Yes. This happens just as often in Scandinavian countries without a 13% black population.
No, no it doesn't.
Yes it does. You think Scandinavia is just a happy clappy place?
However the difference between Scandinavia and other European countries is that the people vote in politicians to work for the people, and the politicians work for the people.
Yes, they have a purer version of democracy.
And fewer black people.
And so you decide that it's the black people that causes all the problems, and not the political thinking. Why is that?
The superiority of white culture is made evident by the high success of countries where they are most concentrated. Everything you admire about Scandinavia is because of their ethnic constitution, including their novel ideas of government.
Go to African nation's populated by black people, you get poverty, shanty towns, starvation, rogue militias, anarchy, massacres, and hopelessness.
The contrast couldn't be any clearer.
Or, perhaps this is because of WHERE they live.
If you look at all the big empires we've known, many of them became successful because of the situation they found around them. The Egyptians for example. Why was Egypt very successful thousands of years ago, but now an absolute mess?
Could it be that the Nile was more fertile? Could it be that you needed less of a population to succeed and the Nile could cope with a certain amount of people, but in more modern times it can't cope well?
The Romans. I mean the Italians haven't been known as great warriors for a long time now. Why was Rome so successful 2000 years ago and not now?
Through time the latitude of successful empires has risen from Egypt, to Greece and Rome, the Spanish and Portuguese to then be Germany, England, France, Russia, the USA.
Or maybe as we've developed technology, the colder climates are more successful.
1/7th of the US population lives between DC and Boston. The area is far more successful than the Deep South. Why is that?
Could be all about resources. Coal become a product for industrialization. Who had coal?
Success based on coal? Seems northern Europe has a lot more. Then again Sweden and others don't have much but were successful. So it's not just coal, but coal played an important part.
Basically this topic is extremely complex. Your idea is to make it simple and blame someone else so you don't need to think. You're basically going to be wrong if you do that.