Connecticut gun owners threaten violence

[Spiderman]

People vote in referendums. There was no referendum. The people did not vote.

Tell me if politicians were the ones who elected the president would you say the people voted?

And there are efforts ongoing to repeal the law.

If the People want this law changed, they will march in en mass in the streets of Hartford, or be shore to elect new folks to change the law.

that hasn't happened. The People like law.

March en mass huh?

Such melodrama.

And the law was put in effect just a few months ago. there hasn't been an election yet.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Well, if any Connecticut gun nut threatens me, I'll gun him down! I have a right to support gun control, and I mean to protect that right!

 

[The T]

People vote in referendums. There was no referendum. The people did not vote.

Tell me if politicians were the ones who elected the president would you say the people voted?

And there are efforts ongoing to repeal the law.

If the People want this law changed, they will march in en mass in the streets of Hartford, or be shore to elect new folks to change the law.

that hasn't happened. The People like law.

Give it time. They will. However they don't like tyranny that YOU advocate.

 

[nodoginnafight]

The electors are not usually sitting politicians but rather party hacks that give the most money.

They are very often state and local level politicians

 

[Spiderman]

Well, if any Connecticut gun nut threatens me, I'll gun him down! I have a right to support gun control, and I mean to protect that right!

It's a stupid ineffectual knee jerk feel good law like most laws passed these days.

 

[Spiderman]

The electors are not usually sitting politicians but rather party hacks that give the most money.

They are very often state and local level politicians

Thus even more proof that the people don't vote on anything in this country. We re merely led to believe we do

 

[nodoginnafight]

The electors are not usually sitting politicians but rather party hacks that give the most money.

They are very often state and local level politicians

Thus even more proof that the people don't vote on anything in this country. We re merely led to believe we do

So the key doesn't start the car, huh?

so there is a process, the people eventually get what they want. I think the process is to keep anything radical from happening too quickly and destabilizing the nation. Or maybe it was developed to to scam everyone.

I guess everyone is entitled to their opinion.

 

[bucs90]

Funny.......

All the "law abiding" gun nuts are now threatening to murder police officers because they don't want to "abide" by the law that is now on the books.

Yeah. Redneck gun nuts are "law abiding".......so long as they like the law. If not, they become dangerous, possibly homicidal.

No worry. Most of them have absolutely no training, and fake courage. They'll either give in...or the cops will just take care of business as usual, just like the Boston cops took care of those dirtbag terrorists.

 

[The T]

Funny.......

All the "law abiding" gun nuts are now threatening to murder police officers because they don't want to "abide" by the law that is now on the books.

Yeah. Redneck gun nuts are "law abiding".......so long as they like the law. If not, they become dangerous, possibly homicidal.

No worry. Most of them have absolutely no training, and fake courage. They'll either give in...or the cops will just take care of business as usual, just like the Boston cops took care of those dirtbag terrorists.

Only LAW that is pertinent:

A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Get it? And NO they aren't going to KILL police you IDIOT.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

You don't get to decide on your own that the Constitution has been disregarded.

We have courts for this.

Please tell us when in US history a President/Governor or judge has overturned an acquittal by a Jury, or when a legislative body from one of the Several States or Congress has passed a Bill of Attainder to usurp an acquittal by a jury with a conviction.

If you cannot name any such instances, then it must be true that individual citizens, the People, are able to decide on their own what is Constitutional and what is not.

So long as Trial by Jury remains, the People themselves are the ultimate Legal Authority.

If the Government started to ignore Juries, and imprison people unjustly; would it necessary, in your own opinion, for the People to enforce their superiority via the Second Amendment to Restore the Rule of Law?

--------------
Why is [MENTION=47266]Victory67[/MENTION] still dodging these questions (in blue and red)?
--------------

[MENTION=20466]Victory[/MENTION]69 has made several posts and has been logged on without interruption, and is still avoiding these two paramount questions.

 

[bucs90]

Guess gun nuts hate Democracy now.

 

[The T]

Guess gun nuts hate Democracy now.

Democracy=MOB RULE...and YES WE do. WE aren't a Democracy.

Learn it, Live It, KNOW it.

 

[bucs90]

Guess gun nuts hate Democracy now.

Democracy=MOB RULE...and YES WE do. WE aren't a Democracy.

Learn it, Live It, KNOW it.

Well, most of the people in the United States want more gun restrictions. And our representatives, which we voted in, are trying to give us what we want. We are a Representative Republic.....see, I already knew that. Democracy via representatives basically.

You gun nuts are just the minority on this. Just like how most people didn't want slavery. And most people don't want to discriminate against gays or minorities.

In the end....progress wins out.

Only problem is you gun nuts threatening to murder people WHEN you end up having to abide by the new laws most people want. You folks are dangerous, and the rest of society will have to find a way to handle that threat unfortunately.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Guess gun nuts hate Democracy now.

Article IV, Section 4, United States Constitution:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Democracy, as observed by our Founding Fathers who studied many Forms of Government from Athens Greece, to Rome to feudalism, to the Enlightenment, despised Democracy.

If you disagree, find just one of the Founding Fathers (whom rarely agreed unanimously) that supported and endorsed Democracy.

 

[BlackSand]

Progressive Liberals don't understand the difference between taking and giving.
The gun debate is no different ... And Progressives will take whatever they want with no regard for who has to give it up.

.

 

[bucs90]

Guess gun nuts hate Democracy now.

Article IV, Section 4, United States Constitution:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

Democracy, as observed by our Founding Fathers who studied many Forms of Government from Athens Greece, to Rome to feudalism, to the Enlightenment, despised Democracy.

If you disagree, find just one of the Founding Fathers (whom rarely agreed unanimously) that supported and endorsed Democracy.

You obviously didn't read my last post clarifying our "Representative Republic" form of government. Our elections are 1 person 1 vote, the person with the most votes wins. Our Reps are decided by Democracy. Our laws and governance are done by Reps.


Either way.....our US population is leaning towards wanting more restrictions on firearms. You gun nuts are going to lose on this issue, its just a matter of time really. Regardless of my opinion on it or yours........its just a fact that with time, more gun restrictions ARE coming. Fact.

 

[bucs90]

CANT have an assault rifle
CAN have an abortion
CANT have a gay wedding
CAN smoke weed
CANT smoke crack
CAN produce porn
CANT sell the porn
CAN invade another country
CANT search our cars
CANT drive over 70mph
CAN text and drive

This nation is full of laws where many think it is a good law, many think it is a bad law. Rarely does 100% of people agree on the validity of a law, with the exception of maybe murder, rape, theft, the old English "Common Laws".

So, the true test is this: We've been told by gun nuts that they are "law abiding citizens".

And we see that 99% of laws are met with a population that is split on the validity of that law.

So, the essence of being "law abiding" really means obeying laws that you may not agree with, but, do so because you abide by laws.



SO all you "law abiding" gun owners......stop with the threats of violence or implying it. If you are a LAW ABIDING citizen, then nothing changes when a new law is passed. People will be split over it. And law abiding citizens will abide by it.

 

[BlackSand]

SO all you "law abiding" gun owners......stop with the threats of violence or implying it. If you are a LAW ABIDING citizen, then nothing changes when a new law is passed. People will be split over it. And law abiding citizens will abide by it.

If you don't want violence ... Then stop asking for it.
Your threats are no different than any other ... Except you intend to have someone else fight for your opinion.

.

 

[whitehall]

Apparently it's an e-mail by a single person named Mike Vanderbaugh. Characterizing it as "a threat by Connecticut gun owners" seems intentionally inflammatory.

 

[The T]

Guess gun nuts hate Democracy now.

Democracy=MOB RULE...and YES WE do. WE aren't a Democracy.

Learn it, Live It, KNOW it.

Well, most of the people in the United States want more gun restrictions. And our representatives, which we voted in, are trying to give us what we want. We are a Representative Republic.....see, I already knew that. Democracy via representatives basically.

You gun nuts are just the minority on this. Just like how most people didn't want slavery. And most people don't want to discriminate against gays or minorities.

In the end....progress wins out.

Only problem is you gun nuts threatening to murder people WHEN you end up having to abide by the new laws most people want. You folks are dangerous, and the rest of society will have to find a way to handle that threat unfortunately.

Gun NUTS that arm ourselves for WHAT?

enabling the people to organize a militia system.
participating in law enforcement;
deterring tyrannical government;
repelling invasion;
suppressing insurrection,
facilitating a natural right of self-defense
__________________________

So WE are dangerous...got it.