You guys know two days ago 6 Palestinians were killed, it's a response, whether you believe it's right or wrong it's a response to that
I support response there are enough muslims in New York city to pay for that which the followers of the rapist pig did on 9-11-01 There are enough "structures" to PAY for that which the vile followers did to the Buddhist statuary in Afghanistan I AM ALL FOR RESPONSE I agree with you RESPONSE IS GOOD The dogs destroyed an ancient synagogue in Tunisia 2500 years old The AL AQSA pustule is neither as ancient nor important -----but it could be used IN RESPONSE. LETS ALL RESPOND
here is what i do not understand. jews have very rightfully objected to the collective punishment directed at them over the ages for the killing of jesus.
why do you think muslims should be subjected to the same thing? personally, i think you either accept both or, hopefully reject both, if you wish to be morally consistent.
Your analogy is absurd from beginning to end "Because" a muslim suggesting that bombing a civilian Israeli city is justified in retaliation because there was an attack on "palestinian' militants at a missile launching site. I responded---in essence that "retaliation" is a two way street. At that point you cited the execution of Jesus by Pontius Pilate-----which some christians decided was supported by jews as an equally logical reason for the genocide of tnes of millions of jews over 2000 years In fact "because" made more sense than do you since he is referring to an ongoing war. I made more sense also since I referred to an event in New York City in which some muslims murdered thousands of New York people and the event was celebrated in muslim neighborhoods. Also ---there have been many terrorist plots and actions IN New York City since. Therefore there is an ONGOING situation there. You did not address the question of retaliation in conflict at all You cited your support of genocide on the basis of LIBEL as being analogous to retalitory raids in an ongoing war and commented in cynical and vulgar manner that "jews have complained about genocides inflicted upon them by your and yours" based on a libel You then imply that I support the kind of filth perpetrated by those of your ilk and plan the genocide of TENS OF MILLIONS OF MUSLIMS. over centuries on a trumped up accusation in the death of one person Your statement is not only absurd----it is obscene
also, you are a jewish poster and i think your posts do not portray jewish people in a good light at all, certainly not the many i have been acquainted with in my life. what exactly do you think you accomplish with your vitriolic tirades?
I think your posts are idiotic and portray you for the dancer on the dead bodies of infants that you are The most prominent aspect of the propaganda of the nazi war criminals who fled to arab countries post world war II was INCESSANT ALLEGATIONS that whatever were the atrocities of the 1930 and 1940 era ------they were actually enacted by jews You echo those nazi war criminals in your writings The motive was to insist that the jews in palestine were all set to commit genocide upon arabs just as they allegedly comitted genocide upon "BLOND BLUE EYES CHRISTIANS" in Germany Do not underestimate yourself -----those men were paid by the Egyptian and Syrian governments Several lived in comfort to old age
and this is a very serious question for the other jewish posters, and not quite exactly touched upon in a recent discussion by the poster, saigon, in a recent thread. certain jewish posters, roudy, MJB, say it, iRose...i think people pretty well can dismiss them as angry crackpots and not at all good representatives of your religion/people. basically, while they become grating, they are relatively harmless. what is far harder to dismiss is the silence exhibited by other jewish posters who seem to be of good will. how in the world do you ignore these people who reflect, rightfully or wrongully, fairly or unfairly, on non-jewish posters.
your comment is not at all innovative-----you are trying to suppress jews who tell the truth
just as "bad examples of jews" in the same way black slaves were threatend as '
"UNGRATEFUL" if they objected to slavery in the Southern part of the USA during the
1800s and threatened that they endangered their "race" ---and, in fact, in a few
cases hanged In the South-----there was a time when blacks who defied the social
restrictions imposed on them were called "UPPITY" and their actions were used to
justify randaom and sporadic hangings and episodes that amounted to pogroms Those'
of your ilk are quite consisent. In shariah adherent lands---pogroms against jews were
justified using your logic and today in Egypt pogroms against christians. The
ARMENIAN GENOCIDE was justified using your logic
i certainly can express my opinion as to the inappropriateness of a stream of posts consisting of "anti-semitic NAZI **********" or "islamo NAZI pig" but any objection on my part will result in my being called an "islamo NAZI pig" etc. surely you are baware of that. does it bother you not one single bit that these people represent themselves as jews?
not at all I grew up in a town that had been strongly BUNDIST in the world war
II era and am acquainted FIRST HAND with the filthy rhetoric of those of your
your ilk Later on I encountered thru my work---muslims from many parts of the
world -----as to the expressions to which you object as emanating from jews--I can
approximate them in arabic and urdu-------the expressions that jews are now
using to describe people like you are not new-------we got them from you and your
ilk I have noticed something that you have missed. The jews here with
background in muslim countries use translations of the filth farted out by muslims
at jews in those countries (and in the US ---in arabic and urdu)
maybe it doesn' bother you, but if you are actually concerned about anti-semitism, and i believe you are, it is probably a very good idea for other jews to stand up to those who portray jews and judaism in such a poor light.