Congressional panel investigating the origins of Covid finds that the virus originated in a lab .

The big words you overlooked

I didn't overlook them, you just didn't understand them... or don't understand how every article will have weasel words for "bothsidesism"

Hell's bells, dude, that would have been number one.
Not really. We don't impeach presidents for incompetence. We should.

A dear friend lost his son early on.........and he doesn't think it was Trumps fault.
I'm sure a lot of Cultists happily sacrifice their children.


Oh really? All Trump's fault
Yup, totally.
 
are you bought and paid for by the CCP ? you sure sound like you are ..

You might be spot on.

He could very well be compromised. Hope not.

I hope he isn't too .. either way he refuses to hold the CCP to one smidgen of responsibility for the virus that killed 1 million of his felons Americans ..

Why is it China's fault that our response was in competent.

China actually- did it right. They completely locked down the country after Covid was discovered, they invested billions building field hospitals (You know, instead of just sending a leaky old ship that couldn't take Covid Patients)

Or as Bill Maher said..

 
Why is it China's fault that our response was in competent.

China actually- did it right. They completely locked down the country after Covid was discovered, they invested billions building field hospitals (You know, instead of just sending a leaky old ship that couldn't take Covid Patients)

Or as Bill Maher said..


Why don't you take your ace over to China and live if you hate this country so bad ? Wait I know why, it's because they wouldn't tolerate someone like you for a split second.
 
Why is it China's fault that our response was in competent.

China actually- did it right. They completely locked down the country after Covid was discovered, they invested billions building field hospitals (You know, instead of just sending a leaky old ship that couldn't take Covid Patients)

Or as Bill Maher said..


they lied , covered up , and withheld info during the early outbreak of COVID .. they also restricted domestic travel to and from Wuhan but allowed international travel .. to spread the virus .. any more questions ? tongzhi ..
 
Why don't you take your ace over to China and live if you hate this country so bad ? Wait I know why, it's because they wouldn't tolerate someone like you for a split second.

I have no desire to live in China. I just spent $4000.00 to get my Chinese wife legal in this country.

All that said, looking big picture, you have to wonder.

This isn't about Communism vs. Capitalism. The Chinese are better Capitalists than we are. They were doing Capitalism while Europeans were living in Mud-huts.

Nope, it's about Democracy vs. Technocracy.

We elected the buffoon from reality TV, who appoints other buffoons like Gabbard, Hegseth, RatFuck Jr., etc.

China appoints the most competent technocrats they can find.

So, yeah, long after my Chinese wife and I end up in cremation urns, China is going to run laps around the US.

And we'll have no one to blame but ourselves.
 
I didn't overlook them, you just didn't understand them... or don't understand how every article will have weasel words for "bothsidesism"
How can you explain your quoted scientists references to probably or suggests ? Scientific method doesn't operate on 'probably'........

Not really. We don't impeach presidents for incompetence. We should.
Bob Hur wouldn't try one because he was incompetent.
I'm sure a lot of Cultists happily sacrifice their children.
Ha ha ha..................you don't have to go out of your way to prove you are a piece of shit.............keep doing what comes naturally to you......... :auiqs.jpg:

Funny, you are now showing up late at night to counter your proven stupidity...............you are a morning liar......being called out for your stupidity must be getting to you.

Sleep tight........:biggrin:
 
How can you explain your quoted
Again, read the entire articles, have someone explain the big words to you.

Bob Hur wouldn't try one because he was incompetent.

Bob Hur took an opportunity to slander a sitting president because he couldn't make a case to a grand jury.

Here's the rub. You can't put sitting presidents on trial. The only remedy is to recommend impeachment, and Hur didn't have the balls to do that.

Ha ha ha..................you don't have to go out of your way to prove you are a piece of shit.

If you had a loved one die of Covid and you are still supporting Cheeto Jesus, you are a cultist. Sorry.

Living with an illegal immigrant, make it right before she ends up on Tommy Homan's list?

Except she was never "illegal". Also, attack on family reported.

I guess what I should have said is that I spent $4000 to move her from legal asylum status to legal relative sponsorship status, because she had already waited 7 years for an asylum hearing and never got one.
 
Again, read the entire articles, have someone explain the big words to you.
I showed your articles to my neighbors 5 year old, he pointed out there were no scientific conclusions only 'maybes'.

Bob Hur took an opportunity to slander a sitting president because he couldn't make a case to a grand jury.
Actually, it was Merrick Garland who gave him the green light.

Washington CNN —

Special counsel Robert Hur’s report released Thursday did not charge President Joe Biden with a crime, but it painted a picture of a forgetful commander in chief who failed to properly protect highly sensitive classified information – a depiction that could hurt Biden politically.
The special counsel report found that Biden willfully retained classified information, including top secret documents, and knew he was in possession of some documents as far back as 2017. He also shared some of that information with the ghostwriter of his 2017 memoir.
The special counsel decided not to charge the president in the case – primarily because he found that nothing proved a willful intent by Biden to illegally hold onto classified information and his cooperation with the investigation.
Yet, in a politically damaging line of reasoning, Hur wrote that one reason Biden wasn’t going to be prosecuted was because he would present to a jury as an elderly man “with a poor memory.” Biden’s lawyers objected to the description – calling it “investigative excess” and accusing Hur of flouting Justice Department rules and norms.


Too mentally incapacitated to testify but ok to launch a nuke.

Here's the rub. You can't put sitting presidents on trial.
No law says that.

If you had a loved one die of Covid and you are still supporting Cheeto Jesus, you are a cultist. Sorry.
If Trump only had a vaccine in January 2020.



Except she was never "illegal".
Your statement led to that belief......and you issued a statement to clarify that.

Also, attack on family reported.
:206:
 
I showed your articles to my neighbors 5 year old, he pointed out there were no scientific conclusions only 'maybes'.
That sounds improbable.
But that you need a five year old to explain things to you isn't surprising.

Actually, it was Merrick Garland who gave him the green light.

Did Garland give him the green light to take cheap political shots when he couldn't prove his case?

No law says that.
No, there's just centuries of precedent. The remedy to a law breaking president is impeachment.
 
But that you need a five year old to explain things to you isn't surprising.
He wants to talk to you................. :auiqs.jpg:
Did Garland give him the green light to take cheap political shots when he couldn't prove his case?
He had all the proof needed, yet concluded it wasn't worth pursuing because the jury would most likely sympathize with him and find he was a nice elderly man who wasn't playing with a full deck.

1738023169905.webp


No, there's just centuries of precedent.
No we have now immunity..........6-3.................:biggrin:
 
He had all the proof needed, yet concluded it wasn't worth pursuing because the jury would most likely sympathize with him and find he was a nice elderly man who wasn't playing with a full deck.

Except it was never going to be an issue for a jury. His only option was to present his evidence to Congress and make a recommendation for impeachment, which he didn't do.

Instead, he made a lot of innuendoes that Biden didn't know when his son died (He did, according to the transcripts) or that he had shared classified documents with his ghost writer (when it was his personal diary.)

Hur was a real snake in the grass.

No we have now immunity..........6-3
Works on the assumption SCOTUS is always going to be in Trump's pocket.
 
Except it was never going to be an issue for a jury. His only option was to present his evidence to Congress and make a recommendation for impeachment, which he didn't do.

Instead, he made a lot of innuendoes that Biden didn't know when his son died (He did, according to the transcripts) or that he had shared classified documents with his ghost writer (when it was his personal diary.)

Hur was a real snake in the grass.


Works on the assumption SCOTUS is always going to be in Trump's pocket.
Hur was a snake why ? Because he botched the political Democrat agenda ?
 
Except you haven't been able to prove that.


You haven't been able to prove that, either, but consider your logic here. An accidental leak would be an accident. Your guys claim they intentionally did it to achieve, something, I guess.

Seems to me that it make a lot more sense to send some agents over with vials and release it in major cities, if that was their goal, rather than letting their own people get infected and hope that Trump was such a complete assclown that he'd ignore every doctor and scientist and let it spread.

I claim it was accidental with a massive cover up.

You say what?
 
I claim it was accidental with a massive cover up.

You say what?

That you have absolutely zero proof of that.

On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence to support the animal origin of the virus. Mainly the fact that the first cases were in a wet market 17 miles from the lab, and virus traces were found in the holding pens for these animals.
 
On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence to support the animal origin of the virus.
You're back to the big words like 'probably' again.

You do know that patient zero was traced to one of the Wuhan Lab scientists don't you?

You do know that the Wuhan Lab was found being very lax in biological safety protocols don't you?

The Wuhan wet market 'probably' could have been contaminated by exposed lab workers shopping there.
 
That you have absolutely zero proof of that.

On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence to support the animal origin of the virus. Mainly the fact that the first cases were in a wet market 17 miles from the lab, and virus traces were found in the holding pens for these animals.
Do you think I am the fucking DA?

:laughing0301:

You demand PROOF for everything, right?

Like Trump and Putin stealing 2016. YOU HAVE PROOF! :spinner:

You are the type of person that demands PROOF, or you will not believe it.

Like Trump raping in a department store,

YOU DEMAND PROOF!
 
That you have absolutely zero proof of that.

On the other hand, there is plenty of evidence to support the animal origin of the virus. Mainly the fact that the first cases were in a wet market 17 miles from the lab, and virus traces were found in the holding pens for these animals.
Joe, show the PROOF of everything you have ever opined on.

DO YOU HAVE PROOF?
 
Back
Top Bottom