I have proposed a lot of solutions, just see my signature for one example, and take a look at my other threads.
It seems all you have to offer is snipe, snipe, snipe at others who do propose things, such as myself. As for education, I'm not going to get into listing degrees, but I have spent a lifetime educating myself, which I doubt you have.
I'm new here and don't know people's track record, but I will try to make it a point to see if you have ever started threads, or made any serious proposals to make this a better world. My guess, in advance, is that you have not. If you want to refer me to some such thread that lays out your proposals, please do so.
But, the backseat drivers, snipers, and kibitzers are the source of some of our worst problems in this world. Life is all about attitude much more than intellect, and yours seems pretty negative and contentless as far as I can see.
But thanks for posting to my thread anyway.

despite what education you bring to the table, your position on the role of the healthcare sector in the economy has some room for improvement. vast expanses of room. granted that, its hard to see that your proposals on the matter could take a more realistic view on the industry under consideration.
looking past that mess to your take on using public infrastructure like the VA to care for persons without insurance, there's no accounting for the logistics of these groups, the effect on care for the military who already encumber the system and the role that medicare and other public care provisions play in private medicine. any pragmatic proposal must take the private sector into account. we are a long ways on from the new deal, and we should have learned by this point that closed loop government expenditure fails to enhance the economy to the extent of public/private work. by removing this input from the private system, id say you are ruining it at once.
alas, you claim the whole effort is charity.

is that the sort of reasoning it takes to be in your 'front seat'? people
in government, who i would consider 'front seaters', have already proposed remedies which take what i appraise as
considerably better informed perspectives on the industry, its role in the economy, and the relationships between public and private enterprise. i happen to think that their conclusions are alright, as i said earlier.
youre wrapped up in this hubris, probably afforded you by your basketweaving degrees, which paints yourself as some righteous pragmatist, but such people dont talk out of the same end that you seem to. indeed, until you get some basic understandings of 'industry', 'charity', 'profit', etc. you've got to persist in your 'lifetime' quest for education, despite these terms being covered in high school.