CO2 Has Almost No Effect on Global Temperature, Says Leading Climate Scientist

[Crick]

again, I don't have any problem. I don't believe a catastrophe awaits me. Yet you keep whining on here about it. conclusion, your problem.

Your problem is your problem

 

[Crick]

what's your summary report?

www.ipcc.ch
"The Physical Science Basis"
The first section of this document is "Summary for Policymakers". The beginning of the SPM is its Technical Summary.

 

[ding]

View attachment 752169
The Physical Science Basis (IPCC AR6, WGI), Chapter 7, pg 959

View attachment 752170
The Physical Science Basis (IPCC AR6, WGI), Chapter 7, pg 961

View attachment 752172
The Physical Science Basis (IPCC AR6, WGI), Chapter 7, pg 962

 

[jc456]

www.ipcc.ch
"The Physical Science Basis"
The first section of this document is "Summary for Policymakers". The beginning of the SPM is its Technical Summary.

again, that doesn't explain how you get to catastrophic conditions. where's that report?

 

[Crick]

again, that doesn't explain how you get to catastrophic conditions. where's that report?

It's waiting for you to engage in an actual conversation

TROLL

 

[jc456]

It's waiting for you to engage in an actual conversation

TROLL

the actual conversation regards catastrophic conditions. It's been since I started posting. You still haven't completed the task of providing catastrophic conditions.

 

[Crick]

the actual conversation regards catastrophic conditions. It's been since I started posting. You still haven't completed the task of providing catastrophic conditions.

I have no intention of responding to your requests or demands. I have no interest in engaging with trolls.

 

[jc456]

I have no intention of responding to your requests or demands. I have no interest in engaging with trolls.

It doesn't bother me at all. Just know that every chart and ipcc report you post 100 times isn't evidence for you to articulate against. None of it shows catastrophic events. Which is the fear mongering effort by you.

 

[Ringo]

 

[EMH]

You should slow down since it is well known that the planet is CURRENTLY in an ice age epoch.

Quaternary glaciation​

LINK

LOL


How did Co2 freeze Greenland and thaw North America AT THE SAME TIME???


Your definition of "ice age" is laughable bullshit.

 

[jc456]

LOL


How did Co2 freeze Greenland and thaw North America AT THE SAME TIME???


Your definition of "ice age" is laughable bullshit.

Why was North America under ice?

 

[Ringo]

In fact, it is enough to destroy CAPITALISM, and all the pressing problems, from the social to the environmental, will be solved.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Can you tell me how the earth transitioned from a greenhouse planet to an icehouse planet with 600 ppm to 1000 ppm of atmospheric CO2?

The only explanation is that CO2 mutated around 1850. Modern CO2 gained a Death Star like capability to drive the climate

 

[ReinyDays]

The only explanation is that CO2 mutated around 1850. Modern CO2 gained a Death Star like capability to drive the climate

1796 ... the year James Watt sold his first steam engine to a brewery ... thus began the Industrial Age ...

 

[CrusaderFrank]

1796 ... the year James Watt sold his first steam engine to a brewery ... thus began the Industrial Age ...

…..and that started the glacier melt, er, or something….Science!!

 

[EMH]

Why was North America under ice?

It is all about the motion of the tectonic plates. NA is moving SW and has for tens of millions of years. But guessing 30 million years ago is when it passed its "closest to the pole" point and, as is motion on the surface of a sphere, started to move away. The angle of the fault at the bottom of the center of the North Atlantic is the key. That has been pushing Greenland NW and Europe SE for over 100 million years. Greenland is where NA was 40 million or so years ago, same arc.

So, NA moved north, got within 600 miles of the North Pole, started to stack ice, grew its continent specific ice age, and then moved away from the pole and the ice age ended because it melted.

north american ice age - Google Search

www.google.com

These maps show the extent of the "North American Ice Age," but are wrong because they have Greenland frozen too and we know Greenland was GREEN 1 million years ago...

 

[ReinyDays]

... tens of millions of years ... 30 million years ago ... for over 100 million years ... 40 million or so years ago ...

I'm with you so far ...

These maps show the extent of the "North American Ice Age," but are wrong because they have Greenland frozen too and we know Greenland was GREEN 1 million years ago...

Then I think you derailed ... from Cenozoic to Pleistocene in one breath ...

 

[Crick]

It is all about the motion of the tectonic plates. NA is moving SW and has for tens of millions of years. But guessing 30 million years ago is when it passed its "closest to the pole" point and, as is motion on the surface of a sphere, started to move away. The angle of the fault at the bottom of the center of the North Atlantic is the key. That has been pushing Greenland NW and Europe SE for over 100 million years. Greenland is where NA was 40 million or so years ago, same arc.

So, NA moved north, got within 600 miles of the North Pole, started to stack ice, grew its continent specific ice age, and then moved away from the pole and the ice age ended because it melted.

north american ice age - Google Search

www.google.com

These maps show the extent of the "North American Ice Age," but are wrong because they have Greenland frozen too and we know Greenland was GREEN 1 million years ago...

Are you suggesting that the ice ages - the glacial cycles - do not involve the planet as a whole cooling and warming but simply different continental plates moving in and out of the polar regions?

 

[EMH]

Are you suggesting that the ice ages - the glacial cycles - do not involve the planet as a whole cooling and warming but simply different continental plates moving in and out of the polar regions?

You have been asked over and over to explain how NA thawed while Greenland froze. There is also Antarctica, which 70 million years ago supported dinosaur life.

That is THE DATA.

Earth ice is all about LAND NEAR a POLE, and LAND MOVES.

Co2 does NOTHING.

 

[EMH]

I'm with you so far ...



Then I think you derailed ... from Cenozoic to Pleistocene in one breath ...

All of your "terms" are bullshit designed to make Co2 the variable that matters. That thesis is BLOWN AWAY by the DATA that PROVES

Greenland FROZE while NORTH AMERICA THAWED


How did Co2 do both at the same time???