Connecticut sends out the first confiscation letters

[Lovebears65]

http://www.gunssavelife.com/?p=11186

1 state down 49 to go for our second amendment rights to be done with .. Leftist wackos are getting their way...

 

[peach174]

The Link says the service is unavailable.

 

[Lovebears65]

The Link says the service is unavailable.

worked for me.. Hmmm

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Connecticut sends out the first confiscation letters | GunsSaveLife.com

1 state down 49 to go for our second amendment rights to be done with .. Leftist wackos are getting their way...

Nitwit, you forgot New York and all the guns "confiscated" there.

 

[Moonglow]

HTTP Error 503. The service is unavailable.

 

[Moonglow]

Reagan was a leftist cause he supported the Brady Bill???

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The Link says the service is unavailable.

worked for me.. Hmmm

Did you bother to read and comprehend the story or are you so much of a tedious partisan hack that you just default to liar.

The letters say nothing about "confiscation."

 

[Harry Dresden]

The Link says the service is unavailable.

worked for me.. Hmmm

Did you bother to read and comprehend the story or are you so much of a tedious partisan hack that you just default to liar.

The letters say nothing about "confiscation."

Jones you are a joke.....you are one of the most tedious partisan hacks here.....and here you are calling someone else that.....geezus....

 

[LordBrownTrout]

The Link says the service is unavailable.

worked for me.. Hmmm

Did you bother to read and comprehend the story or are you so much of a tedious partisan hack that you just default to liar.

The letters say nothing about "confiscation."

Yes it did.

 

[bodecea]

The Link says the service is unavailable.

worked for me.. Hmmm

Did you bother to read and comprehend the story or are you so much of a tedious partisan hack that you just default to liar.

The letters say nothing about "confiscation."

Welcome to a LoveBear thread. Sometimes I wonder if she is a troll trying to make RWrs look stupid.

 

[Victory67]

Link doesn't work.

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Doesn't matter though. Mine were all lost in a horrible boating accident.

 

[g5000]

There were no confiscation letters. They were letters to about 200 gun owners that they had passed a deadline to register their guns.

 

[Victory67]

no confiscation letters have been sent out

"But rather than turn that information over to prosecutors, state officials are giving the gun owners a chance to get rid of the weapons and magazines."

 

[g5000]

Read more: Connecticut gun owners REFUSE to register guns under harsh gun control law | The Daily Caller

Last January after the Sandy Hook shooting, Connecticut passed a stringent new gun control laws, and in April, Gov. Dannel Mallory approved restrictions which redefined the definition of an “assault weapon” to ban 100 more types of semi-automatic weapons. The law’s grandfather clause allowed gun owners already possessing AR-15s and similar weapons to keep them, but they must submit their personal information to a statewide registry.

As a form of civil disobedience, some gun owners have refused to follow the law and register their guns. So now they are in violation.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

worked for me.. Hmmm

Did you bother to read and comprehend the story or are you so much of a tedious partisan hack that you just default to liar.

The letters say nothing about "confiscation."

Welcome to a LoveBear thread. Sometimes I wonder if she is a troll trying to make RWrs look stupid.

True, a liberal troll.

Of course, most on the right don’t need help to look bad.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Did you bother to read and comprehend the story or are you so much of a tedious partisan hack that you just default to liar.

The letters say nothing about "confiscation."

Welcome to a LoveBear thread. Sometimes I wonder if she is a troll trying to make RWrs look stupid.

True, a liberal troll.

Of course, most on the right don’t need help to look bad.

neither do far lefties like yourself Jones.....post no. 7 proved that....

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

worked for me.. Hmmm

Did you bother to read and comprehend the story or are you so much of a tedious partisan hack that you just default to liar.

The letters say nothing about "confiscation."

Yes it did.

No, they do not.

Nowhere in SB 1160 does the law authorize ‘confiscation’:

http://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/TOB/s/pdf/2013SB-01160-R00-SB.pdf

The notion of gun ‘confiscation’ is ignorant idiocy.

Private property cannot be ‘confiscated’ by government absent due process and just compensation, pursuant to the 5th Amendment’s Taking Clause. And before any ‘confiscation’ can take place, a warrant must first be issued allowing the dwelling or other place a firearm might be present to be searched, search of private property cannot be authorized with a ‘letter.’

The OP and those who agree with her is consequently a liar, and indeed a tedious partisan hack.