Colorado Father Fights To Keep Government From Sterilizing His 14-Year-Old Son

I’m curious as to way maga victimhood extends to them being not victims of anything.
 
Does not involve sterilization or any chemical treatments. Also, the father won custody.

The state did not rule against him.

Nothing like The Federalist story.


Does not involve sterilization or any chemical treatments. Also, the father won custody.

The state did not rule against him.

Nothing like The Federalist story.



A repeat of the Texas story above.





Yet another repeat of the Texas story.



A story from Canada.

It does deal with hormone treatment and the court ruling against the dad.

But that's Canada for you. We should raise our tariffs.


Paywall.

Nevertheless, I found the story elsewhere. It involves a five year old.

Does not involve sterilization or any chemical treatments.

Also, the father was abusive toward the mother long before the child's gender issue.

Nothing like the Federalist story.
 
Does not involve sterilization or any chemical treatments. Also, the father won custody.

The state did not rule against him.

Nothing like The Federalist story.



Does not involve sterilization or any chemical treatments. Also, the father won custody.

The state did not rule against him.

Nothing like The Federalist story.




A repeat of the Texas story above.






Yet another repeat of the Texas story.




A story from Canada.

It does deal with hormone treatment and the court ruling against the dad.

But that's Canada for you. We should raise our tariffs.



Paywall.

Nevertheless, I found the story elsewhere. It involves a five year old.

Does not involve sterilization or any chemical treatments.

Also, the father was abusive toward the mother long before the child's gender issue.

Nothing like the Federalist story.


As you can see, custody battles over transgender kids are not rare. You can dismiss the OP article, if it makes you feel better.
 
15th post
What does the child want?

Republicans authoritarian ratfuks literally don't care. They want the heavy hand of the state -- the state that they control -- to give the orders.

All Republicans are uber-statists, because any that aren't uber-statists have been ejected from TheParty.
 
The issue of irreversible surgical or any other medical procedure on a minor should be very simple to comprehend.

A minor cannot consent to sex with an adult. This is the law and just plain common sense. If an adult has sex with a minor, they go to prison. Period.

A parent cannot consent to their child to have sex with an adult. Society would be disgusted with a parent who did that. That parent and the adult would both go to prison.

The law is very simple. A minor is psychologically and physiologically incapable of consenting to sex. Their brains are not developed enough.

And yet liberals somehow believe that a minor is magically able to consent to permanent, irreversible medical treatment.

Or, just as badly, they believe it is okay for a parent to consent to permanent, irreversible medical treatment for their minor child.

So...a child can't consent to sex, but can consent to being permanently medically altered?!?


I am very curious to know how liberals are able to compartmentalize their brains to this fantastic degree.

Seriously. Someone please explain this to me.
 
What does the child want?
What if the child wants to **** Donald Trump?

Serious question.

Would you be willing to go to court to support a child ******* Donald Trump?
 
Back
Top Bottom