JakeStarkey
Diamond Member
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,527
- 2,165
- Banned
- #121
No, he is not. He is far from right now the Dem equiv of RMN, and we are foolish to think so.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If he continues his present course of stonewalling investigations, Jake he's going down the EXACT same path as Nixon.
You forget that Watergate was a third rate burglary that brought down a President not because he was involved in the initial crime but because he was involved in the cover-up. This IRS scandal threatens to become a potential Watergate depending on how Obama responds to it. Right now he's claiming that he knew nothing about it at all. Before the claim was that nobody in the White House knew anything about it at all. Now we know that isn't the case.
What would be "foolish" would be to allow this to BECOME another Watergate! Whether that happens is totally up to Barack Obama.
If he continues his present course of stonewalling investigations, Jake he's going down the EXACT same path as Nixon.
You forget that Watergate was a third rate burglary that brought down a President not because he was involved in the initial crime but because he was involved in the cover-up. This IRS scandal threatens to become a potential Watergate depending on how Obama responds to it. Right now he's claiming that he knew nothing about it at all. Before the claim was that nobody in the White House knew anything about it at all. Now we know that isn't the case.
What would be "foolish" would be to allow this to BECOME another Watergate! Whether that happens is totally up to Barack Obama.
Wrong as can be. The plan to bug the Democrats National Headquarters in the Watergate hotel during an election year was foiled and the Plumbers were arrested. Those arrests ultimately led to the resignation of President Nixon. Because.......
Watergate Scandal Timeline
What makes them different?
Nixon initiated a cover-up. So did Barack Obama...on numerous occaisions.
I guess you have to ask yourself which is more criminal...a break-in of someone's campaign headquarters or using the IRS to knee cap anyone who opposes your agenda? I'm seeing them as rather similar. The main difference is the scale of each action and how many times it occurred.
What makes them different?
Nixon initiated a cover-up. So did Barack Obama...on numerous occaisions.
I guess you have to ask yourself which is more criminal...a break-in of someone's campaign headquarters or using the IRS to knee cap anyone who opposes your agenda? I'm seeing them as rather similar. The main difference is the scale of each action and how many times it occurred.
If you have proof that the President covered up crimes committed by henchmen in his pay, then Rep. Issa would like a word.
Again if you have information that proves the President ordered anyone at the IRS to target any of his political enemies then Rep. Issa would like a few moments of your time.
And that is a nut that I don't think will be cracked.