Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As already correctly noted, should this 'hearing' conducted in bad faith by republicans end up benefiting Clinton, it would be the consequence of the right's unwarranted and partisan animosity toward Clinton, where conservatives would have only themselves to blame for their miscalculation.Hillary stood on point for a full 11 hour interview by the Benghazi committee, being the only witness being questioned. She stood calm, confident, and professional the entire time.
Nothing new came up at all in the Benghazi committee, lots of political theatre and partisan showdowns, but really there isn't anything that I'm aware of that could be used in this interview that could put Clinton into the negative.
I have to say that was quite an endurance test and Hillary came through on top. Congratulations on her well deserved win.
She lied her ass off.Hillary stood on point for a full 11 hour interview by the Benghazi committee, being the only witness being questioned. She stood calm, confident, and professional the entire time.
Nothing new came up at all in the Benghazi committee, lots of political theatre and partisan showdowns, but really there isn't anything that I'm aware of that could be used in this interview that could put Clinton into the negative.
I have to say that was quite an endurance test and Hillary came through on top. Congratulations on her well deserved win.
Lying ***** is a more appropriate title.Hillary stood on point for a full 11 hour interview by the Benghazi committee, being the only witness being questioned. She stood calm, confident, and professional the entire time.
Nothing new came up at all in the Benghazi committee, lots of political theatre and partisan showdowns, but really there isn't anything that I'm aware of that could be used in this interview that could put Clinton into the negative.
I have to say that was quite an endurance test and Hillary came through on top. Congratulations on her well deserved win.
Run Hillary run!
Madame President has a sweet ring to it
It will mean a lying ***** lied her ass off and plenty of you idiots are stupid enough to believe it.As already correctly noted, should this 'hearing' conducted in bad faith by republicans end up benefiting Clinton, it would be the consequence of the right's unwarranted and partisan animosity toward Clinton, where conservatives would have only themselves to blame for their miscalculation.Hillary stood on point for a full 11 hour interview by the Benghazi committee, being the only witness being questioned. She stood calm, confident, and professional the entire time.
Nothing new came up at all in the Benghazi committee, lots of political theatre and partisan showdowns, but really there isn't anything that I'm aware of that could be used in this interview that could put Clinton into the negative.
I have to say that was quite an endurance test and Hillary came through on top. Congratulations on her well deserved win.
LOL, yeah ok Jimmy the Greek.....just out of curiosity how much will what she has for breakfast today alter the probability of her winning the election a year from now?The "hearing", regardless of any "revelations" contained therein, probably increased the chances of a Hillary presidency by at least 10 or 20%.
Hillary contacts Egypts Prime Minister shortly after the attacks and tells him we know this was a pre planned attack it was not about a video then she and the administration tells the public for weeks after that it was about a video. I'm not sure very many would consider that as a win.
Actually two revelations came to light.
1) She told the Egyptians hours after the attack that it was terrorism, she told Chelsea that it "was done by an Al-Qaeda like group, but then spent the next few days, including the casket ceremony of the four dead men blaming the attacks on a video.
2) The consulate sent 600 separate requests to the State Department for extra security, and none of them ever reached Clinton's desk.
Sorry.
That Clinton was subjected to 11 hours of an unwarranted, partisan interrogation is in of itself reprehensible – Gowdy himself conceded that the 'hearings' resulted in no new information, something that was already known before the pointless proceedings began.
And as correctly predicted the ridiculous right is trying – and failing – to propagate their inane lies, misinformation, and spin, where the vast majority of the American people know the truth: that the 'hearings' are nothing more than a partisan witch hunt.
For breakfast she will have Eggs Benedict and shots of Captain Morgan™.LOL, yeah ok Jimmy the Greek.....just out of curiosity how much will what she has for breakfast today alter the probability of her winning the election a year from now?The "hearing", regardless of any "revelations" contained therein, probably increased the chances of a Hillary presidency by at least 10 or 20%.

I hope you're not saying something negative about the PC-Protected religion.Meanwhile, somewhere, a young Muslim is born.
For breakfast she will have Eggs Benedict and shots of Captain Morgan™.LOL, yeah ok Jimmy the Greek.....just out of curiosity how much will what she has for breakfast today alter the probability of her winning the election a year from now?The "hearing", regardless of any "revelations" contained therein, probably increased the chances of a Hillary presidency by at least 10 or 20%.
I'll put her probability in 2016 at 53.75% currently, subject to change.
Full disclosure: I'm the last person on the planet from whom you should take political predictions. But that won't stop me from making them!
.
LOL, Thanks for the laugh MacFor breakfast she will have Eggs Benedict and shots of Captain Morgan™.LOL, yeah ok Jimmy the Greek.....just out of curiosity how much will what she has for breakfast today alter the probability of her winning the election a year from now?The "hearing", regardless of any "revelations" contained therein, probably increased the chances of a Hillary presidency by at least 10 or 20%.
I'll put her probability in 2016 at 53.75% currently, subject to change.
Full disclosure: I'm the last person on the planet from whom you should take political predictions. But that won't stop me from making them!
.
Aren't you supposed to blame the terrorists?People died and she blamed subordinates and the only thing sycophantic clintonites can say is "she stood calm confident and professional"? Is the freaking world still upside down to lefties?
Yup. And the FBI was watching.She lied her ass off.Hillary stood on point for a full 11 hour interview by the Benghazi committee, being the only witness being questioned. She stood calm, confident, and professional the entire time.
Nothing new came up at all in the Benghazi committee, lots of political theatre and partisan showdowns, but really there isn't anything that I'm aware of that could be used in this interview that could put Clinton into the negative.
I have to say that was quite an endurance test and Hillary came through on top. Congratulations on her well deserved win.
There were attacks on 5 other US embassies directly resulting from protests over The Innocence of Muslims.
Were these not your words? What were you implying?
I was not "implying" anything. I was stating a fact.
Come now. A fact isn't just randomly stated for no reason if not to infer a point.
What I understood was
"if the video is responsible for those attacks, then it is possible that it caused the attack on the consulate in Benghazi."
I can't read your intentions from the other side of an internet connection.
You have, once again, added to my statement with your own imagination.
I mentioned the fact that 5 other embassies were attacked directly due to the internet video to add context to your Hillary Clinton quote:
"This has been a difficult week for the State Department and for our country. We’ve seen the heavy assault on our post in Benghazi that took the lives of those brave men. We’ve seen rage and violence directed at American embassies over an awful Internet video that we had nothing do to with.”
Why the need for context? It was easy to see she was blaming Benghazi on the video, irregardless of the five other attacks.