Condi Rice as next president of Harvard?

Lisa558

Diamond Member
Oct 12, 2021
35,670
37,414
2,788
What an excellent outcome, if she were interested:

1) Here we have a BRILLIANT, competent, qualified black woman, so it would prove that Gay’s removal, despite her claims, was not because she was black.

2) It would show that Harvard is committed to diversity, as the liberals there proclaim. What better way to have a conservative president, demonstrating that diversity of opinion is welcome?

3) We wouldn’t have a Jew, thereby sidestepping the liberal antisemites who would march and protest against a Jew.

The questions are:

1) Would have be willing to hire an impressive, accomplished black woman if she’s a Republican who doesn’t side with Jew-haters?

2) Would she be willing to step into the hornet’s nest?

 
What an excellent outcome, if she were interested:

1) Here we have a BRILLIANT, competent, qualified black woman, so it would prove that Gay’s removal, despite her claims, was not because she was black.

2) It would show that Harvard is committed to diversity, as the liberals there proclaim. What better way to have a conservative president, demonstrating that diversity of opinion is welcome?

3) We wouldn’t have a Jew, thereby sidestepping the liberal antisemites who would march and protest against a Jew.

The questions are:

1) Would have be willing to hire an impressive, accomplished black woman if she’s a Republican who doesn’t side with Jew-haters?

2) Would she be willing to step into the hornet’s nest?


No, I don't think making a war criminal the President of Harvard is going to fix the situation.
 
And why does the person have to be black?
Goddamn the people in this country are so obsessed with skin color :rolleyes:
I don’t think she has to be black. But you know full well that leftists have elevated black females above all others and give them jobs they are totally unqualified for.

What could be better than to hire a QUALIFIED black woman? It would demonstrate that blacks can indeed be smart and competent, instead of hiring unqualified blacks and making blacks look like incompetents?
 
I don’t think she has to be black. But you know full well that leftists have elevated black females above all others and give them jobs they are totally unqualified for.
:lmao:

Someone's feeling a little insecure....
What could be better than to hire a QUALIFIED black woman? It would demonstrate that blacks can indeed be smart and competent, instead of hiring unqualified blacks and making blacks look like incompetents?
Sure Lisa. Your commentary is about black women and validating their worth.... :itsok:
 
How about Jerry Falwell Jr.? He has a tremendously successful record in administering a large educational institution, and he was fired because of sexual escapades that shouldn't make any difference in Massachusetts and wouldn't be cause to fire him there.

An Evangelical from the South would provide diversity to the campus, there are few of Falwell's region or religiosity at Harvard.

If we are supposed to be providing jobs on the basis of competency, the fact that many at Harvard disagree with Dr. Falwell's politics shouldn't be a deterrent. Its about being able to do a good job, not who you are supporting politically.
 
What an excellent outcome, if she were interested:

1) Here we have a BRILLIANT, competent, qualified black woman, so it would prove that Gay’s removal, despite her claims, was not because she was black.

2) It would show that Harvard is committed to diversity, as the liberals there proclaim. What better way to have a conservative president, demonstrating that diversity of opinion is welcome?

3) We wouldn’t have a Jew, thereby sidestepping the liberal antisemites who would march and protest against a Jew.

The questions are:

1) Would have be willing to hire an impressive, accomplished black woman if she’s a Republican who doesn’t side with Jew-haters?

2) Would she be willing to step into the hornet’s nest?


Why doesn’t Harvard just pick a white, male Christian to make Conservatives happy?
 
What an excellent outcome, if she were interested:

1) Here we have a BRILLIANT, competent, qualified black woman, so it would prove that Gay’s removal, despite her claims, was not because she was black.

2) It would show that Harvard is committed to diversity, as the liberals there proclaim. What better way to have a conservative president, demonstrating that diversity of opinion is welcome?

3) We wouldn’t have a Jew, thereby sidestepping the liberal antisemites who would march and protest against a Jew.

The questions are:

1) Would have be willing to hire an impressive, accomplished black woman if she’s a Republican who doesn’t side with Jew-haters?

2) Would she be willing to step into the hornet’s nest?


Don't know a lot about her. She sounds levelheaded and smart. If she is not a commie, then OK.

But looks like Harvard has to have black women running it from now on. Or at least a trans. Whatever the case, Harvard wants a commie to run it.



attack%203.gif
 
And why does the person have to be black?
Goddamn the people in this country are so obsessed with skin color :rolleyes:

Well, self-loathing whites have no other choice. Keep all the systemic criminal blacks in the dem run shitholes and they can prey on the commie whites. Perfect for both groups! Sick whites can be disarmed and won't do a thing. And blacks will have a large group to rape, pillage and kill.

white hating liberal guilt.jpg
 
Why don’t they just name Sean Hannity as new President of Harvard so that Conservatives will now love them?


Sean Hannity is a great American, but he doesn't have Division 1 educational experience like Dr. Falwell does.

Like I said, it isn't about politics, its about ability and experience.
 

Forum List

Back
Top