AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 30,811
- 8,940
- 1,340
Maybe you didn't know this, but a murderer doesn't have to be caught with this hand on the knife wedged in his victim's heart to be found guilty. People are convicted daily based on the preponderance of evidence and the lack of REASONABLE doubt. The keyword here is reasonable. It is becoming more and more unreasonable that Hunter Biden would be getting large sums of money from foreign countries based on just his name. Typically, people expect something in return for large payments. What is that something in the case of Hunter? Couple this with the newly found texts, the emails stating 10% to the big guy, Joe lying about knowing any of Hunter's Burisma buddies(pictures to prove otherwise), etc. and the "reasonable" part becomes questionable at best. I don't expect any Democrat to understand. Indoctrination is real thing and very difficult to break.
You think Joe Biden is guilty beyond Reasonable Doubt because....what?
Clearly Hunter Biden name dropped his dady's name to help himself in bussiness deals. That is not serious evidence Joe Biden had anything to do with it.
So thats what I'm saying - find serious evidence then there is something to talk about. Hunter namedroppping his daddy is not illegal last I checked.