Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Conspiracy theory forums on news boards were invented because of 9/11.
Prove me wrong douche waffle muffin muncher.
Conspiracy theory boards were created specifically to cover up the truth about 9/11.
Try these"Lol.Ok. How exactly did you "follow the money"?
abcnews.go.com
theintercept.com
nypost.com
americanmilitarynews.com
911truth.org
How does any of the above prove the subject of this thread, which is:Try these"
The latest legal pursuit is that of an insurance syndicate of British insurer Lloyd's, which says the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, its banks and various charities should be financially responsible for the $215 million it paid in insurance settlements to 9/11 victims' families.
View attachment 704976Who Funded 9/11 Attacks? Insurers, 9/11 Families Still Want Answers
After the ten-year anniversary of Sept. 11 and six months after the death of al Qaeda leader, questions still remain regarding who funded the attacks that led to thousands of deaths and billions of dollars in damages.
View attachment 7049799/11 and the Saudi Connection
Mounting evidence supports allegations that Saudi Arabia helped fund the 9/11 attacks.
View attachment 704981Saudi government allegedly funded a ‘dry run’ for 9/11
Fresh evidence submitted in a major 9/11 lawsuit moving forward against the Saudi Arabian government reveals its embassy in Washington may have funded a “dry run” for the hijackings carried out by …
View attachment 704988New FBI report finds Saudi help in 9/11 terrorist attacks
On Saturday, the FBI released a report documenting several pieces of circumstantial evidence tying the government of Saudi Arabia to the 9/11 terrorists.Who Funded 9/11 Attacks? Families, Insurers Want Answers to Questions
Who funded the 911 attacks? After the 10th 9/11 anniversary, Families and Insurers Still Seek Answers to Questions about who is responsible in their effort
This came about responding to the other mike, back in February of this years (before I was a Mod) and Surada has a different view. To me the real conspiracy is not the falling of the buildings, but who paid to have this done to us, vs with who and where we went to war, due to it, and also, who we want to act and regard as if they are friends and allies, when they are not.How does any of the above prove the subject of this thread, which is:
Conflicting theories of fire-induced collapse 20 years after 9/11...
Try these"
The latest legal pursuit is that of an insurance syndicate of British insurer Lloyd's, which says the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, its banks and various charities should be financially responsible for the $215 million it paid in insurance settlements to 9/11 victims' families.
View attachment 704976Who Funded 9/11 Attacks? Insurers, 9/11 Families Still Want Answers
After the ten-year anniversary of Sept. 11 and six months after the death of al Qaeda leader, questions still remain regarding who funded the attacks that led to thousands of deaths and billions of dollars in damages.
View attachment 7049799/11 and the Saudi Connection
Mounting evidence supports allegations that Saudi Arabia helped fund the 9/11 attacks.
View attachment 704981Saudi government allegedly funded a ‘dry run’ for 9/11
Fresh evidence submitted in a major 9/11 lawsuit moving forward against the Saudi Arabian government reveals its embassy in Washington may have funded a “dry run” for the hijackings carried out by …
View attachment 704988New FBI report finds Saudi help in 9/11 terrorist attacks
On Saturday, the FBI released a report documenting several pieces of circumstantial evidence tying the government of Saudi Arabia to the 9/11 terrorists.Who Funded 9/11 Attacks? Families, Insurers Want Answers to Questions
Who funded the 911 attacks? After the 10th 9/11 anniversary, Families and Insurers Still Seek Answers to Questions about who is responsible in their effort
This came about responding to the other mike, back in February of this years (before I was a Mod) and Surada has a different view. To me the real conspiracy is not the falling of the buildings, but who paid to have this done to us, vs with who and where we went to war, due to it, and also, who we want to act and regard as if they are friends and allies, when they are not.
I see.
So there weren't any conspiracy theory forums prior to 9/11/2001 and they were invented on or after 9/11/2001 all for the purpose of covering up 9/11?
I'll ask again.
If conspiracy forums are in existence for the purpose of covering up 9/11 like you claim, are you accusing the folks at US Message Board of being part of that 9/11 coverup also?
Funny how you avoided answering that.
What I should do is report you for the continuous wrongful accusations but then that would be redundant wouldn't it ?I see.
So there weren't any conspiracy theory forums prior to 9/11/2001 and they were invented on or after 9/11/2001 all for the purpose of covering up 9/11?
I'll ask again.
If conspiracy forums are in existence for the purpose of covering up 9/11 like you claim, are you accusing the folks at US Message Board of being part of that 9/11 coverup also?
Funny how you avoided answering that.
What I should do is report you for the continuous wrongful accusations but then that would be redundant wouldn't it ?
Some people are ignorant and some people are just plain dishonest. I'm pretty sure you fall into the second category.You sure are an ignorant sissy. Do you know anything about the architect or his other buildings? Do you know anything about the special aluminum skin developed for the WTC or how a slim cantilevered design sways?
Some people are ignorant and some people are just plain dishonest. I'm pretty sure you fall into the second category.
Several times in One ( since 9/11 referred to as the North Tower, where my Uncle Bob worked and where windows on the World restaurant was)We're you ever in the twin towers? You seem like a sucker for idiotic conspiracy theories.
There are skyscrapers all over the world except for Antarctica. They must all cope with the same gravity. So shouldn't there be lots of designers who know how to distribute the steel down the structure? Won't the distribution of concrete affect that? Look at the Eiffel Tower.View attachment 705275
Its 10,000 tons of wrought iron doesn't have to support twice its own weight in concrete though.
As you progress down the structure doesn't more and more weight have to be supported? So where are engineers discussing and demanding data on the distributions of steel and concrete down the Twin Towers? The NCSTAR1 report by the NIST does not even specify the total amount of concrete in the towers. They do for the steel but not the distribution.
The Twin Towers Affair has been a scientific farce since 9/12/01. I confronted Richard Gage about the distribution of steel in May of 2008. He looked at me like I had grown a 2nd head. He was doing his dog and pony show at the UofI Circle Campus in Chicago. I got in line after the show.
Try finding data on the distributions of steel and concrete down any skyscraper in the world. What is the big deal? Why should anyone but engineers give a damn but for 9/11?
Instead of asking redundant questions, do the research ....everything you need to know is out there to find.There are skyscrapers all over the world except for Antarctica. They must all cope with the same gravity. So shouldn't there be lots of designers who know how to distribute the steel down the structure? Won't the distribution of concrete affect that? Look at the Eiffel Tower.View attachment 705275
Its 10,000 tons of wrought iron doesn't have to support twice its own weight in concrete though.
As you progress down the structure doesn't more and more weight have to be supported? So where are engineers discussing and demanding data on the distributions of steel and concrete down the Twin Towers? The NCSTAR1 report by the NIST does not even specify the total amount of concrete in the towers. They do for the steel but not the distribution.
The Twin Towers Affair has been a scientific farce since 9/12/01. I confronted Richard Gage about the distribution of steel in May of 2008. He looked at me like I had grown a 2nd head. He was doing his dog and pony show at the UofI Circle Campus in Chicago. I got in line after the show.
Try finding data on the distributions of steel and concrete down any skyscraper in the world. What is the big deal? Why should anyone but engineers give a damn but for 9/11?
Where did I say they were?World Trade Towers weren't brick and mortar.
Where did I say they were?
Instead of asking redundant questions, do the research ....everything you need to know is out there to find.
Start here
The problem here is that you’re too stupid to understand your own statements.What I should do is report you for the continuous wrongful accusations but then that would be redundant wouldn't it ?
What’s your point anyways?There are skyscrapers all over the world except for Antarctica. They must all cope with the same gravity. So shouldn't there be lots of designers who know how to distribute the steel down the structure? Won't the distribution of concrete affect that? Look at the Eiffel Tower.View attachment 705275
Its 10,000 tons of wrought iron doesn't have to support twice its own weight in concrete though.
As you progress down the structure doesn't more and more weight have to be supported? So where are engineers discussing and demanding data on the distributions of steel and concrete down the Twin Towers? The NCSTAR1 report by the NIST does not even specify the total amount of concrete in the towers. They do for the steel but not the distribution.
The Twin Towers Affair has been a scientific farce since 9/12/01. I confronted Richard Gage about the distribution of steel in May of 2008. He looked at me like I had grown a 2nd head. He was doing his dog and pony show at the UofI Circle Campus in Chicago. I got in line after the show.
Try finding data on the distributions of steel and concrete down any skyscraper in the world. What is the big deal? Why should anyone but engineers give a damn but for 9/11?
