Concerning Musk & His Underlings Having Access to the Personally Identifiable Information (PII), Protected Health Information (PHI) & Financial Data

Democrats have no party leader and they're spending their time rallying their base to save foreign aid...notice there's no acknowledgement of corruption within USAID.
No talk about misspending taxpayer $ and government can do better. It would be one thing if democrats were acknowledging the corruption and saying we need to fix it but Musk is not the way...

For those whining about Musk what solution do you propose to fix the corruption? And if you can come up with a solution back it up with examples of where it's been applied and worked.
 
MarcATL said:
It's the biggest data breach in US history, except this ones "approved" and done right in front of our faces.

Republicans are bringing harm to its citizens again, just as they did under the Bush II Regime.
Click to expand...
The demented LEFT's SECRET SLUSH FUND is NOT protected "data", dummy.
All you subverted zombies have are NARRATIVES to try to paint this discovery as nefarious and dangerous.
Excuse me, but that notion is a fucking JOKE.
This data DISCOVERY has to be THOROUGHLY INVESTIGATED and there must be CONSEQUENCES. No amount of your flailing and crying or SPINNING is going to make this go away.
:evil:
 
Last edited:
MarcATL said:
Then you should clearly see how what's being done now is exactly like what was being done then, but worse.

In time no one will admit to ever supporting Trump either, watch....
Click to expand...
Why are your leftist overlords laundering The American People's tax money.
A massive majority of people voted for President Trump.
Exit polling indicates that one of the main reasons The American People voted for President Trump was because they wanted accountability in the federal government agencies. They felt that the federal government was bloated and corrupt.
DOGE is now pulling back the covers on their corruption and it is worse than most American Citizens thought.
Do you have something against accountability?
DOGE is not spying on people.
They are investigating federal fraud within government agencies.
After all the money does not belong to government bureaucracies, it's The American People's money and we have every right to know.
 
NewsVine_Mariyam said:
The conclusion resonated with me so much that I'm going to lead with it and list the "WHY" afterwards:

​

Final Thoughts​

In any reputable tech company, C-suite executives do NOT have unrestricted access to PII, financial data, or PHI because it creates legal, ethical, and security risks. The fact that Elon Musk and his team may have access to such data without regulatory safeguards should alarm both users and compliance experts.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
​
Elon Musk and others associated with X (formerly Twitter) having access to Personally Identifiable Information (PII), financial data, and Protected Health Information (PHI) is a serious security and privacy concern for several reasons:​
​

1. Lack of Verified Security Clearance​

We do not know whether Musk or any of his associates have undergone the necessary security vetting or background checks required for handling sensitive data. Typically, entities dealing with PII, financial data, or PHI must adhere to strict compliance standards, such as:​
​
  • HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) – for PHI in the U.S.
  • GLBA (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) – for financial institutions handling sensitive consumer data.
  • GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) – for data protection in the EU.
  • CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act) – for consumer data privacy in California.
Without proper clearances and training in data security, there is a high risk of misuse, unauthorized access, or data breaches.​
​

2. Conflict of Interest & Ethical Risks​

Elon Musk has repeatedly shown impulsivity in decision-making, including publicly sharing internal documents, emails, and DMs without redacting personal details. If he (or close associates) personally access user data, it raises questions about:​
​
  • Potential abuse – Could data be used to target critics or competitors?
  • Insider trading – Financial information could be leveraged for personal or business gain.
  • Selective enforcement – Could private data be used to retaliate against individuals or organizations Musk dislikes?
A billionaire CEO with direct access to sensitive data creates an enormous power imbalance with zero oversight.​
​

3. Legal & Compliance Violations​

Many organizations separate executives from direct data access because of compliance mandates that enforce least privilege access and data protection controls. If Musk and his team have unrestricted access to X’s sensitive data, it likely violates:​
​
  • HIPAA Compliance (if X handles health-related data via DMs or Spaces).
  • Financial Data Protections (e.g., users paying for X Premium via stored payment info).
  • Privacy Laws (CCPA, GDPR) that require companies to restrict access only to essential personnel.
Violations could lead to massive fines, lawsuits, and government investigations.​
​

4. Security Risks & Potential for Breach​

If sensitive data is accessible without strong internal controls, this dramatically increases risk of:​
​
  • Data leaks – If internal systems lack audit logs or access restrictions.
  • Hacking incidents – If Musk or others with access use insecure devices.
  • State actor exploitation – If Musk collaborates with foreign governments (e.g., China, Saudi Arabia), personal data could be misused.
With no external oversight of X’s security measures, the risk of intentional or unintentional data exposure is alarmingly high.​
​

5. Trust & Reputation Damage​

Big Tech platforms rely on public trust to operate. If users believe their PII, financial data, or PHI can be accessed at the whim of a billionaire CEO, they may:​
​
  • Stop using X for private communications.
  • Withdraw financial data from the platform.
  • Report X to regulators or initiate lawsuits.
A lack of transparency on who can access user data weakens the credibility of any company, especially when that company is already under scrutiny.​
​

https://www.theverge.com/policy/606567/elon-musk-government-takeover-protest-doge?utm_source=chatgpt.com​

Click to expand...


Democrats are pretty selective about the release of personal information.

"House Democrats release Trump's tax returns​



Former President Donald Trump's tax returns from 2015 through 2020 have been made public by the Democratic-controlled House Ways and Means Committee — concluding a years-long political battle by Democrats to obtain and share the documents.

The committee released the tax returns Friday morning on its website and provided no new additional information or statements.


The move comes over a week after the panel voted to release the former president's tax returns and announced that the Internal Revenue Service did not audit Trump in 2017 or 2018 when he was in office — something the IRS is required to do annually for the president and vice president."

www.npr.org

House Democrats release Trump's tax returns

The Democratic-controlled Ways and Means Committee has released former President Trump's tax returns from his time in office, ending a multi-year legal battle for the information.
www.npr.org www.npr.org
 
NewsVine_Mariyam said:
The conclusion resonated with me so much that I'm going to lead with it and list the "WHY" afterwards:

​

Final Thoughts​

In any reputable tech company, C-suite executives do NOT have unrestricted access to PII, financial data, or PHI because it creates legal, ethical, and security risks. The fact that Elon Musk and his team may have access to such data without regulatory safeguards should alarm both users and compliance experts.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
​
Elon Musk and others associated with X (formerly Twitter) having access to Personally Identifiable Information (PII), financial data, and Protected Health Information (PHI) is a serious security and privacy concern for several reasons:​
​

1. Lack of Verified Security Clearance​

We do not know whether Musk or any of his associates have undergone the necessary security vetting or background checks required for handling sensitive data. Typically, entities dealing with PII, financial data, or PHI must adhere to strict compliance standards, such as:​
​
  • HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) – for PHI in the U.S.
  • GLBA (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) – for financial institutions handling sensitive consumer data.
  • GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) – for data protection in the EU.
  • CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act) – for consumer data privacy in California.
Without proper clearances and training in data security, there is a high risk of misuse, unauthorized access, or data breaches.​
​

2. Conflict of Interest & Ethical Risks​

Elon Musk has repeatedly shown impulsivity in decision-making, including publicly sharing internal documents, emails, and DMs without redacting personal details. If he (or close associates) personally access user data, it raises questions about:​
​
  • Potential abuse – Could data be used to target critics or competitors?
  • Insider trading – Financial information could be leveraged for personal or business gain.
  • Selective enforcement – Could private data be used to retaliate against individuals or organizations Musk dislikes?
A billionaire CEO with direct access to sensitive data creates an enormous power imbalance with zero oversight.​
​

3. Legal & Compliance Violations​

Many organizations separate executives from direct data access because of compliance mandates that enforce least privilege access and data protection controls. If Musk and his team have unrestricted access to X’s sensitive data, it likely violates:​
​
  • HIPAA Compliance (if X handles health-related data via DMs or Spaces).
  • Financial Data Protections (e.g., users paying for X Premium via stored payment info).
  • Privacy Laws (CCPA, GDPR) that require companies to restrict access only to essential personnel.
Violations could lead to massive fines, lawsuits, and government investigations.​
​

4. Security Risks & Potential for Breach​

If sensitive data is accessible without strong internal controls, this dramatically increases risk of:​
​
  • Data leaks – If internal systems lack audit logs or access restrictions.
  • Hacking incidents – If Musk or others with access use insecure devices.
  • State actor exploitation – If Musk collaborates with foreign governments (e.g., China, Saudi Arabia), personal data could be misused.
With no external oversight of X’s security measures, the risk of intentional or unintentional data exposure is alarmingly high.​
​

5. Trust & Reputation Damage​

Big Tech platforms rely on public trust to operate. If users believe their PII, financial data, or PHI can be accessed at the whim of a billionaire CEO, they may:​
​
  • Stop using X for private communications.
  • Withdraw financial data from the platform.
  • Report X to regulators or initiate lawsuits.
A lack of transparency on who can access user data weakens the credibility of any company, especially when that company is already under scrutiny.​
​

https://www.theverge.com/policy/606567/elon-musk-government-takeover-protest-doge?utm_source=chatgpt.com​

Click to expand...
No sense in me taking my annual certifications this year on PII, PHI, HIPPA or any other bs I have to certify for to stay in business. I no longer will have to pay for extra security on my work computer. Hell, he's opened a pandora's box. Maybe I will just retire and sell my work computer to the highest bidder.
 
ThisIsMe said:
www.nytimes.com

Elon Musk’s Team Now Has Access to Treasury’s Payments System

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent gave Mr. Musk’s representatives at the so-called Department of Government Efficiency a powerful tool to monitor and potentially limit government spending.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com

According to this, it appears they have been vetted, and have obtained security clearances.
Click to expand...
No, they haven’t. They’re just trying get people to shut up. Musk has no real authority, constitutionally.
 
Delldude said:
So does your Democrats....... what's your point?
Click to expand...

"Your" Democrats??? :laugh2::laugh::laugh2::laugh::laugh2:

I'm not and never have been a Democrat, didn't I have this same conversation with you before? I've been saying ad nauseam that the Ds and the Rs are two wings of the same globalist bird. But even if that wasn't the case, I would never in a million years vote Dem, as I am for limited government, anti authoritarianism, pro-life, traditional values, etc. Enough with the binary thinking, dude.
 
1738863161335.webp
 
there4eyeM said:
Probably, this is the case. Just the same, people should realize that all this info is somewhere and someone could eventually access it. "Security" is a relative term, and we need to understand the risks of living in the world.
Click to expand...
Our data is already out there, that is why democrats claim there is a risk. Democrats fear Musk will find out what they do and did
 
konradv said:
Excuse me none of those “investigators” have been vetted, do the safeguards have already been breached.

I’d also like to comment on Musk’s claim that outing his minions is a crime, when he doxxes federal employees regularly on Twitter. What a hypocrite!
Click to expand...
Democrats already breached the data. Democrats are afraid what we will find, nothing more.

And yes, we are not going to let the criminals vett our investigators
 
toobfreak said:
'Cept there is nothing he has done you can show he has fooled us about, Dope.
Musk has just exposed the greatest scandal ripoff in history.
Prove me wrong, asshole.
Click to expand...

%ou just keep right on believing that.
 
NewsVine_Mariyam said:
The conclusion resonated with me so much that I'm going to lead with it and list the "WHY" afterwards:

​

Final Thoughts​

In any reputable tech company, C-suite executives do NOT have unrestricted access to PII, financial data, or PHI because it creates legal, ethical, and security risks. The fact that Elon Musk and his team may have access to such data without regulatory safeguards should alarm both users and compliance experts.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
​
Elon Musk and others associated with X (formerly Twitter) having access to Personally Identifiable Information (PII), financial data, and Protected Health Information (PHI) is a serious security and privacy concern for several reasons:​
​

1. Lack of Verified Security Clearance​

We do not know whether Musk or any of his associates have undergone the necessary security vetting or background checks required for handling sensitive data. Typically, entities dealing with PII, financial data, or PHI must adhere to strict compliance standards, such as:​
​
  • HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) – for PHI in the U.S.
  • GLBA (Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act) – for financial institutions handling sensitive consumer data.
  • GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation) – for data protection in the EU.
  • CCPA (California Consumer Privacy Act) – for consumer data privacy in California.
Without proper clearances and training in data security, there is a high risk of misuse, unauthorized access, or data breaches.​
​

2. Conflict of Interest & Ethical Risks​

Elon Musk has repeatedly shown impulsivity in decision-making, including publicly sharing internal documents, emails, and DMs without redacting personal details. If he (or close associates) personally access user data, it raises questions about:​
​
  • Potential abuse – Could data be used to target critics or competitors?
  • Insider trading – Financial information could be leveraged for personal or business gain.
  • Selective enforcement – Could private data be used to retaliate against individuals or organizations Musk dislikes?
A billionaire CEO with direct access to sensitive data creates an enormous power imbalance with zero oversight.​
​

3. Legal & Compliance Violations​

Many organizations separate executives from direct data access because of compliance mandates that enforce least privilege access and data protection controls. If Musk and his team have unrestricted access to X’s sensitive data, it likely violates:​
​
  • HIPAA Compliance (if X handles health-related data via DMs or Spaces).
  • Financial Data Protections (e.g., users paying for X Premium via stored payment info).
  • Privacy Laws (CCPA, GDPR) that require companies to restrict access only to essential personnel.
Violations could lead to massive fines, lawsuits, and government investigations.​
​

4. Security Risks & Potential for Breach​

If sensitive data is accessible without strong internal controls, this dramatically increases risk of:​
​
  • Data leaks – If internal systems lack audit logs or access restrictions.
  • Hacking incidents – If Musk or others with access use insecure devices.
  • State actor exploitation – If Musk collaborates with foreign governments (e.g., China, Saudi Arabia), personal data could be misused.
With no external oversight of X’s security measures, the risk of intentional or unintentional data exposure is alarmingly high.​
​

5. Trust & Reputation Damage​

Big Tech platforms rely on public trust to operate. If users believe their PII, financial data, or PHI can be accessed at the whim of a billionaire CEO, they may:​
​
  • Stop using X for private communications.
  • Withdraw financial data from the platform.
  • Report X to regulators or initiate lawsuits.
A lack of transparency on who can access user data weakens the credibility of any company, especially when that company is already under scrutiny.​
​

https://www.theverge.com/policy/606567/elon-musk-government-takeover-protest-doge?utm_source=chatgpt.com​

Click to expand...

He will sell it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Outrage Over President Trump's Gender Mutilation Ban

< Previous Thread

Guy trolls unhinged libs at anti-Trump rally

Next Thread >

Similar threads

C_Clayton_Jones
Elon Musk Handed Legal Blow Over Access to Social Security Data
Replies
5
Views
107
Crepitus
Crepitus
Luckyone
One question for all Trump supporters "Are you consumers?"
6 7 8
Replies
149
Views
844
Luckyone
Luckyone
NewsVine_Mariyam
Federal judge blocks Elon Musk's DOGE from Accessing Treasury Department records
3 4 5
Replies
81
Views
1K
beagle9
beagle9
Thunk
WIN! Court Rules DOGE Can Access Gov't Systems
Replies
18
Views
303
Admiral Rockwell Tory
Admiral Rockwell Tory
DonGlock26
US judge temporarily blocks Musk's DOGE from accessing payment systems
2
Replies
26
Views
495
NewsVine_Mariyam
NewsVine_Mariyam

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom