DKSuddeth
Senior Member
The Bill of Rights only applies to The People of the United States of America
actually it applies to all bodies on US soil, not just american citizens.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Bill of Rights only applies to The People of the United States of America
You want to make it a crime for people to ask for something to be clarified? And you have the nerve to call Bush a nazi for attempting to strengthen a nation? Now I know you are without intelligence.Originally posted by jones
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines03/0106-08.htm
http://www.patandkat.com/pat/weblog/archives/2003/03/11/003081.php
http://www.fair.org/media-beat/030109.html
rewriting history is probly a crime. http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2003/3/14/13398/1467
Originally posted by DKSuddeth
actually it applies to all bodies on US soil, not just american citizens.
Originally posted by Moi
Number one: nobody's decendants owe any explanation, nor even acknowledgement, of their ancestor's activities. Especially those that happened in other countries. Any use of their ancestor's actions to try and shame someone today is just childish, rude and completely inconsequential.
Number Two: Although the East India Company was, perhaps, a thorn in the sides of the founding fathers, it was because of the power given to it under authority of the crown. They did not fight the revolution against EIC- they fought it against the total usurpation of people's rights by the crown and the crown's claim that authority came directly from God. Had the crown not trampled on the rights of it citizens by refusing to recognize the theretofore authority of the colonies administrators, thus antagonizing its colonial dealings from here in america, the founding fathers would not have laid claim that EIC was unfairly burdening them. They were angry at their loss in determining the rule of the land (which, in turn, caused the tax consequences in the first place).
You should perhaps brush up on your US history...
Originally posted by jones
2. And Bush DOES claim god told him to strike saddam and he struck saddam. Actual quote.
Originally posted by jimnyc
Then surely you'll be able to give us a source for this one. I'm not going to get the runaround on this on too, am I?
Originally posted by jimnyc
I don't see this outlining any convicted criminals at all. Face it, you have no clue what you're talking about and you can't name people you are accusing. You are a rambling liar.
Mokhiber: Ari, other than Elliot Abrams, how many convicted criminals are on the White House staff?
Ari Fleischer: You tell me, Russell.
Mokhiber: Could you give a list of convicted criminals on the White House staff, other than Elliot Abrams?
Ari Fleischer: I'll go right to the convicted criminals division and ask them.
Mokhiber: Seriously, why isn't being convicted of a crime a disqualifier for being on the White House staff?
Ari Fleischer: Russell, this is an issue that you like to repeat every briefing --
Mokhiber: But you don't answer it Ari.
Like I said before, you are without intelligence. No one with an ounce of brain power could possibly equate running a concentration camp in a facist regime with an order issued by congress consisting of hundreds of people- both democrats and republicans alike.Originally posted by jones
1. When their dicedents seemingly continue the trend of corporate corruption. The question is raised.
2. Its still corporate special interests. And Bush DOES claim god told him to strike saddam and he struck saddam. Actual quote.
You may want to expand your knowledge into how corporate power in america is so involved in politics, that they CAN manipulate our goverment and remian invulnerable to prosecution.
Of course.Originally posted by jimnyc
Then surely you'll be able to give us a source for this one. I'm not going to get the runaround on this on too, am I?
Since I didn't see this before my other reply, I'll just have to go one more round: if being a convicted "criminal" should keep people out of the white house, Bill Clinton should have left when he was convicted of perjury. PUHLEASE confine your arguments to the real world...you have no idea how to balance on that double-edged sword, do you?Originally posted by jones
This is all I need.
Hey, hear the one about the ex foxnews insider who claims that fox gets a briefing from the whitehouse everyday? outlining what they will report. I didnt say it. The fox guy did.
Originally posted by jones
This is all I need.
Originally posted by jones
And Bush DOES claim god told him to strike saddam and he struck saddam. Actual quote.
Originally posted by jimnyc
Then surely you'll be able to give us a source for this one. I'm not going to get the runaround on this on too, am I?
Originally posted by jones
http://www.google.com/search?q=God+...did&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&start=20&sa=N
You still dwell on the assertion that our media is liberal and not corporatized.
Originally posted by jones
You guys still dont have an argument to stand on. Claiming Im a lyer, sources are biased, or saying everythig is tin foil hat crap is plain childish.
Originally posted by jimnyc
WE don't have an argument? YOU came into the thread and leveled your assertions. You haven't been able to backup your own words yet. You've failed to show that this white house has more convicted criminals employed than ever before. You've failed to show that Bush spoke those words claiming God told him to strike Saddam. You've failed to show Bush's grandfather was a nazi. I asked for follow up and it went ignored.
You made claims. You can't or refuse to back them up. You come in here rambling like a little girl and then cry foul when you are laughed at. You are pathetic.
Originally posted by jones
They're all criminals.
http://www.nhgazette.com/cgi-bin/NHGstore.cgi?user_action=detail&catalogno=NN_Bush_Nazi Link
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/...2&subContrassID=1&sbSubContrassID=0&listSrc=Y