Coconspiritor Adam Schiff: Declassifying Crossfire Hurricane Data Is “Un-American”

[Eric Arthur Blair]

I'm still looking for a guy who wouldn't lie about a bj.
Have you found one?

Yeah. Our hillbilly president from Arkansas. A good friend of Jeff Epstein.
He has a corrupt bitch for a wife. Heard of him? Oh, excuse me.
I thought you said would lie about a bj.

Whether other people would also lie while under oath is immaterial. Thanks.

Terrible crime

Yes. Especially in front of a Grand Jury. Special Prosecutors like Robert Mueller put people in prison for it. 1741. Perjury And False Declarations Before Grand Jury Or Court

Underling? Hardly, you speak as if she was 15

I speak as if this woman was the intern to the president of the United States of America...not his imperial concubine.

 

[Zorro!]

Omg

It's very important that we rub your noses in your fake news crap, how else will you learn?

Darlin, it took me years to prove chloroform had 3 different atoms.
So to throw up paragraphs which support your opinion (whatever that is) is irrelevant.
To quote Just one line of an article
"But neither does the absence of such detail mean that the dossier is false,” wrote Grant and Rosenberg."
So it's not false?
I assume you saw the fox/Ayles doc?
"Our goal is not to report news, it's to say what our readers already believe"
Ask mr Barr, the Iran contra cover up king
So true. To really research something takes months and months, not a little cut and paste in an old white farts forum.
Happy NY darlin, enrol in a research program

The Dossier is false. Steele lied about what his sources told him:

Horowitz:

IG Report: Here Are The 17 Specific ‘Inaccuracies And Omissions’ In The FBI’s FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

Omitted the fact that Steele’s Primary Sub-source, who the FBI found credible, had made statements in January 2017 raising significant questions about the reliability of allegations included in the FISA applications, including, for example, that he/she had no discussion with Person 1 concerning WikiLeaks and there was “nothing bad” about the communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team, and that he/she did not report to Steele in July 2016 that Page had met with Sechin;​

Steele is person 1. The FBI vouched for the reliability of Steele and his primary subsource even though when they finally interviewed the subsource (which they should have done before applying for the first warrant) the subsource said:

• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, s/he never discussed Wikileaks with Steele.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, he was aware of no untoward communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary that s/he had never told Steele that Page had met with Sechin.

One can imagine the silence in the FBI vehicle as they returned to the office realizing that they had clearly submitted a series of false statements to the FISA court and that their oaths required them to immediately disclose to the Court that they had serious credibility issues between Steele and his primary sub-source. Their claims were mutually exclusive on multiple points and that clearly one or both were liars.

It was on the word of these two, which they represented as of the utmost credibility, that they had represented to the Court that Carter Page was most assuredly a spy working with the Kremlin in illegal coordination with the Trump Campaign.

Did they immediately report this to the Court which would have resulted in the immediate cancellation of the existing warrant? No. They all conspired to concealed this from the Court, and they conspired to continue representing the original lies to the Court in subsequent renewals.

And that is just "one" of the 17 lethal flaws Horowitz describes in his extremely fair and low key complete thrashing of the quite corrupt FBI that illegally spied on a Presidential campaign, Transition and Administration.

​

If you can tear yourself away from Americas Greatness (omg) the Times conclusion...

What cares what the Fake News New York Times says? They have been front and center pushing this blizzard of lies on the American People.

The New York Times had a young reporter screwing a married 50 year old Senate security officer in exchange for dirt on Trump.

Fake News New York Times gives new meaning to the practice of "sitting on a source".​

Jealous?
Can't get it up old white fart??
Omg , like the repubs prosecuting Clinton?
Newt getting a bj in his car?
Livingston quitting?

No. Like the Fake News New York Times and WaPo pushing a blizzard of lies on the American People for 3.5 years. The game's up. You fooled no one.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Yeah, Billy was a perv and he did something he shouldn't oughta have - But this is a constant RW tactic. Pretend that Monica wasn't a consenting adult. Guess it makes them feel better about Denny the Diddler.

Your lame attempt at changing the subject is noted and disregarded.

One thing decades of leftist rule has showed us is that Lewinsky was a victim of an older more powerful employer receiving
sexual favors from his underling.

Would Monica Lewinsky ever become Bill Clinton's concubine and grant sexual favors if she was his secretary in a plywood siding supply office and her fat, horny, bulbous nosed STD infested boss, let's call him "Bill",
was pressuring her to come through and be his human cigar holder, among other things?

I guess we'll never know but we do know such an arrangement would be seen as wrong and possibly criminally wrong.

 

[Zorro!]

Yeah, Billy was a perv and he did something he shouldn't oughta have - But this is a constant RW tactic. Pretend that Monica wasn't a consenting adult. Guess it makes them feel better about Denny the Diddler.

Your lame attempt at changing the subject is noted and disregarded.

One thing decades of leftist rule has showed us is that Lewinsky was a victim of an older more powerful employer receiving
sexual favors from his underling.

Would Monica Lewinsky ever become Bill Clinton's concubine and grant sexual favors if she was his secretary in a plywood siding supply office and her fat, horny, bulbous nosed STD infested boss, let's call him "Bill",
was pressuring her to come through and be his human cigar holder, among other things?

I guess we'll never know but we do know such an arrangement would be seen as wrong and possibly criminally wrong.

They seem to want to talk about everything but Adam Schiff and scam called Cross Fire Hurricane that they pushed on this nation, hand in glove with the Fake News Media, for nearly 4 years.

 

[Zorro!]

Omg

Darlin, it took me years to prove chloroform had 3 different atoms.
So to throw up paragraphs which support your opinion (whatever that is) is irrelevant.
To quote Just one line of an article
"But neither does the absence of such detail mean that the dossier is false,” wrote Grant and Rosenberg."
So it's not false?
I assume you saw the fox/Ayles doc?
"Our goal is not to report news, it's to say what our readers already believe"
Ask mr Barr, the Iran contra cover up king
So true. To really research something takes months and months, not a little cut and paste in an old white farts forum.
Happy NY darlin, enrol in a research program

The Dossier is false. Steele lied about what his sources told him:

Horowitz:

IG Report: Here Are The 17 Specific ‘Inaccuracies And Omissions’ In The FBI’s FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

Omitted the fact that Steele’s Primary Sub-source, who the FBI found credible, had made statements in January 2017 raising significant questions about the reliability of allegations included in the FISA applications, including, for example, that he/she had no discussion with Person 1 concerning WikiLeaks and there was “nothing bad” about the communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team, and that he/she did not report to Steele in July 2016 that Page had met with Sechin;​

Steele is person 1. The FBI vouched for the reliability of Steele and his primary subsource even though when they finally interviewed the subsource (which they should have done before applying for the first warrant) the subsource said:

• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, s/he never discussed Wikileaks with Steele.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, he was aware of no untoward communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary that s/he had never told Steele that Page had met with Sechin.

One can imagine the silence in the FBI vehicle as they returned to the office realizing that they had clearly submitted a series of false statements to the FISA court and that their oaths required them to immediately disclose to the Court that they had serious credibility issues between Steele and his primary sub-source. Their claims were mutually exclusive on multiple points and that clearly one or both were liars.

It was on the word of these two, which they represented as of the utmost credibility, that they had represented to the Court that Carter Page was most assuredly a spy working with the Kremlin in illegal coordination with the Trump Campaign.

Did they immediately report this to the Court which would have resulted in the immediate cancellation of the existing warrant? No. They all conspired to concealed this from the Court, and they conspired to continue representing the original lies to the Court in subsequent renewals.

And that is just "one" of the 17 lethal flaws Horowitz describes in his extremely fair and low key complete thrashing of the quite corrupt FBI that illegally spied on a Presidential campaign, Transition and Administration.

​

If you can tear yourself away from Americas Greatness (omg) the Times conclusion...

What cares what the Fake News New York Times says? They have been front and center pushing this blizzard of lies on the American People.

The New York Times had a young reporter screwing a married 50 year old Senate security officer in exchange for dirt on Trump.

Fake News New York Times gives new meaning to the practice of "sitting on a source".​

Jealous?
Can't get it up old white fart??
Omg , like the repubs prosecuting Clinton?
Newt getting a bj in his car?
Livingston quitting?

Omg

Darlin, it took me years to prove chloroform had 3 different atoms.
So to throw up paragraphs which support your opinion (whatever that is) is irrelevant.
To quote Just one line of an article
"But neither does the absence of such detail mean that the dossier is false,” wrote Grant and Rosenberg."
So it's not false?
I assume you saw the fox/Ayles doc?
"Our goal is not to report news, it's to say what our readers already believe"
Ask mr Barr, the Iran contra cover up king
So true. To really research something takes months and months, not a little cut and paste in an old white farts forum.
Happy NY darlin, enrol in a research program

The Dossier is false. Steele lied about what his sources told him:

Horowitz:

IG Report: Here Are The 17 Specific ‘Inaccuracies And Omissions’ In The FBI’s FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

Omitted the fact that Steele’s Primary Sub-source, who the FBI found credible, had made statements in January 2017 raising significant questions about the reliability of allegations included in the FISA applications, including, for example, that he/she had no discussion with Person 1 concerning WikiLeaks and there was “nothing bad” about the communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team, and that he/she did not report to Steele in July 2016 that Page had met with Sechin;​

Steele is person 1. The FBI vouched for the reliability of Steele and his primary subsource even though when they finally interviewed the subsource (which they should have done before applying for the first warrant) the subsource said:

• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, s/he never discussed Wikileaks with Steele.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, he was aware of no untoward communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary that s/he had never told Steele that Page had met with Sechin.

One can imagine the silence in the FBI vehicle as they returned to the office realizing that they had clearly submitted a series of false statements to the FISA court and that their oaths required them to immediately disclose to the Court that they had serious credibility issues between Steele and his primary sub-source. Their claims were mutually exclusive on multiple points and that clearly one or both were liars.

It was on the word of these two, which they represented as of the utmost credibility, that they had represented to the Court that Carter Page was most assuredly a spy working with the Kremlin in illegal coordination with the Trump Campaign.

Did they immediately report this to the Court which would have resulted in the immediate cancellation of the existing warrant? No. They all conspired to concealed this from the Court, and they conspired to continue representing the original lies to the Court in subsequent renewals.

And that is just "one" of the 17 lethal flaws Horowitz describes in his extremely fair and low key complete thrashing of the quite corrupt FBI that illegally spied on a Presidential campaign, Transition and Administration.

​

If you can tear yourself away from Americas Greatness (omg) the Times conclusion...

What cares what the Fake News New York Times says? They have been front and center pushing this blizzard of lies on the American People.

The New York Times had a young reporter screwing a married 50 year old Senate security officer in exchange for dirt on Trump.

Fake News New York Times gives new meaning to the practice of "sitting on a source".​

Jealous?
Can't get it up old white fart??
Omg , like the repubs prosecuting Clinton?
Newt getting a bj in his car?
Livingston quitting?

And who could forget Henry Hyde and Denny "The Diddler" Hastert?

But those guys sure got ol' Bubba for his lie about a blow job!

Schiff says declassifying crossfire hurricane is "unamerican" and this brings Clinton's dick to your mind? Weird!

 

[Zorro!]

It's very important that we rub your noses in your fake news crap, how else will you learn?

Darlin, it took me years to prove chloroform had 3 different atoms.
So to throw up paragraphs which support your opinion (whatever that is) is irrelevant.
To quote Just one line of an article
"But neither does the absence of such detail mean that the dossier is false,” wrote Grant and Rosenberg."
So it's not false?
I assume you saw the fox/Ayles doc?
"Our goal is not to report news, it's to say what our readers already believe"
Ask mr Barr, the Iran contra cover up king
So true. To really research something takes months and months, not a little cut and paste in an old white farts forum.
Happy NY darlin, enrol in a research program

The Dossier is false. Steele lied about what his sources told him:

Horowitz:

IG Report: Here Are The 17 Specific ‘Inaccuracies And Omissions’ In The FBI’s FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

Omitted the fact that Steele’s Primary Sub-source, who the FBI found credible, had made statements in January 2017 raising significant questions about the reliability of allegations included in the FISA applications, including, for example, that he/she had no discussion with Person 1 concerning WikiLeaks and there was “nothing bad” about the communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team, and that he/she did not report to Steele in July 2016 that Page had met with Sechin;​

Steele is person 1. The FBI vouched for the reliability of Steele and his primary subsource even though when they finally interviewed the subsource (which they should have done before applying for the first warrant) the subsource said:

• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, s/he never discussed Wikileaks with Steele.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, he was aware of no untoward communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary that s/he had never told Steele that Page had met with Sechin.

One can imagine the silence in the FBI vehicle as they returned to the office realizing that they had clearly submitted a series of false statements to the FISA court and that their oaths required them to immediately disclose to the Court that they had serious credibility issues between Steele and his primary sub-source. Their claims were mutually exclusive on multiple points and that clearly one or both were liars.

It was on the word of these two, which they represented as of the utmost credibility, that they had represented to the Court that Carter Page was most assuredly a spy working with the Kremlin in illegal coordination with the Trump Campaign.

Did they immediately report this to the Court which would have resulted in the immediate cancellation of the existing warrant? No. They all conspired to concealed this from the Court, and they conspired to continue representing the original lies to the Court in subsequent renewals.

And that is just "one" of the 17 lethal flaws Horowitz describes in his extremely fair and low key complete thrashing of the quite corrupt FBI that illegally spied on a Presidential campaign, Transition and Administration.

​

IN your made up mind Ph.D. Opinion

Actually this a firm fact of reality. Howorwitz has the email sent by the CIA and he has the forgery used by the Corrupt FBI to illegally obtain a spy warrant on the Trump Campaign, Transition and Administration.

IG Report: Here Are The 17 Specific ‘Inaccuracies And Omissions’ In The FBI’s FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

Why are you so invested into defending a forgery?

A forgery in your PhD opinion....

A forgery in fact. See the Horowitz report.

 

[DrLove]

Omg

The Dossier is false. Steele lied about what his sources told him:

Horowitz:

IG Report: Here Are The 17 Specific ‘Inaccuracies And Omissions’ In The FBI’s FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

Omitted the fact that Steele’s Primary Sub-source, who the FBI found credible, had made statements in January 2017 raising significant questions about the reliability of allegations included in the FISA applications, including, for example, that he/she had no discussion with Person 1 concerning WikiLeaks and there was “nothing bad” about the communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team, and that he/she did not report to Steele in July 2016 that Page had met with Sechin;​

Steele is person 1. The FBI vouched for the reliability of Steele and his primary subsource even though when they finally interviewed the subsource (which they should have done before applying for the first warrant) the subsource said:

• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, s/he never discussed Wikileaks with Steele.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, he was aware of no untoward communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary that s/he had never told Steele that Page had met with Sechin.

One can imagine the silence in the FBI vehicle as they returned to the office realizing that they had clearly submitted a series of false statements to the FISA court and that their oaths required them to immediately disclose to the Court that they had serious credibility issues between Steele and his primary sub-source. Their claims were mutually exclusive on multiple points and that clearly one or both were liars.

It was on the word of these two, which they represented as of the utmost credibility, that they had represented to the Court that Carter Page was most assuredly a spy working with the Kremlin in illegal coordination with the Trump Campaign.

Did they immediately report this to the Court which would have resulted in the immediate cancellation of the existing warrant? No. They all conspired to concealed this from the Court, and they conspired to continue representing the original lies to the Court in subsequent renewals.

And that is just "one" of the 17 lethal flaws Horowitz describes in his extremely fair and low key complete thrashing of the quite corrupt FBI that illegally spied on a Presidential campaign, Transition and Administration.

​

If you can tear yourself away from Americas Greatness (omg) the Times conclusion...

What cares what the Fake News New York Times says? They have been front and center pushing this blizzard of lies on the American People.

The New York Times had a young reporter screwing a married 50 year old Senate security officer in exchange for dirt on Trump.

Fake News New York Times gives new meaning to the practice of "sitting on a source".​

Jealous?
Can't get it up old white fart??
Omg , like the repubs prosecuting Clinton?
Newt getting a bj in his car?
Livingston quitting?

Omg

The Dossier is false. Steele lied about what his sources told him:

Horowitz:

IG Report: Here Are The 17 Specific ‘Inaccuracies And Omissions’ In The FBI’s FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

Omitted the fact that Steele’s Primary Sub-source, who the FBI found credible, had made statements in January 2017 raising significant questions about the reliability of allegations included in the FISA applications, including, for example, that he/she had no discussion with Person 1 concerning WikiLeaks and there was “nothing bad” about the communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team, and that he/she did not report to Steele in July 2016 that Page had met with Sechin;​

Steele is person 1. The FBI vouched for the reliability of Steele and his primary subsource even though when they finally interviewed the subsource (which they should have done before applying for the first warrant) the subsource said:

• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, s/he never discussed Wikileaks with Steele.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, he was aware of no untoward communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary that s/he had never told Steele that Page had met with Sechin.

One can imagine the silence in the FBI vehicle as they returned to the office realizing that they had clearly submitted a series of false statements to the FISA court and that their oaths required them to immediately disclose to the Court that they had serious credibility issues between Steele and his primary sub-source. Their claims were mutually exclusive on multiple points and that clearly one or both were liars.

It was on the word of these two, which they represented as of the utmost credibility, that they had represented to the Court that Carter Page was most assuredly a spy working with the Kremlin in illegal coordination with the Trump Campaign.

Did they immediately report this to the Court which would have resulted in the immediate cancellation of the existing warrant? No. They all conspired to concealed this from the Court, and they conspired to continue representing the original lies to the Court in subsequent renewals.

And that is just "one" of the 17 lethal flaws Horowitz describes in his extremely fair and low key complete thrashing of the quite corrupt FBI that illegally spied on a Presidential campaign, Transition and Administration.

​

If you can tear yourself away from Americas Greatness (omg) the Times conclusion...

What cares what the Fake News New York Times says? They have been front and center pushing this blizzard of lies on the American People.

The New York Times had a young reporter screwing a married 50 year old Senate security officer in exchange for dirt on Trump.

Fake News New York Times gives new meaning to the practice of "sitting on a source".​

Jealous?
Can't get it up old white fart??
Omg , like the repubs prosecuting Clinton?
Newt getting a bj in his car?
Livingston quitting?

And who could forget Henry Hyde and Denny "The Diddler" Hastert?

But those guys sure got ol' Bubba for his lie about a blow job!

Schiff says declassifying crossfire hurricane is "unamerican" and this brings Clinton's dick to your mind? Weird!

Yep, you sure are! ^

 

[Zorro!]

Omg

If you can tear yourself away from Americas Greatness (omg) the Times conclusion...

What cares what the Fake News New York Times says? They have been front and center pushing this blizzard of lies on the American People.

The New York Times had a young reporter screwing a married 50 year old Senate security officer in exchange for dirt on Trump.

Fake News New York Times gives new meaning to the practice of "sitting on a source".​

Jealous?
Can't get it up old white fart??
Omg , like the repubs prosecuting Clinton?
Newt getting a bj in his car?
Livingston quitting?

Omg

If you can tear yourself away from Americas Greatness (omg) the Times conclusion...

What cares what the Fake News New York Times says? They have been front and center pushing this blizzard of lies on the American People.

The New York Times had a young reporter screwing a married 50 year old Senate security officer in exchange for dirt on Trump.

Fake News New York Times gives new meaning to the practice of "sitting on a source".​

Jealous?
Can't get it up old white fart??
Omg , like the repubs prosecuting Clinton?
Newt getting a bj in his car?
Livingston quitting?

And who could forget Henry Hyde and Denny "The Diddler" Hastert?

But those guys sure got ol' Bubba for his lie about a blow job!

Schiff says declassifying crossfire hurricane is "unamerican" and this brings Clinton's dick to your mind? Weird!

Yep, you sure are! ^

I don't think you suddenly screaming about Clinton's dick is going to get you folks out of the 3 years of lies you folks and the Fake News Media shoveled on the nation.

And the Fake News Media is showing no outrage at the "former and current Administration officials" who lied about everything they gleefully published.

Why do you think that is?

 

[DrLove]

Omg

What cares what the Fake News New York Times says? They have been front and center pushing this blizzard of lies on the American People.

The New York Times had a young reporter screwing a married 50 year old Senate security officer in exchange for dirt on Trump.

Fake News New York Times gives new meaning to the practice of "sitting on a source".​

Jealous?
Can't get it up old white fart??
Omg , like the repubs prosecuting Clinton?
Newt getting a bj in his car?
Livingston quitting?

Omg

What cares what the Fake News New York Times says? They have been front and center pushing this blizzard of lies on the American People.

The New York Times had a young reporter screwing a married 50 year old Senate security officer in exchange for dirt on Trump.

Fake News New York Times gives new meaning to the practice of "sitting on a source".​

Jealous?
Can't get it up old white fart??
Omg , like the repubs prosecuting Clinton?
Newt getting a bj in his car?
Livingston quitting?

And who could forget Henry Hyde and Denny "The Diddler" Hastert?

But those guys sure got ol' Bubba for his lie about a blow job!

Schiff says declassifying crossfire hurricane is "unamerican" and this brings Clinton's dick to your mind? Weird!

Yep, you sure are! ^

I don't think you suddenly screaming about Clinton's dick is going to get you folks out of the 3 years of lies you folks and the Fake News Media shoveled on the nation.

And the Fake News Media is showing no outrage at the "former and current Administration officials" who lied about everything they gleefully published.

Why do you think that is?

At some point you Trumpublicans should expand your vocabularies beyond "Coup!/ Deep State!!/ and FAKE NEEEEWS!!!"

It's kinda like watching one of Donald's Greatest Hits Rallies.

 

[ph3iron]

Omg
Jealous?
Can't get it up old white fart??
Omg , like the repubs prosecuting Clinton?
Newt getting a bj in his car?
Livingston quitting?

Omg
Jealous?
Can't get it up old white fart??
Omg , like the repubs prosecuting Clinton?
Newt getting a bj in his car?
Livingston quitting?

And who could forget Henry Hyde and Denny "The Diddler" Hastert?

But those guys sure got ol' Bubba for his lie about a blow job!

Schiff says declassifying crossfire hurricane is "unamerican" and this brings Clinton's dick to your mind? Weird!

Yep, you sure are! ^

I don't think you suddenly screaming about Clinton's dick is going to get you folks out of the 3 years of lies you folks and the Fake News Media shoveled on the nation.

And the Fake News Media is showing no outrage at the "former and current Administration officials" who lied about everything they gleefully published.

Why do you think that is?

At some point you Trumpublicans should expand your vocabularies beyond "Coup!/ Deep State!!/ and FAKE NEEEEWS!!!"

It's kinda like watching one of Donald's Greatest Hits Rallies.

You mean The exclusive old white fart zero college crowd?
They have no idea MAGA was our WWII Nazi group name.
Or maybe they do?

 

[ph3iron]

Darlin, it took me years to prove chloroform had 3 different atoms.
So to throw up paragraphs which support your opinion (whatever that is) is irrelevant.
To quote Just one line of an article
"But neither does the absence of such detail mean that the dossier is false,” wrote Grant and Rosenberg."
So it's not false?
I assume you saw the fox/Ayles doc?
"Our goal is not to report news, it's to say what our readers already believe"
Ask mr Barr, the Iran contra cover up king
So true. To really research something takes months and months, not a little cut and paste in an old white farts forum.
Happy NY darlin, enrol in a research program

The Dossier is false. Steele lied about what his sources told him:

Horowitz:

IG Report: Here Are The 17 Specific ‘Inaccuracies And Omissions’ In The FBI’s FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

Omitted the fact that Steele’s Primary Sub-source, who the FBI found credible, had made statements in January 2017 raising significant questions about the reliability of allegations included in the FISA applications, including, for example, that he/she had no discussion with Person 1 concerning WikiLeaks and there was “nothing bad” about the communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team, and that he/she did not report to Steele in July 2016 that Page had met with Sechin;​

Steele is person 1. The FBI vouched for the reliability of Steele and his primary subsource even though when they finally interviewed the subsource (which they should have done before applying for the first warrant) the subsource said:

• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, s/he never discussed Wikileaks with Steele.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, he was aware of no untoward communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary that s/he had never told Steele that Page had met with Sechin.

One can imagine the silence in the FBI vehicle as they returned to the office realizing that they had clearly submitted a series of false statements to the FISA court and that their oaths required them to immediately disclose to the Court that they had serious credibility issues between Steele and his primary sub-source. Their claims were mutually exclusive on multiple points and that clearly one or both were liars.

It was on the word of these two, which they represented as of the utmost credibility, that they had represented to the Court that Carter Page was most assuredly a spy working with the Kremlin in illegal coordination with the Trump Campaign.

Did they immediately report this to the Court which would have resulted in the immediate cancellation of the existing warrant? No. They all conspired to concealed this from the Court, and they conspired to continue representing the original lies to the Court in subsequent renewals.

And that is just "one" of the 17 lethal flaws Horowitz describes in his extremely fair and low key complete thrashing of the quite corrupt FBI that illegally spied on a Presidential campaign, Transition and Administration.

​

IN your made up mind Ph.D. Opinion

Actually this a firm fact of reality. Howorwitz has the email sent by the CIA and he has the forgery used by the Corrupt FBI to illegally obtain a spy warrant on the Trump Campaign, Transition and Administration.

IG Report: Here Are The 17 Specific ‘Inaccuracies And Omissions’ In The FBI’s FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

Why are you so invested into defending a forgery?

A forgery in your PhD opinion....

A forgery in fact. See the Horowitz report.

Your 17 reasons are from one conservative blurb one essential example
In 400 PAGES
I'll list the fact check for you.

 

[ph3iron]

Darlin, it took me years to prove chloroform had 3 different atoms.
So to throw up paragraphs which support your opinion (whatever that is) is irrelevant.
To quote Just one line of an article
"But neither does the absence of such detail mean that the dossier is false,” wrote Grant and Rosenberg."
So it's not false?
I assume you saw the fox/Ayles doc?
"Our goal is not to report news, it's to say what our readers already believe"
Ask mr Barr, the Iran contra cover up king
So true. To really research something takes months and months, not a little cut and paste in an old white farts forum.
Happy NY darlin, enrol in a research program

The Dossier is false. Steele lied about what his sources told him:

Horowitz:

IG Report: Here Are The 17 Specific ‘Inaccuracies And Omissions’ In The FBI’s FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

Omitted the fact that Steele’s Primary Sub-source, who the FBI found credible, had made statements in January 2017 raising significant questions about the reliability of allegations included in the FISA applications, including, for example, that he/she had no discussion with Person 1 concerning WikiLeaks and there was “nothing bad” about the communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team, and that he/she did not report to Steele in July 2016 that Page had met with Sechin;​

Steele is person 1. The FBI vouched for the reliability of Steele and his primary subsource even though when they finally interviewed the subsource (which they should have done before applying for the first warrant) the subsource said:

• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, s/he never discussed Wikileaks with Steele.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, he was aware of no untoward communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary that s/he had never told Steele that Page had met with Sechin.

One can imagine the silence in the FBI vehicle as they returned to the office realizing that they had clearly submitted a series of false statements to the FISA court and that their oaths required them to immediately disclose to the Court that they had serious credibility issues between Steele and his primary sub-source. Their claims were mutually exclusive on multiple points and that clearly one or both were liars.

It was on the word of these two, which they represented as of the utmost credibility, that they had represented to the Court that Carter Page was most assuredly a spy working with the Kremlin in illegal coordination with the Trump Campaign.

Did they immediately report this to the Court which would have resulted in the immediate cancellation of the existing warrant? No. They all conspired to concealed this from the Court, and they conspired to continue representing the original lies to the Court in subsequent renewals.

And that is just "one" of the 17 lethal flaws Horowitz describes in his extremely fair and low key complete thrashing of the quite corrupt FBI that illegally spied on a Presidential campaign, Transition and Administration.

​

IN your made up mind Ph.D. Opinion

Actually this a firm fact of reality. Howorwitz has the email sent by the CIA and he has the forgery used by the Corrupt FBI to illegally obtain a spy warrant on the Trump Campaign, Transition and Administration.

IG Report: Here Are The 17 Specific ‘Inaccuracies And Omissions’ In The FBI’s FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

Why are you so invested into defending a forgery?

A forgery in your PhD opinion....

A forgery in fact. See the Horowitz report.

Try a non rightie site
How Old Claims Compare to IG Report
I have a larger life than to check your selected blurbs.
Just one, the FBI did not surveill trump.
Your 17 are all about carter page.
Try reading the 400 pages

 

[ph3iron]

Darlin, it took me years to prove chloroform had 3 different atoms.
So to throw up paragraphs which support your opinion (whatever that is) is irrelevant.
To quote Just one line of an article
"But neither does the absence of such detail mean that the dossier is false,” wrote Grant and Rosenberg."
So it's not false?
I assume you saw the fox/Ayles doc?
"Our goal is not to report news, it's to say what our readers already believe"
Ask mr Barr, the Iran contra cover up king
So true. To really research something takes months and months, not a little cut and paste in an old white farts forum.
Happy NY darlin, enrol in a research program

The Dossier is false. Steele lied about what his sources told him:

Horowitz:

IG Report: Here Are The 17 Specific ‘Inaccuracies And Omissions’ In The FBI’s FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

Omitted the fact that Steele’s Primary Sub-source, who the FBI found credible, had made statements in January 2017 raising significant questions about the reliability of allegations included in the FISA applications, including, for example, that he/she had no discussion with Person 1 concerning WikiLeaks and there was “nothing bad” about the communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team, and that he/she did not report to Steele in July 2016 that Page had met with Sechin;​

Steele is person 1. The FBI vouched for the reliability of Steele and his primary subsource even though when they finally interviewed the subsource (which they should have done before applying for the first warrant) the subsource said:

• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, s/he never discussed Wikileaks with Steele.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary, he was aware of no untoward communications between the Kremlin and the Trump team.
• Despite Steele's claims to the contrary that s/he had never told Steele that Page had met with Sechin.

One can imagine the silence in the FBI vehicle as they returned to the office realizing that they had clearly submitted a series of false statements to the FISA court and that their oaths required them to immediately disclose to the Court that they had serious credibility issues between Steele and his primary sub-source. Their claims were mutually exclusive on multiple points and that clearly one or both were liars.

It was on the word of these two, which they represented as of the utmost credibility, that they had represented to the Court that Carter Page was most assuredly a spy working with the Kremlin in illegal coordination with the Trump Campaign.

Did they immediately report this to the Court which would have resulted in the immediate cancellation of the existing warrant? No. They all conspired to concealed this from the Court, and they conspired to continue representing the original lies to the Court in subsequent renewals.

And that is just "one" of the 17 lethal flaws Horowitz describes in his extremely fair and low key complete thrashing of the quite corrupt FBI that illegally spied on a Presidential campaign, Transition and Administration.

​

IN your made up mind Ph.D. Opinion

Actually this a firm fact of reality. Howorwitz has the email sent by the CIA and he has the forgery used by the Corrupt FBI to illegally obtain a spy warrant on the Trump Campaign, Transition and Administration.

IG Report: Here Are The 17 Specific ‘Inaccuracies And Omissions’ In The FBI’s FISA Warrants Against Carter Page

Why are you so invested into defending a forgery?

A forgery in your PhD opinion....

A forgery in fact. See the Horowitz report.

Do you really think that a 10 yr Moscow head of mi6 is less believable than the con, whose lies total 16000 now?
Try this
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

You mean The exclusive old white fart zero college crowd?
They have no idea MAGA was our WWII Nazi group name.
Or maybe they do?

Whose old WWII "Nazi group" name? Yours?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Do you really think that a 10 yr Moscow head of mi6 is less believable than the con, whose lies total 16000 now?
Try this
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective.

Yes. And he admitted as much in court in London after being sued by some Russians.

You sure are desperate....and dumb. Christopher Steele says he used unverified information to support details about web company in dossier - CNNPolitics

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Try a non rightie site
How Old Claims Compare to IG Report
I have a larger life than to check your selected blurbs.
Just one, the FBI did not surveill trump.
Your 17 are all about carter page.
Try reading the 400 pages

Barr Slams FBI for Surveilling Trump Campaign Based on 'Thinnest of Suspicions' In Response to IG Report | National Review
You surveil the Trump campaign you must necessarily surveil Trump.

Your lies are rancid and disingenuous as hell...like saying the Mafia was surveilled but not John Gotti. It stinks of leftist
bullshit!

 

[DrLove]

Do you really think that a 10 yr Moscow head of mi6 is less believable than the con, whose lies total 16000 now?
Try this
The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective.

Yes. And he admitted as much in court in London after being sued by some Russians.

You sure are desperate....and dumb. Christopher Steele says he used unverified information to support details about web company in dossier - CNNPolitics

Not really dude - Much of what highly respected US ally Chis Steele claimed has proven to be true.

The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective

But you know ...

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Not really dude - Much of what highly respected US ally Chis Steele claimed has proven to be true.

The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective

But you know ...

Yeah. I know and the FBI knows but you don't know. But thanks for the "funny" picture. I've only seen it fifty times now.
FBI's spreadsheet puts a stake through the heart of Steele's dossier


"Some in the news media have tried in recent days to rekindle their long-lost love affair with former MI6 agent Christopher Steele and his now infamous dossier.

The main trigger was a lengthy interview in June with the Department of Justice (DOJ) inspector general, which some news outlets suggested meant U.S. officials have found Steele, the former Hillary Clinton-backed political muckraker, to be believable.

“Investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising,” Politico crowed. The Washington Post went even further, suggesting Steele’s assistance to the inspector general might “undermine Trumpworld’s alt-narrative” that the Russia-collusion investigation was flawed.

ADVERTISEMENT
For sure, Steele may have valuable information to aid Justice’s internal affairs probe into misconduct during the 2016 Russia election probe. His dossier alleging a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Moscow ultimately was disproven, but not before his intelligence was used to secure a surveillance warrant targeting the Trump campaign in the final days of the 2016 election.

Investigators are trying to ascertain what the British intelligence operative told the FBI about his sources, his relation to the Democratic Party and Clinton campaign, his hatred for Donald Trump, his Election Day deadline to get his information public and his leaking to media outlets before agents used his dossier to justify a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to spy on ex-Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

There is evidence Steele told the DOJ in July, and the State Department in October, about all of these flaws in his work, and that State officials even detected blatant inaccuracies in his intelligence. If so, all of that information should have been flagged by the FBI as potentially derogatory information weighing against Steele’s use as a source for the FISA warrant.

But lest anyone be tempted to think Steele’s 2016 dossier is about to be mysteriously revived as credible, consider this: Over months of work, FBI agents painstakingly researched every claim Steele made about Trump’s possible collusion with Russia, and assembled their findings into a spreadsheet-like document.

The over-under isn’t flattering to Steele.

Multiple sources familiar with the FBI spreadsheet tell me the vast majority of Steele’s claims were deemed to be wrong, or could not be corroborated even with the most awesome tools available to the U.S. intelligence community. One source estimated the spreadsheet found upward of 90 percent of the dossier’s claims to be either wrong, nonverifiable or open-source intelligence found with a Google search."

Your attempt to make Steele's discredited dossier relevant was a fail and frankly a bunch of partisan shit!
Stick with what you know...nothing!

 

[Zorro!]

Not really dude - Much of what highly respected US ally Chis Steele claimed has proven to be true.

The Steele Dossier: A Retrospective

But you know ...

Yeah. I know and the FBI knows but you don't know. But thanks for the "funny" picture. I've only seen it fifty times now.
FBI's spreadsheet puts a stake through the heart of Steele's dossier


"Some in the news media have tried in recent days to rekindle their long-lost love affair with former MI6 agent Christopher Steele and his now infamous dossier.

The main trigger was a lengthy interview in June with the Department of Justice (DOJ) inspector general, which some news outlets suggested meant U.S. officials have found Steele, the former Hillary Clinton-backed political muckraker, to be believable.

“Investigators ultimately found Steele’s testimony credible and even surprising,” Politico crowed. The Washington Post went even further, suggesting Steele’s assistance to the inspector general might “undermine Trumpworld’s alt-narrative” that the Russia-collusion investigation was flawed.

ADVERTISEMENT
For sure, Steele may have valuable information to aid Justice’s internal affairs probe into misconduct during the 2016 Russia election probe. His dossier alleging a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Moscow ultimately was disproven, but not before his intelligence was used to secure a surveillance warrant targeting the Trump campaign in the final days of the 2016 election.

Investigators are trying to ascertain what the British intelligence operative told the FBI about his sources, his relation to the Democratic Party and Clinton campaign, his hatred for Donald Trump, his Election Day deadline to get his information public and his leaking to media outlets before agents used his dossier to justify a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) warrant to spy on ex-Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.

There is evidence Steele told the DOJ in July, and the State Department in October, about all of these flaws in his work, and that State officials even detected blatant inaccuracies in his intelligence. If so, all of that information should have been flagged by the FBI as potentially derogatory information weighing against Steele’s use as a source for the FISA warrant.

But lest anyone be tempted to think Steele’s 2016 dossier is about to be mysteriously revived as credible, consider this: Over months of work, FBI agents painstakingly researched every claim Steele made about Trump’s possible collusion with Russia, and assembled their findings into a spreadsheet-like document.

The over-under isn’t flattering to Steele.

Multiple sources familiar with the FBI spreadsheet tell me the vast majority of Steele’s claims were deemed to be wrong, or could not be corroborated even with the most awesome tools available to the U.S. intelligence community. One source estimated the spreadsheet found upward of 90 percent of the dossier’s claims to be either wrong, nonverifiable or open-source intelligence found with a Google search."

Your attempt to make Steele's discredited dossier relevant was a fail and frankly a bunch of partisan shit!
Stick with what you know...nothing!

How can anyone with brain still be advocating for the Faked Up Hillary Purchased Completely Discredited Steele Dossier?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Transparency is un-American? Donald Trump’s executive order granting William Barr the authority to declassify evidence and documents related to the origins of Operation Crossfire Hurricane might present opportunities for reasonable criticism. A lack of patriotism would not be among those issues, and yet that’s where House Intelligence chair Adam Schiff immediately went:

Too long to quote see more at
Hotair ^ | 05/24/2019 | Ed Morrissey


So what was it when Schiffless leaked?....The party of INFANTICIDE love hypocrisy also!

But they want Mueller's Grand Jury testimony?