Colorado supreme court justices face death threats after Trump ruling

[bodecea]

Yep, we used violence to get the **** away from you cocksucking ******* Brits and your ******* kings and queens.

People that try to destabilize our democracy by violating a candidates right to run in their state should be taken down. Too many people are pushing up daisies for our right to decide who we want to vote for. How dare some unelected ******* CO supreme court hacks trying to **** that up.

Funny thing is....you would have been a con-servative Tory....fighting FOR the crown.

 

[bodecea]

Not always...

Calif. man indicted for allegedly attempting to assassinate Brett Kavanaugh at his home​

Calif. man indicted for allegedly attempting to assassinate Brett Kavanaugh at his home

The federal grand jury charged 26-year-old Nicholas Roske on Wednesday -- accusing him attempting to assassinate Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh

abcnews.go.com

And those who weren't (if they even exist) would rightfully be arrested for trespassing.

 

[bodecea]

You really fucked up when you tried to murder Brett Kavanaugh. This is what you wanted.

Accusing another poster of trying to murder a Supreme Court Justice. Shame on you.............if any MAGAts ever felt shame.

 

[Delldude]

Accusing another poster of trying to murder a Supreme Court Justice. Shame on you.............if any MAGAts ever felt shame.

You just did the same thing.

 

[bodecea]

Odd that it’s the Fascist Progressives who: shot at and wounded Republicans Congressman, threatened SCOTUS justices, and killed Trump supporters

"Fascist Progressives"? More than one did that?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

"Fascist Progressives"? More than one did that?

Are you saying it’s only one person?

 

[bodecea]

Are you saying it’s only one person?

Was it more than one person who shot up the con-gressional baseball practice?

 

[dudmuck]

Liar.

The data is from ACLED.

The BLM movement has remained overwhelmingly non-violent.

• Approximately 94% of all pro-BLM demonstrations have been peaceful, with 6% involving reports of violence, clashes with police, vandalism, looting, or other destructive activity.
  • In the remaining 6%, it is not clear who instigated the violent or destructive activity. While some cases of violence or looting have been provoked by demonstrators, other events have escalated as a result of aggressive government action, intervention from right-wing groups or individual assailants, and car-ramming attacks.
• In contrast, demonstrations involving right-wing militias or militant social movements have turned violent or destructive over twice as often, or nearly 14% of the time.

 

[miketx]

The data is from ACLED.

The BLM movement has remained overwhelmingly non-violent.

• Approximately 94% of all pro-BLM demonstrations have been peaceful, with 6% involving reports of violence, clashes with police, vandalism, looting, or other destructive activity.
  • In the remaining 6%, it is not clear who instigated the violent or destructive activity. While some cases of violence or looting have been provoked by demonstrators, other events have escalated as a result of aggressive government action, intervention from right-wing groups or individual assailants, and car-ramming attacks.
• In contrast, demonstrations involving right-wing militias or militant social movements have turned violent or destructive over twice as often, or nearly 14% of the time.

Total bullshit.

 

[Delldude]

The BLM movement has remained overwhelmingly non-violent.

How much property damage did these bastions of truth, justice and the American way cause?

 

[Papageorgio]

it was because far right groups went there and caused trouble.

Not true, no right wing groups were at Seattles CHOP. Rioting in Portland is a lot older than 2020, it started years before.

The rioting started and then stupid rightwing followed, you are simply wrong and the riots were started by left wing groups. I know you believe the riots should have been leftwing and acceptable to all however most Americans believe it was wrong and your spin is hilarious. Social media had threatened to shutdown sites because left wing groups were arranging when and where they wanted to riot.

How 2020 became the summer of activism both online and offline

“I’m not surprised to see young people being more active ... they’re used to being heard,” professor Stephen Duncombe said.

www.nbcnews.com

You drink the kool-aid.

 

[Independent thinker]

Colorado supreme court justices face death threats after Trump ruling

Report finds ‘significant violent rhetoric’ against justices and Democrats online after ruling to exclude Trump from ballot

www.theguardian.com

Its always thee sane with these violent fascists.It doesnt matter if its a judge, a posecutor or a wman who counts ballots.

They must be destroyed if they suggest that trump is responsible for his actions.

So, you're saying that Democrats can incite violence and death threats against US Supreme court justices but Trump can't against State Supreme Court justices?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

So, you're saying that Democrats can incite violence and death threats against US Supreme court justices but Trump can't against State Supreme Court justices?

Im saying that its a bad thing.Surely we can agree on that ?

 

[Independent thinker]

Im saying that its a bad thing.Surely we can agree on that ?

Yes, it's a bad thing when Democrats openly incite violence against US Supreme Court judges but only complain about it when the right supposedly incites violence against Dem judges.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Yes, it's a bad thing when Democrats openly incite violence against US Supreme Court judges but only complain about it when the right supposedly incites violence against Dem judges.

Well there is a difference between judges interpreting the law and judges making it up as they go along.
But the problem is judges being appointed by politiciams. It leads to the mess you now have.

 

[Independent thinker]

Well there is a difference between judges interpreting the law and judges making it up as they go along.
But the problem is judges being appointed by politiciams. It leads to the mess you now have.

I'll agree with the last part but the way you wrote it, it sounds like you support inciting violence against some judges.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

I'll agree with the last part but the way you wrote it, it sounds like you support inciting violence against some judges.

Nope. But then I never had a load of unaccountable extremist loons make healthcare decisiions for me.

 

[Independent thinker]

Nope. But then I never had a load of unaccountable extremist loons make healthcare decisiions for me.

Who's doing that?

 

[2aguy]

Colorado supreme court justices face death threats after Trump ruling

Report finds ‘significant violent rhetoric’ against justices and Democrats online after ruling to exclude Trump from ballot

www.theguardian.com

Its always thee sane with these violent fascists.It doesnt matter if its a judge, a posecutor or a wman who counts ballots.

They must be destroyed if they suggest that trump is responsible for his actions.

And......its bullshit....

for all the digging the FBI’s rightly done into the explosion of vitriol, the Denver police have had to respond to:

“…what they said was a ‘hoax’ report at one of the justices’ residences. No specific threats to the justices in those forums, from what we understand.
So, no specific threats at this time…”

CNN: Okay, So, CO Supreme Court Justices Weren't Actually Threatened But They're Still in Danger From You People

This is behavior modification in action, even as it’s a bit of a crawl-down from inflammatory

hotair.com

 

[Tommy Tainant]

And......its bullshit....

for all the digging the FBI’s rightly done into the explosion of vitriol, the Denver police have had to respond to:

CNN: Okay, So, CO Supreme Court Justices Weren't Actually Threatened But They're Still in Danger From You People

This is behavior modification in action, even as it’s a bit of a crawl-down from inflammatory

hotair.com

Its true.

FBI investigating threats directed at Colorado supreme court justices after Trump ruling

Court voted 4-3 last week that ex-president was ineligible to run for White House again under US constitution’s insurrection clause

www.theguardian.com