comment on the “baggage” that the other poster brought up.

The “baggage” is exactly the point.
So you disagree that if he could play that he would playing? OK...LOL

Same thing I said to religious nuts about Tebow.

As I figured, you completely ignore the "baggage" statement.

So here, let me help you out.



This is a video of NFL fans burning their NFL gear because they were upset about the kneeling thing. This is the "baggage" that you conveniently didn't want to address.

So let's call it what it is. Kaepernick alienated NFL fans who were upset about the kneeling thing and NFL owners didn't want to bring in that "baggage". Kaepernick was effectively cancelled because fans were offended by his protest.

It's not surprising that conservative posters who cry "CANCEL CULTURE!" the loudest completely ignore it when it comes from their side. You guys don't care about cancel culture. You just care when the left does it.

Now do me a favor and go ahead and continue to ignore the "baggage" statement, showing that you completely ignored the point. Then I can give you a "like" and you can continue to pretend to be objective about cancel culture.

Because of a few fans? LOL
I don't buy it. If Kaep could play he would play


I always thought Tebow shot himself in the foot by insisting he would only play QB. He would have made a helluva tightend.

Or FB...100%

Antonio Brown played. If he played anyone can play. Why? He can still play.

National Felon League has zero morals.
 
15th post
have a "No religion/No politics" rule in the workplace, and it is inflexible
What does that mean on practice? If say you heard Peter and Jack argue about gay marriage during a lunchtime, what are you supposed to do?

If they're off the clock and off company premises? I don't care what they talk about.

But Peter and Jack both know that they're jeopardizing their jobs by having such a discussion under my roof, because workplace rules do not allow it...
They are off the clock but on the company premises, of course. And I suppose it was you who established these rules. What was the main reason?

Yes, I established these rules.

Nothing creates a good argument like religion and/or politics.

Certainly there is a time and place for such discussions. When I'm paying you to do a job, I would much rather have you concentrate on your job than I would have you get into some "ORANGE MAN BAD" argument or start throwing punches over someone's drawing of Allah.

Such things have no home in the workplace...
 
Bullshit Joe. Bullshit. POs are nothing big deal. That is not the same as running a business or acquiring a $25mm company. You are such a liar it is hilarious.

Yeah, whatever, you'd wonder why there was any unemployment with all the supposed business geniuses that hang here.

And, if their manager is the problem, wouldn't I want to know that? If an employee of yours has a problem that's being caused by his manager, wouldn't you want to know that?

I certainly wouldn't trust a higher manager with a complaint about a manager.

If I had a problem with a manager, my go-to would be to start sending resumes.

ports car? Well, I've got a pretty nice Mercedes.

Holy shit, yo uactually posted a picture of "your" car? Man, you must be insecure!!!

I think I need to handle you very gently now, you are easily bruised.
 
Joe is jealous.

He knows he could never build and run his own company. He's not smart enough...

Naw, I just don't consider "Screwing over other people to have a nicer car" to be much of a career goal.
Yet in your job that is what you do. Or do you guaranty a raise for all the people you **** over when you mess up their resumes?
 
Back
Top Bottom