Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Someone sent me this....Hillary stood on point for a full 11 hour interview by the Benghazi committee, being the only witness being questioned. She stood calm, confident, and professional the entire time.
Nothing new came up at all in the Benghazi committee, lots of political theatre and partisan showdowns, but really there isn't anything that I'm aware of that could be used in this interview that could put Clinton into the negative.
I have to say that was quite an endurance test and Hillary came through on top. Congratulations on her well deserved win.
James Woods– Verified account @RealJamesWoods
It boils down to this: if you like Valerie Jarrett as our current president, you'll just love Sidney Blumenthal. #BenghaziAnswers
So because she confidently faced questioning that shows she is a liar, she is presidential? That makes no sense
Seek help for your delusionsSo because she confidently faced questioning that shows she is a liar, she is presidential? That makes no sense
you're wrong. there was no lie. the talking points that are claiming that she lied are the lie.
you are seeing something that isn't there. it's called confirmation bias.
In psychology and cognitive science, confirmation bias (or confirmatory bias) is a tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions, leading to statistical errors.
Confirmation bias - Science Daily
So because she confidently faced questioning that shows she is a liar, she is presidential? That makes no sense
you're wrong. there was no lie. the talking points that are claiming that she lied are the lie.
you are seeing something that isn't there. it's called confirmation bias.
In psychology and cognitive science, confirmation bias (or confirmatory bias) is a tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions, leading to statistical errors.
Confirmation bias - Science Daily
Actually, it was bothSo when she was claiming it was a video tape when we now know she knew it was al qeada, she was telling the truth
The reatest endurance test I could tell is the chair standing up to that fat ass being on it for 11 hours.Hillary stood on point for a full 11 hour interview by the Benghazi committee, being the only witness being questioned. She stood calm, confident, and professional the entire time.
Nothing new came up at all in the Benghazi committee, lots of political theatre and partisan showdowns, but really there isn't anything that I'm aware of that could be used in this interview that could put Clinton into the negative.
I have to say that was quite an endurance test and Hillary came through on top. Congratulations on her well deserved win.
So because she confidently faced questioning that shows she is a liar, she is presidential? That makes no sense
you're wrong. there was no lie. the talking points that are claiming that she lied are the lie.
you are seeing something that isn't there. it's called confirmation bias.
In psychology and cognitive science, confirmation bias (or confirmatory bias) is a tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions, leading to statistical errors.
Confirmation bias - Science Daily
Ahh, but you can't prove there was no lie. You are given to ad hominem instead.
So because she confidently faced questioning that shows she is a liar, she is presidential? That makes no sense
you're wrong. there was no lie. the talking points that are claiming that she lied are the lie.
you are seeing something that isn't there. it's called confirmation bias.
In psychology and cognitive science, confirmation bias (or confirmatory bias) is a tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions, leading to statistical errors.
Confirmation bias - Science Daily
Ahh, but you can't prove there was no lie. You are given to ad hominem instead.
you claim there is a lie, the burden is on you to show an actual lie, not a twisted interpretations of facts to suit your agenda.
Actually, it was bothSo when she was claiming it was a video tape when we now know she knew it was al qeada, she was telling the truth
The videotape created the mobs.....AlQaeda exploited them
So because she confidently faced questioning that shows she is a liar, she is presidential? That makes no sense
you're wrong. there was no lie. the talking points that are claiming that she lied are the lie.
you are seeing something that isn't there. it's called confirmation bias.
In psychology and cognitive science, confirmation bias (or confirmatory bias) is a tendency to search for or interpret information in a way that confirms one's preconceptions, leading to statistical errors.
Confirmation bias - Science Daily
Ahh, but you can't prove there was no lie. You are given to ad hominem instead.
you claim there is a lie, the burden is on you to show an actual lie, not a twisted interpretations of facts to suit your agenda.
no you did not... feel free to delude yourself, but the fact remains there was no lie.
no you did not... feel free to delude yourself, but the fact remains there was no lie.
Blaming a video rather than al qaeda when you know they are responsible is lying.
no you did not... feel free to delude yourself, but the fact remains there was no lie.
Repeating the same thing over and over again while ignoring the very obvious statements to the contrary isn't going to change the facts
no you did not... feel free to delude yourself, but the fact remains there was no lie.
Repeating the same thing over and over again while ignoring the very obvious statements to the contrary isn't going to change the facts
yet you imagine it's working so well for you. fact is, she did not blame the video.
