Commercial Crabber Of 50 Years Tells Gore Sea Level Hasn’t Changed Since At Least 1970

[cnm]

In climate science, those that produce papers that support the consensus view get rewarded with funding and fame. Those who do not get reduced funding and distain.

That's easy to change. Produce the data that shows temperatures are not increasing.

 

[Si modo]

Don't let a more complete picture ruin your confirmation bias.

So we can confidently take it from scientists' work that sea levels are rising. At least that is settled. Does that mean the crabber was more or less observant?

Calculated rates of global mean sea-level rise range from 1.7 to 3.2 mm/yr, depending on the time period examined
USGS Chesapeake Bay Activities Science Summary - Sea-Level Rise and Chesapeake Bay​

Settled?

 

[Si modo]

That's easy to change. Produce the data that shows temperatures are not increasing.

 

[bripat9643]

progressives just get perpetually suckered by soothsayers like Al Gore.

Yeah right. And actual sea level records don't exist. Rightard dumb fucks really are dumb fucks.

Just like the Temperature measurements, the so-called "climate scientists" have been fucking with the sea level measurements.

 

[bripat9643]

Don't let a more complete picture ruin your confirmation bias.

So we can confidently take it from scientists' work that sea levels are rising in Chesapeake Bay. At least that is settled. Does that mean the crabber was more or less observant?

Calculated rates of global mean sea-level rise range from 1.7 to 3.2 mm/yr, depending on the time period examined
USGS Chesapeake Bay Activities Science Summary - Sea-Level Rise and Chesapeake Bay​

Wrong.

 

[bripat9643]

Isn't that typical of deniers? Some 'crabber' gives anecdotal evidence and the denier wingnuts jump on it like it's a fact. Nothing solid, just a 'feeling' the 'mayor' has. Wingnuts a wingnut I guess.

The island community is eroding into the Bay and the residents want federal funds to save the island by building walls and breakers to slow down and halt the erosion. Experts are claiming the erosion control effort would be a costly waste and temporary because of the rising sea levels. The crabber making the claims has a financial and emotional stake in denying the sea level rising model and promoting the "it's only erosion" story.

All so called "climate scientists" are sucking on the government tit, and their pay, pensions and job security depend on the public believing the climate change hoax.

Scientist still get paid for doing science. If your only excuse is that scientists earn money so they can't be believed on science means that everyone in every field is a liar since they get paid for it. That's funny....only scientists who don't make money should be believed.

Wrong again. Climate scientists get paid for supporting the warmist cult agenda. When they are paid for producing a certain conclusion, yes that's true. What agenda does a carpenter get paid to support? Truck Driver? Engineer? Accountant?

All you did is prove you are unable to commit logic.

 

[OnePercenter]

progressives just get perpetually suckered by soothsayers like Al Gore.

Yeah right. And actual sea level records don't exist. Rightard dumb fucks really are dumb fucks.

Just like the Temperature measurements, the so-called "climate scientists" have been fucking with the sea level measurements.

It really reads like you are working for Koch.

 

[bripat9643]

Don't let a more complete picture ruin your confirmation bias.

So we can confidently take it from scientists' work that sea levels are rising in Chesapeake Bay. At least that is settled. Does that mean the crabber was more or less observant?

Calculated rates of global mean sea-level rise range from 1.7 to 3.2 mm/yr, depending on the time period examined
USGS Chesapeake Bay Activities Science Summary - Sea-Level Rise and Chesapeake Bay​

Rise of sea levels is 'the greatest lie ever told'

When running the International Commission on Sea Level Change, he launched a special project on the Maldives, whose leaders have for 20 years been calling for vast sums of international aid to stave off disaster. Six times he and his expert team visited the islands, to confirm that the sea has not risen for half a century. Before announcing his findings, he offered to show the inhabitants a film explaining why they had nothing to worry about. The government refused to let it be shown.

Similarly in Tuvalu, where local leaders have been calling for the inhabitants to be evacuated for 20 years, the sea has if anything dropped in recent decades. The only evidence the scaremongers can cite is based on the fact that extracting groundwater for pineapple growing has allowed seawater to seep in to replace it. Meanwhile, Venice has been sinking rather than the Adriatic rising, says Dr Mörner.

One of his most shocking discoveries was why the IPCC has been able to show sea levels rising by 2.3mm a year. Until 2003, even its own satellite-based evidence showed no upward trend. But suddenly the graph tilted upwards because the IPCC's favoured experts had drawn on the finding of a single tide-gauge in Hong Kong harbour showing a 2.3mm rise. The entire global sea-level projection was then adjusted upwards by a "corrective factor" of 2.3mm, because, as the IPCC scientists admitted, they "needed to show a trend".

When I spoke to Dr Mörner last week, he expressed his continuing dismay at how the IPCC has fed the scare on this crucial issue. When asked to act as an "expert reviewer" on the IPCC's last two reports, he was "astonished to find that not one of their 22 contributing authors on sea levels was a sea level specialist: not one". Yet the results of all this "deliberate ignorance" and reliance on rigged computer models have become the most powerful single driver of the entire warmist hysteria.

•For more information, see Dr Mörner on YouTube (Google Mörner, Maldives and YouTube); or read on the net his 2007 EIR interview "Claim that sea level is rising is a total fraud"; or email him – morner@pog.nu – to buy a copy of his booklet 'The Greatest Lie Ever Told' ​

 

[Dr Grump]

Don't let a more complete picture ruin your confirmation bias.

So we can confidently take it from scientists' work that sea levels are rising in Chesapeake Bay. At least that is settled. Does that mean the crabber was more or less observant?

Calculated rates of global mean sea-level rise range from 1.7 to 3.2 mm/yr, depending on the time period examined
USGS Chesapeake Bay Activities Science Summary - Sea-Level Rise and Chesapeake Bay​

Rise of sea levels is 'the greatest lie ever told'

When running the International Commission on Sea Level Change, he launched a special project on the Maldives, whose leaders have for 20 years been calling for vast sums of international aid to stave off disaster. Six times he and his expert team visited the islands, to confirm that the sea has not risen for half a century. Before announcing his findings, he offered to show the inhabitants a film explaining why they had nothing to worry about. The government refused to let it be shown.

Similarly in Tuvalu, where local leaders have been calling for the inhabitants to be evacuated for 20 years, the sea has if anything dropped in recent decades. The only evidence the scaremongers can cite is based on the fact that extracting groundwater for pineapple growing has allowed seawater to seep in to replace it. Meanwhile, Venice has been sinking rather than the Adriatic rising, says Dr Mörner.

One of his most shocking discoveries was why the IPCC has been able to show sea levels rising by 2.3mm a year. Until 2003, even its own satellite-based evidence showed no upward trend. But suddenly the graph tilted upwards because the IPCC's favoured experts had drawn on the finding of a single tide-gauge in Hong Kong harbour showing a 2.3mm rise. The entire global sea-level projection was then adjusted upwards by a "corrective factor" of 2.3mm, because, as the IPCC scientists admitted, they "needed to show a trend".

When I spoke to Dr Mörner last week, he expressed his continuing dismay at how the IPCC has fed the scare on this crucial issue. When asked to act as an "expert reviewer" on the IPCC's last two reports, he was "astonished to find that not one of their 22 contributing authors on sea levels was a sea level specialist: not one". Yet the results of all this "deliberate ignorance" and reliance on rigged computer models have become the most powerful single driver of the entire warmist hysteria.

•For more information, see Dr Mörner on YouTube (Google Mörner, Maldives and YouTube); or read on the net his 2007 EIR interview "Claim that sea level is rising is a total fraud"; or email him – morner@pog.nu – to buy a copy of his booklet 'The Greatest Lie Ever Told' ​

Nils-Axel Mörner is Wrong About Sea Level Rise

 

[skookerasbil]

Don't let a more complete picture ruin your confirmation bias.

So we can confidently take it from scientists' work that sea levels are rising in Chesapeake Bay. At least that is settled. Does that mean the crabber was more or less observant?

Calculated rates of global mean sea-level rise range from 1.7 to 3.2 mm/yr, depending on the time period examined
USGS Chesapeake Bay Activities Science Summary - Sea-Level Rise and Chesapeake Bay​

Rise of sea levels is 'the greatest lie ever told'

When running the International Commission on Sea Level Change, he launched a special project on the Maldives, whose leaders have for 20 years been calling for vast sums of international aid to stave off disaster. Six times he and his expert team visited the islands, to confirm that the sea has not risen for half a century. Before announcing his findings, he offered to show the inhabitants a film explaining why they had nothing to worry about. The government refused to let it be shown.

Similarly in Tuvalu, where local leaders have been calling for the inhabitants to be evacuated for 20 years, the sea has if anything dropped in recent decades. The only evidence the scaremongers can cite is based on the fact that extracting groundwater for pineapple growing has allowed seawater to seep in to replace it. Meanwhile, Venice has been sinking rather than the Adriatic rising, says Dr Mörner.

One of his most shocking discoveries was why the IPCC has been able to show sea levels rising by 2.3mm a year. Until 2003, even its own satellite-based evidence showed no upward trend. But suddenly the graph tilted upwards because the IPCC's favoured experts had drawn on the finding of a single tide-gauge in Hong Kong harbour showing a 2.3mm rise. The entire global sea-level projection was then adjusted upwards by a "corrective factor" of 2.3mm, because, as the IPCC scientists admitted, they "needed to show a trend".

When I spoke to Dr Mörner last week, he expressed his continuing dismay at how the IPCC has fed the scare on this crucial issue. When asked to act as an "expert reviewer" on the IPCC's last two reports, he was "astonished to find that not one of their 22 contributing authors on sea levels was a sea level specialist: not one". Yet the results of all this "deliberate ignorance" and reliance on rigged computer models have become the most powerful single driver of the entire warmist hysteria.

•For more information, see Dr Mörner on YouTube (Google Mörner, Maldives and YouTube); or read on the net his 2007 EIR interview "Claim that sea level is rising is a total fraud"; or email him – morner@pog.nu – to buy a copy of his booklet 'The Greatest Lie Ever Told' ​

Nils-Axel Mörner is Wrong About Sea Level Rise

Dang........progressives with the fake news..............ghey.

The graph only goes up to 2012..........ghey.

 

[SSDD]

I saw that. He played the part of the typical dumb yokel who, despite his island literally disappearing and about to be uninhabitable in less than 50 years, thinks that it's all just a hoax fabricated in order to..... well... honestly, I don't really know what the yokel crowd thinks the conspiracy is about these days.

He identified the actual problem....erosion. When you have a permanent structure near sea level and the land is disappearing but the water itself isn't rising then erosion is the problem.

 

[SSDD]

I looked over this whole thread and practically every response to the OP amounted to nothing more than on logical fallacy or another..

The only attempt at an actual renuttal was by crick woo cand read a graph and therefore doesn't realize that he just showed tha sea levels are not rising any faster than they have been for decades.

 

[ClosedCaption]

Isn't that typical of deniers? Some 'crabber' gives anecdotal evidence and the denier wingnuts jump on it like it's a fact. Nothing solid, just a 'feeling' the 'mayor' has. Wingnuts a wingnut I guess.

The island community is eroding into the Bay and the residents want federal funds to save the island by building walls and breakers to slow down and halt the erosion. Experts are claiming the erosion control effort would be a costly waste and temporary because of the rising sea levels. The crabber making the claims has a financial and emotional stake in denying the sea level rising model and promoting the "it's only erosion" story.

All so called "climate scientists" are sucking on the government tit, and their pay, pensions and job security depend on the public believing the climate change hoax.

Scientist still get paid for doing science. If your only excuse is that scientists earn money so they can't be believed on science means that everyone in every field is a liar since they get paid for it. That's funny....only scientists who don't make money should be believed.

Wrong again. Climate scientists get paid for supporting the warmist cult agenda. When they are paid for producing a certain conclusion, yes that's true. What agenda does a carpenter get paid to support? Truck Driver? Engineer? Accountant?

All you did is prove you are unable to commit logic.

Wrong. They get paid for science. You can attach any motive you like onto it but it doesn't matter a hill of beans to reality.

Hey, I got one! Barbers only cut hair to promote the Anti-Barbarian look agenda!

 

[SSDD]

In climate science, those that produce papers that support the consensus view get rewarded with funding and fame. Those who do not get reduced funding and distain.

That's easy to change. Produce the data that shows temperatures are not increasing.

Already done that...see thread titled " if the globe isn't warming, why is it called global warming. A few areas are warming..the rest of the earth is either staying the same or cooling. Global warming only shows up in the highly manipulated, homogenized, and infilled global record...look at regional records and the "global" claim just doesn't hold up.

 

[bripat9643]

Isn't that typical of deniers? Some 'crabber' gives anecdotal evidence and the denier wingnuts jump on it like it's a fact. Nothing solid, just a 'feeling' the 'mayor' has. Wingnuts a wingnut I guess.

The island community is eroding into the Bay and the residents want federal funds to save the island by building walls and breakers to slow down and halt the erosion. Experts are claiming the erosion control effort would be a costly waste and temporary because of the rising sea levels. The crabber making the claims has a financial and emotional stake in denying the sea level rising model and promoting the "it's only erosion" story.

All so called "climate scientists" are sucking on the government tit, and their pay, pensions and job security depend on the public believing the climate change hoax.

Scientist still get paid for doing science. If your only excuse is that scientists earn money so they can't be believed on science means that everyone in every field is a liar since they get paid for it. That's funny....only scientists who don't make money should be believed.

Wrong again. Climate scientists get paid for supporting the warmist cult agenda. When they are paid for producing a certain conclusion, yes that's true. What agenda does a carpenter get paid to support? Truck Driver? Engineer? Accountant?

All you did is prove you are unable to commit logic.

Wrong. They get paid for science. You can attach any motive you like onto it but it doesn't matter a hill of beans to reality.

Hey, I got one! Barbers only cut hair to promote the Anti-Barbarian look agenda!

The reality is that if they don't support the warmist cult agenda they don't get any money.

 

[bripat9643]

In climate science, those that produce papers that support the consensus view get rewarded with funding and fame. Those who do not get reduced funding and distain.

That's easy to change. Produce the data that shows temperatures are not increasing.

You obviously don't understand how science or logic work, do you, snowflake?

If you were able to commit logic, you wouldn't be a snowflake.

 

[mamooth]

I looked over this whole thread and practically every response to the OP amounted to nothing more than on logical fallacy or another..

I know you see the crazy crabber as a kindred soul. He makes kook rants that contradict all the science and evidence, and you make kook rants that contradict all of the science and evidence.

The only attempt at an actual renuttal was by crick woo cand read a graph and therefore doesn't realize that he just showed tha sea levels are not rising any faster than they have been for decades.

Anyone who can read a graph sees the obvious acceleration. Only the blind, incompetent or pathologically dishonest say sea level rise isn't accelerating.

Sea Level Rise is Accelerating

This is the data from the Boston gauge, but it's what most of the world looks like. The acceleration is very plain.

 

[bripat9643]

I looked over this whole thread and practically every response to the OP amounted to nothing more than on logical fallacy or another..

I know you see the crazy crabber as a kindred soul. He makes kook rants that contradict all the science and evidence, and you make kook rants that contradict all of the science and evidence.

The only attempt at an actual renuttal was by crick woo cand read a graph and therefore doesn't realize that he just showed tha sea levels are not rising any faster than they have been for decades.

Anyone who can read a graph sees the obvious acceleration. Only the blind, incompetent or pathologically dishonest say sea level rise isn't accelerating.

Sea Level Rise is Accelerating

This is the data from the Boston gauge, but it's what most of the world looks like. The acceleration is very plain.

Open Mind
Science, Politics, Life, the Universe, and Everything​

You think that is a credible, non-political, website?

 

[Old Rocks]

The island community is eroding into the Bay and the residents want federal funds to save the island by building walls and breakers to slow down and halt the erosion. Experts are claiming the erosion control effort would be a costly waste and temporary because of the rising sea levels. The crabber making the claims has a financial and emotional stake in denying the sea level rising model and promoting the "it's only erosion" story.

All so called "climate scientists" are sucking on the government tit, and their pay, pensions and job security depend on the public believing the climate change hoax.

Scientist still get paid for doing science. If your only excuse is that scientists earn money so they can't be believed on science means that everyone in every field is a liar since they get paid for it. That's funny....only scientists who don't make money should be believed.

Wrong again. Climate scientists get paid for supporting the warmist cult agenda. When they are paid for producing a certain conclusion, yes that's true. What agenda does a carpenter get paid to support? Truck Driver? Engineer? Accountant?

All you did is prove you are unable to commit logic.

Wrong. They get paid for science. You can attach any motive you like onto it but it doesn't matter a hill of beans to reality.

Hey, I got one! Barbers only cut hair to promote the Anti-Barbarian look agenda!

The reality is that if they don't support the warmist cult agenda they don't get any money.

The reality is that you are a piss ant little liar. So some knownothing dumb fuck in a little boat thinks he can judge sea level world wide? You silly little cocksucks are really reaching when you post shit like that.

 

[Old Rocks]

In climate science, those that produce papers that support the consensus view get rewarded with funding and fame. Those who do not get reduced funding and distain.

That's easy to change. Produce the data that shows temperatures are not increasing.

You obviously don't understand how science or logic work, do you, snowflake?

If you were able to commit logic, you wouldn't be a snowflake.

I bet you never sat your dumb ass in a university level science class in your life. And then you post this kind of shit.